Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -11.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -29.1%. (2017–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.4B | $4.0B | $5.9B | $10.6B | $7.9B | $6.6B | $3.3B | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $2.9B | $3.5B | $6.0B | $9.6B | $7.4B | $6.0B | $2.9B | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -11.61 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.34 | 3.89 | 9.49 | 37.16 | 67.86 | 95.39 | 44.36 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 3.42 | 4.00 | 5.72 | 8.47 | 10.67 | 8.57 | 5.57 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.42 | 9.59 | 33.83 | 63.57 | 87.16 | 38.33 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | 60.3% | 62.6% | 49.4% | 44.1% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.4% |
| Operating Margin | -13.3% | -13.3% | -48.3% | -154.1% | -389.4% | -570.0% | — | -214.4% | -3.1% | 58.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | -28.8% | -28.8% | -28.2% | -181.8% | -381.5% | -586.4% | -355.2% | -164.4% | -5.7% | 39.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -29.1% | -29.1% | -15.4% | -51.9% | -59.1% | -59.2% | -112.2% | — | -26.7% | 77.0% |
| ROA | -17.4% | -17.4% | -10.1% | -32.6% | -36.4% | -43.8% | -52.8% | -28.3% | -0.8% | 3.9% |
| ROIC | -12.7% | -12.7% | -32.3% | -120.9% | -154.3% | -170.4% | — | — | — | 100.2% |
| ROCE | -11.0% | -11.0% | -20.1% | -33.0% | -47.4% | -52.4% | — | -61.7% | -0.7% | 7.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.34 | 0.26 | 0.38 | 0.16 | 0.01 | — | 0.50 | 0.02 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.97 | 0.02 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.49 | 0.06 | -0.76 | -0.67 | -0.74 | -0.76 | — | -23.80 | -0.15 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -1381.54 | -0.13 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.72 | — |
| Interest Coverage | -12.21 | -12.21 | -6.32 | -22.87 | -40.29 | -451.44 | -73.20 | -594.23 | -18.71 | — |
Net cash position: cash ($902M) exceeds total debt ($414M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.96 | 1.96 | 4.62 | 6.92 | 3.69 | 4.14 | 5.14 | 1.62 | 2.05 | 4.43 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.91 | 1.91 | 4.54 | 6.83 | 3.66 | 4.14 | 5.12 | 1.61 | 2.05 | 4.43 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.49 | 1.49 | 4.04 | 6.05 | 3.44 | 3.85 | 4.38 | 1.25 | 1.36 | 0.04 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.59 | 0.38 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Inventory Turnover | 12.75 | 12.75 | 9.81 | 7.42 | 6.31 | — | — | — | — | -8.73 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 88.79 | 72.67 | 201.05 | 138.87 | 310.49 | 402.06 | 211.19 | 806.53 | 3538.66 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $184M | $183M | $176M | $159M | $141M | $118M | $132M | $100M | $132M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 9 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LEGN stock.
Legend Biotech Corporation's current P/E ratio is -11.6x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Legend Biotech Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -29.1%. The historical average is -34.6%.
Based on historical data, Legend Biotech Corporation is trading at a P/E of -11.6x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Legend Biotech Corporation has 60.3% gross margin and -13.3% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Geopolitical & single-asset dependency
Gross Margin Stabilization Amid Operating Leverage
Legend Biotech's gross margin has stabilized at a healthy 64.5% in 2026Q2, a significant recovery from the 41.8% low in 2024Q1, suggesting the company is achieving better manufacturing efficiency as reported in its latest financial statements.
The volatility in gross margin, ranging from 41.8% to 73.0% over ten quarters, reflects the complex, high-variable-cost nature of autologous cell therapy manufacturing. The recent stabilization above 60% is a positive signal that the company is managing its per-patient production costs more effectively as volume scales. However, the operating margin only turned positive at 14.9% in 2026Q2, indicating that significant fixed costs in R&D and SG&A still require substantial revenue growth to achieve sustainable profitability.
Emerging Positive Returns on Invested Capital
After years of negative returns, Legend Biotech's ROIC turned positive at 5.6% in 2026Q2, a critical inflection point suggesting the commercial scale-up of Carvykti is beginning to generate returns on the substantial capital invested in manufacturing and R&D.
The shift from a deeply negative ROIC of -19.6% in 2024Q1 to a positive 5.6% in 2026Q2 is driven by the dramatic improvement in operating margin, which swung from -125.4% to +14.9% over the same period. This indicates the business model is transitioning from a pure cash-burn phase to one where revenue growth is outpacing the expansion of its cost base. The sustainability of this positive ROIC is contingent on maintaining gross margins and continuing to scale the commercial infrastructure without a proportional increase in operating expenses.
Working Capital Drag from Scaling Operations
Despite a healthy cash conversion cycle of 21 days in 2026Q2, down from 99 days in 2024Q1, the company experienced a massive $100.5M working capital outflow in the same quarter, indicating that operational scaling is creating significant cash drag.
The improvement in the CCC from 99 to 21 days suggests Legend Biotech is managing its receivables and payables more efficiently as commercial operations mature. However, the large negative working capital change in the cash flow statement reveals that the underlying asset growth—likely inventory for manufacturing and receivables from expanding sales—is consuming cash faster than the cycle metrics imply. This disconnect highlights that while the business is becoming more efficient on a per-cycle basis, the absolute cash required to fund its growth trajectory remains substantial.
Conservative Leverage with Strong Interest Coverage
Legend Biotech's debt-to-equity ratio has improved to a conservative 0.23 in 2026Q2, and its interest coverage ratio surged to 288.50, indicating that debt service is exceptionally comfortable following the shift to operating profitability.
The deleveraging trend, with D/E falling from 0.41 in 2025Q4 to 0.23 in 2026Q2, appears driven by equity issuance and retained earnings growth rather than debt repayment. The dramatic improvement in interest coverage from negative values to 288.50 is a direct result of the company generating positive operating income for the first time in the dataset. This financial flexibility is crucial for funding the ongoing manufacturing build-out and pipeline expansion without straining the balance sheet.
Robust Liquidity Buffer for Growth Investments
With a current ratio of 3.04 and quick ratio of 2.94 in 2026Q2, Legend Biotech maintains a strong liquidity position, though the buffer has declined from a peak of 5.66 in early 2024 as capital is deployed for scaling.
The high quick ratio, nearly matching the current ratio, indicates that the company's liquidity is not dependent on inventory, which is a positive sign given the specialized nature of its cell therapy products. The decline in the current ratio from 5.66 to 3.04 over two years reflects a strategic shift from holding excess cash to investing in property, plant, and equipment for manufacturing capacity. This level of liquidity appears adequate to support near-term operations and capital expenditures, but investors should monitor the rate of cash burn relative to revenue growth.
The Misleading Nature of Net Margin
The net margin, which swung from -63.6% to +8.6% in just two years, is the most commonly misapplied ratio for Legend Biotech as it is heavily distorted by non-operating items and the complex accounting of its J&J collaboration.
As noted in the prior analysis, reported net income is highly volatile and often diverges from operating performance due to significant non-operating charges and accounting adjustments. For a company with a 50/50 profit-sharing arrangement, the net margin does not clearly reflect the true unit economics of the CAR-T business or the total capital intensity of the program. Analysts should instead focus on gross margin trends and the operating margin trajectory, which better isolate the core commercial performance from financial engineering and one-time items.