Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -18.7x · EV/EBITDA 20.4x · ROE N/A. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $99M | $25M | $47M | $79M | $94M | $110M | $61M | $82M | $71M | $60M | $61M |
| Enterprise Value | $291M | $217M | $234M | $268M | $278M | $290M | $238M | $251M | $248M | $243M | $245M |
| P/E Ratio → | -18.73 | — | — | — | — | 10.57 | — | 28.93 | 12.25 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.54 | 0.39 | 0.80 | 1.37 | 1.99 | 3.84 | 1.05 | 1.09 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.83 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 27.30 | 6.86 | 109.64 | — | — | — | — | 6.33 | 6.35 | 10.10 | 12.39 |
| P/OCF | 16.87 | 4.24 | 6.84 | — | 102.23 | — | — | 5.71 | 6.23 | 9.57 | 6.78 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.37 | 4.02 | 4.65 | 5.88 | 10.14 | 4.10 | 3.36 | 3.46 | 3.53 | 3.36 |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.43 | 15.21 | 30.05 | 27.34 | 32.96 | — | 24.75 | 2.95 | 3.03 | 3.10 | 3.16 |
| EV / EBIT | 38.13 | 28.39 | 255.03 | 31.01 | — | 11.91 | 48.61 | 18.67 | 12.49 | 25.33 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 59.59 | 549.67 | — | — | — | — | 19.51 | 22.04 | 40.80 | 49.84 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 26.7% | 26.7% | 20.9% | 22.8% | 23.5% | 10.0% | 22.1% | 30.1% | 33.4% | 30.6% | 25.9% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | 11.9% | 2.5% | 7.5% | 7.8% | -17.0% | 8.4% | 20.3% | 22.4% | 18.8% | 7.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -8.3% | -8.3% | -16.9% | -11.7% | -18.5% | 36.3% | -6.5% | 3.8% | 8.1% | -2.4% | -9.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | -5.0% | -5.0% | -8.5% | -5.4% | -6.5% | 7.7% | -2.9% | 2.1% | 4.4% | -1.2% | -5.1% |
| ROIC | 7.2% | 7.2% | 1.2% | 3.3% | 2.6% | -3.5% | 3.6% | 11.0% | 11.3% | 8.9% | 3.7% |
| ROCE | 22.4% | 22.4% | 3.4% | 3.9% | 3.1% | -4.1% | 4.3% | 13.3% | 13.9% | 11.3% | 4.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 13.81 | 13.81 | 24.61 | 19.88 | 23.49 | — | 19.88 | 2.13 | 2.26 | 2.37 | 2.44 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 13.46 | 13.46 | 24.06 | 19.27 | 21.78 | — | 18.41 | 1.99 | 2.16 | 2.33 | 2.37 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 52.74 | 440.03 | — | — | — | — | 13.17 | 15.69 | 30.70 | 37.45 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.07 | 0.85 | -0.13 | 2.38 | 0.47 | 1.23 | 1.81 | 0.89 | -0.22 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.16 | 1.16 | 0.14 | 2.11 | 3.41 | 2.89 | 2.20 | 1.85 | 2.34 | 1.57 | 1.39 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.16 | 1.16 | 0.14 | 2.11 | 3.41 | 2.89 | 2.20 | 2.34 | 3.25 | 2.49 | 1.37 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.09 | 1.54 | 2.37 | 2.36 | 1.26 | 1.09 | 1.45 | 1.07 | 0.98 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.62 | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.37 | 0.20 | 0.45 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.54 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 217.89 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 2.98 | 4.11 | 4.00 | 10.18 | 4.33 | 3.17 | 4.16 | 9.40 | 7.88 | 16.27 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 9.5% | — | 3.5% | 8.2% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 3.7% | 14.6% | 0.9% | — | — | — | — | 15.8% | 15.7% | 9.9% | 8.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.4% | 1.6% | 1.3% | 1.9% | 2.1% | 2.2% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.3% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.4% | 1.6% | 1.3% | 1.9% | 2.1% | 2.2% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $3M | $2M | $3M | $3M | $2M | $2M |
San Francisco market concentration
According to recent market data, INTG trades at a P/S of 1.54 and a P/FCF of 27.30, suggesting that investors are applying a significant conglomerate discount due to the company's complex mix of hospitality, real estate, and volatile investment transactions rather than pure-play lodging metrics.
The negative P/E ratio of -18.73 highlights the disconnect between the company's revenue growth and its inability to generate consistent bottom-line earnings. This valuation profile implies that the market is struggling to price the underlying real estate assets against the unpredictable performance of the investment portfolio.
As reported in financial statements, INTG's gross margin has shown extreme volatility, ranging from 6.1% to 33.5% over the last ten quarters, which indicates that the company's earning power is highly susceptible to rising labor and insurance costs within the competitive San Francisco hospitality sector.
The persistent negative net margin, which reached -8.31% recently, suggests that the core hotel and residential operations are failing to cover the overhead and interest expenses of the broader corporate structure. Investors should monitor whether the recent revenue growth can eventually stabilize these margins above the break-even point.
Based on reported figures, INTG's ROIC has fluctuated between -1.1% and 4.7% over the past ten quarters, indicating that the company is struggling to compound returns on its invested capital compared to more efficient peers in the diversified real estate and lodging space.
The low and inconsistent ROIC suggests that the capital allocated to property renovations and the investment portfolio is not generating sufficient returns to justify the company's high fixed-cost base. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the current asset mix is fundamentally capable of delivering long-term value creation.
Analysis of the company's financial data reveals that the cash conversion cycle is heavily impacted by inconsistent DPO trends, which have swung from 11 to 91 days, suggesting that INTG lacks the leverage to optimize its supplier relationships effectively in the current economic environment.
The low asset turnover ratio, consistently hovering near 0.12 to 0.20, reflects the capital-intensive nature of the company's hotel and real estate holdings. This inefficiency implies that the company requires significant revenue growth just to maintain its existing asset base, leaving little room for operational margin expansion.
The P/E ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for INTG, as it obscures the company's true economic reality by including non-operating gains and losses from the investment segment, which are not representative of the underlying performance of the hotel and residential real estate operations.
Analysts should instead focus on Net Asset Value (NAV) and FFO-equivalent metrics to better capture the value of the 16 apartment complexes and the flagship San Francisco hotel. Relying on P/E in this context leads to a distorted view of the company's profitability and ignores the potential hidden value of its real estate holdings.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying INTG stock.
The InterGroup Corporation's current P/E ratio is -18.7x. The historical average is 24.0x.
The InterGroup Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 20.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 24.5x.
Based on historical data, The InterGroup Corporation is trading at a P/E of -18.7x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
The InterGroup Corporation has 26.7% gross margin and 11.9% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
The InterGroup Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 13.8x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.