Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 9.0x · EV/EBITDA 8.7x · ROE 22.2%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $425M | $661M | $615M | $387M | $433M | $1.2B | $566M | $461M | $285M | $455M | $500M |
| Enterprise Value | $987M | $1.2B | $1.2B | $990M | $1.0B | $1.8B | $1.0B | $980M | $651M | $815M | $837M |
| P/E Ratio → | 9.00 | 13.02 | 18.98 | 11.69 | 10.47 | 35.60 | 35.19 | 32.00 | 24.60 | 12.30 | 25.57 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.03 | 1.58 | 1.52 | 1.01 | 1.17 | 3.13 | 1.72 | 1.68 | 1.06 | 1.76 | 2.01 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.64 | 2.60 | 2.95 | 2.23 | 3.15 | 9.19 | 2.35 | 2.03 | 1.29 | 2.30 | 2.81 |
| P/FCF | 11.88 | — | 17.14 | 29.62 | 405.49 | 19.83 | 8.36 | 16.56 | 8.03 | 15.80 | 18.57 |
| P/OCF | 7.01 | 10.90 | 11.84 | 5.11 | 7.09 | 13.97 | 6.83 | 10.67 | 5.81 | 10.07 | 9.99 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.93 | 2.91 | 2.59 | 2.82 | 4.67 | 3.17 | 3.58 | 2.43 | 3.16 | 3.37 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.70 | 9.88 | 11.08 | 9.56 | 10.49 | 15.20 | 13.39 | 13.75 | 10.71 | 12.55 | 12.75 |
| EV / EBIT | 10.07 | 12.40 | 14.30 | 11.97 | 12.57 | 25.15 | 18.19 | 20.34 | 15.65 | 16.27 | 17.49 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 32.73 | 75.83 | 978.66 | 29.56 | 15.41 | 35.21 | 18.34 | 28.25 | 31.07 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 35.1% | 35.1% | 35.5% | 32.5% | 32.2% | 34.5% | 32.2% | 29.0% | 28.3% | 29.8% | 32.1% |
| Operating Margin | 23.5% | 23.5% | 20.2% | 21.2% | 21.5% | 24.9% | 17.4% | 19.1% | 16.2% | 19.0% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 12.3% | 12.3% | 8.2% | 8.7% | 11.2% | 8.8% | 4.9% | 5.3% | 4.3% | 14.4% | 7.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 22.2% | 22.2% | 17.3% | 21.5% | 31.2% | 18.0% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 5.6% | 19.8% | 11.7% |
| ROA | 3.9% | 3.9% | 2.6% | 2.7% | 3.5% | 2.9% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.3% | 4.1% | 2.3% |
| ROIC | 9.3% | 9.3% | 7.9% | 8.0% | 8.2% | 9.9% | 5.9% | 5.9% | 5.7% | 6.9% | 7.5% |
| ROCE | 7.8% | 7.8% | 6.7% | 6.8% | 7.0% | 8.5% | 5.2% | 5.3% | 4.9% | 5.7% | 6.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.69 | 3.49 | 4.47 | 4.52 | 1.99 | 2.29 | 1.65 | 1.82 | 1.91 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.55 | 4.55 | 5.29 | 5.84 | 6.16 | 5.01 | 6.14 | 7.29 | 6.03 | 5.55 | 5.18 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.20 | 2.68 | 3.48 | 4.46 | 4.51 | 1.99 | 2.29 | 1.65 | 1.82 | 1.89 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.54 | 4.54 | 5.28 | 5.83 | 6.14 | 5.00 | 6.13 | 7.28 | 6.02 | 5.53 | 5.13 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 15.59 | 46.21 | 573.17 | 9.73 | 7.05 | 18.65 | 10.31 | 12.46 | 12.50 |
| Interest Coverage | 3.48 | 3.48 | 2.56 | 2.28 | 3.21 | 2.74 | 1.75 | 1.87 | 1.78 | 2.90 | 3.07 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 1.12 | 0.84 | 0.71 | 0.74 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.92 | 0.65 | 0.55 | 0.61 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.07 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.29 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.28 |
| Inventory Turnover | 34.88 | 34.88 | 32.93 | 30.94 | 32.96 | 33.54 | 30.79 | 27.83 | 28.45 | 27.82 | 27.42 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 37.56 | 27.27 | 26.66 | 24.62 | 28.53 | 27.81 | 33.87 | 27.57 | 29.05 | 30.58 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.7% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.7% | 1.6% | 0.6% | 1.1% | 1.2% | 1.9% | 0.8% | 0.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 13.6% | 13.6% | 20.7% | 20.1% | 16.3% | 21.9% | 37.6% | 37.1% | 47.3% | 10.0% | 12.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 11.1% | 7.7% | 5.3% | 8.6% | 9.5% | 2.8% | 2.8% | 3.1% | 4.1% | 8.1% | 3.9% |
| FCF Yield | 8.4% | — | 5.8% | 3.4% | 0.2% | 5.0% | 12.0% | 6.0% | 12.5% | 6.3% | 5.4% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 8.5% | 11.9% | 0.0% | 2.0% | 5.7% | 3.6% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.7% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.7% | 10.0% | 12.5% | 1.1% | 3.2% | 7.6% | 4.4% | 0.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $16M | $15M | $15M | $16M | $18M | $18M | $18M | $18M | $18M | $17M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CSV stock.
Carriage Services, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 9.0x. The historical average is 20.2x. This places it at the 4th percentile of its historical range.
Carriage Services, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 8.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.6x.
Carriage Services, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 22.2%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 7.6%.
Based on historical data, Carriage Services, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 9.0x. This is at the 4th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Carriage Services, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.68% with a payout ratio of 13.6%.
Carriage Services, Inc. has 35.1% gross margin and 23.5% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Carriage Services, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Declining at-need volume pressure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Discounted Multiples Price In Volume Decline
Based on reported figures, CSV trades at 8.25x trailing earnings and 7.97x EV/EBITDA, well below SCI's 19.41x P/E and 11.48x EV/EBITDA, a discount that suggests investors are pricing in softer at-need volumes.
The forward P/E of 8.01 and PEG of 0.28 imply the market is assigning little growth premium to CSV's earnings path. Against its own multiples the discount is consistent with recent EPS volatility and the Q2 2026 miss. Investors should monitor whether the discount narrows if volume trends stabilize, since the valuation gap to SCI largely reflects scale and volume sensitivity rather than a clear mispricing.
Margin Compression Outpaces Operating Stability
As reported in financial statements, CSV's gross margin fell from 36.4% in Q1 2026 to 31.2% in Q3 2026, while operating margin held in a comparatively narrow 19% to 24% band in recent quarters.
The gross margin contraction of roughly five points within two quarters points to merchandise and labor cost pressure or mix shift rather than a broad operating breakdown. Operating margin resilience suggests overhead leverage is partially offsetting gross pressure. Net margin swings from 6.3% to 19.5% indicate that below-the-line items, including trust fund and non-cash effects, drive much of the bottom-line variability and should be adjusted for when assessing earning power.
Leverage Easing Through Equity Growth
According to recent SEC filings, CSV's debt-to-equity ratio fell from 3.09 to 1.87 over ten quarters, while interest coverage improved to 2.87x in Q3 2026 from 2.26x in Q2 2024.
The deleveraging appears driven largely by equity accretion, since total debt has remained roughly flat near $540M to $580M. Coverage at 2.87x is adequate but not generous for a capital-intensive roll-up with declining volumes. Debt/EBITDA at 27.83x in the latest quarter, versus 2 to 3x earlier, may reflect quarterly EBITDA compression and warrants close monitoring for covenant headroom.
Thin Cash Buffer Against Current Liabilities
Based on reported figures, CSV's current ratio slipped to 0.98 at year-end 2025 before recovering to 1.45 in Q3 2026, with cash holdings of only $1.2M to $8.1M across recent quarters.
Liquidity appears tight relative to the approximately $1.1B liability base, and reliance on working capital timing has been significant. The quick ratio of 1.29 in the latest quarter looks more comfortable, but the limited cash position suggests the company depends on operating inflows and facility access rather than balance sheet reserves. Under a sustained volume decline, this structure would likely warrant close scrutiny of short-term obligations.
Debt/EBITDA Misapplied to Pre-Need Backlog
Debt-to-EBITDA is commonly applied to CSV, yet deferred revenue swinging between $101M and $412M means reported EBITDA may not reflect the cash economics of pre-need contracts.
Pre-need sales recognized at delivery can distort EBITDA timing, making leverage ratios appear volatile even when underlying debt is stable. Free cash flow margin, adjusted for deferred revenue and trust fund effects, likely offers a more reliable measure of debt service capacity. Investors should treat the 27.83x Debt/EBITDA reading as a signal requiring investigation rather than a settled deterioration.