Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Formula One Group (FWONK) vs Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | LYV | 8.8% revenue growth vs FWONK's -100.0% |
| Value | FWONK | Lower P/E (52.1x vs 101.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | FWONK | 43.8% net margin vs LYV's 3.7% |
| Stability / Safety | FWONK | Beta 0.51 vs LYV's 0.90 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | LYV | +13.1% vs FWONK's -5.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FWONK | 42.6% ROA vs LYV's 3.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Formula One Group is the commercial rights holder for the global Formula 1 motorsport championship. It generates revenue primarily from race promotion fees (about 30%), media rights sales (about 35%), and sponsorship deals (about 20%), with the remainder from hospitality and other sources. Its key moat is the exclusive, long-term commercial rights to the world's premier motorsport series — a globally recognized brand with high barriers to entry.
Live Nation Entertainment is the world's largest live entertainment company, operating concerts, festivals, and venue management globally. It generates revenue primarily through concert promotion and production (~60%), ticketing services via Ticketmaster (~30%), and sponsorship/advertising deals (~10%). Its key competitive advantage is its vertically integrated ecosystem—controlling artists, venues, ticketing, and sponsorships—which creates powerful network effects and barriers to entry.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
LYV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FWONK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
LYV is the larger business by revenue, generating $24.6B annually — 24.0x FWONK's $1.0B. FWONK is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LYV's 3.7%. On growth, LYV holds the edge at +11.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | LYVLive Nation Enter… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $24.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $231M | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $449M | $899M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $279M | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -18.4% | +46.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +4.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +43.8% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.3% | +6.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +11.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -56.0% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | LYVLive Nation Enter… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20.4B | $38.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19.4B | $33.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -675.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 52.13x | 101.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 42.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.48x | 114.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LYV scores 6/9 vs FWONK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | LYVLive Nation Enter… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +45.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +42.6% | +3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +3.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.5% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.1B | -$4.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $7.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.35x | 3.95x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in FWONK five years ago would be worth $20,766 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,461 for LYV. Over the past 12 months, LYV leads with a +13.1% total return vs FWONK's -5.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LYV at 31.0% vs FWONK's 11.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | LYVLive Nation Enter… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.6% | +11.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.0% | +13.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.1% | +125.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.7% | +74.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +269.5% | +637.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.6% | +31.0% |
Risk & Volatility
FWONK is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LYV's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYV currently trades 92.5% from its 52-week high vs FWONK's 83.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | LYVLive Nation Enter… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.51x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $109.36 | $175.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $75.26 | $112.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.8% | +92.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.7 | 59.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FWONK as "Buy" and LYV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.2% upside for FWONK (target: $119) vs 11.8% for LYV (target: $181).
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | LYVLive Nation Enter… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $119.25 | $181.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 100 | 230.02 | +130.0% |
| Live Nation Enterta… (LYV) | 100 | 248.34 | +148.3% |
Formula One Group (FWONK) returned +108% over 5 years vs Live Nation Enterta… (LYV)'s +75%. A $10,000 investment in FWONK 5 years ago would be worth $20,766 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | $0.00 | $0.00 | — |
| Live Nation Enterta… (LYV) | $7.8B | $25.2B | +222.0% |
Formula One Group's revenue grew from $0M (2016) to $0M (2025) — a 0.0% CAGR. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.'s revenue grew from $7.8B (2016) to $25.2B (2025) — a 13.9% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 14.3% | -0.8% | -105.7% |
| Live Nation Enterta… (LYV) | 0.0% | 2.0% | +5134.0% |
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.'s net margin went from 0% (2016) to 2% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 4 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 27.8 | 101.8 | +266.2% |
| Live Nation Enterta… (LYV) | 109 | 47.3 | -56.6% |
Formula One Group has traded in a 27x–102x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~102x. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. has traded in a 47x–109x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~-676x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 1.02 | 0 | -100.0% |
| Live Nation Enterta… (LYV) | -0.23 | -0.24 | -4.3% |
Formula One Group's EPS grew from $1.02 (2016) to $0.00 (2025) — a -100% CAGR. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.23 (2016) to $-0.24 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Formula One Group generated $908M FCF in 2025 (+96% vs 2021). Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. generated $334M FCF in 2025 (-79% vs 2021).
FWONK vs LYV: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FWONK or LYV a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Formula One Group (FWONK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FWONK or LYV?
Over the past 5 years, Formula One Group (FWONK) delivered a total return of +107.7%, compared to +74.6% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV). A $10,000 investment in FWONK five years ago would be worth approximately $21K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LYV returned +637.3% versus FWONK's +269.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FWONK or LYV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Formula One Group (FWONK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.51β versus Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.'s 0.90β — meaning LYV is approximately 78% more volatile than FWONK relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — FWONK or LYV?
Formula One Group (FWONK) is the more profitable company, earning 43.8% net margin versus 2.0% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 43.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LYV leads at 5.0% versus -3.4% for FWONK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LYV leads at 46.2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is FWONK or LYV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Formula One Group (FWONK) trades at 52.1x forward P/E versus 101.0x for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — 48.9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FWONK: 30.2% to $119.25.
06Which pays a better dividend — FWONK or LYV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is FWONK or LYV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Formula One Group (FWONK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.51), +269.5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FWONK: +269.5%, LYV: +637.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FWONK and LYV?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 27%