Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA 0.1x · ROE -35.9%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1M | $32M | $317M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $938702 | $31M | $315M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.04 | — | 26.43 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.03 | 0.56 | 7.67 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.01 | 0.51 | 6.97 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 0.06 | 1.43 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 0.06 | 1.43 | 17.52 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.56 | 7.62 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 0.06 | 2.04 | 25.14 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 0.31 | — | 23.91 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 1.41 | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 40.2% | 40.2% | 50.3% | 54.0% | 23.9% | 23.0% | 22.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | 5.4% | 16.5% | 28.4% | -1.7% | 9.8% | -10.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -34.5% | -34.5% | 29.3% | 24.4% | -1.6% | 9.9% | -10.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -35.9% | -35.9% | 36.6% | 53.3% | -9.0% | 129.6% | — |
| ROA | -28.1% | -28.1% | 28.1% | 36.8% | -3.0% | 23.7% | -18.7% |
| ROIC | 4.3% | 4.3% | 17.9% | 63.1% | -5.2% | 45.3% | -46.6% |
| ROCE | 5.5% | 5.5% | 20.3% | 60.6% | -9.3% | 106.2% | -183.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.50 | 1.20 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.48 | 0.38 | — | 1.88 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.01 | -0.05 | -0.34 | 0.20 | 0.71 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.03 | -0.03 | -0.16 | -0.82 | — | 1.11 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.02 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -94.46 | -94.46 | 67.48 | 61.61 | -2.54 | 57.55 | -109.96 |
Net cash position: cash ($4M) exceeds total debt ($4M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.42 | 3.11 | 1.28 | 1.21 | 0.78 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.42 | 3.11 | 0.94 | 1.17 | 0.43 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.60 | 1.95 | 0.24 | 0.16 | 0.00 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.99 | 2.02 | 1.58 | 1.74 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | 8.47 | 39.59 | 4.38 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 10.18 | 11.25 | 48.52 | 61.12 | 161.61 | 74.57 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 3.8% | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 100.0% | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $323751 | $571637 | $518523 | $518523 | $518523 | $518523 |
Liquidity and regulatory exposure
Based on reported figures, GMM trades at a P/S of 0.03 and an EV/EBITDA of 0.08, which appear to reflect deep market skepticism regarding the company's ability to convert its 35% revenue growth into sustainable profitability given the persistent net losses and thin cash reserves.
The extremely low valuation multiples suggest that the market is pricing the company as a distressed asset rather than a high-growth metaverse participant. Investors should monitor whether these depressed levels represent a value opportunity or a rational reaction to the company's inability to achieve positive net margins despite top-line expansion.
According to recent financial statements, GMM's ROIC has experienced significant volatility, collapsing from a peak of 43.5% in 2023Q4 to 1.8% in 2025Q4, indicating that the company is struggling to generate meaningful returns on its invested capital as it scales its digital asset library.
The sharp decline in ROIC suggests that the capital deployed into asset development is not yet yielding the expected competitive advantage or margin expansion. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's proprietary library is losing its technical relevance or if the cost of maintaining these assets is outpacing their licensing revenue.
As reported in quarterly filings, GMM's asset turnover has trended downward to 0.41 in 2025Q4, which, when combined with the historical volatility in DSO, suggests that the company faces structural challenges in converting its project-based production work into timely cash inflows from its client base.
The inability to maintain a consistent asset turnover ratio implies that the company's operational efficiency is being hampered by the long lead times inherent in its project-based business model. Investors should monitor whether these efficiency gaps are temporary project delays or a permanent feature of the company's interactions with its Chinese media clients.
Based on the 2025Q4 reported figures, GMM's current ratio has compressed to 1.10, reflecting a precarious liquidity position where the company's cash balance of $4.17M is increasingly insufficient to cover its short-term obligations and sustain its current rate of operational cash burn.
The narrowing liquidity buffer suggests that the company may be approaching a point where external financing becomes a necessity rather than a strategic choice. This vulnerability is exacerbated by the company's reliance on intangible assets, which provide little comfort to creditors in the event of a liquidity crisis.
The most commonly misapplied metric for GMM is the top-line revenue growth rate, which obscures the company's underlying cash burn and the poor quality of earnings resulting from heavy non-operating expenses and significant goodwill-heavy balance sheet composition.
Investors often prioritize revenue growth as a proxy for success in the metaverse sector, but for GMM, this metric fails to account for the high cost of customer acquisition and the capital intensity of maintaining a 3D asset library. A more appropriate focus would be the free cash flow margin, which better reflects the company's actual ability to sustain operations without constant capital injections.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GMM stock.
Global Mofy Metaverse Limited's current P/E ratio is -0.0x. The historical average is 26.4x.
Global Mofy Metaverse Limited's current EV/EBITDA is 0.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.6x.
Global Mofy Metaverse Limited's return on equity (ROE) is -35.9%. The historical average is 34.9%.
Based on historical data, Global Mofy Metaverse Limited is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Global Mofy Metaverse Limited has 40.2% gross margin and 5.4% operating margin.
Global Mofy Metaverse Limited's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.2x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.