Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -23.5x · EV/EBITDA 13.3x · ROE -4.1%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $17.7B | $16.9B | $13.4B | $14.5B | $14.3B | $18.4B | $21.9B | $20.0B | $24.6B | $22.6B | $12.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $20.1B | $19.3B | $18.7B | $19.9B | $18.8B | $27.6B | $35.4B | $36.5B | $28.7B | $43.2B | $27.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | -23.46 | — | 18.99 | 34.24 | 2.47 | 2.85 | — | 40.09 | 6.43 | 15.53 | 3.23 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.58 | 2.46 | 1.08 | 1.20 | 1.10 | 1.46 | 1.53 | 0.93 | 1.09 | 0.36 | 0.26 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.30 | 1.19 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.68 | 0.56 | 0.48 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 0.47 |
| P/FCF | 16.38 | 15.62 | 10.58 | 9.24 | — | 13.23 | 7.54 | — | 26.63 | — | 7.92 |
| P/OCF | 12.52 | 11.93 | 7.26 | 6.63 | 24.39 | 8.06 | 5.34 | 14.23 | 5.13 | — | 2.33 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.82 | 1.51 | 1.65 | 1.44 | 2.20 | 2.47 | 1.70 | 1.27 | 0.69 | 0.57 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.35 | 12.80 | 6.20 | 6.96 | 5.94 | 9.27 | 10.37 | 7.52 | 6.64 | 3.87 | 3.09 |
| EV / EBIT | 23.39 | 37.60 | 12.03 | 22.15 | 9.67 | 14.03 | — | 188.18 | 43.77 | 18.97 | 5.22 |
| EV / FCF | — | 17.88 | 14.78 | 12.68 | — | 19.88 | 12.19 | — | 31.06 | — | 17.08 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 30.3% | 31.6% | 30.1% | 30.9% | 32.1% | 30.4% | 29.8% | 27.7% | 21.4% | 21.9% |
| Operating Margin | 12.6% | 12.6% | 14.8% | 14.2% | 15.5% | 14.9% | 14.2% | 13.0% | 9.5% | 11.5% | 12.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -11.4% | -11.4% | 5.7% | 3.5% | 45.1% | 51.5% | -20.6% | 2.3% | 16.9% | 2.3% | 8.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -4.1% | -4.1% | 2.9% | 1.6% | 21.7% | 19.6% | -7.3% | 0.7% | 3.9% | 2.2% | 16.1% |
| ROA | -2.7% | -2.7% | 1.9% | 1.1% | 13.5% | 11.1% | -4.2% | 0.4% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.8% |
| ROIC | 2.8% | 2.8% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 4.5% | 3.2% | 2.8% | 2.6% | 1.4% | 6.6% | 11.8% |
| ROCE | 3.4% | 3.4% | 5.4% | 4.7% | 5.2% | 3.8% | 3.4% | 3.2% | 1.5% | 6.2% | 9.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.30 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.13 | 0.33 | 0.78 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.12 | 2.12 | 2.37 | 2.72 | 2.56 | 3.76 | 4.70 | 3.71 | 2.93 | 3.05 | 2.40 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.16 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.04 | 0.20 | 0.54 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.62 | 1.62 | 1.76 | 1.89 | 1.40 | 3.10 | 3.96 | 3.39 | 0.95 | 1.85 | 1.66 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.26 | 4.20 | 3.44 | — | 6.65 | 4.65 | — | 4.43 | — | 9.16 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.64 | 1.64 | 4.26 | 2.27 | 3.94 | 3.75 | -2.34 | 0.29 | 11.91 | — | 6.14 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.42 | 2.42 | 1.33 | 2.43 | 3.02 | 2.90 | 2.37 | 1.20 | 1.73 | 1.91 | 1.88 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.91 | 1.91 | 0.88 | 1.73 | 2.40 | 2.48 | 2.18 | 0.68 | 1.67 | 1.26 | 1.29 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.39 | 0.77 | 1.33 | 0.40 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 0.55 | 0.52 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.27 | 0.20 | 0.31 | 0.12 | 0.33 | 0.61 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.08 | 4.08 | 3.98 | 3.93 | 3.86 | 4.09 | 4.17 | 3.50 | 3.98 | 2.89 | 5.11 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 88.95 | 64.80 | 71.68 | 70.61 | 62.71 | 61.63 | 65.05 | 54.78 | 98.68 | 68.41 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.3% | 3.5% | 4.7% | 4.5% | 4.5% | 3.4% | 4.0% | 8.0% | 14.2% | 15.0% | 19.3% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 90.3% | 153.9% | 11.1% | 9.7% | — | 324.1% | 91.2% | 234.6% | 57.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 5.3% | 2.9% | 40.4% | 35.1% | — | 2.5% | 15.5% | 6.4% | 31.0% |
| FCF Yield | 6.1% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 10.8% | — | 7.6% | 13.3% | — | 3.8% | — | 12.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.8% | 3.0% | 3.7% | 13.8% | 30.5% | 11.7% | 1.1% | 11.6% | 18.0% | 4.4% | 7.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.1% | 6.5% | 8.5% | 18.3% | 35.0% | 15.1% | 5.1% | 19.7% | 32.2% | 19.4% | 26.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $140M | $140M | $150M | $166M | $181M | $245M | $249M | $257M | $178M | $125M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying DD stock.
DuPont de Nemours, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -23.5x. The historical average is 8.4x.
DuPont de Nemours, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 13.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 4.7x.
DuPont de Nemours, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -4.1%. The historical average is 11.6%.
Based on historical data, DuPont de Nemours, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -23.5x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
DuPont de Nemours, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 3.26%.
DuPont de Nemours, Inc. has 30.3% gross margin and 12.6% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
DuPont de Nemours, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.1x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
PFAS litigation overhang
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Mix Shift Masks Core Earnings
Gross margin expanded to 35.1% in 2026Q2 from 32.3% a year earlier, per reported financials, yet net margin remains volatile, swinging from -19.2% to 7.9% over the past year, suggesting one-time distortions.
The gross margin improvement appears to reflect a richer product mix post-divestiture, but operating margin at 14.1% in 2026Q2 is below the 17.8% peak in 2025Q3, indicating that cost discipline is not fully offsetting volume declines. The negative net margins in several quarters are likely driven by impairment and restructuring charges, as suggested by the prior income statement analysis, so investors should focus on gross and operating margins as more reliable indicators of underlying earning power. The sustainability of these margins hinges on whether the Electronics & Industrial segment can maintain pricing power amid semiconductor cyclicality.
ROIC Stagnant Despite Portfolio Slimming
ROIC has hovered near 1% for the past ten quarters, with 2026Q2 at 1.2%, according to the ratio data, indicating that the divestiture-driven reshaping has not yet translated into improved returns on invested capital.
Despite a significantly smaller asset base post-divestiture, ROIC remains low, suggesting that the remaining businesses are not generating excess returns relative to their capital employed. The improvement in gross margin has been offset by lower asset turnover, which fell to 0.09 in 2026Q2 from 0.09 a year earlier, implying that efficiency gains are not materializing. This stagnation may indicate that the company is still in a transitional phase, and investors should monitor whether ROIC can climb toward the mid-single digits as the portfolio stabilizes.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens on DSO
Cash conversion cycle extended to 108 days in 2026Q2 from 89 days in 2025Q3, per the quarterly data, driven by a sharp rise in days sales outstanding to 86 from 71, suggesting potential collection slowdowns.
The increase in DSO is notable given the revenue contraction, which may indicate that customers are taking longer to pay or that the revenue mix is shifting toward slower-paying segments. Inventory days remained elevated at 93, while days payable outstanding rose to 72, but the net effect is a longer cash cycle, tying up more working capital. This trend warrants monitoring, as it could pressure free cash flow if it persists, though the company's strong liquidity position provides a buffer.
Leverage Low but Coverage Volatile
Debt-to-equity improved to 0.23 in 2026Q2 from 0.32 a year earlier, per balance sheet data, yet interest coverage swung from -0.08 in 2025Q4 to 5.00 in 2026Q2, reflecting earnings volatility.
The conservative leverage profile is a positive, with total debt reduced to $3.1B post-divestiture, but the interest coverage ratio's instability highlights the earnings volatility inherent in the remaining portfolio. The negative coverage in 2025Q4 was driven by operating losses, while the recent recovery to 5.00 suggests improved earnings power, but this is still below the 7.34 seen in 2024Q3. Given the PFAS litigation overhang, the low leverage provides some cushion, but investors should monitor whether coverage can stabilize above 5x.
Liquidity Bolstered by Cash Build
Current ratio improved to 2.43 in 2026Q2 from 1.41 a year earlier, per the balance sheet data, with cash more than doubling to $1.7B, providing a solid buffer against short-term obligations.
The quick ratio of 1.82 indicates that even without inventory, the company can cover current liabilities, which is reassuring given the cyclicality of its electronics exposure. The cash build appears to be a result of divestiture proceeds and disciplined cost management, but the negative retained earnings of -$24.3B suggest that the equity base is fragile. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a sharp semiconductor downturn, the liquidity position appears adequate, though the reliance on external capital markets for refinancing is low given the modest debt levels.
P/E Misleading Amid Earnings Distortions
The trailing P/E of -25.61 is meaningless due to negative earnings, while the forward P/E of 19.95 may overstate value, as per valuation data, given the one-time charges and divestiture noise.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for DuPont is the P/E, because the earnings base is distorted by impairments, restructuring costs, and divestiture accounting. Investors should instead use EV/EBITDA, which at 14.63 is more stable and reflects the company's operating performance, though it is still elevated relative to peers like Eastman (8.98). Alternatively, a sum-of-the-parts valuation based on segment-level multiples for Electronics & Industrial and Water & Protection would better capture the true value, as the market may be applying a conglomerate discount that obscures the specialty assets.