Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) P/E Ratio History
Fairly ValuedTrading at 95.4x, near 5Y avg of 95.9x · 70th percentile · In line with own history · Data 2013–2026
Loading P/E history...
P/E Ratio Analysis
As of June 21, 2026, Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 95.4x, with a stock price of $13.36 and trailing twelve-month earnings per share of $0.20.
The current P/E is roughly in line with its 5-year average of 95.9x. Over the past five years, CLDT's P/E has ranged from a low of 23.2x to a high of 671.0x, placing the current valuation at the 70th percentile of its historical range.
Compared to the Real Estate sector median P/E of 24.1x, CLDT trades at a 296% premium to its sector peers. The sector includes 174 companies with P/E ratios ranging from 0.7x to 195.6x.
Relative to the broader market, CLDT commands a significant premium over the S&P 500 median P/E of 24.4x. Investors should consider the company's growth prospects, competitive position, and earnings quality when evaluating whether the current valuation is justified.
For a comprehensive intrinsic value estimate using discounted cash flow analysis, see our CLDT DCF Valuation Calculator →
Note: P/E ratio is just one valuation metric. It does not account for balance sheet strength, cash flow quality, or growth sustainability. Always conduct comprehensive due diligence before making investment decisions.
CLDT Cross-Benchmark Valuation
How does the current P/E compare to sector peers and the broader market?
CLDT P/E vs Peers
Select-service and extended-stay hotels peers sorted by market cap
| Company | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | PEG Ratio | EPS Growth (1Y) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $8B | 33.2 | -Best | -14% | |
| $2B | 281.6 | -Best | -70% | |
| $3B | 28.0 | -Best | +144% | |
| $4B | 22.4Lowest | -Best | -17% | |
| $17B | 22.7 | -Best | +11% | |
| $2B | 31.3 | -Best | +327%Best |
Lower P/E can signal a discount or weaker growth expectations; PEG adds growth context.
CLDT Historical P/E Data (2013–2026)
Quarterly P/E ratios calculated from closing price and TTM EPS
| Quarter | Period End | Price | TTM EPS | P/E Ratio | vs Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 Q1 | - | $7.87 | $0.05 | 143.4x | +88% |
| FY2025 Q4 | Dec 31 2025 | $6.81 | $0.14 | 49.3x | -35% |
| FY2025 Q3 | - | $6.71 | $0.01 | 671.0x | +778% |
| FY2025 Q2 | Jun 30 2025 | $6.97 | $0.03 | 277.7x | +264% |
| FY2025 Q1 | Mar 31 2025 | $7.13 | $0.06 | 126.9x | +66% |
| FY2023 Q2 | Jun 30 2023 | $9.36 | $0.08 | 116.0x | +52% |
| FY2023 Q1 | Mar 31 2023 | $10.49 | $0.08 | 130.0x | +70% |
| FY2019 Q4 | - | $18.34 | $0.39 | 47.0x | -38% |
| FY2019 Q3 | Sep 30 2019 | $18.15 | $0.44 | 41.6x | -46% |
| FY2019 Q2 | Jun 30 2019 | $18.87 | $0.54 | 35.2x | -54% |
| FY2019 Q1 | Mar 31 2019 | $19.24 | $0.63 | 30.7x | -60% |
| FY2018 Q4 | Dec 31 2018 | $17.68 | $0.66 | 26.9x | -65% |
| FY2018 Q3 | Sep 30 2018 | $20.89 | $0.78 | 26.8x | -65% |
| FY2018 Q2 | Jun 30 2018 | $21.22 | $0.83 | 25.6x | -67% |
| FY2018 Q1 | Mar 31 2018 | $19.15 | $0.67 | 28.6x | -63% |
| FY2017 Q4 | Dec 31 2017 | $22.76 | $0.73 | 31.2x | -59% |
| FY2017 Q3 | Sep 30 2017 | $21.32 | $0.68 | 31.4x | -59% |
| FY2017 Q2 | Jun 30 2017 | $20.09 | $0.67 | 30.0x | -61% |
| FY2017 Q1 | Mar 31 2017 | $19.75 | $0.85 | 23.2x | -70% |
| FY2016 Q4 | Dec 31 2016 | $20.55 | $0.81 | 25.4x | -67% |
| FY2016 Q3 | Sep 30 2016 | $19.25 | $0.86 | 22.4x | -71% |
| FY2016 Q2 | - | $21.98 | $0.88 | 25.0x | -67% |
| FY2016 Q1 | - | $21.43 | $0.90 | 23.8x | -69% |
| FY2015 Q4 | - | $20.48 | $0.86 | 23.8x | -69% |
| FY2015 Q3 | Sep 30 2015 | $21.48 | $0.58 | 37.0x | -52% |
| FY2015 Q2 | - | $26.47 | $0.52 | 50.9x | -33% |
| FY2015 Q1 | - | $29.41 | $2.61 | 11.3x | -85% |
| FY2014 Q4 | Dec 31 2014 | $28.97 | $2.50 | 11.6x | -85% |
| FY2014 Q3 | - | $23.08 | $2.66 | 8.7x | -89% |
| FY2014 Q2 | Jun 30 2014 | $21.90 | $2.46 | 8.9x | -88% |
| FY2014 Q1 | Mar 31 2014 | $20.22 | $0.15 | 135.1x | +77% |
| FY2013 Q4 | - | $20.45 | $0.12 | 168.2x | +120% |
Average P/E for displayed period: 76.4x
Intrinsic Valuation
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
Historical Returns
13+ years return with dividends reinvested.
DCA Calculator
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Peer Comparison
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
CLDT — Frequently Asked Questions
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CLDT stock.
What is CLDT's P/E ratio?
Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) trailing twelve-month P/E ratio is 95.4x, based on TTM diluted EPS of $0.20. The 5-year average P/E is 95.9x and the historical range spans 23.2x to 671.0x.
Is CLDT stock overvalued or undervalued?
CLDT trades at 95.4x P/E, near its 5-year average of 95.9x. The 70th percentile ranking within the 23.2x–671.0x historical range places valuation within normal bounds.
Is CLDT stock expensive?
CLDT is fairly valued relative to its own history. The current P/E of 95.4x is near the 5-year average of 95.9x (70th percentile of historical range).
What is CLDT's historical P/E range?
Over the past 5 years, CLDT's P/E ratio has ranged from 23.2x to 671.0x, with a median of 35.2x and an average of 95.9x. The current P/E of 95.4x places the stock at the 70th percentile of this range. Full historical data spans 2013–2026.
How does CLDT's P/E compare to the S&P 500?
CLDT trades at 95.4x P/E versus the S&P 500 median of 24.4x. The 291% premium to the market typically reflects higher expected earnings growth or quality.
How does CLDT's valuation compare to Real Estate peers?
Chatham Lodging Trust P/E of 95.4x compares to the Real Estate sector median of 24.1x. The premium reflects expected growth above peers or stronger fundamentals. See the peer comparison table on this page for ticker-by-ticker P/E and PEG.
What is CLDT's PEG ratio?
CLDT PEG ratio is N/A, based on a P/E of 95.4x and EPS growth of 275.0%. PEG normalises P/E by growth and helps compare stocks with different earnings trajectories.
What is CLDT's earnings yield?
CLDT earnings yield is 1.05%, the inverse of its 95.4x P/E ratio. Earnings yield represents the percentage of each dollar invested that the company earns. It can be compared directly to bond yields to assess relative attractiveness of stocks versus fixed income.