Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -87.8%. (2007–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1M | $3M | $11M | $10M | $7M | $157M | $19M | $15M | $18M | $31M | $46M |
| Enterprise Value | $-3695334 | $-2154183 | $9M | $6M | $473138 | $157M | $20M | $16M | $18M | $32M | $47M |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.19 | 0.48 | 1.81 | 1.56 | 1.60 | 82.07 | 12.89 | 4.06 | 5.83 | 14.37 | 13.90 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.21 | 0.54 | 4.35 | 1.74 | 0.94 | — | — | — | — | — | 89.11 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.20 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 49.95 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -0.41 | 1.53 | 0.88 | 0.11 | 81.62 | 13.54 | 4.33 | 6.02 | 14.84 | 13.91 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 53.61 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 24.1% | 24.1% | 21.6% | 16.4% | 21.6% | 43.4% | 33.2% | 23.5% | 22.2% | 26.2% | 18.4% |
| Operating Margin | -61.1% | -61.1% | -67.6% | -62.2% | -74.5% | -142.1% | -82.8% | -23.2% | -108.6% | -226.9% | -203.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -60.6% | -60.6% | -66.1% | -63.8% | -74.9% | -156.4% | -108.0% | -24.4% | -123.2% | -258.8% | -203.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -87.8% | -87.8% | -95.8% | -62.0% | -98.5% | — | — | — | — | — | -799.1% |
| ROA | -55.1% | -55.1% | -64.0% | -48.4% | -52.1% | -141.7% | -101.7% | -42.0% | -127.6% | -157.9% | -158.2% |
| ROIC | -557.3% | -557.3% | -277.7% | -262.5% | -273.7% | — | — | — | — | -905.4% | -398.0% |
| ROCE | -80.2% | -80.2% | -93.7% | -59.6% | -90.9% | — | — | — | — | -2098.1% | -616.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.37 | 0.06 | 0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | 1.13 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.99 | -0.68 | -0.76 | -0.88 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.06 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3.41 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -85.76 | -85.76 | -149.79 | -567.56 | -61.68 | -9.96 | -3.02 | -6.54 | -8.50 | -10.79 | -81.16 |
Net cash position: cash ($5M) exceeds total debt ($443636)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.86 | 4.86 | 2.19 | 4.06 | 4.55 | 0.78 | 0.22 | 0.39 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 1.00 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.67 | 4.67 | 2.12 | 3.84 | 4.30 | 0.68 | 0.17 | 0.36 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.88 |
| Cash Ratio | 4.07 | 4.07 | 1.14 | 3.26 | 3.48 | 0.40 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.21 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.82 | 1.16 | 0.89 | 0.45 | 0.64 | 1.19 | 1.97 | 1.25 | 0.63 | 0.91 |
| Inventory Turnover | 16.98 | 16.98 | 31.86 | 16.73 | 6.66 | 3.15 | 4.47 | 21.61 | 13.51 | 4.16 | 8.23 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 17.74 | 77.45 | 15.79 | 99.88 | 93.77 | 55.74 | 87.19 | 118.41 | 78.56 | 41.03 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.0% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $3M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $1M | $808108 | $792089 | $430765 | $426715 | $415175 |
Persistent Operating Cash Burn
As reported in recent financial filings, IVDA trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 0.19, reflecting a market valuation that appears to heavily discount the company's long-term growth prospects given the recent 12.3% year-over-year revenue decline and the absence of positive earnings to support traditional valuation multiples.
The current P/S multiple suggests that investors are pricing the firm as a distressed asset rather than a growth-oriented AI provider. This valuation level implies that the market remains skeptical of the company's ability to pivot toward high-margin software revenue, viewing the current hardware-heavy business model as a liability rather than a foundation for future scale.
Based on historical quarterly data, IVDA's ROIC has consistently remained in negative territory, reaching a low of -188.9% in 2025Q4, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder capital rather than compounding it through its existing operational and investment activities.
The persistent inability to generate a positive return on invested capital suggests that the firm's cost structure is fundamentally misaligned with its revenue generation capabilities. Without a significant improvement in operating margins, the company's reliance on external capital to fund operations will likely continue to dilute existing shareholders.
According to the provided financial statements, the cash conversion cycle has fluctuated wildly, ranging from -30 days to 109 days, which highlights the inherent unpredictability of the company's municipal project-based revenue model and the resulting strain on its internal working capital management.
The wide variance in days sales outstanding and days payable outstanding suggests that IVDA lacks the leverage to dictate terms to its suppliers or customers. This inefficiency forces the company to maintain higher cash balances than would otherwise be necessary, further exacerbating the impact of its ongoing operating losses.
As reported in recent quarterly filings, the company's current ratio of 4.53 in 2026Q1 appears superficially strong, yet this metric masks the underlying reality of persistent cash burn and the potential for rapid liquidity depletion if project-based revenue cycles fail to materialize as anticipated.
While the current ratio suggests an ability to cover short-term obligations, the lack of consistent operating cash flow means that the company's liquidity is highly dependent on its existing cash reserves. Investors should monitor the burn rate closely, as any delay in government contract payments could quickly transform this seemingly adequate liquidity position into a funding crisis.
The most commonly misapplied metric for IVDA is the price-to-sales ratio, which obscures the low quality of revenue derived from pass-through hardware sales and fails to account for the high operational costs required to support the company's complex, multi-standard IoT integration platform.
Analysts should instead focus on the ratio of software-to-hardware revenue, as this provides a clearer picture of the company's progress toward a scalable, high-margin business model. Relying on headline revenue growth ignores the reality that much of the firm's top-line is currently tied to low-margin, non-recurring infrastructure deployments.
Includes 30+ ratios · 16 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying IVDA stock.
Iveda Solutions, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Iveda Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -87.8%. The historical average is -146.2%.
Based on historical data, Iveda Solutions, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.3x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Iveda Solutions, Inc. has 24.1% gross margin and -61.1% operating margin.