Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -26.2%. (2016–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $35893 | $411M | $1.5B | $1.6B | $10.9B | $17.7B | $35.3B | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $3M | $413M | $1.6B | $1.6B | $10.9B | $17.7B | $35.3B | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | 211.90 | 38957.36 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.00 | 21.93 | 21.02 | 741.67 | 900.47 | 721.03 | 1481.92 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.00 | 12.77 | 38.13 | 112.10 | 619.32 | 300.89 | 789.28 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 6254.71 | 3500.38 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | 3516.71 | 2869.41 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 22.08 | 21.06 | 742.92 | 900.58 | 720.64 | 1481.55 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 1580.96 | 3394.05 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | 1730.76 | 3638.84 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 6251.33 | 3499.51 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 8.3% | 8.3% | 1.6% | 56.4% | 53.4% | 54.6% | 68.4% | 67.0% | 62.5% | 51.1% |
| Operating Margin | -23.8% | -23.8% | -20.6% | -358.9% | -421.4% | 41.5% | 39.8% | 44.9% | 42.0% | 30.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -50.9% | -50.9% | -26.2% | -426.5% | -483.0% | 33.2% | 38.1% | 42.7% | 36.2% | 27.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -26.2% | -26.2% | -70.0% | -58.2% | -153.1% | 15.8% | 24.9% | 31.6% | 35.6% | 37.0% |
| ROA | -15.3% | -15.3% | -46.2% | -26.5% | -104.5% | 12.1% | 19.2% | 22.9% | 22.3% | 20.6% |
| ROIC | -8.5% | -8.5% | -37.4% | -32.5% | -112.2% | 18.0% | 25.5% | 28.9% | 28.4% | 26.2% |
| ROCE | -11.4% | -11.4% | -50.2% | -44.9% | -131.7% | 19.5% | 25.8% | 33.0% | 41.1% | 40.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.19 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.18 | 0.30 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 0.55 | 0.64 | 0.38 | 0.63 | 0.71 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.19 | 0.08 | -0.16 | -0.20 | -0.30 | 0.07 | 0.16 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | -0.86 | -0.85 | -0.97 | 0.25 | 0.38 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | -3.39 | -0.88 | — | 0.22 | 0.49 |
| Interest Coverage | -2.76 | -2.76 | -101.44 | -52.81 | -131.01 | 19.63 | 55.03 | 59.27 | 33.56 | 22.47 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.72 | 1.72 | 6.93 | 1.24 | 1.19 | 3.12 | 3.12 | 3.60 | 2.52 | 1.88 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.14 | 0.14 | 3.84 | 1.24 | 1.18 | 3.12 | 3.11 | 3.56 | 2.47 | 1.72 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.97 | 1.13 | 1.66 | 1.70 | 0.69 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.25 | 1.50 | 0.06 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.41 | 0.52 | 0.42 | 0.75 |
| Inventory Turnover | 0.27 | 0.27 | 4.13 | — | 53.24 | 123.17 | 60.13 | 22.35 | 8.86 | 5.10 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 106.63 | 105.46 | 2543.63 | 591.00 | 476.42 | 410.63 | 239.01 | 169.85 | 153.60 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 0.5% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $597229 | $309753 | $856520 | $505373 | $398591 | $351411 | $348000 | $348000 | $348000 |
Imminent liquidity and insolvency
As reported in recent financial statements, BHAT's gross margin volatility, ranging from a -42.1% trough in 2023Q4 to 36.5% in 2025Q2, underscores the company's inability to maintain consistent pricing power or cost control within the highly competitive and commoditized electronic toy manufacturing sector.
The erratic nature of these margins suggests that the company is frequently forced into aggressive discounting to clear inventory, which severely undermines its long-term earning power. Investors should monitor whether the recent margin recovery is a sustainable shift or merely a temporary byproduct of inventory liquidation, as the negative operating margins continue to signal a fundamental misalignment between revenue generation and fixed cost structures.
Based on historical data, BHAT's ROIC has deteriorated from a peak of 16.3% in 2018Q4 to negative levels in recent periods, indicating that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding capital through its AR-integrated product strategy.
The collapse in return metrics reflects a failure to achieve the necessary scale to offset the high R&D and manufacturing costs inherent in their hybrid hardware-software model. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's capital allocation strategy is capable of generating any positive return, or if the business model is structurally incapable of producing returns above its cost of capital.
According to recent filings, the company's cash conversion cycle has ballooned to 505 days in 2025Q2, a significant deterioration from historical norms that highlights severe bottlenecks in inventory turnover and an inability to efficiently convert product sales into liquid cash reserves.
The extreme duration of the cash conversion cycle suggests that capital is being trapped in slow-moving inventory, which poses a significant risk of obsolescence in the fast-paced electronic gaming market. This inefficiency, combined with the high days sales outstanding, implies that the company lacks leverage over its customers and suppliers, further straining its already precarious liquidity position.
As indicated by the most recent quarterly data, BHAT's cash balance of only $14,300 against a backdrop of persistent negative net margins suggests an extreme liquidity shortfall that threatens the company's ability to continue as a going concern without immediate and dilutive external financing.
While the current ratio appears superficially high at 23.03 in 2025Q2, this figure is likely distorted by the inclusion of illiquid assets or receivables that cannot be readily converted to cash to meet immediate obligations. Investors should view this liquidity profile as highly vulnerable, as the company lacks the necessary cash buffer to navigate even minor operational disruptions or regulatory headwinds.
The current ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for BHAT, as it obscures the company's severe lack of actual cash liquidity by including potentially uncollectible receivables and obsolete inventory in the numerator, thereby providing a false sense of security regarding the firm's solvency.
Analysts should instead focus on the quick ratio or a cash-to-burn rate analysis to better understand the company's immediate survival prospects. Relying on the current ratio in this context ignores the reality that the company's assets are largely non-liquid, making it a poor indicator of the firm's ability to meet its near-term financial obligations.
Includes 30+ ratios · 9 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BHAT stock.
Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is 0.0x.
Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -26.2%. The historical average is -18.1%.
Based on historical data, Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. is trading at valuation metrics that vary. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. has 8.3% gross margin and -23.8% operating margin.