FWONK
Formula One Group
Entertainment
Market Cap$20.83B
5Y Perf.+174.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FWONK vs LYV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
LYV
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
Entertainment
Market Cap$38.65B
5Y Perf.+238.3%
FWONK vs LYV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FWONK | LYV |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $20.83B | $38.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.02B | $25.61B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $449M | $84M |
| Gross Margin | -18.4% | 40.3% |
| Operating Margin | -3.4% | 3.4% |
| Forward P/E | 57.5x | 115.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $12.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.05B | $7.11B |
FWONK vs LYV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FWONK
LYV
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 100 | 274.4 | +174.4% |
| Live Nation Enterta… (LYV) | 100 | 338.3 | +238.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FWONK vs LYV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FWONK leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FWONK
Formula One Group
The Income Pick
FWONK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.35
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35
- Beta 0.35
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
LYV
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
The Growth Play
LYV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.8%, EPS growth -108.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.7%
- 6.2% 10Y total return vs FWONK's 418.1%
- 8.8% revenue growth vs FWONK's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | LYV | 8.8% revenue growth vs FWONK's -100.0% |
| Value | FWONK | Lower P/E (57.5x vs 115.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | FWONK | 43.8% margin vs LYV's 0.3% |
| Stability / Safety | FWONK | Beta 0.35 vs LYV's 0.80 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | LYV | +24.0% vs FWONK's -0.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FWONK | 42.6% ROA vs LYV's 0.4% |
FWONK vs LYV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
FWONK vs LYV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFWONKLAGGINGLYV
LYVLive Nation Entertain…
1leads
FWONKFormula One Group
1leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs LYVMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FWONK2/2
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
LYV5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FWONK and LYV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LYV is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.6B annually — 25.0x FWONK's $1.0B. FWONK is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LYV's 0.3%. On growth, LYV holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | LYVLive Nation Enter… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $25.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $231M | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $449M | $84M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $279M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -18.4% | +40.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +3.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +43.8% | +0.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.3% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -4.8% |
Evenly matched — FWONK and LYV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FWONK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | LYVLive Nation Enter… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20.8B | $38.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19.8B | $44.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -692.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 57.49x | 115.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 21.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.94x | 115.84x |
FWONK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FWONK and LYV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LYV scores 5/9 vs FWONK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | LYVLive Nation Enter… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +4.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +42.6% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +19.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.5% | +13.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 6.84x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.1B | $5.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $7.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $12.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.35x | 3.68x |
Evenly matched — FWONK and LYV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LYV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FWONK five years ago would be worth $21,768 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,800 for LYV. Over the past 12 months, LYV leads with a +24.0% total return vs FWONK's -0.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LYV at 28.8% vs FWONK's 9.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | LYVLive Nation Enter… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.7% | +14.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -0.1% | +24.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.5% | +113.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +117.7% | +108.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +418.1% | +622.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.3% | +28.8% |
LYV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FWONK and LYV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FWONK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LYV's 0.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYV currently trades 94.9% from its 52-week high vs FWONK's 85.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | LYVLive Nation Enter… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $109.36 | $175.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $80.15 | $125.34 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.5% | +94.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 63.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 2.8M |
Evenly matched — FWONK and LYV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FWONK as "Buy" and LYV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.4% upside for FWONK (target: $116) vs 8.8% for LYV (target: $181).
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | LYVLive Nation Enter… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $116.33 | $181.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
FWONK leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). LYV leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
Best OverallFormula One Group (FWONK)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FWONK vs LYV: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FWONK or LYV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
(LYV) is the stronger pick with 8. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Formula One Group (FWONK). Analysts rate Formula One Group (FWONK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FWONK or LYV?
Over the past 5 years, Formula One Group (FWONK) delivered a total return of +117.
7%, compared to +108. 0% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LYV returned +622. 5% versus FWONK's +418. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FWONK or LYV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Formula One Group (FWONK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
35β versus Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. 's 0. 80β — meaning LYV is approximately 125% more volatile than FWONK relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — FWONK or LYV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
(LYV) is pulling ahead at 8. 8% versus -100. 0% for Formula One Group (FWONK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Formula One Group grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -108. 8% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FWONK or LYV?
Formula One Group (FWONK) is the more profitable company, earning 43.
8% net margin versus 2. 0% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 43. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LYV leads at 5. 9% versus -3. 4% for FWONK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LYV leads at 23. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FWONK or LYV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Formula One Group (FWONK) trades at 57.
5x forward P/E versus 115. 8x for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — 58. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FWONK: 24. 4% to $116. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — FWONK or LYV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is FWONK or LYV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Formula One Group (FWONK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
35), +418. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FWONK: +418. 1%, LYV: +622. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FWONK and LYV?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 6%
- Gross Margin > 24%
Revenue Growth>
%
(FWONK: -257.8% · LYV: 12.1%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.