Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 13.5x · EV/EBITDA 9.4x · ROE 28.7%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $11.7B | $13.1B | $9.1B | $5.4B | $3.3B | $3.3B | $2.0B | $1.8B | $1.3B | $2.0B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $10.4B | $11.8B | $8.1B | $4.2B | $2.9B | $3.3B | $2.2B | $2.1B | $1.8B | $2.4B | $2.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 13.50 | 17.22 | 15.03 | 8.90 | 5.07 | 7.08 | 14.08 | 17.64 | 12.84 | 23.63 | 22.97 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.34 | 3.14 | 2.41 | 1.57 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.53 | 0.90 | 1.11 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.66 | 5.20 | 3.24 | 2.27 | 1.84 | 2.64 | 2.46 | 2.70 | 2.38 | 3.80 | 2.45 |
| P/FCF | 29.48 | 19.09 | 16.08 | 8.66 | 4.86 | 11.88 | 9.79 | 10.56 | 10.34 | — | 19.04 |
| P/OCF | 15.51 | 17.35 | 14.08 | 7.97 | 4.61 | 10.66 | 8.03 | 8.92 | 7.97 | 46.31 | 14.52 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.82 | 2.15 | 1.24 | 0.73 | 0.87 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.70 | 1.05 | 1.05 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.35 | 12.23 | 9.83 | 5.31 | 3.15 | 4.65 | 7.59 | 8.99 | 8.29 | 12.89 | 11.43 |
| EV / EBIT | 11.61 | 11.54 | 9.86 | 4.99 | 3.31 | 5.03 | 9.66 | 10.98 | 10.03 | 16.26 | 14.12 |
| EV / FCF | — | 17.16 | 14.31 | 6.83 | 4.22 | 11.65 | 10.96 | 12.43 | 13.61 | — | 18.01 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 27.4% | 27.4% | 27.7% | 28.9% | 28.1% | 22.0% | 18.0% | 16.3% | 14.3% | 14.4% | 16.2% |
| Operating Margin | 21.4% | 21.4% | 20.4% | 22.1% | 22.0% | 17.4% | 10.3% | 7.9% | 6.9% | 6.7% | 7.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 18.3% | 18.3% | 16.0% | 17.6% | 16.5% | 12.4% | 5.8% | 4.2% | 4.2% | 3.8% | 4.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 28.7% | 28.7% | 23.4% | 28.9% | 42.9% | 45.5% | 19.1% | 16.5% | 19.0% | 11.6% | 11.1% |
| ROA | 24.3% | 24.3% | 20.0% | 24.1% | 33.2% | 28.8% | 9.6% | 7.4% | 7.8% | 6.2% | 7.2% |
| ROIC | 44.7% | 44.7% | 38.2% | 43.6% | 51.2% | 44.1% | 18.3% | 14.6% | 13.9% | 13.4% | 14.4% |
| ROCE | 32.6% | 32.6% | 28.9% | 34.9% | 54.1% | 51.7% | 21.1% | 16.8% | 15.6% | 13.1% | 13.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.44 | 0.63 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.24 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 1.22 | 1.77 | 2.34 | 2.52 | 1.20 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.52 | -0.36 | -0.48 | -0.24 | -0.05 | 0.30 | 0.48 | 0.75 | 0.64 | -0.13 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.37 | -1.37 | -1.22 | -1.43 | -0.47 | -0.09 | 0.81 | 1.35 | 2.00 | 1.87 | -0.65 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.92 | -1.77 | -1.83 | -0.64 | -0.22 | 1.18 | 1.87 | 3.28 | — | -1.03 |
| Interest Coverage | 9454.16 | 9454.16 | 2002.13 | 693.25 | 1082.52 | 84.17 | 11.87 | 7.47 | 6.97 | 7.51 | 20.77 |
Net cash position: cash ($1.4B) exceeds total debt ($46M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.92 | 5.92 | 5.06 | 6.43 | 4.41 | 2.66 | 2.43 | 2.96 | 3.02 | 3.05 | 4.08 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.68 | 4.68 | 3.89 | 5.23 | 3.12 | 1.54 | 1.50 | 1.71 | 1.60 | 1.70 | 2.98 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.36 | 3.36 | 2.66 | 4.00 | 1.95 | 0.23 | 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.31 | 0.50 | 1.60 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.38 | 1.15 | 1.24 | 1.78 | 2.18 | 1.57 | 1.77 | 1.83 | 1.72 | 1.42 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.94 | 5.94 | 5.89 | 6.40 | 6.38 | 6.83 | 6.24 | 6.97 | 6.52 | 5.92 | 7.12 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 41.54 | 43.59 | 37.52 | 34.86 | 45.69 | 54.42 | 40.54 | 39.79 | 39.43 | 45.51 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.9% | 0.8% | 1.0% | 1.2% | 1.7% | 0.9% | 1.1% | 1.2% | 1.7% | 9.7% | 0.9% |
| Payout Ratio | 14.3% | 14.3% | 14.7% | 11.1% | 8.5% | 6.2% | 16.0% | 22.1% | 21.7% | 230.1% | 21.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.4% | 5.8% | 6.7% | 11.2% | 19.7% | 14.1% | 7.1% | 5.7% | 7.8% | 4.2% | 4.4% |
| FCF Yield | 3.4% | 5.2% | 6.2% | 11.5% | 20.6% | 8.4% | 10.2% | 9.5% | 9.7% | — | 5.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.1% | 1.9% | 0.5% | 0.4% | 1.1% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 2.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.0% | 2.7% | 1.5% | 1.6% | 2.8% | 1.0% | 1.4% | 1.3% | 4.2% | 9.7% | 0.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $222M | $228M | $227M | $226M | $227M | $226M | $225M | $229M | $230M | $229M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MLI stock.
Mueller Industries, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 13.5x. The historical average is 14.6x. This places it at the 45th percentile of its historical range.
Mueller Industries, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 9.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 5.8x.
Mueller Industries, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 28.7%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 18.0%.
Based on historical data, Mueller Industries, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 13.5x. This is at the 45th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Mueller Industries, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.93% with a payout ratio of 14.3%.
Mueller Industries, Inc. has 27.4% gross margin and 21.4% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Mueller Industries, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.0x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Metal spread normalization risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Returns Cooling From First-Quarter Peak
Mueller's ROIC slipped to 9.8% in 2026Q3 from 14.6% two quarters earlier, according to the company's quarterly ratio disclosures, with the decline appearing driven by 450 basis points of gross margin compression rather than any meaningful deterioration in asset turnover.
ROIC has oscillated between 6.6% in 2025Q4 and 14.6% in 2026Q1 over the trailing ten quarters, so the current 9.8% reads as mid-range rather than a structural low, but the swing appears to be set almost entirely by the metal spread rather than capital productivity. Asset turnover held inside a narrow 0.28-0.35 band throughout the period, which implies incremental returns are being driven by pricing, and the parallel slide in quarterly ROE from 8.1% to 6.2% suggests the compression is margin-borne rather than volume-borne. Because ROA of 5.2% sits only one percentage point below ROE, there is essentially no leverage amplification in these returns, so investors should judge compounding ability on the spread, not the balance sheet.
Cash Cycle Lengthens Despite Payables Stretch
Mueller's cash conversion cycle widened to 75 days in 2026Q3 from 69 days in 2024Q2, as reported in its quarterly ratio summary, with DSO rising five days to 48 and inventory days reaching 53 offsetting only part of a three-day payables extension.
The lengthening cycle coincides with the 31.6% year-over-year revenue surge, which may indicate that receivables and inventory are growing faster than collections in a rising-copper environment rather than a genuine loss of working-capital discipline, since DPO has actually stretched from 23 to 26 days. The 88-day peak in 2025Q4 versus 69 days in 2024Q2 shows the CCC is highly sensitive to input cost swings, and the resulting working-capital swings of roughly $240 million between 2026Q1 and 2026Q3 explain why the -7.1% FCF margin in 2026Q2 occurred despite $249.7 million of net income. Asset turnover improving to 0.33-0.35 from 0.28-0.30 a year earlier suggests throughput is genuinely rising, but the combination of a lengthening CCC and volatile conversion warrants monitoring of whether channel inventory is being pushed ahead of end demand.
Debt Service A Non-Event For MLI
With debt-to-equity of 0.01 and D/EBITDA of 0.09 in 2026Q3, per Mueller's reported balance sheet data, interest coverage of 2,201x renders refinancing and covenant risk effectively moot, leaving leverage analysis largely uninformative for this particular capital structure.
Total debt of $26.5 million against $4.3 billion of assets means the highest observed D/EBITDA in the ten-quarter series was only 0.30 in 2025Q4, so even a full-cycle EBITDA decline would leave debt service trivially covered; interest coverage was unavailable for 2026Q1, which does not alter the picture given the scale involved. The more relevant question appears to be the opportunity cost of the $1.37 billion cash balance, which alongside a 0.9% dividend yield suggests capital is being hoarded rather than deployed, a posture that may flatter ROA and ROIC comparisons with more fully invested peers. Liquidity remains a further buffer, with the current ratio at 4.39 and quick ratio at 3.44 in 2026Q3, though both have come down from 5.92 and 4.68 at the 2025Q4 peak, a drift investors should monitor as it may simply reflect working-capital build rather than any change in policy.
Multiples Price Spread Normalization
MLI trades at 15.78x trailing earnings and 13.18x forward EPS with a PEG of 0.39, per the current valuation summary, a discount to nVent's 29.1x and WESCO's 24.4x that appears to imply the market expects the metal spread to compress.
The drop from 11.05x EV/EBITDA to 8.15x forward embeds roughly 36% EBITDA growth, which looks demanding against a 21.42% TTM operating margin already flagged as above historical norms, so the forward multiple may be resting on the very peak earnings investors should be discounting. The 4.76x price-to-book ratio stands well above the peer median near 3.1x, indicating the market is paying for the 28.7% return on equity rather than the asset base, a premium that appears justified only if mid-teens ROIC persists. Notably, P/FCF of 17.43x sits above the 15.78x P/E, consistent with the LIFO-driven cash conversion distortions already observed, and the 0.39 PEG should be treated cautiously because the 31.6% revenue growth underpinning it contains commodity pass-through rather than pure volume.
Margin Lead, ROIC Lag Versus Peers
Against the comp set, Mueller's 18.3% net margin and 0.01 debt-to-equity compare with WESCO's 2.7% margin at 1.49 leverage, as compiled in the peer table, a structural gap that appears to reflect MLI's value-add spread rather than simply superior operating efficiency.
Mueller's latest quarterly ROIC of 9.8% actually trails Insteel's 14.1% and Mueller Water Products' 19.7%, which is surprising given its much higher net margin, and the gap likely reflects the depressed invested-capital denominator treatment of $1.37 billion of idle cash rather than weaker operating assets. On earnings multiples, MLI's 15.78x sits below nVent (29.10x) and WESCO (24.37x) but above Insteel (13.22x), placing it mid-pack where a domestic, low-leverage, cash-generative fabricator would typically trade, so the valuation gap versus higher-growth electrical names appears structural rather than a mispricing that closes without a re-rating catalyst. Griffon's 198.4% ROE and Atkore's negative P/E are distorted by leverage and losses respectively, so neither is a meaningful benchmark, and investors should anchor instead on Watts-style plumbing comps for the Piping Systems segment.
Trailing P/E Obscures Spread-Driven Earnings
The 15.78x trailing P/E is the ratio most likely misapplied to this business model, per the current multiple set, because reported EPS embeds a cyclical peak in the metal spread plus interest income on $1.37 billion of cash rather than normalized operating earning power.
Operating margin has ranged from 14.1% in 2025Q4 to 26.2% in 2026Q1 within a single year, so applying a trailing multiple to earnings struck near the top of that range understates the valuation a mid-cycle margin would imply, and the 2025Q4 case where net income of $153.7 million exceeded operating income of $135.5 million illustrates how non-operating items further inflate the denominator. A more informative cross-check would be EV/EBITDA with the cash balance netted and EBITDA restated at a normalized operating margin, or EV/Sales adjusted to strip commodity inflation from the 31.6% revenue growth, since the headline P/E silently assumes the current spread is permanent. The corroborating signal is that P/FCF of 17.43x already runs above the P/E, suggesting cash-based earnings are weaker than the reported figure, so a low P/E here may be measuring earnings quality rather than cheapness.