Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 43.4x · EV/EBITDA 27.5x · ROE 7.0%. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $23.4B | $24.6B | $22.2B | $14.8B | $14.3B | $14.4B | $9.7B | $10.4B | $7.0B | $7.1B | $9.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $27.4B | $28.7B | $22.6B | $16.3B | $15.6B | $16.0B | $11.8B | $15.5B | $11.9B | $12.6B | $11.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 43.37 | 45.82 | — | 79.91 | 27.34 | — | — | — | — | 27.76 | 30.21 |
| P/S Ratio | 5.21 | 5.50 | 6.09 | 4.60 | 5.57 | 6.75 | 8.49 | 5.16 | 3.83 | 3.98 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.76 | 2.92 | 3.01 | 2.31 | 2.07 | 2.08 | 1.48 | 1.99 | 1.26 | 1.25 | 1.36 |
| P/FCF | 31.12 | 32.80 | 45.20 | 76.74 | 59.02 | 31.09 | — | 41.76 | 27.58 | — | 26.30 |
| P/OCF | 26.86 | 28.31 | 39.22 | 23.93 | 26.86 | 29.99 | — | 35.51 | 26.13 | — | 26.16 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.40 | 6.19 | 5.06 | 6.05 | 7.48 | 10.30 | 7.68 | 6.50 | 7.07 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.52 | 28.79 | 35.37 | 24.49 | 29.08 | 36.57 | — | 37.16 | 33.95 | 34.52 | 24.96 |
| EV / EBIT | 45.43 | 37.71 | 100.44 | 38.37 | 38.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 38.22 | 45.93 | 84.50 | 64.02 | 34.45 | — | 62.12 | 46.78 | — | 30.07 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 24.9% | 24.9% | 31.9% | 30.5% | 32.0% | 30.3% | 14.9% | 31.1% | 30.3% | 31.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.5% | 13.5% | 7.9% | 9.2% | 6.7% | 1.9% | -38.8% | -1.7% | -6.0% | -2.2% | — |
| Net Profit Margin | 12.4% | 12.4% | -0.8% | 5.7% | 21.7% | -8.9% | -52.1% | -15.4% | -8.2% | 14.3% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.0% | 7.0% | -0.4% | 2.8% | 8.0% | -2.8% | -10.1% | -5.8% | -2.7% | 3.9% | 4.3% |
| ROA | 4.1% | 4.1% | -0.3% | 1.7% | 4.9% | -1.7% | -5.3% | -2.8% | -1.3% | 3.4% | 13.3% |
| ROIC | 4.5% | 4.5% | 2.7% | 2.8% | 1.6% | 0.4% | -3.5% | -0.3% | -0.8% | -0.3% | 3.7% |
| ROCE | 4.8% | 4.8% | 2.9% | 3.0% | 1.7% | 0.4% | -4.1% | -0.3% | -1.0% | -0.6% | 17.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.40 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.52 | 0.57 | 1.08 | 0.91 | 1.02 | 0.22 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.14 | 5.14 | 4.68 | 4.36 | 5.51 | 8.31 | — | 13.58 | 14.40 | 15.88 | 3.49 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.48 | 0.05 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.32 | 0.97 | 0.88 | 0.97 | 0.20 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.08 | 4.08 | 0.56 | 2.25 | 2.27 | 3.56 | — | 12.18 | 13.94 | 15.11 | 3.12 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.42 | 0.73 | 7.76 | 5.00 | 3.36 | — | 20.36 | 19.21 | — | 3.76 |
| Interest Coverage | 27.18 | 27.18 | 1.08 | 1.99 | 2.68 | -0.28 | -3.84 | -1.06 | -0.04 | -0.38 | -3.58 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.46 | 1.46 | 2.67 | 2.17 | 2.43 | 1.83 | 3.27 | 1.76 | 0.86 | 1.57 | 5.65 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.46 | 1.46 | 2.67 | 2.17 | 2.43 | 1.83 | 3.27 | 1.76 | 0.86 | 1.57 | 5.65 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.12 | 1.12 | 2.33 | 1.79 | 2.08 | 1.60 | 2.43 | 1.38 | 0.44 | 0.92 | 5.42 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.15 | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 18.65 | 11.39 | 13.93 | 17.45 | 11.28 | 38.57 | 12.46 | 21.98 | 17.20 | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.3% | 2.2% | — | 1.3% | 3.7% | — | — | — | — | 3.6% | 3.3% |
| FCF Yield | 3.2% | 3.0% | 2.2% | 1.3% | 1.7% | 3.2% | — | 2.4% | 3.6% | — | 3.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 4.3% | 0.4% | 0.7% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 4.3% | 0.4% | 0.7% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $250M | $240M | $235M | $244M | $232M | $232M | $231M | $232M | $211M | $321M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FWONK stock.
Liberty Media Corporation's current P/E ratio is 43.4x. The historical average is 42.2x. This places it at the 60th percentile of its historical range.
Liberty Media Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 27.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 31.7x.
Liberty Media Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 7.0%. The historical average is 6.7%.
Based on historical data, Liberty Media Corporation is trading at a P/E of 43.4x. This is at the 60th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Liberty Media Corporation has 24.9% gross margin and 13.5% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Liberty Media Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
F1 concentration and event risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Compression from Self-Promotion
Gross margin fell from 48.0% in 2024Q1 to 35.2% in 2026Q2, per recent financial statements, reflecting the shift to self-promoted events like Las Vegas and higher event costs.
The decline in gross margin appears tied to the Las Vegas self-promotion model, where FWONK bears the capital expenditure and operational risk instead of receiving a flat promotion fee. Operating margin has been volatile, swinging from -12.5% in 2025Q1 to 20.9% in 2025Q2, but 2026Q2's 9.4% suggests a stabilization at lower levels. Net margin is distorted by non-operating items, as seen in 2025Q2's 28.5% versus 2026Q2's 0.5%, so investors should focus on operating margin and cash flow to gauge true earning power.
ROIC Remains Thin but Improving
ROIC averaged around 1% over the last ten quarters, with 2026Q2 at 0.6%, according to reported figures, indicating modest returns on the large capital base post-MotoGP acquisition.
ROIC has been consistently low, ranging from -0.5% in 2025Q1 to 2.7% in 2025Q2, reflecting the heavy investment in acquisitions and self-promoted events. The MotoGP purchase added significant goodwill and intangibles, which now constitute 43% of total assets, diluting returns. While ROE has been more volatile due to non-operating gains, the underlying return on capital appears to be gradually improving as the Las Vegas event matures, but it remains below the cost of capital, suggesting that value creation is still in its early stages.
Working Capital Swings Reflect Event Timing
Cash conversion cycle is not calculable due to missing inventory data, but DSO has ranged from 9 to 31 days, while DPO swung from 32 to 135 days, per SEC filings, indicating significant timing effects.
The wide swings in DPO, from 32 days in 2025Q4 to 135 days in 2025Q1, reflect the timing of payments to teams and suppliers around the race calendar. Asset turnover is extremely low at 0.06 in 2026Q2, consistent with a capital-intensive, event-driven business. The lack of inventory data suggests that inventory is not a material component, but the working capital volatility highlights the importance of cash flow timing in assessing operational efficiency.
Leverage Elevated but Manageable
Debt-to-equity rose to 0.87 in 2025Q3 post-MotoGP, then settled to 0.59 by 2026Q2, while interest coverage improved to 8.89 in 2025Q4, per recent financial statements, indicating manageable debt service.
The temporary spike in leverage was driven by the MotoGP acquisition, but the subsequent reduction to 0.59 suggests disciplined deleveraging. Interest coverage has been volatile, dipping to -3.80 in 2024Q4 due to negative EBIT, but recovering to 8.89 in 2025Q4 and 1.49 in 2026Q2. The D/EBITDA ratio of 24.62 in 2026Q2 is elevated, but this is partly due to seasonal EBITDA troughs; investors should monitor the trajectory as the Las Vegas event matures and MotoGP integration progresses.
Liquidity Buffer Compresses After Acquisition
Current ratio fell from 2.67 in 2024Q4 to 1.27 in 2026Q2, while cash dropped from $2.6B to $1.5B, as reported in financial statements, reflecting the cash outlay for MotoGP.
The liquidity position has weakened but remains adequate, with a current ratio above 1.0. The quick ratio equals the current ratio, indicating minimal inventory dependence. However, the compressed liquidity buffer could be strained if a race cancellation or economic downturn hits sponsorship revenue. The $1.1B deferred revenue in 2026Q2 provides some forward visibility, but the reliance on F1's popularity and the capital-intensive self-promotion model warrant monitoring.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA in Seasonal Business
EV/EBITDA of 30.2x appears rich, but the metric is distorted by seasonal EBITDA troughs and the team payment structure, which acts like a minority interest, per recent filings.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for FWONK is EV/EBITDA, because EBITDA is depressed in off-season quarters and inflated during the racing season, making the multiple appear higher than the underlying cash generation. Additionally, team payments are a variable cost tied to EBITDA, effectively reducing the cash available to shareholders, so EV/EBITDA overstates value. Investors should use EV/EBITDAR (adding back rent and team payments) or EV/operating cash flow to better capture the economics of the league-owner model.