Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -1377.4%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5M | $4M | $6M | $10M | $847M | $2.6B | $948M | $140M | $980M | $2.2B | $2M |
| Enterprise Value | $-2243605 | $-2483095 | $2M | $9M | $841M | $2.6B | $969M | $153M | $990M | $2.2B | $15M |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.24 |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.41 | 0.75 | — | 1.38 | 72.16 | 117.58 | — | — | 86.16 | 8.89 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -1377.4% | -1377.4% | -453.4% | -79.1% | -124.1% | -264.8% | — | — | -197.1% | -123.9% | — |
| ROA | -459.6% | -459.6% | -143.5% | -49.3% | -85.4% | -306.7% | -934.3% | -299.6% | -185.3% | -113.3% | 24729.1% |
| ROIC | — | — | -2583.5% | -160.5% | -166.0% | -1884.9% | — | -106.5% | -137.3% | -83.1% | — |
| ROCE | -603.4% | -603.4% | -494.8% | -140.9% | -126.1% | -262.5% | — | — | -190.1% | -116.5% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | — | — | 0.95 | 0.00 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -1.18 | — | -0.14 | -0.47 | -0.41 | — | — | 0.94 | -0.00 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -97.81 | -97.81 | — | -35.67 | -2609.50 | -80.14 | -7.52 | -17.16 | -27.43 | -15.76 | -1.43 |
Net cash position: cash ($7M) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.50 | 3.50 | 0.72 | 2.12 | 3.35 | 3.14 | 0.16 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 0.00 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.50 | 3.50 | 0.72 | 2.12 | 3.35 | 3.14 | 0.16 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 0.00 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.94 | 2.94 | 0.67 | 2.11 | 3.34 | 3.12 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.00 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 9.7% | 5.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 416.8% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 9.7% | 5.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $6M | $2M | $1M | $32M | $28M | $4M | $3M | $3M | $986419 | $160 |
Imminent liquidity exhaustion
According to current market data, GTBP trades at a price-to-book ratio of 0.41, a valuation level that suggests investors are heavily discounting the company's intellectual property and pipeline potential relative to its historical book value as it struggles to secure a viable path toward commercialization.
The low P/B multiple indicates that the market assigns little value to the company's intangible assets, likely reflecting skepticism regarding the TriKE platform's clinical validation. This valuation appears to be a distressed pricing mechanism, common for pre-revenue biotechs where the primary concern is the probability of total capital impairment rather than future earnings growth.
Based on reported figures from 2024Q1, the company's ROIC of -47.1% highlights a significant erosion of invested capital, a trend that underscores the difficulty of generating positive returns while the firm remains in a high-burn, clinical-stage development phase without any offsetting commercial revenue streams.
The negative ROIC is a structural outcome of heavy R&D spending relative to a shrinking asset base. Investors should monitor whether future capital allocations can improve these returns, though current trends suggest that the company is effectively destroying value as it attempts to fund its pipeline through repeated equity dilution.
As reported in recent financial statements, the current ratio has fluctuated significantly, reaching 3.69 in 2026Q1, yet this metric masks the underlying reality that the company's absolute cash reserves are insufficient to sustain long-term clinical operations without immediate and substantial external financing or strategic partnerships.
While the current ratio appears superficially healthy, it is highly sensitive to the timing of capital raises and does not account for the rapid depletion of cash through ongoing R&D. The lack of inventory or receivables means that the company's liquidity is entirely dependent on its ability to access capital markets, which remains a high-risk factor.
Compared to peers like Nektar Therapeutics and MacroGenics, GTBP's financial profile appears structurally weaker, as evidenced by its inability to maintain a stable ROE or positive net margins, which places it at a disadvantage when competing for limited institutional biotech investment capital.
The gap between GTBP and its peers is not merely temporary but reflects a lack of clinical maturity and the absence of a diversified pipeline. Investors should note that while peers may also face negative margins, their ability to sustain operations often relies on more robust balance sheets or established partnerships that GTBP currently lacks.
The price-to-book ratio is frequently misapplied to GTBP, as it obscures the reality that the company's book value is largely composed of historical R&D costs rather than tangible assets that could be liquidated to provide a floor for the share price during a liquidity crisis.
Investors should instead focus on the 'cash runway to milestone' metric, as the book value provides a false sense of security in a business model where the primary assets are intangible and highly speculative. Relying on P/B ignores the reality that the company's true value is tied to clinical trial outcomes, not the accounting value of its laboratory equipment or intellectual property.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GTBP stock.
GT Biopharma, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.1x. The historical average is 0.2x.
GT Biopharma, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -1377.4%. The historical average is -138.0%.
Based on historical data, GT Biopharma, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.1x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
GT Biopharma, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 9.66%.