Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 17.3x · EV/EBITDA 7.4x · ROE 6.5%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $87M | $55M | $51M | $61M | $47M | $50M | $33M | $43M | $52M | $45M | $44M |
| Enterprise Value | $114M | $83M | $80M | $87M | $61M | $68M | $58M | $42M | $53M | $48M | $44M |
| P/E Ratio → | 17.33 | 11.01 | 15.19 | 15.35 | 7.51 | 4.21 | 29.73 | 7.91 | 14.14 | 14.88 | 14.53 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.43 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.35 | 0.30 | 0.36 | 0.29 | 0.37 | 0.46 | 0.42 | 0.43 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.10 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.82 | 0.65 | 0.82 | 0.73 | 0.95 | 1.26 | 1.18 | 1.22 |
| P/FCF | 18.65 | 11.85 | 36.88 | — | 50.03 | 18.20 | 5.82 | 10.97 | 11.25 | 40.68 | 7.78 |
| P/OCF | 8.31 | 5.28 | 7.71 | 7.23 | 4.52 | 3.53 | 3.77 | 4.42 | 5.23 | 5.46 | 5.05 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.39 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.36 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.43 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.39 | 5.33 | 6.04 | 6.63 | 4.97 | 4.79 | 6.28 | 4.48 | 5.19 | 5.33 | 4.68 |
| EV / EBIT | 14.07 | 8.60 | 12.10 | 12.22 | 5.79 | 3.61 | 19.52 | 6.64 | 7.15 | 7.60 | 6.52 |
| EV / FCF | — | 17.63 | 57.67 | — | 64.58 | 25.03 | 10.14 | 10.82 | 11.50 | 42.95 | 7.79 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 19.0% | 19.0% | 21.7% | 18.8% | 25.5% | 20.9% | 20.1% | 23.2% | 24.0% | 23.4% | 24.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 4.0% | 3.4% | 4.0% | 4.4% | 6.3% | 2.6% | 5.4% | 6.6% | 5.9% | 6.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.5% | 2.5% | 1.8% | 2.3% | 4.0% | 8.6% | 1.0% | 4.6% | 3.2% | 2.8% | 2.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 6.5% | 6.5% | 4.5% | 5.4% | 9.4% | 22.2% | 2.5% | 12.5% | 9.2% | 8.1% | 8.7% |
| ROA | 3.6% | 3.6% | 2.3% | 2.7% | 4.6% | 9.8% | 1.2% | 7.9% | 5.8% | 5.2% | 5.5% |
| ROIC | 5.8% | 5.8% | 4.7% | 5.6% | 6.2% | 8.7% | 3.8% | 11.0% | 13.4% | 12.2% | 14.1% |
| ROCE | 6.6% | 6.6% | 5.2% | 5.6% | 5.9% | 8.9% | 4.1% | 11.5% | 14.4% | 13.2% | 15.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.85 | 1.20 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.28 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.05 | 3.05 | 3.79 | 3.91 | 4.54 | 3.60 | 5.93 | 1.40 | 1.42 | 1.39 | 1.08 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.34 | 0.38 | 0.34 | 0.19 | 0.31 | 0.54 | -0.01 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.75 | 1.75 | 2.18 | 1.97 | 1.12 | 1.31 | 2.68 | -0.06 | 0.11 | 0.28 | 0.01 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.77 | 20.80 | — | 14.54 | 6.84 | 4.32 | -0.15 | 0.25 | 2.27 | 0.01 |
| Interest Coverage | 10.03 | 10.03 | 6.48 | 6.68 | 13.96 | 20.14 | 3.54 | 8.92 | 9.89 | 10.43 | 12.21 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.69 | 1.69 | 1.58 | 1.58 | 2.29 | 1.97 | 1.44 | 1.49 | 1.43 | 1.36 | 1.34 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.31 | 1.31 | 1.23 | 1.26 | 2.00 | 1.76 | 1.30 | 1.24 | 1.19 | 1.10 | 1.11 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.11 | 1.11 | 1.07 | 1.14 | 1.90 | 1.62 | 1.18 | 1.04 | 1.01 | 0.90 | 0.89 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.46 | 1.33 | 1.20 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.00 | 1.69 | 1.68 | 1.77 | 1.83 |
| Inventory Turnover | 24.02 | 24.02 | 21.00 | 19.67 | 18.12 | 25.31 | 24.88 | 27.05 | 26.72 | 28.81 | 29.81 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 1.59 | 2.06 | 1.75 | 1.05 | 1.20 | 2.20 | 2.74 | 1.53 | 1.69 | 2.43 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.2% | 1.8% | 1.8% | 1.4% | 3.9% | — | — | 1.2% | 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.8% |
| Payout Ratio | 20.3% | 20.3% | 27.7% | 21.0% | 29.4% | — | — | 9.7% | 12.6% | 12.3% | 11.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.8% | 9.1% | 6.6% | 6.5% | 13.3% | 23.8% | 3.4% | 12.6% | 7.1% | 6.7% | 6.9% |
| FCF Yield | 5.4% | 8.4% | 2.7% | — | 2.0% | 5.5% | 17.2% | 9.1% | 8.9% | 2.5% | 12.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.2% | 1.8% | 1.8% | 1.4% | 3.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.2% | 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M |
Regional Economic Concentration Risk
Based on current market data, BDL trades at a P/E of 16.24 and an EV/EBITDA of 7.03, suggesting that investors are applying a significant discount compared to broader restaurant peers, likely due to the company's limited liquidity and its unique, non-traditional hybrid retail-restaurant business model.
The valuation multiples appear to imply a market expectation of low-to-moderate growth, which is consistent with the company's historical focus on organic, regional expansion. Investors should monitor whether the current P/S of 0.40 adequately captures the underlying value of the company's finite liquor licenses and owned real estate assets.
As reported in recent financial statements, BDL's net margin has fluctuated between 0.1% and 5.1% over the last ten quarters, indicating that the company's true earning power is frequently obscured by the volatile commodity costs and the complex accounting of its non-controlling interest partnership structures.
The 19.00% gross margin is structurally constrained by the blended retail liquor segment, which inherently carries lower margins than the restaurant business. This suggests that management's ability to drive bottom-line profitability is highly sensitive to input cost inflation, leaving little room for operational error.
According to quarterly data, BDL's ROIC has remained in a narrow range between 0.5% and 2.9% over the past ten quarters, suggesting that the company is struggling to generate meaningful returns on its invested capital relative to the capital-intensive nature of its restaurant and retail operations.
The low ROIC appears to be a function of both thin operating margins and a heavy asset base, which includes significant property holdings. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's capital allocation strategy is prioritizing long-term asset preservation over the generation of competitive returns for shareholders.
Based on reported figures, BDL's cash conversion cycle has shown significant volatility, swinging from negative 6 days to positive 4 days, which highlights the company's inconsistent ability to manage inventory and payables effectively within its dual-segment operating environment across the South Florida market.
The low asset turnover ratio of 0.39 suggests that the company's revenue generation is not keeping pace with its asset base, which is typical for real-estate-heavy restaurant operators. Investors should monitor whether this efficiency gap is structural or if it reflects the inherent limitations of the company's regional footprint.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to BDL, as it fails to account for the significant non-controlling interests that dilute earnings attributable to common shareholders, thereby providing a misleading picture of the company's actual profitability and its ability to distribute cash to the parent entity.
Analysts should instead focus on cash-on-cash returns at the individual unit level and adjust for the value of owned real estate and liquor licenses. Relying solely on consolidated P/E multiples likely obscures the true intrinsic value of the company's unique, barrier-protected assets in the South Florida market.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BDL stock.
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 17.3x. The historical average is 11.6x. This places it at the 93th percentile of its historical range.
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 7.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 4.6x.
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 6.5%. The historical average is 12.5%.
Based on historical data, Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 17.3x. This is at the 93th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.17% with a payout ratio of 20.3%.
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. has 19.0% gross margin and 4.0% operating margin.
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.0x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.