Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 22.7x · EV/EBITDA 49.2x · ROE 9.0%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $111.7B | $81.7B | $63.4B | $48.7B | $58.4B | $80.3B | $51.7B | $71.7B | $66.0B | $78.9B | $65.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $421.1B | $519.7B | $300.2B | $272.2B | $303.3B | $239.6B | $-17395920000 | $44.5B | $17.6B | $29.8B | $28.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 22.67 | 11.53 | 8.79 | 6.97 | 6.02 | 8.51 | 7.84 | 8.60 | 7.72 | 9.94 | 9.32 |
| P/S Ratio | 4.26 | 2.20 | — | — | 3.72 | 3.51 | 2.73 | 4.90 | 4.04 | 4.42 | 3.66 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.81 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 0.62 | 0.78 | 1.10 | 0.73 | 1.02 | 0.98 | 1.28 | 1.14 |
| P/FCF | 31.26 | 16.14 | 4.18 | 1.56 | 3.57 | — | 0.92 | — | 3.79 | 30.57 | 17.57 |
| P/OCF | 29.25 | 15.10 | 4.05 | 1.54 | 3.45 | — | 0.91 | — | 3.71 | 4.76 | 16.08 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 14.01 | — | — | 19.31 | 10.47 | -0.92 | 3.04 | 1.08 | 1.67 | 1.59 |
| EV / EBITDA | 49.22 | 42.91 | 20.09 | 25.90 | 10.23 | 17.11 | -1.76 | 3.73 | 0.75 | 1.52 | 1.61 |
| EV / EBIT | 56.74 | 49.46 | 34.13 | — | 23.95 | 19.19 | -2.13 | 4.19 | 1.67 | 3.02 | 3.04 |
| EV / FCF | — | 102.71 | 19.80 | 8.70 | 18.53 | — | -0.31 | — | 1.01 | 11.56 | 7.64 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 87.3% | 87.3% | -228.8% | -470.9% | 198.3% | 135.1% | 165.6% | 206.7% | 172.7% | 149.8% | 143.9% |
| Operating Margin | 28.3% | 28.3% | -102.0% | -128.7% | 179.0% | 54.6% | 44.0% | 74.2% | 139.6% | 106.0% | 94.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 21.0% | 21.0% | -60.0% | -109.8% | 63.1% | 42.0% | 35.9% | 57.4% | 52.3% | 44.8% | 39.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.0% | 9.0% | 9.5% | 9.7% | 13.4% | 13.4% | 9.6% | 12.2% | 13.2% | 13.4% | 12.8% |
| ROA | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.8% |
| ROIC | 1.6% | 1.6% | 2.5% | 1.7% | 6.0% | 4.7% | 7.4% | 9.5% | 22.2% | 20.4% | 20.0% |
| ROCE | 1.9% | 1.9% | 1.8% | 0.9% | 2.4% | 1.2% | 0.8% | 1.2% | 2.7% | 2.4% | 2.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 5.69 | 5.69 | 3.58 | 3.99 | 4.16 | 3.37 | 0.11 | 0.28 | 0.21 | 0.17 | 0.16 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 41.61 | 41.61 | 20.12 | 29.86 | 10.48 | 17.54 | 0.75 | 1.64 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.51 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 4.94 | 2.82 | 2.84 | 3.28 | 2.19 | -0.98 | -0.39 | -0.71 | -0.80 | -0.64 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 36.16 | 36.16 | 15.85 | 21.27 | 8.26 | 11.38 | -7.00 | -2.29 | -2.05 | -2.49 | -2.10 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 86.57 | 15.62 | 7.14 | 14.96 | — | -1.24 | — | -2.78 | -19.01 | -9.93 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.21 | -0.05 | 0.82 | 1.56 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.89 | 1.11 | 1.19 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.24 | 0.93 | 1.39 | 1.91 | 0.73 | 1.15 | 1.08 | 0.77 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.24 | 0.93 | 1.39 | 1.91 | 0.73 | 1.15 | 1.08 | 0.77 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.46 | 0.93 | 1.17 | 0.38 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.44 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.03 | -0.01 | -0.00 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.3% | 6.6% | 8.2% | 11.1% | 8.8% | 5.7% | 8.8% | 6.2% | 6.3% | 4.8% | 5.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 68.9% | 68.9% | 67.0% | 73.2% | 51.6% | 47.8% | 67.3% | 52.9% | 48.8% | 47.4% | 50.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.4% | 8.7% | 11.4% | 14.4% | 16.6% | 11.7% | 12.8% | 11.6% | 13.0% | 10.1% | 10.7% |
| FCF Yield | 3.2% | 6.2% | 23.9% | 64.2% | 28.0% | — | 108.2% | — | 26.4% | 3.3% | 5.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.6% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 5.8% | 1.6% | 1.3% | 1.9% | 2.0% | 2.0% | 1.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.9% | 7.7% | 8.2% | 11.1% | 14.5% | 7.3% | 10.1% | 8.1% | 8.3% | 6.8% | 6.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.2B |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BNS stock.
The Bank of Nova Scotia's current P/E ratio is 22.7x. The historical average is 9.3x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
The Bank of Nova Scotia's current EV/EBITDA is 49.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 6.4x.
The Bank of Nova Scotia's return on equity (ROE) is 9.0%. The historical average is 14.4%.
Based on historical data, The Bank of Nova Scotia is trading at a P/E of 22.7x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
The Bank of Nova Scotia's current dividend yield is 3.34% with a payout ratio of 68.9%.
The Bank of Nova Scotia has 87.3% gross margin and 28.3% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
The Bank of Nova Scotia's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 41.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent NIM stagnation
Persistent Discount Reflects LatAm Risk Premium
BNS trades at a P/B of 1.84, a significant discount to peers like RY (2.98) and TD (2.30), suggesting the market prices in a higher risk premium for its international exposure relative to its domestic-focused peers.
The valuation discount appears structural, as BNS's P/B multiple has consistently lagged the Canadian peer group, implying investors demand a higher return on equity to compensate for the perceived volatility of its Pacific Alliance operations. The forward P/E of 11.05 suggests the market expects a meaningful earnings recovery, but the discount to tangible book value indicates skepticism about the durability of that recovery. This valuation gap could narrow if the bank's strategic pivot toward a North successfully de-risks the earnings profile.
ROE Recovery Driven by Efficiency Gains
ROE has improved from a low of 1.3% in 2025Q1 to 3.2% in 2026Q3, primarily driven by a significant reduction in the efficiency ratio from 68.9% to 53.9%, indicating that cost control is the main lever of profitability improvement.
The DuPont decomposition reveals that the ROE recovery is not being driven by expanding leverage or net interest margin, which has remained flat at 0.4%, but by operational deleveraging. The improvement in the efficiency ratio suggests management's restructuring efforts are yielding results, but the absolute ROE level remains well below the double-digit returns of peers like RY (16.1%) and TD (12.8%). This indicates that while cost control is a positive step, the bank's core earning power is still constrained by its flat NIM and elevated credit costs.
NIM Flatline Undermines Operating Leverage
The net interest margin has been stuck at 0.4% for ten consecutive quarters, indicating that higher asset yields have been entirely offset by rising funding costs, which severely limits the bank's ability to generate positive operating leverage.
The persistent NIM stagnation is a critical concern, as it means the bank is not benefiting from the higher rate environment in the way its domestic peers are. This suggests a structural issue with either the asset mix, which may be weighted toward lower-yielding international loans, or the funding base, which may be experiencing competitive pressure on deposit costs. The improving efficiency ratio is a positive offset, but without NIM expansion, the bank's ability to grow earnings organically is fundamentally impaired.
Thin Equity Buffer Limits Flexibility
The equity-to-assets ratio has remained stable at a thin 0.06, providing a limited buffer against asset-side volatility and suggesting that the bank's significant asset growth has been funded primarily by debt, not retained earnings.
While the absolute equity level has grown modestly to $89.2B, the stable and low equity-to-assets ratio indicates that the bank is operating with high leverage relative to its asset base. This structure amplifies returns on equity when asset quality is good but provides minimal cushion against losses, particularly in the international portfolio. The ratio suggests that future capital return to shareholders, such as buybacks, may be constrained until the bank can organically build a stronger capital buffer through retained earnings.
Elevated Provisions Signal International Stress
Provisions for credit losses have remained elevated between $1.0B and $1.4B per quarter, indicating persistent credit stress likely concentrated in the international retail portfolio, which is weighing on net income.
The sustained high level of provisions, despite a stable NIM, suggests that credit quality deterioration is a primary headwind to profitability. This pattern is consistent with stress in the Pacific Alliance consumer credit markets, where economic volatility may be impacting borrower repayment capacity. Investors should monitor whether these provisions are building reserves for future losses or simply reflecting current charge-offs, as the former would indicate a more concerning outlook for asset quality.
P/E Multiple Misleads on Earnings Quality
The P/E ratio of 23.03 is the most commonly misapplied metric for BNS, as it is heavily distorted by volatile provisions for credit losses and does not reflect the underlying earning power of the franchise.
The high P/E multiple is a function of depressed earnings from elevated credit costs, not a reflection of premium valuation. Using P/E in isolation obscures the bank's true valuation relative to its tangible assets and earning capacity. A more appropriate metric is the P/B ratio, which at 1.84 provides a clearer picture of how the market values the bank's balance sheet and franchise relative to its peers, and the forward P/E, which incorporates expectations for a normalization of credit costs.