Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 5.6x · EV/EBITDA 4.3x · ROE 15.0%. (1997–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.9B | $5.9B | $5.5B | $3.8B | $3.2B | $3.0B | $2.2B | $1.7B | $2.5B | $3.4B | $4.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $7.4B | $8.3B | $7.8B | $6.2B | $5.6B | $5.2B | $4.7B | $4.6B | $4.8B | $5.1B | $6.9B |
| P/E Ratio → | 5.65 | 9.24 | — | 2.22 | — | — | — | — | 3.08 | 8.87 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.96 | 2.75 | 3.86 | 2.55 | 0.81 | 1.24 | 1.98 | 1.09 | 1.39 | 2.71 | 4.64 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.29 | 1.36 | 1.35 | 0.88 | 1.08 | 0.80 | 0.49 | 0.34 | 0.48 | 0.87 | 1.06 |
| P/FCF | 10.25 | 11.04 | 20.14 | 28.41 | 4.77 | 6.45 | 6.99 | — | — | 213.30 | 17.25 |
| P/OCF | 4.80 | 5.73 | 6.80 | 4.71 | 2.58 | 3.21 | 2.71 | 1.72 | 2.77 | 5.21 | 8.91 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.90 | 5.44 | 4.12 | 1.42 | 2.19 | 4.31 | 2.98 | 2.74 | 4.07 | 7.65 |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.33 | 6.13 | 11.94 | 8.30 | 1.81 | 3.14 | 66.96 | 6.03 | 4.62 | 11.53 | 46.49 |
| EV / EBIT | 9.39 | 8.57 | 258.78 | 2.62 | — | — | — | 21.86 | 3.88 | 18.16 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 15.63 | 28.40 | 45.90 | 8.30 | 11.38 | 15.19 | — | — | 320.93 | 28.44 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 47.2% | 47.2% | 28.8% | 35.2% | 71.3% | 56.8% | 12.2% | 33.9% | 43.8% | 22.6% | -7.0% |
| Operating Margin | 36.8% | 36.8% | 11.8% | 20.9% | 66.3% | 48.3% | — | 16.6% | 31.4% | 2.3% | -30.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 29.6% | 29.6% | -6.3% | 114.2% | -3.6% | -20.9% | -44.6% | -5.2% | 45.2% | 30.5% | -94.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 15.0% | 15.0% | -2.1% | 47.1% | -4.3% | -12.3% | -10.3% | -1.6% | 17.7% | 9.7% | -19.3% |
| ROA | 7.2% | 7.2% | -1.1% | 20.1% | -1.7% | -6.2% | -5.7% | -0.9% | 10.3% | 4.7% | -8.4% |
| ROIC | 9.0% | 9.0% | 1.9% | 3.9% | 34.6% | 13.4% | — | 2.5% | 6.3% | 0.4% | -2.7% |
| ROCE | 10.3% | 10.3% | 2.2% | 4.2% | 36.3% | 15.7% | — | 3.1% | 7.6% | 0.4% | -3.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.81 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.47 | 0.57 | 0.70 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.80 | 1.80 | 3.50 | 3.16 | 0.78 | 1.36 | 36.36 | 3.84 | 2.29 | 5.02 | 18.70 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.80 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.69 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.80 | 1.80 | 3.47 | 3.16 | 0.77 | 1.36 | 36.14 | 3.82 | 2.28 | 3.87 | 18.30 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 4.59 | 8.26 | 17.49 | 3.54 | 4.93 | 8.19 | — | — | 107.64 | 11.19 |
| Interest Coverage | 5.71 | 5.71 | 0.20 | 16.51 | -0.66 | -3.21 | -2.53 | 1.39 | 8.53 | 1.73 | -2.07 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.33 | 0.51 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.62 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 1.93 | 0.67 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.32 | 0.49 | 0.42 | 0.48 | 0.60 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 1.91 | 0.60 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 1.15 | 0.06 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.24 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.46 | 0.29 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.10 |
| Inventory Turnover | 43.15 | 43.15 | 70.37 | 49.22 | 41.53 | 168.02 | 98.69 | 146.40 | 101.81 | 89.90 | 14.73 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 55.52 | 50.07 | 32.47 | 32.98 | 51.80 | 50.55 | 49.47 | 85.62 | 69.38 | 71.16 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.1% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 17.7% | 10.8% | — | 45.0% | — | — | — | — | 32.5% | 11.3% | — |
| FCF Yield | 9.8% | 9.1% | 5.0% | 3.5% | 21.0% | 15.5% | 14.3% | — | — | 0.5% | 5.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 10.6% | 8.9% | 3.3% | 8.3% | 17.7% | 8.3% | 1.8% | 7.3% | 15.8% | 3.3% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 10.6% | 8.9% | 3.3% | 8.3% | 17.7% | 8.3% | 1.8% | 7.3% | 15.8% | 3.3% | 0.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $160M | $151M | $192M | $190M | $216M | $199M | $191M | $215M | $231M | $229M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 29 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CNX stock.
CNX Resources Corporation's current P/E ratio is 5.6x. The historical average is 21.3x. This places it at the 11th percentile of its historical range.
CNX Resources Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 4.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.5x.
CNX Resources Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 15.0%. The historical average is 24.6%.
Based on historical data, CNX Resources Corporation is trading at a P/E of 5.6x. This is at the 11th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
CNX Resources Corporation has 47.2% gross margin and 36.8% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
CNX Resources Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.8x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Peak-cycle earnings and thin liquidity
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Low Multiples Price in Cyclical Normalization
CNX trades at 8.87x trailing P/E and 5.47x EV/EBITDA, below Antero and Range, as reported figures suggest the market discounts its recent earnings surge as non-repeatable.
Compared with its peers Antero (17.92x P/E) and Range (18.32x P/E), CNX's trailing multiple appears depressed, which may indicate that investors are capitalizing a normalized rather than peak earnings base. The forward P/E of 10.89x sitting above the trailing figure implies consensus expects some earnings compression, consistent with decelerating revenue growth from 59% to 49%. Investors should monitor whether the market's discount reflects a durable cyclical view or an underappreciation of the midstream and CBM assets.
Margin Swings Reflect Pricing, Not Structure
Based on CNX's reported quarters, gross margin ranged from 20.1% in 2024Q3 to 64.2% in 2026Q1, a swing that appears driven mainly by realized gas prices rather than cost changes.
A 44-point gross margin range within two years points to commodity exposure dominating the margin profile rather than structural efficiency gains. The 36.8% operating margin in the latest period is strong relative to the group, but the volatility limits its usefulness as a run-rate measure of earning power. Analysts should anchor on through-cycle margins rather than the recent peak when judging durability.
ROIC Lags Peers Despite Strong Margins
CNX's quarterly ROIC of 2.7% in 2026Q3 sits well below Range's 11.2% and Coterra's 10.9%, suggesting heavy invested capital is not yet converting into peer-level returns.
The gap between CNX's high margins and low ROIC indicates that its asset base, dominated by roughly $8.0B of net PP&E, dilutes capital efficiency. This may reflect the capital intensity of maintaining Appalachian infrastructure and the drag of a large legacy asset base on returns. Investors should watch whether ROIC improves as the asset base is worked down, or whether it remains structurally subdued relative to peers.
Moderate Leverage Masks Thin Liquidity Buffer
As reported in the financial statements, CNX's debt-to-equity fell to 0.50 in 2026Q3 and interest coverage reached 6.54x, yet cash held at only $2.0M against $9.2B in total assets.
The debt-to-equity improvement appears driven partly by equity growth rather than debt paydown alone, which suggests the deleveraging may be less robust than headline figures imply. Interest coverage above 6x indicates current debt service is comfortable under present pricing. However, the near-zero cash balance suggests the company relies on revolver access and operating cash flow to bridge timing gaps, warranting further investigation of its liquidity under a sustained price downturn.
Misapplied P/E Obscures Capital Intensity
The trailing P/E is most commonly misapplied to CNX, as reported earnings swung from a $432.5M net income quarter to negative results, obscuring the depletion and capex burden embedded in cash flow.
Using trailing P/E for an asset-heavy producer with heavy DD&A and non-operating swings can make the stock appear cheap during peak-earnings periods and expensive during trough periods. EV/EBITDA or P/FCF, at 9.35x, better captures the cash cost of sustaining the Appalachian asset base. Analysts should adjust for hedge mark-to-market effects and depletion before treating the 8.87x P/E as a reliable signal of value.