Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 14.0x · EV/EBITDA 5.3x · ROE 16.4%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.5B | $4.1B | $4.4B | $4.0B | $4.4B | $3.3B | $1.2B | $2.1B | $1.8B | $791M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $4.7B | $4.2B | $4.5B | $4.0B | $4.1B | $3.3B | $1.4B | $2.3B | $2.0B | $791M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 13.95 | 12.51 | 12.05 | 10.44 | 4.98 | 8.00 | — | 44.93 | 18.68 | 4.43 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.45 | 3.10 | 3.31 | 3.27 | 2.60 | 3.07 | 2.17 | 2.23 | 1.71 | 1.96 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.27 | 2.03 | 2.22 | 2.13 | 2.53 | 3.17 | 1.40 | 0.77 | 0.66 | 0.50 | — |
| P/FCF | 11.05 | 9.93 | 10.04 | 9.31 | 5.30 | 5.99 | 13.35 | 9.89 | 7.07 | 79.58 | — |
| P/OCF | 5.14 | 4.62 | 4.73 | 4.69 | 3.40 | 4.20 | 3.79 | 3.24 | 3.01 | 3.07 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.21 | 3.43 | 3.28 | 2.44 | 3.10 | 2.55 | 2.45 | 1.95 | 1.96 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.29 | 4.77 | 4.87 | 4.68 | 3.14 | 4.18 | — | 3.47 | 2.82 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 10.64 | 9.60 | 8.89 | 7.31 | 3.82 | 5.57 | — | 18.05 | 6.11 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 10.30 | 10.39 | 9.33 | 4.97 | 6.05 | 15.70 | 10.88 | 8.08 | 79.58 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 46.7% | 46.7% | 51.7% | 57.2% | 74.1% | 68.9% | 23.8% | 32.9% | 89.6% | 61.0% | 59.6% |
| Operating Margin | 33.5% | 33.5% | 38.9% | 43.6% | 63.4% | 55.9% | -355.7% | 13.5% | 26.3% | -0.3% | 26.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 24.8% | 24.8% | 27.8% | 31.6% | 52.7% | 38.7% | -223.2% | 5.3% | 9.0% | 0.4% | 19.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 16.4% | 16.4% | 19.0% | 21.4% | 64.2% | 44.3% | -67.7% | 1.8% | 4.4% | 0.2% | 3.4% |
| ROA | 11.4% | 11.4% | 13.1% | 14.6% | 41.4% | 26.1% | -49.1% | 1.5% | 3.7% | 0.1% | 3.3% |
| ROIC | 15.4% | 15.4% | 19.2% | 23.9% | 63.4% | 42.6% | -72.5% | 3.2% | 9.0% | -0.1% | 3.5% |
| ROCE | 17.1% | 17.1% | 20.6% | 22.9% | 57.1% | 42.2% | -83.4% | 3.9% | 11.3% | -0.1% | 4.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.38 | 0.47 | 0.14 | 0.14 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.30 | 0.50 | — | 0.59 | 0.54 | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.00 | -0.16 | 0.03 | 0.25 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.01 | -0.21 | 0.04 | — | 0.32 | 0.35 | — | 0.00 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.02 | -0.33 | 0.05 | 2.34 | 0.99 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage | 20.31 | 20.31 | 35.32 | 16661.97 | 46.09 | 19.34 | -66.89 | 4.52 | 11.13 | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.54 | 1.54 | 1.42 | 1.88 | 2.50 | 2.37 | 2.18 | 1.67 | 1.48 | 1.41 | 1.39 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.54 | 1.54 | 1.42 | 1.88 | 2.50 | 2.37 | 2.18 | 1.67 | 1.48 | 1.41 | 1.39 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 1.27 | 1.98 | 1.68 | 1.49 | 1.04 | 0.69 | — | 1.30 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.37 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.24 | 0.17 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 48.63 | 41.02 | 56.43 | 36.78 | 50.69 | 55.00 | 40.98 | 49.25 | 103.39 | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.5% | 2.8% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 1.7% | 0.4% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 34.8% | 34.8% | 26.7% | 22.7% | 8.4% | 3.4% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.2% | 8.0% | 8.3% | 9.6% | 20.1% | 12.5% | — | 2.2% | 5.4% | 22.6% | — |
| FCF Yield | 9.1% | 10.1% | 10.0% | 10.7% | 18.9% | 16.7% | 7.5% | 10.1% | 14.1% | 1.3% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 4.5% | 5.1% | 6.3% | 5.1% | 8.0% | 9.0% | 2.4% | 3.8% | 20.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 7.0% | 7.8% | 8.5% | 7.3% | 9.7% | 9.4% | 2.4% | 3.8% | 20.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $186M | $186M | $188M | $188M | $175M | $166M | $167M | $159M | $81M | $75M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MGY stock.
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation's current P/E ratio is 14.0x. The historical average is 14.5x. This places it at the 75th percentile of its historical range.
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 5.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 4.0x.
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 16.4%. The historical average is 10.7%.
Based on historical data, Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation is trading at a P/E of 14.0x. This is at the 75th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation's current dividend yield is 2.50% with a payout ratio of 34.8%.
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation has 46.7% gross margin and 33.5% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.5x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Karnes inventory exhaustion risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Resilience Amid Revenue Plateau
Gross margin surged to 81.5% in 2026Q2 from 49.0% in 2026Q1, while operating margin expanded to 50.0%, according to MGY's latest financial statements, reflecting strong cost control despite flat revenue.
The dramatic sequential margin expansion appears driven by a sharp drop in COGS, which fell 51.7% quarter-over-quarter, likely due to lower production costs or favorable price realizations. However, the prior year's trend shows operating margin declining from 38.8% in 2025Q1 to 35.6% in 2026Q1, suggesting underlying cost pressures. The 2026Q2 spike may be non-recurring, and investors should monitor whether margins can sustain above 50% as the company shifts capital toward the Giddings Field, which may carry higher per-unit costs.
ROIC Recovery Signals Capital Efficiency
ROIC improved to 7.9% in 2026Q2 from 4.3% in 2026Q1, while ROE rose to 8.7%, based on MGY's reported figures, indicating a rebound from the prior quarter's trough.
The sequential improvement in ROIC and ROE appears driven by the margin surge and efficient capital deployment, as asset turnover remained low at 0.16. Over the past year, ROIC has ranged from 3.3% to 7.9%, reflecting commodity price volatility and lumpy drilling results. The company's low leverage amplifies ROE relative to ROIC, but the underlying return on invested capital remains modest, suggesting that the market's forward P/E of 9.43 implies expectations of sustained margin expansion and efficient reinvestment in the Giddings Field.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves Sharply
DSO dropped to 36 days in 2026Q2 from 46 days in 2026Q1, while DPO extended to 170 days, according to MGY's financial statements, indicating improved cash collection and supplier payment terms.
The sharp reduction in DSO suggests more efficient receivables management, possibly due to higher oil price realizations or a shift in sales mix. The extension of DPO to 170 days from 82 days in the prior quarter indicates MGY is leveraging supplier credit, which may reflect increased negotiating power or timing of payables. However, the current ratio fell to 0.96, below 1.0, implying that current liabilities exceed current assets, though the company's minimal debt and strong cash flow generation mitigate liquidity concerns. Investors should monitor whether the extended DPO is sustainable or a one-time timing effect.
Fortress Balance Sheet Provides Flexibility
Debt-to-equity remains exceptionally low at 0.18 in 2026Q2, with interest coverage of 35.7x, according to MGY's reported figures, positioning the company to withstand commodity price downturns.
MGY's leverage is among the lowest in its peer group, with D/E of 0.18 versus peers like CIVI (0.68) and MTDR (0.59). Interest coverage of 35.7x indicates that debt service is highly comfortable, and the company's minimal debt load insulates it from rising interest rates. This fortress balance sheet provides strategic optionality for opportunistic acquisitions or increased shareholder returns, as evidenced by the $80.1M returned to shareholders in 2026Q2. However, the shift toward Giddings Field development may increase capital intensity, and investors should monitor whether debt levels rise to fund that growth.
Liquidity Buffer Thins but Cash Remains Strong
Current ratio dipped to 0.96 in 2026Q2 from 1.10 in 2026Q1, while cash stood at $295.9M, according to MGY's balance sheet, indicating a temporary working capital squeeze.
The current ratio below 1.0 suggests that current liabilities exceed current assets, which could signal liquidity stress if not for the company's substantial cash position and minimal debt. The quick ratio of 0.96 indicates that even without inventory, the company can cover near-term obligations. The dip appears driven by timing of payables and receivables, as DPO extended to 170 days. Given the fortress balance sheet and robust operating cash flow, the liquidity position appears adequate, but investors should monitor if the current ratio remains below 1.0 in subsequent quarters.
Misapplied Metric: P/E on Cyclical Earnings
The trailing P/E of 15.06 may mislead investors because MGY's earnings are highly cyclical and subject to non-cash impairments, according to reported financials, obscuring true earning power.
For E&P companies like MGY, P/E ratios are often distorted by commodity price swings and accounting adjustments such as impairments or reserve revisions. The forward P/E of 9.43 appears more indicative of normalized earnings, but even that may be optimistic if oil prices decline. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 5.69 (and 3.86 forward) better captures the company's cash-generating ability and is less affected by depreciation and non-cash items. Investors should also consider price-to-cash flow or FCF yield, as MGY's operating cash flow consistently exceeds net income, making earnings-based multiples less reliable.