Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 50.6x · EV/EBITDA 38.0x · ROE 16.6%. (1999–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $140.7B | $205.4B | $188.9B | $120.6B | $96.1B | $131.4B | $98.4B | $70.6B | $56.9B | $42.4B | $24.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $137.6B | $202.4B | $187.1B | $117.8B | $94.5B | $130.2B | $96.8B | $69.6B | $56.0B | $38.6B | $20.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 50.61 | 71.96 | 81.30 | 67.07 | 72.70 | 77.10 | 92.76 | 51.18 | 50.52 | 64.37 | 33.87 |
| P/S Ratio | 13.98 | 20.41 | 22.62 | 16.92 | 15.44 | 23.02 | 22.58 | 15.77 | 15.28 | 13.57 | 9.22 |
| P/B Ratio | 8.05 | 11.45 | 11.43 | 9.00 | 8.64 | 10.95 | 10.06 | 8.51 | 8.51 | 8.98 | 4.31 |
| P/FCF | 56.49 | 82.47 | 144.92 | 160.85 | 100.23 | 75.71 | 86.08 | 60.24 | 57.93 | 44.53 | 25.20 |
| P/OCF | 46.43 | 67.78 | 78.24 | 66.48 | 64.43 | 62.90 | 66.28 | 44.20 | 48.65 | 37.10 | 23.90 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 20.11 | 22.40 | 16.54 | 15.18 | 22.81 | 22.21 | 15.53 | 15.05 | 12.34 | 7.43 |
| EV / EBITDA | 38.00 | 55.86 | 66.55 | 54.32 | 48.63 | 60.91 | 72.65 | 44.18 | 42.47 | 33.57 | 19.42 |
| EV / EBIT | 46.73 | 61.11 | 69.96 | 60.15 | 58.80 | 68.89 | 92.20 | 50.60 | 46.72 | 36.31 | 21.15 |
| EV / FCF | — | 81.24 | 143.48 | 157.18 | 98.58 | 75.02 | 84.66 | 59.31 | 57.05 | 40.49 | 20.31 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 66.0% | 66.0% | 67.5% | 66.4% | 67.4% | 69.3% | 65.6% | 69.4% | 69.9% | 70.1% | 69.9% |
| Operating Margin | 29.3% | 29.3% | 28.1% | 24.8% | 25.3% | 31.9% | 24.1% | 30.7% | 32.2% | 33.7% | 35.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 28.4% | 28.4% | 27.8% | 25.2% | 21.3% | 29.9% | 24.3% | 30.8% | 30.3% | 21.1% | 27.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 16.6% | 16.6% | 15.5% | 14.7% | 11.4% | 15.6% | 11.7% | 18.4% | 19.8% | 12.6% | 14.6% |
| ROA | 14.5% | 14.5% | 13.6% | 12.7% | 10.0% | 13.8% | 10.1% | 15.7% | 16.6% | 10.8% | 12.9% |
| ROIC | 15.0% | 15.0% | 13.9% | 13.1% | 11.6% | 14.4% | 10.2% | 15.8% | 26.8% | 86.8% | 74.2% |
| ROCE | 16.5% | 16.5% | 15.2% | 13.9% | 13.2% | 16.1% | 11.1% | 17.5% | 20.4% | 20.1% | 18.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | — | — | 0.01 | — | 0.01 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.05 | — | — | 0.04 | — | 0.05 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.17 | -0.11 | -0.21 | -0.14 | -0.10 | -0.17 | -0.13 | -0.13 | -0.81 | -0.84 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.85 | -0.85 | -0.67 | -1.27 | -0.81 | -0.56 | -1.22 | -0.69 | -0.65 | -3.35 | -4.68 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.23 | -1.44 | -3.67 | -1.65 | -0.69 | -1.42 | -0.93 | -0.87 | -4.04 | -4.89 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($3.4B) exceeds total debt ($303M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.87 | 4.87 | 4.07 | 4.76 | 4.40 | 5.08 | 6.86 | 4.53 | 5.28 | 4.55 | 7.69 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.96 | 3.96 | 3.22 | 4.02 | 3.77 | 4.57 | 6.24 | 3.95 | 4.78 | 4.31 | 7.43 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.96 | 2.96 | 2.30 | 3.15 | 2.90 | 3.68 | 5.36 | 3.13 | 3.73 | 3.73 | 6.82 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.49 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.42 | 0.39 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.54 | 0.42 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.86 | 1.86 | 1.83 | 1.96 | 2.27 | 2.98 | 2.49 | 2.30 | 2.74 | 3.88 | 4.47 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 59.05 | 59.29 | 64.94 | 62.96 | 57.08 | 60.85 | 57.73 | 66.87 | 59.25 | 58.06 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.0% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 2.0% | 2.0% | 1.6% | 3.0% |
| FCF Yield | 1.8% | 1.2% | 0.7% | 0.6% | 1.0% | 1.3% | 1.2% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 2.2% | 4.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.6% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 2.7% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 5.4% | 0.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.6% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 2.7% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 5.4% | 0.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $363M | $362M | $357M | $362M | $366M | $361M | $359M | $356M | $349M | $354M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 27 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ISRG stock.
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 50.6x. The historical average is 53.8x. This places it at the 45th percentile of its historical range.
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 38.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 38.7x.
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 16.6%. The historical average is 7.2%.
Based on historical data, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 50.6x. This is at the 45th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Intuitive Surgical, Inc. has 66.0% gross margin and 29.3% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.1x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Procedure volume concentration
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Signals Operating Leverage
Operating margin expanded from 24.8% in 2024Q1 to 33.6% in 2026Q2, as reported in SEC filings, while gross margin held above 66%, indicating strong pricing power and cost discipline.
The consistent gross margin above 66% suggests that ISRG maintains pricing power despite scaling, while the operating margin expansion of nearly 900 basis points over ten quarters reflects significant operating leverage. Net margin has been volatile, dipping to 27.0% in 2025Q2 and peaking at 31.0% in 2025Q1, likely due to non-recurring items or tax effects, but the underlying trend is upward. Investors should focus on operating margin as the cleanest measure of core earning power, as it excludes the noise from tax rates and one-time gains.
Return on Capital Inflecting Higher
ROIC improved from 3.2% in 2024Q1 to 4.7% in 2026Q2, based on reported figures, while ROE rose from 4.0% to 4.6%, indicating a gradual but steady compounding of returns.
The absolute ROIC and ROE levels appear low, but this is partly due to the company's massive cash pile and conservative capital structure, which depresses returns on equity and invested capital. The upward trajectory in ROIC, driven by margin expansion and improving asset turnover, suggests that the company is becoming more efficient at generating returns from its invested capital. As the asset base matures and revenue grows, these returns should continue to climb, though they remain below peers like Stryker and Boston Scientific, which have higher leverage and lower cash balances.
Working Capital Drags on Cash Conversion
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 217 days in 2026Q2, up from 212 days in 2024Q1, as reported in financial statements, driven by high inventory days of 194 and slow receivable collection.
The CCC is exceptionally long, primarily due to DIO of 194 days, which reflects the capital-intensive nature of manufacturing surgical robots and the need to hold significant inventory. DSO has improved from 61 days in 2024Q1 to 53 days in 2026Q2, indicating better receivables management, but DPO remains low at around 30 days, suggesting limited supplier leverage. The high inventory levels may be strategic to ensure supply chain resilience, but they tie up cash and could become a drag if demand softens. Asset turnover is low at 0.14, consistent with a heavy asset base, but it has been stable, indicating that revenue growth is matching asset growth.
Minimal Debt Provides Strategic Flexibility
ISRG's debt-to-equity ratio is effectively zero, with D/EBITDA at 0.28 in 2025Q4, as per balance sheet data, indicating a fortress balance sheet with negligible refinancing risk.
The company operates with virtually no debt, which is unusual for a capital-intensive manufacturer and provides exceptional financial flexibility. This conservative leverage allows ISRG to invest heavily in R&D and capacity expansion without the burden of interest payments, and it positions the company to weather economic downturns or pursue opportunistic acquisitions. The absence of debt also means that the company's earnings are not levered, so the low ROE is a function of the capital structure rather than operational weakness. Investors should monitor whether the company begins to employ leverage to enhance returns, but the current stance suggests a risk-averse approach.
Ample Liquidity Buffers Short-Term Obligations
Current ratio improved to 4.96 in 2026Q2, with quick ratio at 3.91, as reported in recent filings, indicating a strong liquidity position that can cover short-term liabilities nearly five times over.
The current ratio has remained above 4.0 for the past ten quarters, reflecting a substantial cash and investment portfolio that far exceeds current liabilities. The quick ratio, which excludes inventory, is still above 3.9, suggesting that even without selling inventory, the company can meet its obligations. This liquidity cushion provides a buffer against operational disruptions or market volatility, and it supports the company's ability to fund its growth initiatives without external financing. However, the large cash balance also drags on returns, as it earns minimal interest, so investors should weigh the opportunity cost of this conservatism.
P/E Misleads on Growth Potential
The trailing P/E of 47.49 appears expensive, but forward P/E of 34.61 and PEG of 2.18, based on reported figures, suggest the market is pricing in sustained double-digit growth.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for ISRG is the trailing P/E, which fails to account for the company's rapid earnings growth and the significant non-cash stock-based compensation that inflates reported earnings. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 35.60 is still high but better reflects the company's cash-generating ability and excludes depreciation and amortization. Additionally, investors should consider price-to-FCF, which at 53.01 is elevated but may normalize as capital expenditures decline. The PEG ratio of 2.18 suggests that the stock is not cheap relative to its growth rate, but the quality of that growth, driven by recurring procedure volumes, may justify a premium.