Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -6.9x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -20.3%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $105M | $106M | $23M | $22M | $31M | $144M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $163M | $163M | $112M | $119M | $63M | $161M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -6.90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.62 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.26 | 1.55 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.33 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | 8.53 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | 1.99 | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.41 | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.21 | 0.69 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 8.09 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 29.22 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 42.55 | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 34.6% | 34.6% | 41.2% | 31.7% | 32.9% | 38.5% | 42.3% | 43.5% |
| Operating Margin | -6.2% | -6.2% | 1.0% | -12.7% | -22.5% | -5.0% | 3.5% | -0.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -3.0% | -3.0% | -0.8% | -4.2% | -27.5% | -5.9% | 2.6% | -0.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -20.3% | -20.3% | -6.1% | -23.5% | -86.4% | — | — | — |
| ROA | -5.5% | -5.5% | -1.3% | -7.3% | -53.1% | -17.3% | 9.5% | -4.1% |
| ROIC | -13.9% | -13.9% | 2.0% | -27.8% | -39.9% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -17.2% | -17.2% | 2.5% | -31.9% | -70.9% | -34.5% | 29.4% | -31.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.91 | 0.91 | 1.95 | 2.35 | 0.73 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 6.95 | — | — | — | 2.03 | 5.21 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.85 | 1.82 | 2.08 | 0.33 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 6.46 | — | — | — | -2.99 | -0.95 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 34.02 | — | — | — | -11.76 | -0.25 |
| Interest Coverage | -3.28 | -3.28 | 0.34 | -7.93 | -210.98 | -5.72 | 5.52 | -0.03 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.27 | 1.28 | 2.34 | 0.90 | 1.70 | 0.67 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.61 | 1.10 | 0.54 | 1.22 | 0.39 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.15 | 0.63 | 0.31 | 1.05 | 0.27 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.90 | 1.72 | 1.68 | 1.34 | 2.68 | 2.26 | 4.39 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.24 | 5.24 | 5.40 | 4.78 | 2.62 | 6.87 | 5.89 | 9.02 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 32.13 | 31.33 | 23.26 | 27.06 | 11.65 | 8.08 | 3.86 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | 100.0% | 4.9% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 11.7% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 64.3% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 4.9% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $10M | $7M | $6M | $5M | $14M | $14M | $4M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BRCC stock.
BRC Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -6.9x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
BRC Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -20.3%. The historical average is -34.1%.
Based on historical data, BRC Inc. is trading at a P/E of -6.9x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
BRC Inc. has 34.6% gross margin and -6.2% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Imminent liquidity and solvency
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Market Pricing Reflects Growth Uncertainty
According to current market data, BRCC trades at a P/S ratio of 0.38, which suggests that investors are heavily discounting the company's future growth prospects compared to high-growth retail peers like Dutch Bros, which commands a significantly higher valuation multiple in the current market environment.
The negative P/E ratio and lack of a forward P/E suggest that the market is currently prioritizing survival over earnings potential. This valuation level implies that investors are skeptical of the company's ability to scale its retail and wholesale operations profitably without further dilutive capital raises.
Capital Efficiency Remains Highly Volatile
As reported in recent financial statements, BRCC's ROIC has fluctuated significantly, dropping to -6.9% in 2025Q2 before recovering to 1.1% in 2026Q1, indicating that the company has struggled to consistently generate returns on its invested capital that exceed its cost of funding.
The erratic nature of these returns suggests that the company's capital allocation strategy is currently hampered by high operational overhead and inconsistent segment performance. Investors should monitor whether the recent positive shift in ROIC is a sustainable trend or merely a temporary byproduct of reduced capital expenditure.
Working Capital Management Under Pressure
Based on the provided quarterly figures, the cash conversion cycle has remained elevated, averaging approximately 45 to 50 days, which highlights the company's ongoing difficulty in optimizing its inventory turnover and managing trade credit effectively within the competitive packaged food industry.
The persistent DIO levels suggest that inventory management remains a significant drag on liquidity, particularly as the company shifts toward wholesale channels. This inefficiency forces the company to tie up precious cash in stock, further exacerbating the liquidity risks identified in recent balance sheet disclosures.
Debt Service Capacity Remains Fragile
According to historical data, the interest coverage ratio has been highly unstable, frequently dipping into negative territory, which indicates that the company's ability to service its debt obligations is precarious and highly dependent on volatile operational cash flows rather than stable earnings.
While the company has reduced its total debt, the low interest coverage ratio suggests that even minor operational setbacks could lead to significant solvency concerns. The reliance on external financing to cover operating losses makes the current leverage profile appear increasingly unsustainable without a clear path to profitability.
Misapplication of Traditional P/E Multiples
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to BRCC, as it obscures the company's heavy reliance on non-cash charges and stock-based compensation, which significantly distort GAAP earnings and fail to capture the underlying cash-generating potential of the business model.
Analysts should instead focus on EV/Sales or adjusted EBITDA metrics to better understand the company's valuation relative to its revenue-generating capacity. Relying on P/E in this context ignores the structural reality of the company's current growth-at-all-costs phase and its unique accounting structure.