Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 23.3x · EV/EBITDA 13.5x · ROE 5.7%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $32.5B | $31.8B | $36.8B | $31.6B | $21.4B | $26.1B | $17.4B | $7.7B | $4.3B | $6.2B | — |
| Enterprise Value | $36.1B | $35.4B | $40.3B | $32.8B | $22.6B | $27.4B | $19.6B | $8.8B | $5.7B | $7.9B | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 23.26 | 54.63 | 43.91 | 40.71 | 35.30 | 46.17 | — | 48.26 | 15.85 | 339.30 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 4.03 | 4.15 | 5.09 | 4.60 | 3.62 | 5.06 | 4.39 | 3.80 | 1.59 | 2.63 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 3.28 | 3.13 | 3.60 | 3.21 | 2.32 | 2.87 | 1.90 | 4.10 | 2.55 | 4.23 | — |
| P/FCF | 21.41 | 26.04 | 29.52 | 24.87 | 27.99 | 47.26 | 20.15 | 25.53 | 10.90 | 43.45 | — |
| P/OCF | 23.96 | 23.43 | 26.37 | 22.97 | 24.91 | 42.34 | 19.08 | 22.32 | 9.62 | 31.14 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.62 | 5.57 | 4.77 | 3.82 | 5.32 | 4.94 | 4.35 | 2.13 | 3.32 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.54 | 18.38 | 22.60 | 20.21 | 18.09 | 27.76 | 41.59 | 25.79 | 9.19 | 27.89 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 25.44 | 33.30 | 29.92 | 27.62 | 26.75 | 45.66 | 298.87 | 44.24 | 12.75 | 281.79 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 28.99 | 32.28 | 25.79 | 29.53 | 49.74 | 22.68 | 29.28 | 14.60 | 54.91 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 38.5% | 38.5% | 43.8% | 41.9% | 39.3% | 38.6% | 35.4% | 38.6% | 37.6% | 37.8% | 37.0% |
| Operating Margin | 18.5% | 18.5% | 18.0% | 16.9% | 13.8% | 11.0% | 1.5% | 9.6% | 16.5% | 4.6% | 5.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 7.6% | 7.6% | 11.6% | 11.3% | 10.2% | 10.9% | -0.8% | 7.9% | 10.0% | 0.8% | -1.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 5.7% | 5.7% | 8.3% | 8.2% | 6.6% | 6.2% | -0.6% | 9.0% | 17.1% | 2.1% | -10.8% |
| ROA | 3.2% | 3.2% | 5.0% | 5.1% | 4.0% | 3.6% | -0.3% | 3.5% | 5.9% | 0.4% | -0.8% |
| ROIC | 7.8% | 7.8% | 7.9% | 8.1% | 5.9% | 3.9% | 0.6% | 4.8% | 10.6% | 2.8% | 2.7% |
| ROCE | 8.7% | 8.7% | 8.7% | 8.7% | 6.1% | 4.0% | 0.6% | 4.9% | 11.1% | 2.8% | 2.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.38 | 0.43 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 1.38 | 10.22 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.52 | 2.52 | 2.79 | 1.70 | 2.23 | 3.52 | 8.36 | 4.78 | 2.68 | 7.21 | 10.06 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.24 | 0.60 | 0.87 | 1.12 | 9.28 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.87 | 1.87 | 1.93 | 0.72 | 0.94 | 1.38 | 4.65 | 3.30 | 2.33 | 5.82 | 9.13 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.95 | 2.76 | 0.92 | 1.54 | 2.48 | 2.54 | 3.74 | 3.70 | 11.46 | 27.65 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.18 | 4.18 | 6.31 | 7.58 | 8.19 | 6.85 | 0.59 | 2.25 | 4.51 | 0.20 | 0.63 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.06 | 2.06 | 2.29 | 2.22 | 2.37 | 2.80 | 2.58 | 2.69 | 2.23 | 2.61 | 2.39 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.49 | 1.49 | 1.71 | 1.67 | 1.76 | 2.22 | 2.10 | 1.81 | 1.35 | 1.72 | 1.50 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.96 | 1.44 | 1.17 | 0.88 | 0.37 | 0.70 | 0.51 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.44 | 0.40 | 0.34 | 0.25 | 0.44 | 0.60 | 0.51 | 0.45 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.01 | 4.01 | 3.85 | 3.99 | 3.50 | 3.70 | 3.58 | 2.47 | 3.20 | 2.99 | 2.75 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 72.42 | 67.37 | 65.51 | 69.22 | 67.20 | 79.17 | 83.06 | 71.30 | 82.41 | 83.11 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 5.5% | 5.5% | 3.9% | 4.2% | 5.4% | 1.5% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.3% | 1.8% | 2.3% | 2.5% | 2.8% | 2.2% | — | 2.1% | 6.3% | 0.3% | — |
| FCF Yield | 4.7% | 3.8% | 3.4% | 4.0% | 3.6% | 2.1% | 5.0% | 3.9% | 9.2% | 2.3% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 3.1% | 3.2% | 0.7% | 0.8% | 1.2% | 2.8% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 1.0% | 0.1% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.2% | 3.3% | 0.8% | 0.9% | 1.4% | 2.9% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 1.0% | 0.1% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $401M | $407M | $409M | $410M | $421M | $383M | $209M | $209M | $184M | $190M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying IR stock.
Ingersoll Rand Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 23.3x. The historical average is 40.7x. This places it at the 14th percentile of its historical range.
Ingersoll Rand Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 13.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 23.5x.
Ingersoll Rand Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 5.7%. The historical average is 2.7%.
Based on historical data, Ingersoll Rand Inc. is trading at a P/E of 23.3x. This is at the 14th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Ingersoll Rand Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.10% with a payout ratio of 5.5%.
Ingersoll Rand Inc. has 38.5% gross margin and 18.5% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Ingersoll Rand Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Acquisition-driven leverage and multiple compression
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiples Price in Sustained Compounding
Based on reported figures, IR trades at 56.45 trailing P/E but 23.06 forward P/E, a steep compression that implies the market expects near-term earnings to recover sharply from the depressed trailing base.
The gap between trailing and forward earnings multiples suggests trailing results are being weighed down by quarters such as the 2025Q2 loss, so the trailing P/E overstates the price investors are actually paying for normalized earnings. At 14.85x forward EV/EBITDA and 26.25x price-to-free-cash-flow, the stock still carries a premium relative to the broader sector, implying that the valuation depends on the company sustaining its margin recovery and acquisition-led growth. Investors should monitor whether forward estimates hold, since a multiple this dependent on earnings normalization leaves limited room for disappointment.
Volatile Margins Obscure True Earning Power
As reported in the quarterly statements, IR's operating margin swung from 4.0% in 2025Q2 to 37.9% in 2026Q3, with net margins ranging from negative 6.1% to 32.4%, which makes any single-quarter read of earning power unreliable.
Compared with the more stable operating margins typical of peers such as IDEX and Pentair, IR's quarterly variance appears driven by non-recurring items, amortization from acquisition accounting, and gross margin swings between roughly 24% and 45%. Operating margin on a trailing basis is a more reliable anchor than net margin, which is distorted by below-the-line charges. The pattern suggests earning power is closer to the mid-to-high teens operating margin observed across most quarters than to the peak 37.9% print, warranting caution in extrapolating recent strength.
ROIC Lags Peers Despite Recent Recovery
Based on IR's reported quarterly figures, ROIC has moved from 0.4% in 2025Q2 to 4.2% in 2026Q3, still well below the 10% to 15% range reported by peers such as IDEX, Pentair, and Franklin Electric.
The low ROIC is partly a function of the goodwill-heavy asset base, which dilutes invested capital returns even when operating performance improves, so the gap versus peers may reflect acquisition premiums rather than weak operations. Return on equity of 6.4% in the latest quarter is similarly modest for a company with a 56x trailing P/E, indicating the market is paying for growth optionality rather than current capital efficiency. Investors should monitor whether ROIC can sustainably exceed its cost of capital as acquired businesses integrate.
Conservative Debt Load Supports Acquisition Capacity
According to reported figures, IR's debt-to-equity has held between 0.45 and 0.49 across ten quarters while interest coverage has ranged from 1.45x to 24.62x, indicating a balance sheet that is structurally manageable but sensitive to earnings dips.
The stable debt-to-equity ratio suggests management has kept leverage roughly constant as equity grew, rather than actively deleveraging, which is consistent with an M&A strategy that redeploys cash flow into acquisitions. Interest coverage's wide range, especially the 1.45x print in 2025Q2, indicates that debt service comfort depends heavily on quarterly operating income, which has proven volatile. Net debt rising from acquisitions warrants monitoring, as coverage would compress quickly if operating margins fall back toward the lower end of their recent range.
Clean Ratios Mask Intangible-Heavy Equity
Based on reported figures, the 0.47 debt-to-equity ratio looks conservative, yet goodwill of roughly $8.1B to $8.6B against total assets near $18B suggests tangible equity is considerably thinner than headline book value.
Debt-to-equity is the ratio most commonly cited as evidence of balance sheet strength for IR, but in an acquisition-built company it obscures how much equity consists of goodwill and intangibles that could be impaired. A tangible debt-to-equity or net debt to tangible capital ratio would give a more conservative picture of solvency. Investors should weigh the clean headline leverage against the risk that a goodwill write-down would materially reduce book equity without any change in cash generation.