Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -4.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -10.0%. (2018–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $427M | $388M | $438M | $324M | $307M | $676M | $736M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $587M | $549M | $411M | $184M | $112M | $191M | $767M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -4.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.11 | 1.01 | 1.71 | 2.01 | 5.63 | 30.43 | 56.42 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.47 | 1.01 | 0.99 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 1.15 | 8.23 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.43 | 1.60 | 1.14 | 2.04 | 8.61 | 58.81 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 21.0% | 21.0% | 11.4% | 6.0% | -10.4% | -30.7% | -73.6% | -49.9% | -57.8% |
| Operating Margin | -28.8% | -28.8% | -51.2% | -95.3% | -273.9% | -404.4% | -447.8% | -199.5% | -165.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -10.8% | -10.8% | -17.3% | -26.4% | -50.5% | -26.6% | — | -141.3% | -82.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -10.0% | -10.0% | -9.0% | -8.0% | -5.0% | -1.7% | — | -117.4% | -47.3% |
| ROA | -4.7% | -4.7% | -5.5% | -5.5% | -3.7% | -1.3% | — | -33.2% | -16.5% |
| ROIC | -17.2% | -17.2% | -24.2% | -31.9% | -52.8% | -60.2% | -65.5% | -222.0% | — |
| ROCE | -14.5% | -14.5% | -18.7% | -22.6% | -22.3% | -22.0% | -67.2% | -58.3% | -41.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.20 | 0.13 | 0.10 | — | 0.44 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.42 | -0.06 | -0.26 | -0.38 | -0.82 | 0.35 | -0.10 | -0.62 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -15.36 | -15.36 | — | — | -5057.19 | -28.99 | -32.79 | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.19 | 2.19 | 1.84 | 2.99 | 3.15 | 10.80 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 1.45 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.19 | 2.19 | 1.84 | 2.99 | 3.15 | 10.80 | 0.31 | 0.34 | 1.44 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.12 | 1.12 | 1.05 | 2.34 | 2.82 | 10.35 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 1.14 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.40 | 0.32 | 0.20 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.25 | 0.20 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1885.36 | 144.74 | 111.32 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 36.71 | 90.36 | 100.19 | 127.62 | 224.78 | 198.99 | 31.41 | 68.49 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $133M | $108M | $91M | $69M | $68M | $69M | $69M | $69M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EVGO stock.
EVgo, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -4.4x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
EVgo, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -10.0%. The historical average is -28.4%.
Based on historical data, EVgo, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -4.4x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
EVgo, Inc. has 21.0% gross margin and -28.8% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Capital-intensive growth with negative returns
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Valuation Reflects Speculative Growth Bet
The current P/S ratio of 1.15 and P/B of 0.49, as reported in recent financial statements, price EVgo at a discount to tangible assets, yet this valuation implies the market assigns minimal value to future earnings potential given the company's persistent negative returns.
With a P/E ratio of -4.55, traditional earnings-based valuation is inapplicable, shifting focus to price-to-sales and price-to-book. The P/B ratio below 1.0 suggests the market values the company's physical charging infrastructure at less than its accounting cost, a reflection of severe doubt about future profitability. The forward EV/EBITDA of 14.13 appears to be a forward-looking estimate that is not yet supported by historical EBITDA generation, indicating high execution risk in reaching that profitability threshold.
Gross Margin Collapse Signals Operational Stress
EVgo's gross margin plummeted to 8.9% in 2026Q2, a stark deterioration from the 38.0% peak in 2025Q4, suggesting a fundamental shift in the revenue mix or cost structure that is severely undermining the company's core earning power.
The sharp drop in gross margin, from double-digits to single-digit levels, appears to indicate that newer revenue streams or charging sessions are carrying significantly lower margins, possibly due to higher energy pass-through costs or promotional pricing. This collapse is compounded by a persistent and substantial operating margin deficit, with losses consistently exceeding 40% of revenue in recent quarters. The negative operating leverage suggests that the company's fixed overhead, primarily SG&A, is overwhelming any gross profit, making the path to profitability dependent on both margin recovery and significant scale.
Negative Returns on Invested Capital Persist
Return on invested capital has remained negative over the past ten quarters, reaching -7.0% in 2026Q2, which indicates that the company's heavy capital investments in charging infrastructure are not generating any accounting profit and are actively eroding the capital base.
The consistently negative ROIC, coupled with a negative ROE, confirms that the business is destroying value from a shareholder's perspective on a book basis. The slight improvement from the -5.9% range in early 2024 to -7.0% in mid-2026 is not meaningful progress but rather a fluctuation within a deeply unprofitable zone. This trend underscores that the company's growth model is not yet translating into positive returns, a critical concern for a capital-intensive industrial business where compounding returns is essential for long-term viability.
Adequate Liquidity Masked by Cash Burn Trend
Despite a current ratio of 2.19 in 2026Q2, as reported in the company's balance sheet, the trend shows a steady decline from a peak of 2.93 in 2024Q1, indicating that operational and investment cash consumption is steadily eroding the liquidity cushion.
The quick ratio mirrors the current ratio, confirming that inventory is not a material component of current assets, which is logical for a service-based charging network. However, the healthy ratio is largely a function of a recent capital infusion that boosted cash and equity, rather than operational cash generation. Given the severe negative free cash flow margin of -128.6%, this liquidity position is temporary and reliant on continued access to external financing; under a scenario where capital markets access tightens, the burn rate could rapidly strain this adequacy.
Return on Equity Misleads for Growth Ventures
The most commonly misapplied ratio is ROE, which stands at -6.3% for EVGO; this metric is misleading because it is distorted by volatile equity from frequent capital raises and does not reflect the true operational performance or asset efficiency of this infrastructure-heavy growth company.
For a company like EVgo, which relies on episodic equity issuances to fund its asset base, the equity figure fluctuates wildly, making ROE an unreliable gauge of management effectiveness. A more relevant metric would be Return on Assets (ROA) or, ideally, a measure of infrastructure utilization and revenue per charger, to assess whether the deployed capital is generating meaningful top-line growth. Focusing on ROE in this context obscures the real issue: the company is deploying significant capital but generating negative returns on those assets, as evidenced by the negative ROIC trend.