Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -8.4x · EV/EBITDA 97.4x · ROE -14.7%. (2005–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.1B | $661M | $605M | $1.5B | $1.7B | $1.6B | $456M | $588M | $541M | $847M | $1.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $1.4B | $987M | $1.1B | $1.8B | $2.0B | $2.0B | $813M | $961M | $1.2B | $1.9B | $1.9B |
| P/E Ratio → | -8.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.62 | 11.46 | 99.46 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.51 | 0.32 | 0.25 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.57 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.14 | 0.24 | 0.31 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.32 | 0.86 | 0.69 | 1.50 | 1.60 | 1.47 | 0.59 | 0.68 | 0.51 | 0.80 | 1.10 |
| P/FCF | 16.42 | 10.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 43.29 |
| P/OCF | 10.41 | 6.51 | — | 26.32 | 24.30 | 381.92 | 4.61 | — | 13.88 | — | 12.94 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.70 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.31 | 0.54 | 0.55 |
| EV / EBITDA | 97.39 | 69.48 | 25.07 | 49.37 | — | 16.90 | — | — | 6.27 | 14.81 | 10.68 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | 82.21 | — | — | — | 41.30 | 20.83 |
| EV / FCF | — | 15.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 75.71 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 1.8% | 1.8% | 5.3% | 5.0% | 3.1% | 6.3% | 4.4% | 1.3% | 5.6% | 8.2% | 9.2% |
| Operating Margin | -4.0% | -4.0% | -1.9% | -1.9% | -2.7% | 0.9% | -6.4% | -5.9% | 2.3% | 0.7% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -5.8% | -5.8% | -3.4% | -2.8% | -3.5% | -2.3% | -5.7% | -6.9% | 0.4% | 1.7% | 0.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -14.7% | -14.7% | -8.8% | -9.1% | -11.8% | -7.0% | -13.2% | -17.3% | 1.5% | 6.0% | 1.1% |
| ROA | -7.2% | -7.2% | -4.4% | -4.6% | -5.9% | -3.5% | -6.6% | -8.5% | 0.6% | 2.3% | 0.5% |
| ROIC | -5.2% | -5.2% | -2.7% | -3.5% | -5.3% | 1.5% | -7.8% | -7.3% | 3.5% | 0.9% | 4.9% |
| ROCE | -6.2% | -6.2% | -3.2% | -3.9% | -6.0% | 1.8% | -10.7% | -11.2% | 5.5% | 1.3% | 5.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.84 | 1.29 | 1.13 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 35.77 | 35.77 | 15.06 | 18.45 | — | 6.72 | — | — | 4.74 | 10.38 | 6.30 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.42 | 0.54 | 0.33 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.60 | 1.03 | 0.82 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 22.94 | 22.94 | 11.04 | 8.92 | — | 3.09 | — | — | 3.40 | 8.35 | 4.57 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 32.43 |
| Interest Coverage | -0.88 | -0.88 | -1.15 | -1.18 | -2.02 | 0.36 | -3.03 | -3.30 | -0.64 | 0.56 | 1.74 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.79 | 1.79 | 1.48 | 1.90 | 1.91 | 2.37 | 1.42 | 1.23 | 1.45 | 1.36 | 1.68 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.89 | 1.34 | 1.33 | 1.80 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.97 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.45 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 1.17 | 0.52 | 0.45 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.51 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.33 | 1.38 | 1.70 | 1.73 | 1.31 | 1.22 | 1.42 | 1.74 | 1.30 | 1.36 |
| Inventory Turnover | 13.86 | 13.86 | 10.24 | 14.51 | 12.73 | 9.89 | 6.82 | 9.43 | 4.96 | 4.64 | 7.33 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 12.98 | 14.09 | 10.55 | 10.95 | 15.61 | 10.67 | 17.12 | 9.54 | 15.99 | 15.78 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | 0.9% | 1.5% | — | 0.6% | 2.1% | 5.4% | 7.6% | 4.7% | 3.5% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 259.2% | 64.5% | 349.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3.0% | 8.7% | 1.0% |
| FCF Yield | 6.1% | 9.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.8% | 4.5% | 0.8% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.5% | 10.5% | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.8% | 4.5% | 1.6% | 2.1% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 4.6% | 15.9% | 8.2% | 5.4% | 4.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $67M | $64M | $59M | $56M | $47M | $35M | $38M | $41M | $50M | $39M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 21 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GPRE stock.
Green Plains Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -8.4x. The historical average is 45.0x.
Green Plains Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 97.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 16.5x.
Green Plains Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -14.7%. The historical average is -1.1%.
Based on historical data, Green Plains Inc. is trading at a P/E of -8.4x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Green Plains Inc. has 1.8% gross margin and -4.0% operating margin.
Green Plains Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 35.8x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Margin volatility masks cyclical exposure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Recovery from Cyclical Trough
Gross margin has rebounded sharply to 25.3% in 2026Q2 from a negative -13.6% in 2025Q4, suggesting a significant operational swing that appears more cyclical than structural given the company's history.
This dramatic margin improvement drives the positive operating income of $67.9M in 2026Q2, demonstrating the high operating leverage inherent in the business model where small input price changes can cause outsized profit swings. However, the underlying net margin of 15.0% may be overstated by one-time items, as the return to positive territory follows several quarters of deep losses, indicating that true structural earning power remains unproven.
Volatile Returns Driven by Cyclical Margins
The company's ROIC has swung from -3.5% in 2025Q1 to 4.2% in 2026Q2, highlighting that returns on invested capital are overwhelmingly dictated by cyclical margin swings rather than sustained operational efficiency improvements.
The ROIC trend closely mirrors the gross margin trajectory, suggesting the business is a price-taker with limited ability to control its cost of capital during downturns. While the current 4.2% ROIC is positive, it remains below the cost of capital for an industrial business and compares unfavorably to a peer like REX American Resources with a 9.1% ROIC, indicating GPRE is not consistently creating value for shareholders.
Price Reflects Recovery, Not Structural Value
At a forward P/E of 9.13 and EV/EBITDA of 33.65, the market appears to be pricing a significant earnings rebound, but the negative trailing P/E of -8.90 confirms the recent losses the valuation is trying to look past.
The low P/S ratio of 0.54 reflects the market's skepticism about the sustainability of margins on a declining revenue base. The high forward EV/EBITDA multiple versus the historical low P/E suggests investors are betting on a rapid margin normalization, but this multiple is misleading if the current EBITDA cycle peak is unsustainable, a key risk given the historical volatility.
Working Capital Swings Dominate Cash Cycle
The cash conversion cycle has extended to 39 days in 2026Q2 from a low of 21 days in 2024Q1, primarily driven by a 17-day increase in days inventory outstanding, which suggests potential buildup or valuation issues.
The increase in DIO to 37 days, coupled with a stable DSO, indicates that inventory is becoming a less efficient asset for the company, potentially tying up cash and increasing risk if commodity prices turn. This deterioration in working capital efficiency is a key driver of the volatile free cash flow observed in recent quarters.
Serviceable Debt Amid Volatile Coverage
While the debt-to-equity ratio has improved to 0.63, the interest coverage ratio swung from a negative -7.04 to a positive 8.59 over six quarters, indicating that debt service comfort is entirely dependent on achieving cyclical profit peaks.
The current interest coverage of 8.59x appears strong, but the history of negative coverage ratios implies that during downturns, the company's debt load becomes a significant burden. This volatility in coverage ratios suggests the leverage level, while currently manageable, introduces refinancing risk during prolonged weak periods.
The Misleading Lure of the Current P/E
The trailing P/E ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for GPRE, as it is based on earnings from a volatile cycle and fails to capture the structural risk of margin collapse.
Using the trailing or even the forward P/E implies a stable earnings power that does not exist for a cyclical industrial company. Investors should instead focus on price-to-sales and normalized EV/EBITDA across a full cycle, as the P/E can swing from positive to deeply negative year-over-year, rendering it useless for valuation.