Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -4.6x · EV/EBITDA 11.3x · ROE -23.1%. (2001–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.3B | $4.6B | $7.6B | $17.0B | $11.2B | $18.8B | $15.4B | $15.3B | $12.2B | $14.8B | $11.5B |
| Enterprise Value | $17.0B | $16.3B | $19.6B | $29.3B | $24.8B | $22.5B | $18.4B | $19.0B | $15.3B | $17.9B | $13.8B |
| P/E Ratio → | -4.56 | — | — | 8.67 | 5.90 | 9.97 | 7.76 | 18.00 | 10.10 | 17.58 | 12.74 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.56 | 0.49 | 0.74 | 1.55 | 1.15 | 2.21 | 2.72 | 2.44 | 1.70 | 2.41 | 2.13 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.19 | 1.04 | 1.35 | 2.25 | 1.83 | 4.15 | 3.95 | 5.30 | 3.61 | 4.49 | 3.80 |
| P/FCF | 6.62 | 5.77 | 14.24 | 12.77 | 8.75 | 14.60 | 15.73 | 14.16 | 9.98 | 27.63 | 17.73 |
| P/OCF | 4.64 | 4.04 | 7.83 | 8.95 | 6.14 | 10.72 | 11.46 | 10.56 | 7.82 | 18.44 | 12.84 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.71 | 1.90 | 2.68 | 2.56 | 2.64 | 3.26 | 3.02 | 2.13 | 2.91 | 2.57 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.25 | 10.80 | 155.18 | 12.21 | 13.35 | 9.68 | 18.05 | 15.97 | 9.11 | 14.82 | 11.70 |
| EV / EBIT | 22.15 | — | — | 15.39 | 13.57 | 9.62 | 7.80 | 17.22 | 9.34 | 14.93 | 11.97 |
| EV / FCF | — | 20.30 | 36.82 | 22.00 | 19.42 | 17.45 | 18.80 | 17.53 | 12.51 | 33.35 | 21.39 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 18.8% | 18.8% | 22.9% | 23.8% | 24.6% | 31.4% | 22.9% | 25.5% | 27.6% | 24.7% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 8.0% | -6.8% | 15.4% | 14.2% | 22.8% | 11.7% | 13.2% | 18.6% | 14.7% | 16.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -12.2% | -12.2% | -14.8% | 17.9% | 19.6% | 22.1% | 35.1% | 13.5% | 16.9% | 13.7% | 16.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -23.1% | -23.1% | -23.1% | 28.7% | 35.6% | 44.8% | 58.4% | 27.1% | 36.1% | 26.7% | 30.8% |
| ROA | -5.2% | -5.2% | -6.2% | 7.4% | 9.9% | 16.5% | 19.5% | 9.1% | 12.8% | 9.4% | 10.6% |
| ROIC | 3.4% | 3.4% | -2.8% | 6.4% | 7.4% | 19.3% | 7.4% | 9.6% | 15.6% | 11.5% | 13.1% |
| ROCE | 4.1% | 4.1% | -3.4% | 7.5% | 8.7% | 21.1% | 8.0% | 10.9% | 17.2% | 11.8% | 12.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.89 | 2.89 | 2.31 | 1.87 | 2.48 | 0.93 | 1.02 | 1.42 | 1.04 | 1.10 | 1.00 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 8.57 | 8.57 | 102.79 | 5.88 | 8.15 | 1.81 | 3.89 | 3.46 | 2.11 | 3.02 | 2.54 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.61 | 2.14 | 1.63 | 2.23 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 1.26 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.78 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 7.73 | 7.73 | 95.16 | 5.13 | 7.34 | 1.58 | 2.95 | 3.07 | 1.84 | 2.54 | 2.00 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 14.53 | 22.58 | 9.24 | 10.67 | 2.84 | 3.08 | 3.37 | 2.53 | 5.72 | 3.66 |
| Interest Coverage | -0.59 | -0.59 | -0.47 | 2.64 | 4.51 | 23.39 | 21.65 | 9.27 | 13.08 | 9.81 | 9.17 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.55 | 1.55 | 1.34 | 1.53 | 1.63 | 1.52 | 1.91 | 1.58 | 1.62 | 1.79 | 2.30 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.74 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 1.41 | 0.98 | 1.03 | 1.21 | 1.63 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.25 | 0.44 | 0.37 | 0.22 | 0.75 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.39 | 0.62 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 0.71 | 0.52 | 0.66 | 0.77 | 0.64 | 0.64 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.49 | 3.49 | 3.47 | 3.54 | 2.60 | 3.84 | 4.46 | 4.52 | 4.96 | 5.14 | 5.53 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 56.10 | 57.31 | 59.52 | 77.51 | 71.27 | 80.16 | 68.46 | 67.24 | 73.12 | 69.36 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.2% | 0.3% | 4.1% | 1.8% | 2.7% | 1.6% | 1.9% | 2.0% | 2.3% | 1.6% | 1.8% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | 15.6% | 15.7% | 16.1% | 14.8% | 35.2% | 23.2% | 28.6% | 22.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | 11.5% | 17.0% | 10.0% | 12.9% | 5.6% | 9.9% | 5.7% | 7.8% |
| FCF Yield | 15.1% | 17.3% | 7.0% | 7.8% | 11.4% | 6.8% | 6.4% | 7.1% | 10.0% | 3.6% | 5.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 5.3% | 4.2% | 6.5% | 6.6% | 3.4% | 4.4% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.2% | 0.3% | 4.1% | 1.8% | 2.8% | 6.9% | 6.1% | 8.4% | 8.9% | 5.0% | 6.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $110M | $109M | $109M | $109M | $112M | $118M | $125M | $135M | $138M | $146M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 25 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CE stock.
Celanese Corporation's current P/E ratio is -4.6x. The historical average is 12.9x.
Celanese Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 11.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.5x.
Celanese Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -23.1%. The historical average is 32.4%.
Based on historical data, Celanese Corporation is trading at a P/E of -4.6x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Celanese Corporation's current dividend yield is 0.24%.
Celanese Corporation has 18.8% gross margin and 8.0% operating margin.
Celanese Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 8.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
High leverage and integration risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Recovery Masked by Impairments
Gross margin improved to 22.5% in 2026Q2 from 17.4% in 2025Q4, but net margin remains thin at 4.5%, according to reported figures, suggesting underlying earnings power is still recovering from non-cash charges.
The sequential gross margin expansion of 510 basis points from 2025Q4 to 2026Q2 appears to reflect easing feedstock costs and operational adjustments, yet operating margin at 10.0% remains below the 2024Q2 level of 9.4% only marginally. The deep negative net margins in 2024Q4 (-80.8%) and 2025Q3 (-56.1%) were driven by large impairments, which distort the true earning power. Investors should focus on gross and operating margins excluding one-time items, as the current net margin of 4.5% likely understates the normalized profitability of the acetyl chain and engineered materials segments.
Return on Capital Still Subdued
ROIC recovered to 1.3% in 2026Q2 from -5.6% in 2025Q3, but remains far below the cost of capital, as per financial statements, indicating that the M&M acquisition has yet to generate adequate returns.
The sharp swing in ROIC from -5.6% to 1.3% over two quarters is largely attributable to the absence of impairment charges, but the absolute level remains weak relative to the company's historical performance and its cost of capital. ROE at 2.8% in 2026Q2 is similarly depressed, reflecting a thin equity base that has been eroded by cumulative losses. The improvement in asset turnover from 0.10 to 0.13 suggests some operational efficiency gains, but the return on capital is still insufficient to support the current leverage, implying that value creation hinges on sustained margin expansion and debt reduction.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves
Cash conversion cycle shortened to 94 days in 2026Q2 from 126 days in 2024Q4, driven by lower DIO and DSO, as reported in financial statements, indicating better inventory and receivables management.
The reduction in DIO from 122 days to 98 days and DSO from 71 to 59 days over the same period suggests that Celanese is managing its working capital more tightly, likely in response to demand softness. DPO has remained relatively stable around 62-67 days, indicating that the company is not stretching supplier payments further. This improvement in CCC is a positive sign for cash generation, but it may also reflect lower inventory levels due to destocking, which could reverse when demand recovers. The asset turnover ratio, though improved to 0.13, remains low, consistent with the capital-intensive nature of the chemical industry.
Leverage Elevated Despite Debt Reduction
Debt-to-equity rose to 2.69 in 2026Q2 from 1.84 in 2024Q1, even as total debt declined, according to reported figures, because equity shrank by over 40% due to impairments and losses.
The D/E ratio of 2.69 is misleadingly high because the equity base has been eroded by cumulative losses and goodwill impairments, not because debt has increased. Interest coverage at 1.26x in 2026Q2 is thin, though it has improved from the negative readings in 2025Q3 and 2024Q4, indicating that operating income is barely sufficient to cover interest expenses. The D/EBITDA ratio of 39.12x in 2026Q2 is extremely elevated, but this is distorted by depressed EBITDA; on a normalized basis, leverage is likely still high but not as extreme. The company's ability to service its debt depends on a sustained recovery in margins and cash flow, which is not yet evident.
Liquidity Buffer Thin but Stable
Current ratio improved to 1.23 in 2026Q2 from 1.21 in 2024Q1, but quick ratio remains below 1.0 at 0.74, as per financial statements, indicating reliance on inventory to meet short-term obligations.
The current ratio of 1.23 provides a modest cushion, but the quick ratio of 0.74 suggests that excluding inventory, current assets do not fully cover current liabilities. This is typical for a manufacturer with significant inventory, but it implies that a sudden inventory write-down or demand shock could strain liquidity. Cash balances have increased to $1.4B, which provides some buffer, but the company's high debt load and thin interest coverage mean that liquidity could deteriorate quickly if operating cash flow weakens. The improvement in the current ratio from 1.34 in 2024Q4 to 1.23 in 2026Q2 is modest, and the company remains vulnerable to a prolonged downturn.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA Multiple
EV/EBITDA of 10.96 appears reasonable, but it is distorted by depressed EBITDA from impairments, as reported in financial statements, making the multiple misleadingly high and obscuring the company's true valuation.
The EV/EBITDA multiple is commonly used to value chemical companies, but for Celanese, the EBITDA figure is significantly depressed by non-cash charges and cyclical trough earnings. As a result, the current EV/EBITDA of 10.96 overstates the company's valuation relative to its normalized earnings power. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBIT or EV/normalized EBITDA, adjusting for one-time items and the full cycle. Additionally, the P/E of -4.18 is meaningless due to negative earnings, so investors should rely on EV/Sales (0.51) or P/B (1.09) as cross-checks. The market may be undervaluing the company if normalized earnings recover, but the high leverage and integration risks warrant a discount.