Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -850.2%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $561776 | $4M | $68M | $129M | $233M | $224M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $11M | $14M | $80M | $143M | $246M | $231M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | 241.33 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.05 | 0.30 | 15.06 | 28.25 | 43.65 | 43.11 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.07 | 0.45 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.15 | 17.59 | 31.39 | 46.12 | 44.30 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 82.0% | 82.0% | 68.6% | 68.2% | 63.1% | 60.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -151.8% | -151.8% | -297.4% | -214.8% | -110.8% | -191.8% | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -184.9% | -184.9% | -696.0% | -315.9% | -290.1% | -191.7% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -850.2% | -850.2% | — | — | — | -10.9% | -3.1% |
| ROA | -78.5% | -78.5% | -203.6% | -267.6% | -298.3% | -8.4% | -2.6% |
| ROIC | -102.3% | -102.3% | — | — | — | -8.0% | — |
| ROCE | -553.3% | -553.3% | — | — | — | -8.8% | -0.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.32 | 1.32 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.29 | — | — | — | — | -0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -8.41 | -8.41 | -7.69 | -1.59 | -5.50 | -7.53 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.24 | 15.83 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.24 | 15.83 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 11.97 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.38 | 0.18 | 0.86 | 0.97 | 1.06 | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 21.67 | 75.48 | 8.41 | 4.68 | 5.24 | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 0.4% | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $189150 | $222908 | $6854 | $2300 | $2300 | $2300 |
Existential liquidity shortfall
Based on reported figures, Banzai's P/S multiple of 0.05x suggests that the market is heavily discounting the company's future growth potential, likely due to the severe liquidity constraints and the lack of a clear, near-term path toward achieving positive net income or sustainable cash flow generation.
The extremely low P/S ratio indicates that investors are assigning minimal value to the company's top-line revenue, likely viewing the current growth trajectory as unsustainable without significant capital dilution. This valuation profile is typical for firms where the market perceives an existential risk, effectively ignoring standard SaaS growth premiums in favor of a liquidation-focused assessment.
As reported in financial statements, Banzai's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -23.9% in 2026Q1, which underscores a fundamental inability to generate returns on invested capital that exceed the company's cost of funding or support long-term value creation for shareholders.
The negative ROIC trend suggests that every dollar of capital deployed into the business is currently destroying value rather than compounding it. This decay is driven by the company's inability to scale its operating margins, as the cost of acquiring and retaining customers continues to outpace the revenue generated by the platform.
According to recent SEC filings, Banzai's asset turnover ratio has stagnated at 0.09x, revealing a structural inefficiency in how the company utilizes its asset base to drive revenue, further exacerbated by a highly volatile cash conversion cycle that complicates short-term liquidity management.
The low asset turnover suggests that the company's investment in technology and infrastructure is not yet yielding sufficient revenue volume to justify the capital expenditure. Investors should monitor whether management can improve these efficiency metrics, as the current levels indicate a significant disconnect between operational scale and asset utilization.
Based on the most recent quarterly data, Banzai's current ratio of 0.07x highlights an extreme liquidity shortfall, indicating that the company lacks the necessary short-term assets to cover its immediate liabilities, which poses a severe threat to ongoing operational continuity without urgent external financing.
A current ratio well below 1.0 is a clear indicator of financial distress, suggesting that the company is operating on a razor-thin margin of safety. This liquidity position leaves virtually no room for error, making the firm highly susceptible to even minor disruptions in revenue collection or unexpected increases in operating expenses.
The P/S ratio is frequently misapplied to Banzai's business model, as it obscures the company's underlying cash burn and liquidity crisis by focusing solely on top-line revenue growth without accounting for the massive capital requirements needed to sustain that growth in a high-churn environment.
For a company in Banzai's position, the P/S ratio provides a misleading sense of scale and potential, ignoring the fact that revenue growth is currently value-destructive. Analysts should instead prioritize the CAC-to-LTV ratio or the cash runway duration, as these metrics provide a more accurate assessment of the company's ability to survive and eventually reach profitability.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BNZI stock.
Banzai International, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Banzai International, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -850.2%. The historical average is -7.0%.
Based on historical data, Banzai International, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Banzai International, Inc. has 82.0% gross margin and -151.8% operating margin.