Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -49.9x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -26.4%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9.7B | $6.5B | $7.9B | $3.8B | $2.1B | $2.1B | $3.3B | $2.2B | $2.0B | $882M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $9.7B | $6.5B | $7.8B | $4.1B | $2.3B | $2.3B | $3.5B | $2.3B | $2.0B | $857M | $1.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | -49.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 147.22 | — | — | 285.83 |
| P/S Ratio | 19.03 | 12.73 | 20.63 | 12.23 | 7.33 | 7.02 | 14.89 | 9.46 | 10.94 | 5.54 | 10.93 |
| P/B Ratio | 14.27 | 9.84 | 10.31 | 8.34 | 3.91 | 3.51 | 5.02 | 3.33 | 11.41 | 6.38 | 10.66 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 232.05 | 45.94 | 207.35 |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | 83.50 | — | — | 105.16 | 34.57 | 101.60 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 12.82 | 20.45 | 13.16 | 8.26 | 7.98 | 15.67 | 9.50 | 10.78 | 5.38 | 10.87 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 1514.34 | — | — | — | 267.84 | 138.80 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 857364.65 | 293.34 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 228.56 | 44.66 | 206.28 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 77.5% | 77.5% | 75.5% | 76.0% | 75.6% | 77.3% | 59.2% | 83.7% | 86.2% | 86.8% | 85.9% |
| Operating Margin | -17.1% | -17.1% | -31.9% | -40.9% | -29.1% | -11.2% | -54.9% | -21.2% | -7.2% | -1.4% | 3.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -37.0% | -37.0% | -38.2% | -42.8% | -35.1% | -16.9% | -53.5% | 6.5% | -7.1% | -0.1% | 4.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -26.4% | -26.4% | -23.8% | -27.2% | -17.8% | -7.9% | -18.0% | 3.6% | -8.3% | -0.1% | 4.3% |
| ROA | -20.1% | -20.1% | -15.3% | -13.4% | -9.0% | -4.6% | -13.2% | 3.0% | -6.9% | -0.1% | 3.6% |
| ROIC | -9.3% | -9.3% | -12.6% | -12.5% | -7.4% | -2.9% | -12.1% | -9.1% | -7.6% | -1.5% | 3.3% |
| ROCE | -10.3% | -10.3% | -13.9% | -13.8% | -8.0% | -3.3% | -14.4% | -10.7% | -8.2% | -1.8% | 4.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.13 | 0.83 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.41 | 0.11 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 247.50 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.07 | -0.09 | 0.63 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.26 | 0.02 | -0.17 | -0.18 | -0.06 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 182.49 | — | — | — | -7.66 | -0.72 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -3.49 | -1.28 | -1.08 |
| Interest Coverage | -40.65 | -40.65 | -13.50 | -8.81 | -6.17 | -2.68 | -8.37 | -18.51 | — | — | 6.98 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.69 | 4.69 | 5.99 | 5.34 | 6.13 | 7.67 | 9.45 | 4.56 | 5.81 | 5.58 | 7.09 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.06 | 4.06 | 5.22 | 4.78 | 5.61 | 7.31 | 9.13 | 3.82 | 5.38 | 5.16 | 6.68 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.75 | 2.75 | 4.25 | 3.99 | 4.87 | 6.53 | 8.14 | 3.02 | 4.63 | 4.44 | 5.65 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.57 | 0.39 | 0.33 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 0.29 | 0.88 | 0.96 | 0.85 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.63 | 1.80 | 1.82 | 2.90 | 5.80 | 0.91 | 1.89 | 1.88 | 2.36 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 78.12 | 57.82 | 46.22 | 46.55 | 41.51 | 58.51 | 59.17 | 37.60 | 38.17 | 45.64 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.7% | — | — | 0.3% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.4% | 2.2% | 0.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $57M | $53M | $48M | $47M | $46M | $44M | $41M | $35M | $34M | $36M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GKOS stock.
Glaukos Corporation's current P/E ratio is -49.9x. The historical average is 147.2x.
Glaukos Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -26.4%. The historical average is -14.6%.
Based on historical data, Glaukos Corporation is trading at a P/E of -49.9x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Glaukos Corporation has 77.5% gross margin and -17.1% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent operating losses
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Despite Losses
Gross margin improved from 76.3% in 2024Q1 to 81.7% in 2026Q2, per financial statements, while operating margin narrowed from -45.6% to -9.3%, indicating strong pricing power and operating leverage.
The gross margin expansion of over 500 basis points suggests that GKOS is gaining pricing power or benefiting from a favorable product mix, which is a positive signal for future profitability. Operating margin improvement from -45.6% to -9.3% over the same period indicates that revenue growth is outpacing expense growth, a sign of emerging operating leverage. However, the company remains loss-making at the operating level, and the net margin in 2025Q4 was distorted by a large non-operating charge, so investors should focus on operating margin trends rather than net income.
Returns Still Negative but Improving
ROIC improved from -3.8% in 2024Q1 to -1.9% in 2026Q2, as reported in financial statements, while ROE turned less negative, indicating that capital efficiency is gradually improving despite ongoing losses.
The improvement in ROIC from -3.8% to -1.9% suggests that the company is becoming more efficient at deploying its capital, even though it remains value-destructive. The gap between ROIC and ROE (which was -2.7% in 2026Q2) reflects the impact of leverage and equity issuance, but the trend is positive. The improvement is driven by margin expansion rather than asset turnover, which remains low at 0.20, indicating that the business is asset-light but still scaling. Investors should monitor whether ROIC can turn positive as revenue growth continues.
Working Capital Drag Persists
Cash conversion cycle lengthened from 194 days in 2024Q1 to 175 days in 2026Q2, per reported figures, with DSO rising from 46 to 63 days, indicating slower collections that may strain liquidity.
The cash conversion cycle remains elevated, driven by a high DIO of 163 days and a DSO of 63 days, which suggests that inventory and receivables are tying up significant cash. While the CCC has improved slightly from its peak of 242 days in 2024Q3, it is still well above typical medical device peers, indicating potential inefficiencies in working capital management. The increase in DSO from 46 to 63 days may reflect a shift in customer mix or payment terms, and investors should monitor whether this trend reverses as the company scales.
Deleveraging Reduces Refinancing Risk
Debt-to-equity fell from 0.85 in 2024Q1 to 0.15 in 2026Q2, per balance sheet data, with total debt down to $102.8M, significantly reducing interest burden and refinancing risk.
The dramatic reduction in leverage from 0.85 to 0.15 indicates a strategic deleveraging, likely through debt repayment or equity issuance, which strengthens the balance sheet. Interest coverage is negative due to operating losses, but the lower debt level reduces the risk of covenant breaches and refinancing pressure. The company's ability to service debt is not yet comfortable, but the trend is favorable, and the low D/E ratio provides a cushion for continued investment in growth.
Liquidity Buffer Remains Robust
Current ratio improved to 5.04 in 2026Q2 from 5.38 in 2024Q1, per financial statements, with quick ratio at 4.46, indicating a strong liquidity position to fund operations and growth.
The current ratio of 5.04 and quick ratio of 4.46 suggest that GKOS has ample short-term assets to cover its liabilities, even under stress scenarios. The high liquidity is partly due to the asset-light model and significant cash reserves, which provide a buffer against ongoing operating losses. However, the company is still burning cash in some quarters, so the liquidity position could deteriorate if losses persist, but the current level appears adequate to support the accelerating growth strategy.
Misapplied P/S Multiple
The price-to-sales ratio of 21.09, based on reported figures, is often misapplied to GKOS because it ignores the company's negative earnings and cash flow, obscuring the true cost of growth.
For a company with persistent operating losses and thin free cash flow margins, the P/S multiple is not a reliable valuation metric because it does not account for the capital required to generate sales. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBITDA or EV/Revenue, but even these need to be adjusted for the heavy stock-based compensation that inflates cash flow. Investors should consider the path to profitability and the sustainability of gross margin expansion, rather than relying solely on revenue multiples, which can be misleading for high-growth but unprofitable companies.