Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 604.0x · EV/EBITDA 58.7x · ROE 0.7%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.7B | $2.8B | $2.8B | $2.9B | $1.8B | $3.1B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $4.6B | $2.7B | $3.1B | $3.3B | $2.1B | $3.1B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 604.00 | 352.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.29 | 1.93 | 2.23 | 2.73 | 2.04 | 4.67 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 3.11 | 1.81 | 1.93 | 2.01 | 1.16 | 2.02 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 42.58 | 25.03 | 32.61 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 32.06 | 18.84 | 26.05 | — | 33.25 | 331.00 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.90 | 2.50 | 3.13 | 2.47 | 4.69 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 58.69 | 34.21 | 79.44 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 191.75 | 112.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 24.53 | 36.47 | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 32.4% | 32.4% | 32.2% | 28.6% | 27.6% | 30.2% | 35.6% | 29.4% |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | 1.7% | -2.5% | -17.9% | -24.5% | -42.9% | 4.1% | 7.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 0.7% | 0.7% | -4.6% | -17.6% | -25.1% | -46.0% | -10.1% | 2.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 0.7% | 0.7% | -4.0% | -12.6% | -14.1% | -24.2% | -9.2% | — |
| ROA | 0.4% | 0.4% | -2.7% | -8.7% | -10.5% | -17.6% | -4.1% | 2.0% |
| ROIC | 1.1% | 1.1% | -1.3% | -7.6% | -9.2% | -14.8% | 1.8% | — |
| ROCE | 1.3% | 1.3% | -1.7% | -9.7% | -11.0% | -17.3% | 1.8% | 6.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.34 | 0.36 | 0.32 | 0.10 | 0.37 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.46 | 2.46 | 12.33 | — | — | — | 7.88 | 3.72 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.04 | 0.23 | 0.30 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 0.35 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.69 | -0.69 | 8.40 | — | — | — | 7.47 | 3.55 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.50 | 3.86 | — | — | — | — | 27.74 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.06 | 2.06 | -1.17 | -8.74 | -10.68 | -7.56 | -1.01 | 2.46 |
Net cash position: cash ($249M) exceeds total debt ($194M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.65 | 1.65 | 1.37 | 1.11 | 1.33 | 2.28 | 1.00 | 0.50 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.65 | 1.65 | 1.37 | 1.11 | 1.33 | 1.96 | 1.00 | 0.50 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.68 | 0.39 | 0.62 | 1.27 | 0.25 | 0.06 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.50 | 0.40 | 0.35 | 0.24 | 0.76 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | 12.24 | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 24.53 | 38.52 | 43.44 | 43.10 | 54.30 | 42.29 | 32.86 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.2% | 0.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 2.3% | 4.0% | 3.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $391M | $379M | $367M | $355M | $328M | $374M | $374M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LFST stock.
LifeStance Health Group, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 604.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
LifeStance Health Group, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 58.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 56.8x.
LifeStance Health Group, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 0.7%. The historical average is -10.6%.
Based on historical data, LifeStance Health Group, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 604.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
LifeStance Health Group, Inc. has 32.4% gross margin and 1.7% operating margin.
LifeStance Health Group, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
SBC masking true labor cost
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Drives Profitability Inflection
LifeStance's operating margin has swung from -5.1% in 2024Q2 to 7.0% in 2026Q2, according to recent quarterly filings, indicating a clear profitability inflection driven by operating leverage as revenue scales faster than fixed costs.
The improvement is led by a 390 basis point expansion in gross margin to 35.2%, which suggests favorable payor contract negotiations or a mix shift toward higher-reimbursement psychiatry services. The operating margin expansion to 7.0% demonstrates meaningful SG&A leverage, yet the net margin of 5.4% remains compressed, indicating that significant non-cash stock-based compensation continues to dilute reported earnings power.
Deleveraging Creates a Fortress Balance Sheet
LifeStance's debt-to-equity ratio has compressed from 0.35 in 2024Q1 to 0.14 in 2026Q2, and interest coverage has surged to 11.43x, providing a substantial buffer against economic or operational stress.
This rapid deleveraging, driven by debt paydown and cash accumulation, has transformed the capital structure from modestly leveraged to a net cash position. The resulting low interest burden provides significant financial flexibility for future investments or to absorb potential operational shocks, such as a spike in clinician recruitment costs or a temporary payor reimbursement lag.
Early Signs of Capital Compounding Emerge
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) has improved from a negative -0.6% in 2024Q2 to 1.6% in 2026Q2, signaling the initial stages of value creation as the business scales toward profitability.
While a 1.6% ROIC remains below the cost of capital, the trajectory is positive and driven primarily by margin expansion rather than asset turnover, which remains low at 0.20. For LifeStance to compound value sustainably, it must continue translating revenue growth into operating profit while maintaining or improving the efficiency of its clinician and clinic asset base.
Ample Liquidity Underpins Operational Stability
The company's current ratio stands at 1.38 in 2026Q2, supported by a cash balance of $225.9M that exceeds total debt, according to recent financial statements, providing a robust liquidity cushion.
The consistent liquidity ratio above 1.2 for the past six quarters suggests the company can comfortably meet near-term obligations. However, the balance sheet's health is more a function of its net cash position than traditional working capital, as the quick ratio equals the current ratio, indicating minimal inventory risk inherent to its service-based model.
The Misleading Allure of Adjusted EBITDA
The wide gap between the 1.8% operating margin and the 15% Adjusted EBITDA margin, as reported in recent filings, highlights how EBITDA can mislead investors by excluding significant recurring costs like stock-based compensation.
For a labor-intensive services firm like LifeStance, stock-based compensation is a real, recurring economic cost used to attract and retain clinicians. Excluding it from EBITDA inflates profitability metrics and obscures the true cash earnings power of the business model. Investors should focus on free cash flow conversion or net income as a more accurate measure of sustainable profitability.