Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -3.0x · EV/EBITDA 7.6x · ROE -58.4%. (2005–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.6B | $1.5B | $2.4B | $3.1B | $2.9B | $4.0B | $3.0B | $2.9B | $1.4B | $2.8B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise Value | $2.9B | $2.9B | $3.8B | $3.6B | $3.2B | $5.5B | $5.4B | $5.2B | $2.6B | $3.6B | $3.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | -3.01 | — | — | — | — | — | 59.30 | — | 10.34 | 18.63 | 19.82 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.68 | 0.67 | 1.15 | 1.79 | 1.85 | 2.84 | 2.72 | 0.86 | 0.40 | 0.85 | 0.70 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.03 | 1.01 | 0.95 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.42 | 0.76 | 0.82 |
| P/FCF | 22.47 | 75.96 | — | 239.15 | — | 16.07 | 16.28 | 514.34 | 9.25 | 18.79 | 13.82 |
| P/OCF | 7.19 | 6.96 | 21.37 | 22.62 | — | 11.36 | 10.09 | 21.78 | 6.40 | 12.88 | 10.28 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.27 | 1.79 | 2.08 | 2.05 | 3.88 | 4.78 | 1.57 | 0.70 | 1.10 | 0.99 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.57 | 10.37 | — | 23.47 | 21.57 | 27.64 | 29.75 | 11.90 | 6.78 | 22.42 | 9.66 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | 145.75 | — | — | 30.77 | 18.17 | 97.80 | 15.13 |
| EV / FCF | — | 143.40 | — | 278.34 | — | 21.96 | 28.62 | 943.23 | 16.40 | 24.12 | 19.72 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 59.8% | 59.8% | 56.0% | 58.0% | 55.6% | 54.5% | 53.9% | 42.1% | 30.9% | 31.2% | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | -0.8% | -0.8% | -36.8% | -3.8% | -4.6% | -4.4% | -5.9% | 6.1% | 6.5% | 0.9% | 6.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | -52.7% | -52.7% | -39.2% | -1.9% | -0.9% | 5.0% | 3.8% | -15.9% | 3.8% | 4.6% | 3.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -58.4% | -58.4% | -27.6% | -1.0% | -0.3% | 1.7% | 1.2% | -15.1% | 3.9% | 4.4% | 4.0% |
| ROA | -27.7% | -27.7% | -17.9% | -0.8% | -0.2% | 0.9% | 0.6% | -7.5% | 2.1% | 2.3% | 2.0% |
| ROIC | -0.4% | -0.4% | -14.8% | -1.3% | -1.1% | -0.8% | -0.8% | 3.0% | 4.0% | 0.5% | 4.1% |
| ROCE | -0.5% | -0.5% | -18.6% | -1.7% | -1.3% | -0.9% | -1.0% | 3.4% | 4.3% | 0.5% | 4.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.55 | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.46 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.34 | 0.28 | 0.42 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.01 | 5.01 | — | 3.54 | 2.25 | 10.82 | 13.39 | 5.66 | 3.16 | 6.58 | 3.44 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.90 | 0.53 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.32 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.32 | 0.21 | 0.35 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.88 | 4.88 | — | 3.30 | 2.09 | 7.42 | 12.82 | 5.41 | 2.96 | 4.95 | 2.89 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 67.44 | — | 39.19 | — | 5.89 | 12.34 | 428.89 | 7.15 | 5.33 | 5.90 |
| Interest Coverage | -32.29 | -32.29 | -13.41 | -2.40 | 0.88 | -3.18 | -1.25 | 1.42 | 2.88 | 0.92 | 7.98 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.02 | 2.02 | 2.17 | 2.43 | 1.41 | 2.25 | 1.68 | 1.64 | 1.63 | 1.89 | 1.61 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.04 | 1.04 | 1.13 | 1.16 | 0.65 | 1.90 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 1.22 | 1.49 | 1.25 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.66 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.20 | 0.38 | 0.20 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.59 | 0.45 | 0.38 | 0.37 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.45 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 0.57 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.54 | 1.54 | 1.69 | 1.53 | 1.63 | 1.82 | 0.92 | 3.37 | 5.10 | 5.29 | 6.19 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 71.89 | 70.49 | 62.32 | 62.44 | 65.25 | 168.38 | 61.63 | 38.48 | 107.30 | 83.95 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.7% | — | 9.7% | 5.4% | 5.0% |
| FCF Yield | 4.4% | 1.3% | — | 0.4% | — | 6.2% | 6.1% | 0.2% | 10.8% | 5.3% | 7.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 13.8% | 0.0% | 0.8% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 13.8% | 0.0% | 0.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $57M | $55M | $54M | $54M | $51M | $46M | $46M | $40M | $41M | $41M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 21 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ENOV stock.
Enovis Corporation's current P/E ratio is -3.0x. The historical average is 35.7x.
Enovis Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 7.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.2x.
Enovis Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -58.4%. The historical average is 8.8%.
Based on historical data, Enovis Corporation is trading at a P/E of -3.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Enovis Corporation has 59.8% gross margin and -0.8% operating margin.
Enovis Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.0x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent negative net margins
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Recovery Masks Underlying Strain
Gross margin improved to 61.6% in 2026Q2 from 54.8% in 2024Q4, yet operating margin remains thin at 3.0%, per reported financials, indicating acquisition-related costs still weigh on profitability.
The gross margin expansion suggests a favorable mix shift toward higher-margin reconstructive implants, but the operating margin of 3.0% in 2026Q2 remains far below the 8.4% seen in 2025Q4, implying that SG&A and amortization continue to absorb gains. Net margin of -0.2% in 2026Q2, while improved from -90.4% in 2025Q4, still reflects the drag from non-cash charges and integration costs, suggesting the underlying earning power is not yet visible in GAAP figures. Investors should monitor whether operating leverage can sustain as revenue growth stabilizes, given the high fixed-cost base.
ROIC Recovery Still in Early Stages
ROIC turned positive at 0.5% in 2026Q2, up from -11.6% in 2024Q4, but remains well below the cost of capital, as reported in quarterly data, indicating value creation is not yet established.
The improvement in ROIC from deeply negative levels suggests that the impairment charges and integration costs are abating, but a 0.5% return on invested capital is insufficient to cover the cost of capital, implying that the company is still in the early stages of recovering its return profile. ROE of -0.1% in 2026Q2, while dramatically better than -29.6% in 2025Q4, remains negative, reflecting the retained earnings deficit and the ongoing drag from amortization. The path to double-digit returns will require sustained margin expansion and efficient capital deployment, which has yet to be demonstrated.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens on Inventory
Cash conversion cycle extended to 231 days in 2026Q2 from 214 days in 2024Q1, driven by DIO of 245 days, per reported figures, indicating significant capital tied up in consignment inventory.
The cash conversion cycle of 231 days is heavily influenced by days inventory outstanding of 245 days, which reflects the consignment inventory model common in orthopedics, but the trend is worsening from 214 days in 2024Q1, suggesting inventory management is becoming less efficient. DSO of 69 days is relatively stable, while DPO of 83 days provides some offset, but the net effect is a prolonged cycle that consumes cash. This may indicate that the company is holding excess inventory to support surgeon demand, but it also raises concerns about obsolescence risk and the need for working capital discipline.
Leverage Creeps Higher as Equity Erodes
Debt-to-equity rose to 0.93 in 2026Q2 from 0.43 in 2024Q1, while interest coverage improved to 1.93, per balance sheet data, indicating rising leverage but still manageable debt service.
The doubling of debt-to-equity from 0.43 to 0.93 reflects both the accumulation of debt and the erosion of equity due to cumulative losses, with retained earnings swinging to -$1.5B. Interest coverage of 1.93 in 2026Q2 is a marked improvement from negative levels in prior quarters, but it remains thin, suggesting that operating income barely covers interest expense. The D/EBITDA ratio of 15.47 is elevated, though this is distorted by depressed EBITDA; as margins recover, this ratio could improve, but the current level indicates limited headroom for additional debt.
Liquidity Adequate but Cash Buffer Thin
Current ratio of 1.98 in 2026Q2 remains above 1.0, but cash dropped to $12.6M from $66.3M in 2024Q1, per balance sheet data, suggesting a thin liquidity cushion.
The current ratio of 1.98 indicates that current assets cover current liabilities nearly twice over, but the sharp decline in cash to $12.6M raises concerns about the company's ability to absorb short-term shocks without drawing on credit lines. The quick ratio of 1.00 suggests that excluding inventory, the company barely covers its current liabilities, which is typical for a business with high inventory levels. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a drop in elective procedures, the thin cash buffer could force the company to rely on external financing, which may be constrained given the current leverage.
EV/EBITDA Misleads on Turnaround
EV/EBITDA of 10.32 appears reasonable, but with EBITDA depressed by acquisition charges, this multiple overstates value, as reported in financials; adjusted EBITDA may be more appropriate.
The EV/EBITDA multiple of 10.32 is below the peer average, but it is calculated on an EBITDA that includes significant non-cash charges and integration costs, making it artificially low. A more accurate assessment would use adjusted EBITDA that excludes these one-time items, which would likely result in a higher multiple, indicating that the stock is not as cheap as it appears. Investors should focus on forward EV/EBITDA or price-to-sales, which at 0.67 suggests the market is pricing in a recovery, but the sustainability of that recovery remains unproven.