Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -96.8%. (1997–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $13M | $51M | $137M | $620M | $1.1B | $2.2B | $4.1B | $3.3B | $2.3B | $3.1B | $4.0B |
| Enterprise Value | $565M | $602M | $862M | $1.4B | $2.0B | $3.2B | $4.3B | $3.6B | $2.9B | $3.7B | $4.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | 28.60 | 52.79 | — | — | 331.11 | 59.72 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.36 | 0.62 | 1.17 | 2.06 | 1.59 | 1.08 | 1.27 | 1.42 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.09 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 0.66 | 1.10 | 2.05 | 2.67 | 2.27 | 1.50 | 1.79 | 2.36 |
| P/FCF | 0.23 | 0.88 | — | 7.48 | 28.72 | 55.02 | 32.47 | 36.28 | — | 85.70 | 26.36 |
| P/OCF | 0.17 | 0.65 | 6.19 | 5.33 | 16.74 | 27.62 | 20.66 | 21.67 | 55.23 | 29.04 | 18.68 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.44 | 0.55 | 0.81 | 1.11 | 1.67 | 2.19 | 1.76 | 1.37 | 1.51 | 1.63 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | 54.50 | — | 20.85 | 27.51 | 33.44 | 156.43 | 22.30 | 27.35 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | 27.92 | 37.26 | 72.17 | — | 34.31 | 42.15 |
| EV / FCF | — | 10.44 | — | 16.91 | 51.21 | 78.45 | 34.48 | 40.05 | — | 102.42 | 30.35 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 20.1% | 20.1% | 21.4% | 21.9% | 22.1% | 22.6% | 25.0% | 22.7% | 18.9% | 21.0% | 19.0% |
| Operating Margin | -15.0% | -15.0% | -29.6% | -1.1% | -4.8% | 5.5% | 5.4% | 2.7% | -1.5% | 4.3% | 3.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -22.5% | -22.5% | -34.0% | -4.3% | -6.5% | 4.1% | 3.9% | -3.9% | -8.7% | 0.4% | 2.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -96.8% | -96.8% | -74.9% | -7.7% | -11.1% | 6.0% | 5.2% | -5.4% | -11.3% | 0.6% | 4.0% |
| ROA | -22.6% | -22.6% | -28.5% | -3.4% | -4.9% | 3.3% | 3.5% | -3.4% | -6.6% | 0.3% | 2.3% |
| ROIC | -16.0% | -16.0% | -23.7% | -0.8% | -3.3% | 4.1% | 4.5% | 2.2% | -1.1% | 3.4% | 3.5% |
| ROCE | -25.7% | -25.7% | -29.2% | -1.0% | -4.1% | 5.1% | 5.6% | 2.7% | -1.4% | 4.1% | 4.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 3.94 | 3.94 | 1.64 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.44 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 32.50 | — | 6.66 | 2.09 | 3.50 | 34.27 | 4.28 | 4.40 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 3.56 | 1.53 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.17 | 0.24 | 0.39 | 0.35 | 0.36 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 30.38 | — | 6.23 | 1.61 | 3.15 | 32.59 | 3.64 | 3.60 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 9.56 | — | 9.43 | 22.49 | 23.43 | 2.01 | 3.77 | — | 16.72 | 3.99 |
| Interest Coverage | -4.39 | -4.39 | -9.06 | -0.45 | -1.83 | 9.00 | 13.39 | 2.74 | -1.49 | 4.03 | 5.20 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1.91 | 1.98 | 2.56 | 2.23 | 1.99 | 1.87 | 1.83 | 2.49 | 2.57 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.32 | 0.32 | 1.02 | 1.01 | 1.22 | 1.08 | 1.00 | 1.04 | 1.05 | 1.56 | 1.56 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.25 | 0.40 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.24 | 0.97 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.89 | 0.94 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.97 |
| Inventory Turnover | 7.24 | 7.24 | 4.93 | 4.94 | 4.51 | 4.75 | 5.18 | 6.40 | 5.70 | 4.96 | 6.76 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 32.64 | 36.14 | 37.67 | 32.70 | 32.93 | 32.25 | 30.38 | 36.42 | 37.53 | 28.88 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 3.5% | 1.9% | — | — | 0.3% | 1.7% |
| FCF Yield | 100.0% | 113.4% | — | 13.4% | 3.5% | 1.8% | 3.1% | 2.8% | — | 1.2% | 3.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 18.5% | 2.6% | 1.8% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 18.5% | 2.6% | 1.8% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $91M | $90M | $90M | $89M | $93M | $101M | $104M | $104M | $104M | $104M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HAIN stock.
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.0x. The historical average is 39.6x.
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -96.8%. The historical average is -2.1%.
Based on historical data, The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has 20.1% gross margin and -15.0% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Balance sheet insolvency risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Distressed Valuation Reflects Structural Uncertainty
According to current market data, HAIN trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 0.03, a valuation level that suggests investors are heavily discounting the company's future earnings potential due to persistent revenue contraction and the ongoing, unproven nature of the Hain Reimagined portfolio simplification strategy.
The extremely low P/S ratio relative to broader packaged food peers indicates that the market is pricing in significant terminal value risk rather than near-term growth. Investors should monitor whether the current EV/EBITDA of 8.13 represents a value opportunity or a value trap, given that the company's negative net margins make traditional P/E-based valuation metrics largely irrelevant for assessing intrinsic worth.
Capital Efficiency Remains Substantially Impaired
Based on reported financial figures, HAIN's ROIC has languished at levels near 0.7% as of 2026Q3, demonstrating that the company is failing to generate meaningful returns on its invested capital compared to the cost of capital required to maintain its fragmented and complex brand portfolio.
The persistent inability to drive ROIC above low single digits suggests that the company's historical acquisition strategy has resulted in significant capital destruction. Without a material improvement in operating margins, the company appears unlikely to achieve the compounding returns necessary to justify its current capital structure.
Working Capital Management Remains Volatile
As reported in recent quarterly filings, HAIN's cash conversion cycle has fluctuated significantly, reaching 46 days in 2026Q3, which highlights the operational difficulty of managing inventory and receivables across a diverse and shrinking portfolio of natural and organic food brands.
The variability in the cash conversion cycle suggests that the company lacks the supply chain leverage of larger CPG competitors, forcing it to rely on working capital swings to manage liquidity. Investors should monitor whether the recent reduction in DIO is a result of effective SKU rationalization or simply a symptom of declining demand for slower-moving product lines.
Debt Burden Constrains Strategic Flexibility
According to the latest balance sheet data, HAIN's debt-to-equity ratio has surged to 2.76, a level that indicates a significantly strained capital structure as the company's equity base continues to erode under the weight of persistent net losses and restructuring-related impairments.
The rising leverage ratio, coupled with an interest coverage ratio that has fallen below 1.0 in recent periods, suggests that the company's ability to service its debt obligations is becoming increasingly precarious. This trend warrants close investigation, as it limits management's capacity to fund necessary marketing investments to defend its core Power Brands.
Misapplication of Traditional CPG Multiples
The most commonly misapplied metric for HAIN is the P/E ratio, which obscures the company's true financial health by failing to account for the massive non-cash impairment charges that currently render GAAP earnings negative and misleading for fundamental valuation purposes.
Investors should instead focus on EV/Sales or normalized EBITDA metrics to strip away the noise of restructuring costs and asset write-downs. Relying on P/E in this context is dangerous, as it ignores the underlying cash-generating reality of the business and the significant risk posed by the company's rapidly depleting equity base.