Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 14.9x · EV/EBITDA 22.7x · ROE 12.4%. (1997–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $103.8B | $83.6B | $49.6B | $53.6B | $44.1B | $54.2B | $36.8B | $46.9B | $41.4B | $71.9B | $54.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $236.4B | $200.0B | $151.0B | $113.7B | $76.4B | $64.1B | $3.6B | $128.9B | $124.9B | $161.9B | $166.8B |
| P/E Ratio → | 14.88 | 13.21 | 9.50 | 12.95 | 12.05 | 11.32 | 14.75 | 9.80 | 8.81 | 14.65 | 11.75 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.96 | 3.63 | 2.20 | 2.36 | 2.33 | 2.96 | 2.06 | 2.60 | 2.29 | 4.08 | 3.14 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.85 | 1.64 | 0.97 | 1.03 | 0.87 | 0.99 | 0.66 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 1.41 | 1.09 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.36 | 3.70 | 6.25 | — | 6.67 |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.36 | 3.60 | 5.99 | — | 6.39 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 8.68 | 6.70 | 5.02 | 4.04 | 3.51 | 0.20 | 7.13 | 6.90 | 9.20 | 9.58 |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.70 | 21.86 | 15.14 | 10.18 | 12.29 | 8.42 | 0.77 | 16.90 | 17.18 | 20.79 | 25.90 |
| EV / EBIT | 22.70 | 21.86 | 16.23 | 10.83 | 13.88 | 9.45 | 0.93 | 18.85 | 18.50 | 22.28 | 28.25 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.03 | 10.15 | 18.84 | — | 20.33 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 94.3% | 94.3% | 32.2% | 37.6% | 50.8% | 69.0% | 56.4% | 52.2% | 54.0% | 35.3% | 34.0% |
| Operating Margin | 39.7% | 39.7% | 14.0% | 17.8% | 16.4% | 26.3% | 14.1% | 21.1% | 20.9% | 15.2% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 27.5% | 27.5% | 9.6% | 12.4% | 10.9% | 18.5% | 9.2% | 14.7% | 14.3% | 10.2% | 9.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.4% | 12.4% | 12.4% | 14.2% | 7.0% | 8.7% | 4.5% | 9.0% | 9.0% | 9.7% | 9.4% |
| ROA | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.5% |
| ROIC | 3.1% | 3.1% | 3.3% | 4.2% | 2.4% | 3.3% | 1.8% | 2.7% | 2.9% | 3.2% | 2.4% |
| ROCE | 3.7% | 3.7% | 3.7% | 4.6% | 2.6% | 3.4% | 2.1% | 4.0% | 3.4% | 3.2% | 2.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 3.32 | 3.32 | 3.34 | 2.87 | 2.37 | 2.12 | 1.42 | 2.47 | 2.58 | 2.19 | 2.61 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 18.51 | 18.51 | 17.18 | 13.43 | 19.23 | 15.23 | 17.02 | 17.72 | 18.36 | 14.39 | 20.46 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.29 | 1.98 | 1.15 | 0.64 | 0.18 | -0.60 | 1.50 | 1.61 | 1.76 | 2.22 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 12.73 | 12.73 | 10.16 | 5.38 | 5.19 | 1.31 | -7.17 | 10.75 | 11.48 | 11.56 | 17.41 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.32 | 6.45 | 12.59 | — | 13.67 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | 0.21 | 0.29 | 0.37 | 0.90 | 0.42 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.24 | 0.19 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | 7.8% | 5.5% | 7.0% | 4.4% | 0.0% | 5.7% | 6.3% | 3.6% | 4.6% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 60.7% | 40.7% | 84.2% | 49.9% | 0.1% | 56.0% | 56.6% | 52.3% | 54.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.7% | 7.6% | 10.5% | 7.7% | 8.3% | 8.8% | 6.8% | 10.2% | 11.4% | 6.8% | 8.5% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 279.4% | 27.1% | 16.0% | — | 15.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 7.7% | 6.6% | 3.9% | 3.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 15.5% | 12.1% | 10.9% | 7.4% | 0.0% | 5.7% | 6.3% | 3.6% | 4.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $3.0B | $3.2B | $3.6B | $3.6B | $3.9B | $3.9B | $3.9B | $3.9B | $3.9B | $3.9B |
Includes 30+ ratios · 28 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ING stock.
ING Groep N.V.'s current P/E ratio is 14.9x. The historical average is 13.1x. This places it at the 85th percentile of its historical range.
ING Groep N.V.'s current EV/EBITDA is 22.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 22.9x.
ING Groep N.V.'s return on equity (ROE) is 12.4%. The historical average is 11.5%.
Based on historical data, ING Groep N.V. is trading at a P/E of 14.9x. This is at the 85th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
ING Groep N.V. has 94.3% gross margin and 39.7% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
ING Groep N.V.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 18.5x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Revenue anomaly and margin compression
Premium Multiple Hinges on Efficiency
ING trades at 1.75x book versus 0.80x for Deutsche Bank and 0.87x for Barclays, implying the market rewards its digital model, but the premium narrows if efficiency slips, as per peer data.
The P/B of 1.75 is well above the European average, reflecting expectations of superior returns and capital generation. However, with ROE at 12.4% (trailing) and a tangible book value per share of $17.18, the market is pricing in sustained profitability. If NIM compression persists, the premium could contract, as seen in the recent P/B decline from 18.01 in 2026Q1 to 17.78 in 2026Q2.
ROE Stability Masks Fee Shift
ROE has held near 3% quarterly, but the composition is shifting: fee income rose to 9.2% of revenue in 2026Q2 from 8.9% a year earlier, as reported in ING's quarterly filings.
The DuPont decomposition shows that ROE is driven by modest asset utilization (NIM of 1.8%) and high leverage (equity/assets of 4-5%). The increase in fee income suggests a strategic pivot toward less rate-sensitive revenue, which could improve earnings quality. However, the efficiency ratio spiked to 86.1% in 2026Q2, indicating that cost control is becoming more challenging as revenue growth slows.
NIM Compression Pressures Efficiency
Net interest margin fell to 1.8% in 2026Q2 from 2.0% a year earlier, while the efficiency ratio deteriorated to 86.1% from 89.0%, per ING's financial statements.
The NIM decline reflects rising deposit betas and peaking ECB rates, which are squeezing the spread between asset yields and funding costs. The efficiency ratio spike is partly due to a sharp drop in total revenue, which may be a data anomaly given the record income reported for 2025. Investors should monitor whether cost-cutting initiatives can offset margin pressure, as the bank's digital advantage may be eroding.
Thin Equity Buffer Limits Flexibility
Equity-to-assets ratio has remained at 4-5% over the past year, with equity around $50B against $1.2T assets, indicating a modest capital base, as per balance sheet data.
ING's capital ratios appear adequate but not fortress-like, especially when compared to peers with higher equity buffers. The high debt/equity ratio of 3.32, combined with ongoing buybacks, suggests that capital return may be prioritized over building a larger cushion. If regulatory requirements increase or credit costs rise, ING may have limited headroom to absorb shocks without cutting distributions.
Provisions Stable, But Risks Loom
Loan loss provisions remained stable at $279M in 2026Q2 versus $299M a year earlier, suggesting no deterioration in credit quality, as reported in ING's financial statements.
The stability in provisions is reassuring, but it may not fully reflect the potential impact of a Dutch or German housing downturn. Given the high concentration in mortgages, any adverse macro shock could lead to a sharp increase in credit costs. The market may be underestimating this tail risk, especially as the bank's exposure to emerging markets like Poland and Turkey adds currency and geopolitical risk.
P/E Misleads on Earnings Quality
ING's P/E of 14.07 appears reasonable, but it is distorted by the anomalous 65.3% YoY revenue decline in the latest snapshot, which conflicts with record 2025 income, as per disclosures.
The P/E ratio is commonly misapplied to banks because it can be artificially inflated or deflated by one-off items and provision volatility. For ING, the reported revenue drop is inconsistent with the record total income of €23B for 2025, suggesting a data reporting issue or a non-operational event. Investors should instead focus on P/TBV and ROTCE, which better capture the bank's underlying earning power and capital efficiency.