Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -48.8%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $93M | $99M | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $103M | $109M | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.39 | 2.54 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.21 | 0.42 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.78 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 40.2% | 40.2% | 14.1% | -166.0% | 11.7% | 28.5% | 17.8% |
| Operating Margin | -83.1% | -83.1% | -790.5% | -1030.1% | -536.2% | -176.0% | -459.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -202.1% | -202.1% | -1922.6% | -898.8% | -480.0% | -180.7% | -528.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -48.8% | -48.8% | -127.2% | — | -224.6% | -97.3% | -160.6% |
| ROA | -42.1% | -42.1% | -97.5% | -230.1% | -104.7% | -77.0% | -112.4% |
| ROIC | -14.3% | -14.3% | -36.3% | — | — | -367.8% | -598.9% |
| ROCE | -18.9% | -18.9% | -43.3% | -478.7% | -149.1% | -90.5% | -122.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.11 | — | — | 0.00 | 0.11 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.04 | 0.07 | — | — | -0.80 | -0.83 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -1.63 | -1.63 | -16.62 | -23.02 | -20.09 | -1279.00 | -8.09 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.32 | 5.32 | 1.57 | 1.12 | 3.03 | 6.44 | 4.87 |
| Quick Ratio | 5.29 | 5.29 | 1.17 | 0.37 | 1.11 | 4.83 | 3.68 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.81 | 0.11 | 0.79 | 4.42 | 3.25 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.43 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.21 |
| Inventory Turnover | 36.73 | 36.73 | 1.42 | 2.02 | 0.42 | 0.98 | 0.73 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 304.34 | 47.64 | 51.52 | 29.61 | 11.94 | 12.91 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.7% | 0.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.7% | 0.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $153M | $4M | $3M | $2M | $62008 | $26176 |
Imminent liquidity shortfall risk
According to current market data, DVLT trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 2.42, a valuation that appears to price in aggressive future growth expectations while ignoring the company's negative P/E of -0.64 and the lack of a clear path to sustainable profitability in the near term.
The current valuation multiple suggests investors are placing a significant growth premium on the company's proprietary data valuation engine, despite the absence of positive earnings. This pricing appears highly speculative when compared to peers, as the market seems to be betting on a successful pivot to a scalable SaaS model rather than the current consultancy-heavy revenue stream.
Based on reported figures, DVLT's ROIC has consistently languished in negative territory, reaching -9.9% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its aggressive investment in blockchain and AI-driven data monetization infrastructure.
The persistent negative return on invested capital suggests that the firm's heavy R&D spending and specialized engineering headcount are not yet generating sufficient returns to justify the capital deployed. Investors should monitor whether the company can achieve a positive inflection point in capital efficiency as it attempts to transition from a service-based model to a platform-centric one.
As reported in recent financial statements, the company's cash conversion cycle has been highly volatile, swinging from a peak of 793 days in 2026Q1 to negative values in previous quarters, reflecting an inconsistent ability to manage supplier leverage and customer payment terms effectively.
The extreme fluctuations in the cash conversion cycle suggest that DVLT's working capital management is heavily dependent on the timing of lumpy, project-based contracts. This lack of predictability in cash inflows may indicate that the company lacks the structural leverage over its customers required to maintain a stable and efficient operating cycle.
Based on the latest quarterly filings, DVLT's current ratio of 4.62 masks a precarious reality, as the company's cash reserves have dwindled to approximately $2 million, leaving it highly vulnerable to operational shocks given its -202% net margin and ongoing high cash burn.
While the current ratio appears superficially healthy, the underlying cash position is insufficient to sustain the current rate of operational expenditure for an extended period. This liquidity mismatch warrants further investigation, as the company may be forced to seek dilutive financing to maintain its status as a going concern.
Investors frequently misapply the price-to-sales ratio to DVLT, which obscures the company's underlying lack of unit economics and the potential for revenue inflation through non-cash barter transactions common in the blockchain sector, making it a poor proxy for true business health.
Relying on P/S in this context is dangerous because it ignores the massive operating losses and the high probability that top-line growth is being driven by one-time setup fees rather than recurring platform revenue. A more appropriate metric for this business model would be the 'Customer Acquisition Cost Payback Period' or 'Total Data Assets Under Management,' which better capture the sustainability of the company's growth strategy.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying DVLT stock.
Datavault AI Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.6x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Datavault AI Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -48.8%. The historical average is -131.7%.
Based on historical data, Datavault AI Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.6x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Datavault AI Inc. has 40.2% gross margin and -83.1% operating margin.