Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -48.9x · EV/EBITDA 6.5x · ROE 4.7%. (1996–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $199M | $221M | $187M | $158M | $144M | $349M | $436M | $238M | $356M | $418M | $597M |
| Enterprise Value | $384M | $406M | $379M | $383M | $410M | $588M | $607M | $435M | $484M | $476M | $619M |
| P/E Ratio → | -48.93 | 17.84 | — | — | — | 46.92 | 20.27 | — | — | 25.51 | 15.92 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.25 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.54 | 0.81 | 0.44 | 0.75 | 0.98 | 1.42 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.55 | 0.45 | 1.11 | 1.45 | 0.86 | 1.27 | 1.52 | 2.40 |
| P/FCF | — | 9.67 | 4.57 | 4.13 | — | — | 10.35 | 51.29 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 10.40 | 11.53 | 4.11 | 4.02 | — | — | 7.78 | 12.66 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.60 | 0.90 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.02 | 1.11 | 1.47 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.47 | 6.09 | 7.53 | 6.63 | 8.38 | 14.15 | 10.51 | 16.54 | 21.07 | 8.80 | 8.63 |
| EV / EBIT | 6.75 | 6.06 | 9.50 | 8.15 | 11.24 | 20.50 | 13.02 | 25.98 | 30.94 | 9.37 | 8.86 |
| EV / FCF | — | 17.76 | 9.26 | 10.03 | — | — | 14.41 | 93.75 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 20.2% | 20.2% | 20.3% | 18.5% | 16.7% | 18.1% | 20.2% | 22.1% | 18.9% | 24.7% | 27.3% |
| Operating Margin | 7.2% | 7.2% | 5.3% | 6.4% | 5.3% | 4.4% | 8.6% | 3.1% | 3.3% | 11.6% | 16.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.6% | 1.6% | -2.6% | -6.9% | -0.6% | 1.1% | 4.0% | -1.4% | -1.7% | 3.8% | 8.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.7% | 4.7% | -7.2% | -16.3% | -1.3% | 2.4% | 7.4% | -2.6% | -2.8% | 6.2% | 16.4% |
| ROA | 1.3% | 1.3% | -2.0% | -4.8% | -0.4% | 0.8% | 2.6% | -1.0% | -1.4% | 3.5% | 8.8% |
| ROIC | 9.5% | 9.5% | 6.2% | 6.3% | 4.8% | 4.2% | 7.4% | 2.9% | 3.2% | 12.3% | 20.8% |
| ROCE | 9.3% | 9.3% | 6.6% | 7.4% | 5.9% | 5.2% | 9.5% | 4.1% | 4.7% | 16.4% | 23.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.62 | 0.89 | 0.49 | 0.26 | 0.12 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.99 | 2.99 | 4.00 | 4.15 | 5.67 | 6.32 | 3.23 | 9.38 | 6.02 | 1.31 | 0.43 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 0.46 | 0.21 | 0.09 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.77 | 2.77 | 3.81 | 3.90 | 5.43 | 5.76 | 2.96 | 7.49 | 5.59 | 1.07 | 0.31 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 8.09 | 4.69 | 5.90 | — | — | 4.06 | 42.46 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 1.43 | 1.43 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.92 | 1.85 | 2.96 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 3.29 | 5.33 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.46 | 1.46 | 1.46 | 1.39 | 1.40 | 1.26 | 1.30 | 1.28 | 1.26 | 0.74 | 0.86 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.40 | 0.47 | 0.36 | 0.37 | 0.55 | 0.40 | 0.28 | 0.33 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.08 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.87 | 0.97 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.59 | 1.59 | 1.68 | 1.47 | 1.60 | 1.38 | 1.42 | 1.78 | 1.58 | 3.85 | 4.08 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 52.04 | 60.18 | 65.67 | 78.80 | 63.35 | 61.06 | 78.58 | 68.10 | 80.45 | 24.02 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | 5.6% | — | — | — | 2.1% | 4.9% | — | — | 3.9% | 6.3% |
| FCF Yield | — | 10.3% | 21.9% | 24.2% | — | — | 9.7% | 1.9% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 5.7% | 5.1% | 2.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 1.1% | 2.2% | 0.3% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.7% | 5.1% | 2.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 1.1% | 2.2% | 0.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $20M | $20M | $20M | $19M | $20M | $19M | $19M | $19M | $20M | $19M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MPAA stock.
Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -48.9x. The historical average is 21.1x.
Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 6.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.6x.
Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 4.7%. The historical average is 0.4%.
Based on historical data, Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -48.9x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. has 20.2% gross margin and 7.2% operating margin.
Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.0x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Debt service coverage collapse
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Cheap Book Multiple, Sticky Earnings Multiple
At 0.80 times book and 5.80 times EV/EBITDA, MPAA trades below every peer in the comparison set, yet its 17.18 trailing P/E exceeds Strattec's 13.97, a divergence suggesting the discount reflects a damaged earnings base rather than a straightforward valuation gap, based on current market pricing.
The 0.80x price-to-book sits below Dorman (2.70), Standard Motor Products (1.22) and Strattec (1.06), but investors should weigh that gap against MPAA's $32.1M equity contraction over ten quarters, since a shrinking book base mechanically lowers the ratio even as it signals capital decay. The step-down from a 17.18 trailing to a 14.20 forward P/E implies analysts are modeling a recovery from 2027Q1's -8.0% net margin, an assumption that appears contingent on gross margin returning toward the 23-24% seen in 2026Q4 and 2025Q3. The 8.82 P/FCF multiple warrants particular caution, as trailing four-quarter free cash flow is roughly negative $4M, leaving the multiple anchored to a cash generation profile that has already inflected.
Returns on Capital Sit Near Zero
MPAA's return on invested capital of 0.6% in 2027Q1 is its second-weakest print over ten quarters and sits roughly eight to thirteen points below peer ROIC levels according to the ratio dataset, implying deployed capital currently earns almost no spread over its cost.
ROIC has oscillated between -0.9% and 3.8% without discernible trend, and the driver appears to be margin rather than asset efficiency: operating margin swung from -3.8% to 10.6% across the period while asset turnover remained pinned between 0.17 and 0.23. Against Dorman's 13.9%, SMP's 10.6% and Strattec's 8.7% ROIC, MPAA's spread looks structural rather than cyclical, which may indicate the aftermarket program structure and cost base leave less economic rent per dollar invested. ROE of -5.2% in 2027Q1, read alongside an equity base that has fallen to $253.0M, suggests the company is currently decaying rather than compounding returns on shareholder capital.
Inventory Cycle Drags Cash Recovery
MPAA's cash conversion cycle stretched to 200 days in 2027Q1, with days inventory outstanding at 262 against 111 days payable per the quarterly ratio table, a working capital profile in which supplier terms finance only a fraction of an unusually long inventory holding period.
Because DSO has held in a relatively tight 48-68 day band throughout the ten quarters, the cycle's expansion from a 146-day low in 2026Q2 appears almost entirely inventory-driven, consistent with the $59.7M of working capital absorbed over the three quarters ending 2027Q1. Asset turnover of 0.17, its joint-lowest reading versus a 0.23 peak, implies each dollar of assets is converting into less revenue, which would mechanically pressure ROIC even if margins held. For a manufacturer carrying 262 days of stock, investors should monitor whether the build reflects deliberate program stocking against the $304.5M deferred revenue backlog or slower-moving replacement-parts demand, as the two readings carry very different cash flow implications.
Coverage Erodes as EBITDA Contracts
Interest coverage collapsed to 0.17 times in 2027Q1 from 2.17 times one quarter earlier, while leverage jumped to 114.81 times EBITDA from 7.94 times according to MPAA's reported ratios, indicating the latest period's earnings no longer service debt costs at anything close to prior levels.
The debt-to-equity ratio of 0.90 is its highest since 2025Q1 and has risen as equity fell to $253.0M, so part of the leverage increase appears to come from the denominator rather than new borrowing, a distinction that matters for refinancing conversations. The 114.81x D/EBITDA reading should be treated as distorted by a depressed EBITDA quarter rather than a literal solvency measure, but the coverage collapse from 2.17x to 0.17x is the more interpretable signal that debt service comfort has deteriorated sharply. With $19.1M of cash against $228.7M of total debt, and $304.5M of deferred revenue sitting as a non-debt claim ahead of equity, covenant headroom and refinancing terms warrant close monitoring.
Trailing P/E Misreads Loss Cycle
MPAA's trailing P/E of 17.18 is the ratio most commonly misapplied to this model, since five of ten quarters posted net losses and the denominator changes sign, making the multiple swing between misleading cheapness and apparent expensiveness without any change in operating economics, based on reported quarterly earnings.
The misreading cuts both ways: a low or negative P/E in quarters like 2025Q1 (-10.6% net margin) or 2027Q1 (-8.0%) makes the stock look statistically attractive while losses are accumulating, and the resulting 17.18x in profitable quarters makes it look costly when the business is actually recovering. A more faithful frame appears to be EV/EBITDA computed on mid-cycle EBITDA, adjusted for the roughly $17M gap between operating and net results in 2027Q1 and for the working-capital swings that drove free cash flow from +$33.7M to -$12.4M, which would separate operating performance from below-line and inventory noise. As a secondary caution, the 0.26x price-to-sales multiple is also easy to misapply here, since revenue recognition interacts with a $304.5M deferred revenue balance that represents delivery obligations rather than completed economics.