Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 11.6x · EV/EBITDA 4.9x · ROE 24.3%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.7B | $3.5B | $4.9B | $5.2B | $5.0B | $6.4B | $7.6B | $8.7B | $5.6B | $4.6B | $3.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $3.2B | $3.9B | $5.1B | $5.5B | $5.2B | $6.2B | $7.4B | $8.7B | $5.2B | $4.3B | $3.8B |
| P/E Ratio → | 11.58 | 11.13 | 15.94 | 18.45 | 21.40 | 90.28 | — | 24.97 | 24.03 | 29.57 | 22.42 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.61 | 0.82 | 1.24 | 1.42 | 1.50 | 2.13 | 3.07 | 3.15 | 2.20 | 2.06 | 2.00 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.45 | 2.63 | 4.02 | 4.19 | 4.05 | 5.08 | 5.28 | 5.48 | 4.54 | 3.87 | 4.34 |
| P/FCF | 20.27 | 8.48 | 8.03 | 9.54 | 7.83 | 20.29 | 48.96 | 23.18 | 19.64 | 24.57 | 12.86 |
| P/OCF | 5.03 | 6.50 | 6.75 | 8.14 | 6.74 | 15.69 | 30.10 | 17.15 | 14.08 | 16.22 | 9.99 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.93 | 1.28 | 1.48 | 1.54 | 2.06 | 2.98 | 3.15 | 2.04 | 1.90 | 1.93 |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.95 | 5.91 | 8.04 | 9.67 | 9.91 | 19.28 | 42.64 | 14.78 | 11.17 | 11.87 | 11.47 |
| EV / EBIT | 5.97 | 7.41 | 9.65 | 12.00 | 14.34 | 35.44 | 165.36 | 18.45 | 15.58 | 14.84 | 14.50 |
| EV / FCF | — | 9.61 | 8.29 | 9.97 | 8.02 | 19.61 | 47.50 | 23.24 | 18.19 | 22.67 | 12.46 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 41.3% | 41.3% | 40.1% | 39.7% | 39.9% | 36.6% | 36.5% | 43.4% | 41.3% | 39.8% | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | 12.5% | 12.5% | 12.6% | 11.7% | 11.5% | 6.1% | 1.9% | 17.3% | 14.1% | 11.8% | 12.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 7.3% | 7.3% | 7.7% | 7.6% | 6.9% | 2.4% | -0.1% | 12.6% | 9.2% | 7.0% | 8.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 24.3% | 24.3% | 24.7% | 22.4% | 18.5% | 5.2% | -0.2% | 24.7% | 19.1% | 14.9% | 20.2% |
| ROA | 5.0% | 5.0% | 5.2% | 5.0% | 4.6% | 1.5% | -0.1% | 8.7% | 7.2% | 5.4% | 7.1% |
| ROIC | 25.0% | 25.0% | 26.3% | 22.8% | 24.1% | 12.2% | 2.5% | 29.5% | 32.3% | 24.6% | 23.8% |
| ROCE | 20.2% | 20.2% | 17.3% | 13.9% | 13.0% | 6.2% | 1.5% | 19.1% | 19.5% | 16.3% | 17.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.65 | 1.65 | 1.70 | 1.61 | 1.42 | 1.27 | 1.11 | 0.93 | 0.52 | 0.38 | 0.67 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.26 | 3.26 | 3.28 | 3.56 | 3.39 | 4.97 | 9.24 | 2.51 | 1.38 | 1.28 | 1.83 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.35 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.10 | -0.17 | -0.16 | 0.01 | -0.33 | -0.30 | -0.14 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.25 | 0.41 | 0.23 | -0.67 | -1.31 | 0.04 | -0.89 | -0.99 | -0.37 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.13 | 0.26 | 0.43 | 0.18 | -0.69 | -1.46 | 0.06 | -1.45 | -1.90 | -0.41 |
| Interest Coverage | 6.30 | 6.30 | 6.58 | 8.20 | 9.60 | 4.54 | 1.22 | 12.97 | 8.85 | 8.87 | 9.22 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.11 | 1.11 | 1.25 | 1.54 | 1.58 | 1.79 | 1.81 | 1.79 | 1.51 | 1.34 | 1.35 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.11 | 1.11 | 1.25 | 1.54 | 1.58 | 1.79 | 1.81 | 1.79 | 1.51 | 1.27 | 1.28 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.89 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 0.62 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.50 | 0.59 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.72 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.17 | 15.04 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 28.77 | 26.06 | 36.68 | 29.43 | 24.74 | 17.28 | 26.80 | 29.14 | 120.71 | 93.74 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.6% | 9.0% | 6.3% | 5.4% | 4.7% | 1.1% | — | 4.0% | 4.2% | 3.4% | 4.5% |
| FCF Yield | 4.9% | 11.8% | 12.4% | 10.5% | 12.8% | 4.9% | 2.0% | 4.3% | 5.1% | 4.1% | 7.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 24.7% | 19.2% | 5.4% | 7.2% | 3.5% | 3.6% | 3.2% | 0.9% | 3.2% | 0.1% | 2.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 24.7% | 19.2% | 5.4% | 7.2% | 3.5% | 3.6% | 3.2% | 0.9% | 3.2% | 0.1% | 2.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $46M | $48M | $52M | $53M | $54M | $53M | $55M | $55M | $55M | $54M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EEFT stock.
Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 11.6x. The historical average is 35.1x. This places it at the 5th percentile of its historical range.
Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 4.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.2x.
Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 24.3%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is -17.7%.
Based on historical data, Euronet Worldwide, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 11.6x. This is at the 5th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. has 41.3% gross margin and 12.5% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Leverage and volatile cash conversion
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Low Multiples Reflect Earnings Skepticism
Based on EEFT's reported figures, the stock trades at 10.36x trailing earnings and 4.73x EV/EBITDA, below EVTC's 15.25x and 9.37x, suggesting the market is pricing in durable earnings pressure rather than a temporary dislocation.
A forward P/E of 6.72 against a trailing 10.36 implies consensus expects a meaningful earnings rebound, yet a price-to-sales multiple of 0.64 offers limited support if net margins remain as volatile as the reported 3.7% to 13.8% range. The discount to peers may reflect skepticism that the recent revenue slowdown is cyclical rather than structural, so investors should monitor whether forward estimates are realized before treating the multiple as mispriced.
Margin Swings Obscure Underlying Earnings Power
According to reported quarterly figures, EEFT's operating margin ranged from 7.1% to 17.0% over ten quarters, a spread that appears to reflect mix and classification effects more than steady pricing power.
The latest operating margin of 14.8% sits well above the 7.1% trough in 2026Q1, yet a gross margin swing from 12.4% to 43.8% is too wide to attribute to core operations alone. Relative to peers, the net margin of 9.8% is respectable but not clearly superior, so investors should weigh a trailing average over any single quarter when judging earning power.
ROIC Compounding Stalls Below Prior Peaks
Based on EEFT's reported ratios, ROIC has oscillated between 2.9% and 9.1% across ten quarters, with the latest reading of 4.7% well below the 8.7% reached in 2025Q3, indicating returns on invested capital are not compounding consistently.
ROE of 8.9% in the latest quarter is supported by leverage, with debt-to-equity near 1.78, so part of the equity return reflects financial structure rather than operating efficiency. The gap between ROE and ROIC suggests the capital base is increasingly debt-funded, which may narrow the spread over the cost of capital if margins compress again.
Debt Burden Elevated Against Thin Equity Cushion
As reported in financial statements, EEFT's debt-to-equity has ranged from 1.70 to 2.25 across the period, and debt-to-EBITDA of 10.99 in the latest quarter suggests debt service capacity depends heavily on earnings recovery.
Interest coverage of 8.35 in 2026Q3 looks comfortable on the surface but has swung from 3.35 to 9.61 over the window, a volatility that indicates coverage is sensitive to operating income timing. Investors should monitor refinancing exposure given the elevated leverage relative to the equity base, since a renewed margin contraction would compress coverage quickly.
Cash Buffer Thins Despite Adequate Current Ratio
Based on EEFT's reported figures, the current ratio of 1.42 in 2026Q3 sits within a 1.11 to 1.60 range, yet cash declined from $2.3B to $955.4M, suggesting the liquidity cushion has tightened materially even as working capital ratios remain above parity.
A current ratio above 1.0 provides some near-term coverage, but the sharp cash drawdown means reliance on receivables and short-term inflows has increased. Under a severe stress scenario, investors should watch whether working capital reversals, as seen in the erratic free cash flow margin, could pressure the buffer faster than the ratio alone implies.
Peer Discount May Be Warranted
The bear case reading of EEFT's reported ratios is that the discount to peers reflects a structurally weaker return profile, with ROIC of 4.7% trailing IMXI and EVTC despite a similar or higher multiple base.
Based on reported figures, the cheap multiple may be a value trap if ROIC remains depressed and leverage keeps the equity return flattered by debt. Investors should treat the low P/E as an analytical question rather than a conclusion, and the reliance on P/E alone may obscure the capital-structure drivers behind the stock's pricing.