Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 2.2x · EV/EBITDA 0.4x · ROE 0.5%. (2018–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $409276 | $86M | $8.4B | $1.5B | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $364278 | $86M | $8.4B | $1.5B | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 2.19 | 458.33 | 11108.70 | 44363.64 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.02 | 4.69 | 460.43 | 87.86 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.01 | 1.53 | 455.48 | 126.17 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 0.24 | 51.28 | 2840.35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 0.10 | 21.08 | 2372.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.69 | 460.48 | 88.74 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 0.42 | 97.98 | 2861.38 | 537.13 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 9518.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 51.25 | 2840.67 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 45.0% | 45.0% | 39.5% | 47.2% | 46.0% | 47.2% | 49.9% | 53.1% | 49.6% |
| Operating Margin | -10.3% | -10.3% | -2.9% | -3.5% | -10.8% | -3.0% | -0.3% | 8.5% | 7.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.0% | 1.0% | 4.1% | 0.2% | -9.7% | 3.4% | -1.6% | 7.5% | 6.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 0.5% | 0.5% | 5.0% | 0.5% | -64.2% | 20.0% | -7.3% | 52.2% | 56.1% |
| ROA | 0.3% | 0.3% | 1.9% | 0.1% | -4.9% | 2.2% | -0.9% | 5.9% | 5.1% |
| ROIC | -3.7% | -3.7% | -1.7% | -2.3% | -8.6% | -2.9% | -0.2% | 8.6% | 6.5% |
| ROCE | -4.0% | -4.0% | -2.1% | -3.3% | -10.9% | -3.6% | -0.3% | 12.9% | 11.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.71 | 1.38 | 12.60 | 4.60 | 5.74 | 4.67 | 6.55 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 9.83 | 9.83 | 4.45 | 5.81 | — | — | 52.97 | 7.62 | 3.38 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.00 | 0.05 | 1.26 | 10.12 | 3.22 | 3.91 | 2.97 | 6.15 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.05 | -0.05 | 0.32 | 5.29 | — | — | 36.09 | 4.84 | 3.17 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.03 | 0.32 | — | — | — | 13.05 | 8.45 | 46.15 |
| Interest Coverage | -10.02 | -10.02 | 17.31 | — | -50.19 | 0.98 | -0.05 | 7.17 | 7.66 |
Net cash position: cash ($9M) exceeds total debt ($9M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.81 | 0.81 | 1.30 | 0.63 | 0.48 | 0.55 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.52 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.73 | 0.73 | 1.25 | 0.58 | 0.43 | 0.50 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.47 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.86 | 0.10 | 0.22 | 0.32 | 0.43 | 0.46 | 0.08 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.22 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.49 | 0.59 | 0.49 | 0.72 | 0.81 |
| Inventory Turnover | 8.91 | 8.91 | 14.93 | 12.58 | 10.34 | 14.73 | 11.00 | 16.81 | 18.88 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 40.81 | 79.90 | 42.21 | 34.66 | 28.19 | 25.25 | 13.22 | 20.52 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 45.7% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 100.0% | 2.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $389787 | $205295 | $155316 | $159375 | $159375 | $159375 | $159375 | $159375 |
Geographic concentration and scalability
According to current market data, CHSN trades at a P/S ratio of 0.02 and a P/FCF of 0.24, suggesting that investors are pricing the company as a distressed micro-cap expansion story rather than a stable consumer staple with predictable long-term earnings potential.
The absence of a meaningful P/E ratio reflects the company's inability to generate consistent GAAP profitability, which complicates traditional valuation benchmarking against peers like Dutch Bros or The Cheesecake Factory. Investors should interpret these low multiples as a reflection of high execution risk regarding the NYC expansion rather than an indication of deep value.
Based on historical financial statements, CHSN's ROIC has remained largely negative or near-zero, with a -1.4% reading in 2025Q4, indicating that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding returns on its invested capital during this aggressive growth phase.
The persistent inability to generate positive returns on invested capital suggests that the capital-intensive nature of the NYC flagship strategy is failing to offset the mature, lower-growth profile of the Xinjiang operations. This trend warrants further investigation into whether management can pivot toward a more capital-efficient model before the current cash reserves are exhausted.
As reported in recent filings, the company's cash conversion cycle has fluctuated between -16 and 12 days, revealing that CHSN relies heavily on favorable supplier payment terms and prepaid customer card balances to manage its liquidity rather than organic operational efficiency.
The reliance on DPO to manage the cash conversion cycle suggests that the company may be stretching its supplier relationships to fund its expansionary activities. Investors should monitor whether these working capital levers remain sustainable if the company's bargaining power with suppliers diminishes due to stagnant revenue growth.
Based on the provided quarterly data, the current ratio has shown significant volatility, dropping to 0.81 in 2025Q4 from a peak of 2.00 in 2025Q2, which indicates that the company's short-term solvency is highly sensitive to the timing of seasonal revenue and capital expenditure cycles.
The erratic nature of the quick ratio suggests that the company lacks a robust liquidity cushion to withstand prolonged operational stress or unexpected delays in the NYC market. This vulnerability implies that the company may be forced to rely on external financing if the core Xinjiang business experiences a seasonal downturn.
The most commonly misapplied metric for CHSN is the P/E ratio, which obscures the company's true financial health by failing to account for the significant non-operating items and FX translation risks that frequently distort the reported net income of this dual-market operator.
Instead of relying on P/E, analysts should focus on EV/Sales and cash-burn metrics to better understand the company's underlying operational viability. Using standard restaurant valuation multiples ignores the unique geographic and structural risks inherent in bridging a Xinjiang-based supply chain with a high-cost NYC retail footprint.
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CHSN stock.
Chanson International Holding's current P/E ratio is 2.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Chanson International Holding's current EV/EBITDA is 0.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 98.0x.
Chanson International Holding's return on equity (ROE) is 0.5%. The historical average is 7.8%.
Based on historical data, Chanson International Holding is trading at a P/E of 2.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Chanson International Holding has 45.0% gross margin and -10.3% operating margin.
Chanson International Holding's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 9.8x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.