Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -14.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -13.9%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10M | $12M | $28M | $37M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $-282752 | $2M | $21M | $30M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -14.61 | — | — | 32.24 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.08 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.51 | 0.62 | 1.21 | 1.45 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 2.54 | 3.06 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 2.53 | 3.06 | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.07 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | 16.37 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | 17.91 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 0.46 | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.9% | 1.7% | 2.0% | 2.3% | 2.7% |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | -0.5% | -0.6% | 0.4% | 1.0% | 1.3% | 1.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | -0.6% | -0.6% | -0.6% | 0.3% | 0.8% | 1.1% | 1.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -13.9% | -13.9% | -15.5% | 6.1% | 35.9% | 53.7% | 59.2% |
| ROA | -4.1% | -4.1% | -6.1% | 2.9% | 14.0% | 14.1% | 12.2% |
| ROIC | -14.1% | -14.1% | -14.4% | 9.7% | 55.0% | 124.6% | — |
| ROCE | -11.4% | -11.4% | -13.8% | 8.8% | 45.7% | 62.9% | 69.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.05 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 0.23 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.08 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.52 | -0.28 | -0.28 | -0.38 | -0.34 | -1.09 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | -3.85 | -0.96 | -0.68 | -1.52 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -2.61 | — | — | -1.49 | — | -1.65 |
| Interest Coverage | -2.80 | -2.80 | -5.59 | 5.49 | 18.19 | 1233.89 | 5083.62 |
Net cash position: cash ($12M) exceeds total debt ($2M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.47 | 1.86 | 1.79 | 1.44 | 1.24 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.47 | 1.86 | 1.78 | 1.44 | 1.24 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.26 | 0.39 | 0.16 | 0.30 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 7.11 | 8.55 | 8.15 | 18.08 | 12.10 | 9.94 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | 2313.23 | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 28.80 | 23.85 | 22.66 | 14.54 | 20.17 | 27.26 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | 3.1% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 39.4% | 32.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $28M | $28M | $25M | $21M | $25M | $25M |
Margin and credit risk
As reported in recent financial statements, BANL's gross margin has compressed to a precarious 0.7% in 2025Q4, which, when combined with negative operating margins of -0.6%, suggests the firm's current brokerage-based business model is failing to cover its fixed administrative and listing-related overhead costs.
The consistent decline in profitability metrics indicates that the company lacks the pricing power necessary to offset competitive pressures in the marine fuel logistics sector. Investors should monitor whether management can identify higher-margin service niches, as the current trajectory suggests that the firm's earning power is effectively non-existent under existing operational conditions.
Based on the company's reported figures, ROIC has plummeted from a peak of 38.4% in 2022Q4 to -2.1% in 2025Q4, signaling a rapid deterioration in the firm's ability to generate returns on its invested capital as the business model shifts from profitable growth to persistent operational deficits.
This sharp reversal in capital efficiency highlights the risks inherent in an asset-light brokerage model that lacks a durable competitive moat. The decay in returns suggests that the capital previously deployed is no longer contributing to value creation, warranting further investigation into whether the firm's current strategy can ever return to positive compounding.
According to historical data, the company's asset turnover has significantly declined from 7.69 in 2022Q4 to 0.95 in 2025Q4, indicating that the firm is requiring a much larger asset base to generate the same volume of revenue, which suggests a loss of operational efficiency in its core logistics activities.
The fluctuation in DSO and DPO metrics implies that the company is struggling to manage its trade credit cycles effectively, which is critical for a business acting as a credit intermediary. This inefficiency may indicate that the firm is being forced to extend more lenient terms to customers to maintain volume, thereby increasing its exposure to potential bad debt.
Based on current market data, BANL trades at a P/B of 0.51 and a P/FCF of 2.54, which, as noted in recent institutional research, suggests that the market is pricing the company as a distressed entity rather than a growing participant in the energy midstream sector.
These depressed valuation multiples appear to reflect the market's lack of confidence in the firm's ability to achieve sustainable profitability. While the low P/B might suggest a value opportunity, it more likely reflects the market's assessment that the company's book value is at risk of further erosion due to ongoing operational losses.
Investors frequently misapply the Price-to-Sales ratio to BANL, which obscures the reality that the firm's top-line revenue is largely a pass-through of fuel costs rather than a reflection of the actual value-added services provided by the company's brokerage and logistics operations.
Using P/S in this context is misleading because it ignores the razor-thin gross margins that define the business model. A more appropriate metric for evaluating the firm's true economic productivity would be gross profit per metric ton, which would strip away the volatility of underlying oil prices and provide a clearer picture of the firm's actual service-based earning potential.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BANL stock.
CBL International Limited's current P/E ratio is -14.6x. The historical average is 32.2x.
CBL International Limited's return on equity (ROE) is -13.9%. The historical average is 20.9%.
Based on historical data, CBL International Limited is trading at a P/E of -14.6x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
CBL International Limited has 0.8% gross margin and -0.5% operating margin.