Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -397.8x · EV/EBITDA 23.7x · ROE -0.4%. (1999–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9.1B | $7.2B | $8.8B | $10.8B | $10.2B | $12.8B | $8.4B | $8.0B | $4.7B | $5.5B | $3.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $10.8B | $8.9B | $10.8B | $11.7B | $10.8B | $13.2B | $8.6B | $8.2B | $4.7B | $5.6B | $3.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | -397.80 | — | 77.13 | 25.34 | 34.35 | 46.36 | 53.07 | 40.45 | 26.11 | 70.04 | 22.29 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.64 | 2.08 | 2.60 | 3.65 | 4.04 | 5.31 | 4.21 | 3.85 | 2.47 | 3.09 | 2.13 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.61 | 2.85 | 4.83 | 7.65 | 9.02 | 11.83 | 8.59 | 8.51 | 5.12 | 7.36 | 4.91 |
| P/FCF | 653.48 | 514.48 | 64.44 | 44.47 | 70.33 | 67.38 | 35.61 | 56.85 | 24.57 | 49.33 | 36.66 |
| P/OCF | 67.74 | 53.33 | 34.87 | 30.89 | 37.21 | 45.43 | 25.19 | 37.40 | 19.52 | 35.36 | 26.26 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.59 | 3.22 | 3.95 | 4.28 | 5.44 | 4.33 | 3.95 | 2.48 | 3.14 | 2.18 |
| EV / EBITDA | 23.73 | 19.49 | 24.78 | 21.22 | 20.78 | 26.18 | 26.16 | 21.74 | 14.36 | 19.92 | 15.14 |
| EV / EBIT | 45.88 | 108.09 | 42.49 | 20.88 | 25.20 | 32.25 | 35.80 | 27.61 | 17.07 | 23.56 | 16.87 |
| EV / FCF | — | 639.96 | 79.60 | 48.14 | 74.63 | 69.09 | 36.59 | 58.29 | 24.66 | 50.14 | 37.40 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 45.9% | 45.9% | 49.0% | 51.0% | 51.6% | 50.0% | 47.3% | 48.0% | 47.5% | 46.0% | 46.1% |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 6.9% | 7.5% | 14.7% | 17.1% | 17.1% | 12.5% | 14.5% | 13.8% | 12.2% | 11.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -0.3% | -0.3% | 3.4% | 14.4% | 11.7% | 11.5% | 7.9% | 9.5% | 9.5% | 4.5% | 9.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -0.4% | -0.4% | 7.0% | 33.6% | 26.8% | 26.9% | 16.5% | 21.3% | 21.7% | 10.9% | 21.3% |
| ROA | -0.1% | -0.1% | 2.2% | 10.9% | 8.2% | 8.3% | 5.4% | 8.0% | 8.8% | 4.2% | 8.7% |
| ROIC | 4.4% | 4.4% | 6.1% | 16.1% | 20.5% | 23.7% | 15.9% | 21.8% | 22.3% | 20.1% | 17.6% |
| ROCE | 5.0% | 5.0% | 6.7% | 15.2% | 16.0% | 16.6% | 11.3% | 16.5% | 17.8% | 15.8% | 14.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.81 | 0.81 | 1.24 | 0.98 | 1.12 | 1.28 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.37 | 0.56 | 0.59 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.48 | 4.48 | 5.14 | 2.50 | 2.44 | 2.77 | 2.78 | 2.34 | 1.04 | 1.49 | 1.78 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.69 | 1.14 | 0.63 | 0.55 | 0.30 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.02 | 0.12 | 0.10 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.82 | 3.82 | 4.72 | 1.62 | 1.20 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.54 | 0.06 | 0.33 | 0.30 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 125.47 | 15.16 | 3.66 | 4.30 | 1.71 | 0.98 | 1.44 | 0.10 | 0.82 | 0.74 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.36 | 1.36 | 5.32 | 34.18 | 26.71 | 28.52 | 16.68 | 18.52 | 21.84 | 15.30 | 15.74 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.73 | 1.73 | 1.60 | 1.80 | 2.31 | 2.63 | 2.43 | 2.78 | 2.18 | 2.59 | 2.42 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.77 | 0.99 | 1.44 | 1.88 | 1.56 | 1.89 | 1.33 | 1.66 | 1.58 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.14 | 0.41 | 0.71 | 1.24 | 0.92 | 1.06 | 0.54 | 0.84 | 0.95 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.89 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.70 | 1.70 | 1.61 | 1.50 | 1.53 | 1.70 | 1.51 | 1.87 | 1.95 | 1.96 | 1.97 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 78.17 | 76.03 | 76.56 | 85.86 | 62.93 | 61.58 | 63.79 | 68.78 | 66.00 | 55.25 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.8% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 26.7% | 6.9% | 10.0% | 8.7% | 15.6% | 12.7% | 14.0% | 32.3% | 16.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 1.3% | 3.9% | 2.9% | 2.2% | 1.9% | 2.5% | 3.8% | 1.4% | 4.5% |
| FCF Yield | 0.2% | 0.2% | 1.6% | 2.2% | 1.4% | 1.5% | 2.8% | 1.8% | 4.1% | 2.0% | 2.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 1.4% | 2.6% | 1.2% | 1.5% | 1.8% | 0.0% | 2.8% | 4.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.3% | 1.7% | 2.9% | 1.4% | 1.8% | 2.1% | 0.5% | 3.3% | 5.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $152M | $150M | $147M | $149M | $153M | $155M | $157M | $157M | $159M | $162M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 27 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BRKR stock.
Bruker Corporation's current P/E ratio is -397.8x. The historical average is 38.5x.
Bruker Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 23.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 25.0x.
Bruker Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -0.4%. The historical average is 12.3%.
Based on historical data, Bruker Corporation is trading at a P/E of -397.8x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Bruker Corporation's current dividend yield is 0.25%.
Bruker Corporation has 45.9% gross margin and 6.9% operating margin.
Bruker Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.5x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Integration costs and negative margins
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Recovery Masked by Integration Drag
Gross margin improved to 49.6% in 2026Q2 from 44.9% a year earlier, yet operating margin swung to -7.8%, indicating acquisition-related costs are offsetting operational gains. Based on quarterly filings, profitability remains strained.
The gross margin expansion suggests the core instrument business is holding pricing power, but the operating margin collapse to -7.8% in 2026Q2 from 1.5% in 2025Q2 implies that SG&A and R&D expenses are absorbing the gross profit gains. This divergence points to integration costs from recent acquisitions, such as ELITechGroup and NanoString assets, which may be temporarily depressing earnings. Investors should monitor whether these costs are one-time or structural, as the negative net margin of -6.2% in 2026Q2 could persist if integration drag continues.
Return on Capital Stuck Near Zero
ROIC has hovered between -1.2% and 2.0% over the past ten quarters, with 2026Q2 at -1.2%, reflecting that recent acquisitions have not yet generated returns above the cost of capital. As reported in financial statements, capital efficiency remains weak.
The persistently low ROIC, despite a strong competitive position in NMR, suggests that the company's growth through M&A has not yet translated into profitable returns. The negative ROIC in 2026Q2 indicates that the capital base expanded faster than operating income, likely due to integration costs and elevated interest expenses. This trend warrants close monitoring, as sustained sub-cost-of-capital returns could signal value destruction, though the recent EPS beat and maintained guidance suggest management expects improvement.
Working Capital Cycle Stretched by Inventory
Cash conversion cycle rose to 279 days in 2026Q2 from 235 days in 2025Q4, driven by inventory days of 241, indicating that cash is increasingly tied up in stock. According to recent filings, working capital efficiency is deteriorating.
The lengthening CCC, primarily due to high DIO, suggests that Bruker is building inventory ahead of expected demand or facing slower turnover in its instrument business. DSO also increased to 88 days in 2026Q2 from 71 days in 2025Q4, which may indicate softer collections or a shift in customer mix. This trend reduces cash flow generation and could pressure liquidity if not reversed, though the company's asset turnover of 0.14 remains stable, implying that the issue is more about working capital management than asset utilization.
Deleveraging Progress but Interest Coverage Thin
Debt-to-equity fell to 0.79 in 2026Q2 from a peak of 1.30 in 2025Q2, yet interest coverage was negative in 2026Q2 due to operating losses. Based on balance sheet data, leverage is moderating but debt service remains a concern.
The reduction in D/E from 1.30 to 0.79 indicates that Bruker is actively paying down debt, improving its financial flexibility. However, the negative operating income in 2026Q2 means interest coverage is not calculable, and the prior quarter's coverage of 2.49x is thin relative to peers. This suggests that while the balance sheet is healing, the company's ability to service debt from operations is currently strained, and any further rate hikes could amplify pressure.
Liquidity Buffer Improving but Quick Ratio Weak
Current ratio improved to 1.85 in 2026Q2 from 1.61 a year earlier, but quick ratio of 0.92 indicates heavy reliance on inventory. As per quarterly data, short-term liquidity is adequate but vulnerable to inventory obsolescence.
The current ratio above 1.5 suggests that Bruker can cover short-term obligations, but the quick ratio below 1.0 reveals that a significant portion of current assets is tied up in inventory, which may be slow-moving given the long lead times of NMR systems. This inventory dependence could become a liquidity risk if demand softens or if inventory becomes obsolete. The cash position of $184.9M provides a modest buffer, but it is not sufficient to cover all short-term liabilities without relying on inventory conversion.
P/E Misleading Due to Negative Earnings
The trailing P/E of -397.07 is meaningless given negative net income, while forward P/E of 28.22 suggests market optimism. Investors should instead focus on EV/EBITDA of 23.69, which better captures operating performance. Based on valuation data, this multiple is more relevant.
The negative trailing P/E is a common misapplication for companies with temporary losses, as it provides no insight into valuation. The forward P/E of 28.22 implies that the market expects a sharp earnings recovery, which may be optimistic given the integration costs. EV/EBITDA of 23.69 is more informative, as it normalizes for capital structure and non-cash charges, but it remains above the peer average, suggesting the stock is not cheap. Investors should use EV/EBITDA or EV/Sales to assess Bruker's valuation until earnings stabilize.