Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 24.4x · EV/EBITDA 15.8x · ROE 25.8%. (1997–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $13.8B | $31.1B | $14.0B | $5.5B | $2.8B | $1.4B | $1.9B | $1.2B | $2.3B | $2.5B | $1.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $14.1B | $31.4B | $14.4B | $6.1B | $3.5B | $1.9B | $2.4B | $1.8B | $2.9B | $3.0B | $2.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 24.42 | 58.63 | 37.25 | 29.62 | 49.24 | — | — | 1064.91 | 13.83 | 13.28 | 37.81 |
| P/S Ratio | 4.34 | 9.95 | 4.87 | 2.00 | 1.08 | 0.74 | 1.32 | 0.54 | 0.97 | 1.16 | 0.98 |
| P/B Ratio | 6.30 | 13.96 | 7.43 | 3.38 | 1.98 | 1.02 | 1.40 | 0.81 | 1.52 | 1.68 | 1.47 |
| P/FCF | 40.58 | 85.81 | 48.98 | 30.91 | — | — | 12.99 | 19.38 | 44.30 | 33.72 | 57.24 |
| P/OCF | 22.86 | 51.39 | 31.82 | 20.05 | 187.86 | 225.61 | 7.77 | 5.05 | 9.93 | 11.96 | 13.63 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 10.05 | 5.02 | 2.19 | 1.36 | 1.06 | 1.62 | 0.81 | 1.20 | 1.39 | 1.28 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.82 | 36.96 | 21.84 | 13.23 | 13.11 | 18.25 | — | 11.80 | 7.86 | 9.78 | 9.62 |
| EV / EBIT | 20.12 | 45.22 | 27.17 | 21.86 | 25.35 | — | — | 67.98 | 11.78 | 15.87 | 23.02 |
| EV / FCF | — | 86.63 | 50.46 | 33.95 | — | — | 16.01 | 29.15 | 54.72 | 40.32 | 74.73 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 30.6% | 26.7% | 21.2% | 13.2% | 8.2% | 0.1% | 15.1% | 18.7% | 17.7% | 16.7% |
| Operating Margin | 22.5% | 22.5% | 18.1% | 11.7% | 5.2% | -1.4% | -16.8% | 1.2% | 10.1% | 8.8% | 6.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 17.0% | 17.0% | 13.1% | 6.8% | 2.2% | -2.7% | -15.6% | 0.1% | 7.0% | 8.7% | 2.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 25.8% | 25.8% | 21.4% | 12.3% | 4.1% | -3.6% | -16.2% | 0.1% | 11.1% | 14.0% | 4.1% |
| ROA | 14.5% | 14.5% | 11.1% | 5.9% | 1.9% | -1.7% | -7.4% | 0.0% | 5.4% | 6.4% | 1.7% |
| ROIC | 21.8% | 21.8% | 17.5% | 11.4% | 5.0% | -1.0% | -9.6% | 0.9% | 9.0% | 7.6% | 5.4% |
| ROCE | 22.2% | 22.2% | 17.9% | 11.9% | 5.2% | -1.0% | -9.1% | 0.9% | 8.9% | 7.4% | 4.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 0.46 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.38 | 0.37 | 0.50 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.81 | 0.81 | 1.12 | 1.62 | 2.82 | 6.99 | — | 5.25 | 1.57 | 1.78 | 2.53 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.13 | 0.22 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 0.44 | 0.32 | 0.41 | 0.36 | 0.33 | 0.45 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.64 | 1.18 | 2.66 | 5.54 | — | 3.96 | 1.50 | 1.60 | 2.25 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.82 | 1.48 | 3.04 | — | — | 3.02 | 9.78 | 10.43 | 6.60 | 17.49 |
| Interest Coverage | 18.36 | 18.36 | 8.31 | 4.24 | 2.13 | -0.41 | -7.87 | 1.31 | 9.28 | 6.66 | 3.36 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.81 | 3.81 | 3.65 | 3.41 | 2.79 | 2.98 | 3.65 | 2.80 | 2.97 | 3.24 | 2.76 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.23 | 2.23 | 2.01 | 1.84 | 1.40 | 1.66 | 2.26 | 1.20 | 1.08 | 1.35 | 1.02 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.43 | 0.10 | 0.41 | 0.94 | 0.43 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.17 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.63 | 0.50 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.62 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.64 | 2.64 | 2.66 | 2.96 | 3.46 | 3.40 | 3.46 | 2.56 | 2.46 | 2.58 | 2.17 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 82.00 | 73.01 | 74.41 | 76.04 | 75.99 | 76.36 | 48.92 | 58.90 | 64.03 | 58.97 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.7% | 1.4% | 2.9% | 2.0% | 3.3% | 1.7% | 1.4% | 1.9% |
| Payout Ratio | 7.6% | 7.6% | 10.7% | 21.4% | 69.9% | — | — | 2586.7% | 23.1% | 18.2% | 72.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.1% | 1.7% | 2.7% | 3.4% | 2.0% | — | — | 0.1% | 7.2% | 7.5% | 2.6% |
| FCF Yield | 2.5% | 1.2% | 2.0% | 3.2% | — | — | 7.7% | 5.2% | 2.3% | 3.0% | 1.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.6% | 0.7% | 1.0% | 0.7% | 1.4% | 2.9% | 2.0% | 3.3% | 1.7% | 1.4% | 1.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $50M | $51M | $50M | $49M | $49M | $48M | $48M | $48M | $48M | $47M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CRS stock.
Carpenter Technology Corporation's current P/E ratio is 24.4x. The historical average is 28.8x. This places it at the 58th percentile of its historical range.
Carpenter Technology Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 15.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.8x.
Carpenter Technology Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 25.8%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 8.7%.
Based on historical data, Carpenter Technology Corporation is trading at a P/E of 24.4x. This is at the 58th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Carpenter Technology Corporation's current dividend yield is 0.29% with a payout ratio of 7.6%.
Carpenter Technology Corporation has 30.6% gross margin and 22.5% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Carpenter Technology Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.8x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Surcharge distortion and aerospace cycle reversal risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Peer Discount Amid Own-History Premium
CRS trades at a 27.1x trailing P/E and 20.6x EV/EBITDA based on recent market data, which appears elevated against its own history but represents a substantial discount to Howmet Aerospace's 50.1x P/E and ATI's 55.1x P/E. The 21.1x forward P/E implies meaningful earnings growth is expected.
The 21.1x forward P/E versus 27.1x trailing P/E implies the market is capitalizing approximately 28% earnings growth, which appears reasonable given the accelerating margin trajectory but assumes no reversal in the aerospace build-rate cycle. The 6.44x P/B is notably below Howmet's 14.1x and ATI's 11.6x, yet CRS's ROE of 7.4% substantially trails peers' 25%+ ROE levels, so the book value discount appears partially justified by lower return generation. The 39.0x P/FCF multiple warrants caution, as recent capex intensity has compressed free cash flow, and investors should assess whether the Athens investment cycle is nearing completion before capitalizing forward cash flow recovery.
Premium Mix Drives Structural Margin Expansion
Gross margin expanded 820 basis points from 23.9% to 32.1% over ten quarters, as reported in quarterly filings, while operating margin surged from 13.6% to 24.6%. This margin trajectory appears driven by premium product mix shift and Athens utilization gains rather than cyclical commodity recovery alone.
Operating income grew 81% from $108.3M to $196.4M over the period while SG&A remained virtually flat, confirming exceptional fixed-cost leverage that suggests the operating margin is capturing true incremental earning power rather than accounting distortion. However, the 20.4% net margin in 2027Q1 may be flattered by non-recurring items or working capital timing, and analysts should normalize for the surcharge pass-through effect, which inflates revenue without corresponding profit and structurally depresses reported margin percentages. If the premium mix shift toward LEAP-engine alloys and titanium products continues, there may be additional margin upside, though the 32.1% gross margin should be benchmarked against Howmet's comparable level to assess sustainability.
Margins Climb But Capital Returns Remain Subdued
Despite dramatic margin improvement, ROIC reached only 5.6% in 2027Q1 per reported financial statements, reflecting an asset turnover of just 0.21x. This suggests the substantial capital deployed in the Athens facility is not yet generating returns commensurate with the operating leverage improvement.
ROIC has improved from 3.8% to 5.6% over ten quarters, but this remains well below what investors would expect for a business with 24.6% operating margins, indicating the enormous asset base required for VIM and VAR melting capabilities is diluting capital efficiency. The 6.44x P/B valuation implies the market is pricing in future ROIC expansion toward 10%+ as the Athens ramp matures, which would require either further asset rationalization or sustained volume growth to improve the 0.21x asset turnover ratio. Investors should monitor whether ROIC reaches a 7-8% threshold over the next four quarters, as failure to do so may suggest the capital intensity of this business model structurally limits shareholder value creation despite impressive operating margins.
Working Capital Consumes Cash at Expanding Cycle
The cash conversion cycle lengthened from 136 to 171 days over ten quarters, according to reported quarterly data, driven primarily by a 30-day increase in days inventory outstanding to 145 days. This lengthening suggests working capital is absorbing significant cash that would otherwise compound shareholder returns.
DIO has risen from 115 to 145 days while DPO increased only from 40 to 56 days, indicating inventory is growing faster than the company's ability to offset it with supplier financing — a pattern consistent with pre-building inventory ahead of accelerating aerospace build rates but one that warrants monitoring for destocking risk. DSO has expanded from 62 to 82 days, which may reflect longer payment terms extended to aerospace customers to secure volume commitments, though this also represents working capital leverage being ceded to customers. The 2027Q1 working capital consumption of $166.1M versus the prior quarter's $158.1M release demonstrates the volatility inherent in this cycle lengthening and explains the erratic FCF margin swings from 26.5% to negative 3.1%.
Deleveraging Amplifies Balance Sheet Resilience
According to recent SEC filings, CRS reduced its D/E ratio from 0.46 to 0.32 over ten quarters while interest coverage surged from 6.8x to 28.1x, creating one of the strongest credit profiles in the specialty metals sector. This positions the company well to absorb an aerospace downturn.
The combination of declining absolute debt ($741.4M to $691.0M) and rapidly expanding EBITDA has produced a D/EBITDA improvement from 5.22x to 2.97x, which provides substantial headroom under most covenant structures and suggests the company could fund a significant acquisition or accelerated buyback without stressing the balance sheet. However, the record $133.9M buyback in 2027Q1 occurred simultaneously with negative FCF of -$24.9M and a 59% sequential decline in cash to $159.5M, a combination that warrants scrutiny of whether management's capital allocation discipline is loosening at an inopportune point in the capex cycle. The 28.1x interest coverage effectively eliminates near-term refinancing risk, but investors should note that coverage ratios for commodity-sensitive businesses can deteriorate rapidly if revenue contracts during an aerospace destocking cycle.
Surcharge Mechanics Distort Margin and P/E Readings
The P/E ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for CRS's business model, as the surcharge pass-through mechanism inflates reported revenue and creates quarter-to-quarter earnings volatility. Analysts should instead evaluate normalized EV/EBITDA or sales ex-surcharge metrics, which strip out nickel and cobalt price distortion.
When nickel prices spike, reported revenue increases without any corresponding profit contribution, mathematically compressing gross margin percentages while simultaneously making revenue growth rates appear stronger than underlying demand warrants — a dynamic that can cause analysts to misjudge both the quality of top-line growth and the durability of margin expansion. The appropriate alternative is to model the business on an ex-surcharge basis, using EV/EBITDA as the primary valuation anchor since EBITDA is less distorted by raw material pass-through than net income. Additionally, LIFO inventory accounting may produce liquidation gains during destocking cycles that artificially boost reported earnings, further rendering trailing P/E a misleading metric for a business whose earnings quality fluctuates with commodity prices and inventory turns.