Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio N/A · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -11.5%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| P/FCF | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | 73.1% | 73.3% | 74.9% | 75.6% | 73.6% |
| Operating Margin | -21.3% | -21.3% | 37.2% | -3.3% | 42.7% | 44.7% | 37.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -27.9% | -27.9% | 27.0% | -14.0% | 29.8% | 30.3% | 23.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -11.5% | -11.5% | 12.9% | -6.8% | 15.2% | 19.4% | 16.9% |
| ROA | -8.0% | -8.0% | 8.8% | -4.7% | 10.3% | 11.4% | 9.1% |
| ROIC | -5.7% | -5.7% | 11.3% | -1.0% | 13.4% | 15.3% | 13.3% |
| ROCE | -6.4% | -6.4% | 12.9% | -1.2% | 16.0% | 19.8% | 18.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.30 | 0.51 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 0.71 | 3.64 | 0.62 | 0.85 | 1.28 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.30 | 0.51 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 0.70 | 3.62 | 0.62 | 0.85 | 1.28 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 6.60 | 6.50 | 1.71 | 1.74 | 1.56 | 2.60 |
| Interest Coverage | -9.71 | -9.71 | 33.48 | 27.63 | 16.02 | 10.87 | 7.68 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 6.90 | 6.90 | 1.35 | 0.44 | 1.40 | 0.24 | 0.14 |
| Quick Ratio | 6.90 | 6.90 | 1.35 | 0.44 | 1.40 | 0.24 | 0.14 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.30 | 0.32 | 0.36 | 0.34 | 0.38 | 0.39 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | 100.0% | — | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | 27.1% | 101.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Terminal legacy revenue decline
According to recent financial statements, Qwest's operating margin plummeted to -174.0% in 2025Q4, a stark reversal from the 38.7% levels observed in 2024Q4, indicating that the company's fixed-cost structure is no longer sustainable against the backdrop of rapidly eroding legacy wireline revenues and high maintenance requirements.
The dramatic shift from positive to deeply negative margins suggests that the company has reached a critical inflection point where revenue decay has outpaced its ability to rationalize operating expenses. Investors should monitor whether this margin compression is driven by non-recurring impairment charges or a permanent, structural inability to cover the costs of its aging copper network.
Based on reported figures, the company's ROIC deteriorated from a positive 3.0% in 2024Q2 to -11.1% in 2025Q4, signaling that the firm is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its ongoing investments in network infrastructure and legacy service maintenance.
The transition to negative returns on invested capital implies that the capital being deployed into the business is failing to generate sufficient incremental cash flow to justify its cost. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's capital allocation strategy is effectively pivoting toward growth or merely subsidizing the decline of its legacy asset base.
As reported in quarterly filings, the company's asset turnover ratio has remained consistently low at approximately 0.07 to 0.09 over the last ten quarters, suggesting that the firm's massive physical infrastructure base is failing to generate meaningful revenue relative to its total asset carrying value.
This persistent inefficiency highlights the challenge of managing a high-fixed-cost utility model where the underlying assets are becoming increasingly underutilized. The lack of improvement in asset turnover suggests that the company may be carrying significant idle or obsolete capacity that continues to weigh on its overall operational efficiency.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's current ratio has fluctuated wildly, reaching 6.90 in 2025Q4, yet this figure appears misleading given the extremely low absolute cash balance of $39 million relative to the scale of its multi-billion dollar revenue and operational cost base.
While the high current ratio might suggest strong short-term liquidity, the absolute cash position leaves the company with virtually no margin for error in the event of unexpected operational disruptions or emergency capital needs. Investors should view this liquidity profile as vulnerable, as it likely relies on parent-level support rather than independent cash generation.
Market participants often misapply the Price-to-Book ratio to this business model, as the reported book value fails to account for the rapid economic obsolescence of legacy copper assets and the potential for significant future impairment charges that could further erode the company's equity base.
Relying on P/B for a legacy telecom entity obscures the reality that the physical assets may be worth significantly less than their carrying value in a liquidation scenario. Analysts should instead focus on cash-flow-based valuation metrics or the replacement cost of the rights-of-way, which provide a more accurate reflection of the company's true economic value.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CTBB stock.
Qwest Corp. NT's return on equity (ROE) is -11.5%. The historical average is 7.7%.
Based on historical data, Qwest Corp. NT is trading at valuation metrics that vary. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Qwest Corp. NT has -21.3% operating margin.