Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -5.9x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -5.1%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $45M | $54M | $99M | $738M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $11M | $-171037782 | $-222970100 | $155M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -5.91 | — | 1.92 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.40 | 0.25 | 0.35 | 8.98 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.31 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.78 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -0.80 | -0.79 | 1.89 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | -27.40 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | -4.44 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 7.2% | 7.2% | 53.7% | 11.0% | 81.6% | 82.0% | 57.3% | 17.4% |
| Operating Margin | -47.4% | -47.4% | 1.1% | -79.0% | 68.1% | 70.8% | 14.7% | -7.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -23.6% | -23.6% | 18.3% | -32.6% | 75.0% | 71.2% | 15.1% | -8.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -5.1% | -5.1% | 5.2% | -2.8% | 47.0% | 147.0% | 30.2% | -14.5% |
| ROA | -4.8% | -4.8% | 5.0% | -2.8% | 45.4% | 137.4% | 19.8% | -7.5% |
| ROIC | -10.6% | -10.6% | 0.4% | -16.5% | 160.9% | 721.6% | 28.2% | -6.8% |
| ROCE | -10.2% | -10.2% | 0.3% | -6.9% | 42.6% | 145.7% | 29.2% | -12.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.57 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 0.03 | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.23 | -0.32 | -0.61 | -0.76 | -0.86 | -0.57 | 0.37 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | -39.56 | — | -2.19 | -1.12 | -2.22 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | -2.20 | -1.27 | -1.26 | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | 897.02 | -572.40 | 5029.18 | 2285.99 | 50.09 | -19.55 |
Net cash position: cash ($227M) exceeds total debt ($2M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 13.60 | 13.60 | 9.43 | 27.61 | 43.34 | 19.22 | 4.48 | 2.07 |
| Quick Ratio | 12.38 | 12.38 | 8.14 | 26.12 | 39.29 | 17.11 | 3.50 | 0.85 |
| Cash Ratio | 11.10 | 11.10 | 6.81 | 24.44 | 37.10 | 15.90 | 2.03 | 0.22 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.21 | 0.26 | 0.08 | 0.50 | 1.03 | 1.24 | 0.91 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.82 | 3.82 | 1.32 | 1.75 | 1.12 | 1.71 | 2.46 | 1.32 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | 36.73 | 61.41 | 2.67 | — | 55.63 | 61.09 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | 2.3% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 52.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $30M | $30M | $60M | $62M | $60M | $60M | $60M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ICG stock.
Intchains Group Limited's current P/E ratio is -5.9x. The historical average is 1.9x.
Intchains Group Limited's return on equity (ROE) is -5.1%. The historical average is 29.6%.
Based on historical data, Intchains Group Limited is trading at a P/E of -5.9x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Intchains Group Limited has 7.2% gross margin and -47.4% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Extreme cyclical revenue volatility
Distressed Pricing Reflects Operational Uncertainty
As reported in recent financial filings, ICG trades at a P/B ratio of 0.14, suggesting that the market is pricing the company as a distressed asset rather than a growth-oriented semiconductor firm, with current valuations heavily discounting the firm's significant cash reserves relative to its market capitalization.
The negative TTM P/E ratio of -2.67 underscores the lack of current earnings power, while the forward P/E of 1.44 implies that investors are banking on a rapid, albeit speculative, recovery in profitability. This valuation gap warrants caution, as the market appears to be assigning little to no value to the company's intellectual property or future ASIC design pipeline.
Capital Efficiency Decaying Amid Losses
Based on the provided financial data, ICG's ROIC has trended into negative territory, reaching -7.8% in 2025Q4, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its core semiconductor design and manufacturing activities.
The volatility in ROIC, which swung from 14.0% in 2024Q2 to deep negative levels, highlights the extreme sensitivity of the firm's returns to the cyclical nature of cryptocurrency mining. Investors should monitor whether management can stabilize these returns, as the current trend suggests that the firm's invested capital is failing to generate adequate economic profit.
Working Capital Management Remains Volatile
According to recent quarterly disclosures, ICG's days inventory outstanding (DIO) has fluctuated wildly, peaking at 661 days in 2025Q3, which suggests significant challenges in managing hardware inventory in a market characterized by rapid technological obsolescence and shifting demand for specific ASIC mining protocols.
The extremely low asset turnover ratio of 0.03 further confirms that the company is struggling to generate meaningful revenue from its asset base. This inefficiency appears structural, as the firm's fabless model requires high upfront costs that are not being offset by sufficient sales velocity in the current environment.
Liquidity Buffer Masks Operational Burn
As indicated by the latest financial statements, ICG maintains a high current ratio of 13.60, which provides a substantial liquidity cushion, yet this figure is largely driven by cash reserves rather than operational efficiency or the ability to convert current assets into sustainable cash flow.
While the lack of debt provides a defensive posture, the rapid depletion of cash reserves to fund ongoing operating losses suggests that this liquidity position is not a permanent state. Investors should monitor the burn rate closely, as the company's reliance on cash to cover negative margins is unsustainable over the long term.
Misapplication of Traditional Semiconductor Multiples
Based on the company's unique business model, the P/E ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric, as it obscures the extreme cyclicality and inventory-heavy nature of the ASIC market, leading to potentially misleading conclusions about the firm's true earning power and long-term valuation.
Instead of relying on P/E, analysts should focus on the cash-to-market-cap ratio and the net burn rate, which provide a more accurate picture of the company's survival prospects in a hostile regulatory and market environment. The P/E ratio fails to account for the high probability of inventory write-downs that can render accounting earnings meaningless in this specific sector.