Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 17.6x · EV/EBITDA 12.5x · ROE 28.7%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $13.3B | $13.1B | $9.1B | $5.4B | $3.3B | $3.3B | $2.0B | $1.8B | $1.3B | $2.0B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $12.0B | $11.8B | $8.1B | $4.2B | $2.9B | $3.3B | $2.2B | $2.1B | $1.8B | $2.4B | $2.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 17.59 | 17.22 | 15.03 | 8.90 | 5.07 | 7.08 | 14.08 | 17.64 | 12.84 | 23.63 | 22.97 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.19 | 3.14 | 2.41 | 1.57 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.53 | 0.90 | 1.11 |
| P/B Ratio | 5.31 | 5.20 | 3.24 | 2.27 | 1.84 | 2.64 | 2.46 | 2.70 | 2.38 | 3.80 | 2.45 |
| P/FCF | 19.43 | 19.09 | 16.08 | 8.66 | 4.86 | 11.88 | 9.79 | 10.56 | 10.34 | — | 19.04 |
| P/OCF | 17.66 | 17.35 | 14.08 | 7.97 | 4.61 | 10.66 | 8.03 | 8.92 | 7.97 | 46.31 | 14.52 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.82 | 2.15 | 1.24 | 0.73 | 0.87 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.70 | 1.05 | 1.05 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.47 | 12.23 | 9.83 | 5.31 | 3.15 | 4.65 | 7.59 | 8.99 | 8.29 | 12.89 | 11.43 |
| EV / EBIT | 13.43 | 11.54 | 9.86 | 4.99 | 3.31 | 5.03 | 9.66 | 10.98 | 10.03 | 16.26 | 14.12 |
| EV / FCF | — | 17.16 | 14.31 | 6.83 | 4.22 | 11.65 | 10.96 | 12.43 | 13.61 | — | 18.01 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 27.4% | 27.4% | 27.7% | 28.9% | 28.1% | 22.0% | 18.0% | 16.3% | 14.3% | 14.4% | 16.2% |
| Operating Margin | 21.4% | 21.4% | 20.4% | 22.1% | 22.0% | 17.4% | 10.3% | 7.9% | 6.9% | 6.7% | 7.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 18.3% | 18.3% | 16.0% | 17.6% | 16.5% | 12.4% | 5.8% | 4.2% | 4.2% | 3.8% | 4.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 28.7% | 28.7% | 23.4% | 28.9% | 42.9% | 45.5% | 19.1% | 16.5% | 19.0% | 11.6% | 11.1% |
| ROA | 24.3% | 24.3% | 20.0% | 24.1% | 33.2% | 28.8% | 9.6% | 7.4% | 7.8% | 6.2% | 7.2% |
| ROIC | 44.7% | 44.7% | 38.2% | 43.6% | 51.2% | 44.1% | 18.3% | 14.6% | 13.9% | 13.4% | 14.4% |
| ROCE | 32.6% | 32.6% | 28.9% | 34.9% | 54.1% | 51.7% | 21.1% | 16.8% | 15.6% | 13.1% | 13.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.44 | 0.63 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.24 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 1.22 | 1.77 | 2.34 | 2.52 | 1.20 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.52 | -0.36 | -0.48 | -0.24 | -0.05 | 0.30 | 0.48 | 0.75 | 0.64 | -0.13 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.37 | -1.37 | -1.22 | -1.43 | -0.47 | -0.09 | 0.81 | 1.35 | 2.00 | 1.87 | -0.65 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.92 | -1.77 | -1.83 | -0.64 | -0.22 | 1.18 | 1.87 | 3.28 | — | -1.03 |
| Interest Coverage | 9454.16 | 9454.16 | 2002.13 | 693.25 | 1082.52 | 84.17 | 11.87 | 7.47 | 6.97 | 7.51 | 20.77 |
Net cash position: cash ($1.4B) exceeds total debt ($46M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.92 | 5.92 | 5.06 | 6.43 | 4.41 | 2.66 | 2.43 | 2.96 | 3.02 | 3.05 | 4.08 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.68 | 4.68 | 3.89 | 5.23 | 3.12 | 1.54 | 1.50 | 1.71 | 1.60 | 1.70 | 2.98 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.36 | 3.36 | 2.66 | 4.00 | 1.95 | 0.23 | 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.31 | 0.50 | 1.60 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.38 | 1.15 | 1.24 | 1.78 | 2.18 | 1.57 | 1.77 | 1.83 | 1.72 | 1.42 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.94 | 5.94 | 5.89 | 6.40 | 6.38 | 6.83 | 6.24 | 6.97 | 6.52 | 5.92 | 7.12 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 41.54 | 43.59 | 37.52 | 34.86 | 45.69 | 54.42 | 40.54 | 39.79 | 39.43 | 45.51 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.8% | 0.8% | 1.0% | 1.2% | 1.7% | 0.9% | 1.1% | 1.2% | 1.7% | 9.7% | 0.9% |
| Payout Ratio | 14.3% | 14.3% | 14.7% | 11.1% | 8.5% | 6.2% | 16.0% | 22.1% | 21.7% | 230.1% | 21.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.7% | 5.8% | 6.7% | 11.2% | 19.7% | 14.1% | 7.1% | 5.7% | 7.8% | 4.2% | 4.4% |
| FCF Yield | 5.1% | 5.2% | 6.2% | 11.5% | 20.6% | 8.4% | 10.2% | 9.5% | 9.7% | — | 5.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.8% | 1.9% | 0.5% | 0.4% | 1.1% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 2.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.6% | 2.7% | 1.5% | 1.6% | 2.8% | 1.0% | 1.4% | 1.3% | 4.2% | 9.7% | 0.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $222M | $228M | $227M | $226M | $227M | $226M | $225M | $229M | $230M | $229M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MLI stock.
Mueller Industries, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 17.6x. The historical average is 14.6x. This places it at the 72th percentile of its historical range.
Mueller Industries, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 12.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 5.8x.
Mueller Industries, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 28.7%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 18.0%.
Based on historical data, Mueller Industries, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 17.6x. This is at the 72th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Mueller Industries, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.81% with a payout ratio of 14.3%.
Mueller Industries, Inc. has 27.4% gross margin and 21.4% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Mueller Industries, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.0x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Metal spread normalization risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Reflects Pricing Power
According to recent financial statements, MLI's gross margin improved to 27.7% in Q2 2026 from 21.6% in Q4 2025, while operating margin reached 21.7%, suggesting strong pricing power and operational leverage.
The sequential margin recovery from the Q4 2025 trough (operating margin 14.1%) to Q2 2026 (21.7%) indicates that the company can quickly capitalize on favorable metal spreads and volume growth. However, the TTM operating margin of 21.42% is well above historical industry norms, and the Q4 2025 dip demonstrates that margins are not structurally stable. Investors should monitor whether this elevated margin is a new baseline or a cyclical peak, as a reversion to the mean could compress earnings significantly.
ROIC Volatility Masks Strong Capital Efficiency
Based on reported figures, MLI's ROIC swung from 6.6% in Q4 2025 to 14.6% in Q1 2026, with ROE averaging 6.5% quarterly, indicating high sensitivity to metal spreads and working capital timing.
The quarterly ROIC range of 6.6% to 14.6% over the past ten quarters reflects the cyclicality of the metal fabrication business, where inventory gains and losses distort returns. Despite this volatility, the company's low capital intensity (capex averaging 1.8% of revenue) and near-zero debt suggest that returns on invested capital are driven by operational efficiency rather than financial leverage. The Q2 2026 ROIC of 11.0% is respectable, but investors should focus on the full-cycle average rather than any single quarter, as the Q4 2025 trough demonstrates the potential for sharp declines.
Working Capital Swings Drive Cash Flow Volatility
As reported in financial statements, MLI's cash conversion cycle lengthened to 73 days in Q2 2026 from 69 days in Q4 2024, driven by DIO of 51 days and DSO of 46 days, indicating increased inventory investment.
The CCC has been relatively stable in the 69-88 day range over the past ten quarters, but the Q2 2026 negative free cash flow margin of -7.1% suggests that working capital outflows are temporarily absorbing cash. The DIO increase to 51 days from 48 days in Q2 2025 may indicate inventory build-up ahead of expected demand or higher copper prices inflating inventory values. The DPO of 24 days is modest, suggesting limited supplier leverage, but the company's strong cash position mitigates any concern. Investors should monitor whether the working capital expansion is a timing effect or a structural shift, as persistent outflows could signal inventory obsolescence.
Fortress Balance Sheet Provides Strategic Flexibility
According to recent SEC filings, MLI's debt-to-equity stands at 0.01 with total debt of $24.7M against $3.5B equity, and interest coverage of 2435.6x, indicating negligible leverage and ample capacity for strategic initiatives.
The near-zero leverage is a defining feature of MLI's financial profile, providing a substantial buffer against cyclical downturns and rising interest rates. The interest coverage ratio of 2435.6x in Q2 2026 is extraordinary, but it reflects the minimal debt rather than exceptional earnings power. The $1.37B cash pile, which covers over 56 times total debt, suggests that management is prioritizing financial stability over optimizing the cost of capital. While this conservative posture reduces risk, it may also indicate a lack of high-return internal investment opportunities, and investors should monitor whether the cash is deployed effectively through acquisitions or shareholder returns.
Ample Liquidity Buffers Against Cyclicality
Based on reported figures, MLI's current ratio improved to 4.78 in Q2 2026 from 4.66 in Q2 2025, with quick ratio of 3.76, indicating a strong liquidity position that can withstand severe demand shocks.
The current ratio of 4.78 and quick ratio of 3.76 are well above the 1.0-1.5 range typical for industrial manufacturers, reflecting the company's conservative balance sheet management. The high cash balance of $1.37B provides a substantial cushion against a prolonged downturn in construction activity or a sharp decline in copper prices, which could trigger inventory losses. However, the negative free cash flow margin of -7.1% in Q2 2026 suggests that even a fortress balance sheet can be temporarily strained by working capital swings. Investors should monitor whether the liquidity position remains stable if the metal spread normalizes and margins compress.
Premium Valuation Justified by Superior Returns
Compared to peers, MLI trades at a P/E of 18.06 versus MWA's 20.60 and IIIN's 14.46, with a ROE of 28.7% versus the peer average of 15.4%, suggesting the market rewards its superior profitability.
MLI's valuation is not excessive given its profitability metrics. The forward P/E of 14.88 and PEG of 0.44 indicate that the market is pricing in significant earnings growth, which is supported by the Q2 2026 EPS beat and accelerating revenue growth. The EV/EBITDA of 12.85 is higher than IIIN's 7.62 but lower than NVT's 32.05, reflecting MLI's position as a high-quality metal fabricator rather than a pure commodity player. The ROE of 28.7% is the highest among the peer group, driven by strong margins and low equity base, but investors should note that this is partly due to the company's conservative leverage, which boosts ROE without adding financial risk.
What Could Invalidate the Base Case
The ratio most commonly misapplied to MLI is the P/E ratio, which obscures the impact of commodity price pass-through and LIFO inventory accounting on reported earnings, as noted in recent financial statements.
The P/E ratio is misleading for MLI because reported earnings are heavily influenced by copper price movements and LIFO inventory adjustments, which can create artificial gains or losses that do not reflect underlying operational performance. For example, a 10% increase in revenue might be entirely due to higher copper prices rather than volume growth, inflating the P/E without indicating real value creation. Instead, investors should use EV/EBITDA or P/FCF, which are less distorted by inventory accounting and better capture the company's cash-generating ability. The current P/FCF of 19.96 is higher than the P/E of 18.06, reflecting the negative FCF in Q2 2026, but this is a timing effect rather than a structural issue. Investors should also consider the company's cash balance, which is not fully reflected in the P/E, and adjust for it to get a more accurate valuation.