Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 31.6x · EV/EBITDA 66.4x · ROE 6.6%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.1B | $1.0B | $397M | $343M | $278M | $403M | $397M | $460M | $614M | $716M | $874M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.2B | $1.1B | $425M | $362M | $305M | $402M | $430M | $470M | $654M | $689M | $837M |
| P/E Ratio → | 31.63 | 31.37 | — | 6.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 41.57 |
| P/S Ratio | 5.64 | 5.06 | 2.28 | 2.06 | 2.52 | 2.95 | 3.79 | 3.93 | 4.77 | 10.57 | 14.48 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.85 | 1.83 | 0.80 | 0.68 | 0.78 | 1.03 | 1.09 | 0.92 | 1.26 | 1.37 | 1.97 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 48.50 |
| P/OCF | 162.38 | 145.72 | 13.48 | — | — | — | — | — | 1260.55 | — | 34.72 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 5.45 | 2.44 | 2.18 | 2.76 | 2.95 | 4.11 | 4.01 | 5.07 | 10.17 | 13.86 |
| EV / EBITDA | 66.44 | 60.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 44.21 |
| EV / EBIT | — | 76.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 349.30 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 46.43 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 11.0% | 11.0% | 17.7% | 10.7% | -0.5% | -4.7% | -25.7% | 7.7% | 24.9% | 27.6% | 41.2% |
| Operating Margin | -6.5% | -6.5% | -29.0% | -97.5% | -86.4% | -47.1% | -146.2% | -54.6% | -36.6% | -38.8% | 25.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 17.4% | 17.4% | -25.0% | 33.3% | -73.4% | -41.5% | -145.4% | -51.1% | -34.8% | -15.7% | 34.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 6.6% | 6.6% | -8.8% | 12.9% | -21.7% | -15.0% | -35.2% | -12.1% | -8.9% | -2.2% | 4.9% |
| ROA | 4.6% | 4.6% | -6.6% | 9.3% | -15.2% | -10.9% | -26.5% | -9.5% | -7.4% | -2.0% | 4.3% |
| ROIC | -1.7% | -1.7% | -7.3% | -26.9% | -18.5% | -12.2% | -25.3% | -9.3% | -6.9% | -4.4% | 2.9% |
| ROCE | -1.9% | -1.9% | -8.1% | -30.2% | -20.6% | -13.6% | -29.0% | -10.9% | -8.3% | -5.1% | 3.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.19 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.00 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 7.14 | 7.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.07 | -0.00 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.08 | -0.05 | -0.08 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.30 | 4.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -1.98 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -2.08 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.96 | 1.96 | -2.75 | — | -12.61 | -9.35 | -19.68 | -8.33 | -28.43 | -27.22 | 2.87 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.69 | 1.69 | 0.86 | 1.76 | 0.97 | 1.62 | 1.17 | 1.88 | 1.65 | 2.31 | 3.82 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.27 | 1.27 | 0.48 | 1.09 | 0.59 | 1.32 | 0.58 | 1.10 | 1.04 | 1.46 | 2.52 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.31 | 0.83 | 0.49 | 1.12 | 0.46 | 0.99 | 0.52 | 0.93 | 2.23 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.26 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.55 | 6.55 | 7.93 | 7.44 | 3.50 | 9.06 | 4.89 | 2.82 | 4.36 | 1.53 | 1.33 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 5.67 | 8.79 | 5.51 | 9.48 | 9.91 | 6.30 | 8.29 | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.3% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.2% | 3.2% | — | 16.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.4% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $54M | $51M | $48M | $47M | $45M | $40M | $36M | $34M | $31M | $30M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MUX stock.
McEwen Mining Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 31.6x. The historical average is 32.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
McEwen Mining Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 66.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 49.4x.
McEwen Mining Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 6.6%. The historical average is -40.1%.
Based on historical data, McEwen Mining Inc. is trading at a P/E of 31.6x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
McEwen Mining Inc. has 11.0% gross margin and -6.5% operating margin.
McEwen Mining Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 7.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Earnings quality dependency
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Divergence Masks Core Weakness
Gross margin improved to 33.9% in 2026Q2, yet operating margin of 13.0% and net margin of 16.2% diverge sharply, per reported figures, suggesting non-operating gains distort underlying profitability.
The 2026Q2 gross margin of 33.9% marks a significant recovery from the 26.3% a year earlier, but it still trails the 37-44% range of larger precious metals peers, indicating persistent cost pressures at the 100%-owned mines. The operating margin of 13.0% is a positive swing from the -8.9% in 2025Q4, yet the net margin of 16.2% is inflated by non-operating items, as evidenced by the 45.1% net margin in 2026Q1 and 59.0% in 2025Q4. Investors should treat the net margin as unreliable for assessing earning power; the operating margin, while improving, remains thin and vulnerable to commodity price fluctuations.
Capital Returns Still in Negative Zone
ROIC turned positive at 0.8% in 2026Q2, but the trailing ten quarters show negative returns, with ROE at 1.4%, according to financial statements, indicating the company is not yet compounding shareholder capital.
The 2026Q2 ROIC of 0.8% is a marginal improvement from the -0.7% in 2025Q4, but it remains far below the cost of capital, suggesting that the heavy investment in Los Azules and mine development is not yet generating adequate returns. ROE of 1.4% is similarly weak, and the negative retained earnings of -$1.2B underscore that the company has historically destroyed value. The improvement in returns is driven by operational stabilization at Gold Bar and Black Fox, but the scale of capital deployed suggests that meaningful ROIC expansion will require either higher metal prices or successful execution of the copper project.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves
Cash conversion cycle turned negative at -17 days in 2026Q2, per reported figures, as DPO of 103 days exceeds DSO and DIO combined, indicating the company is effectively using supplier financing.
The negative CCC of -17 days in 2026Q2, down from -15 days in 2025Q4, reflects a deliberate extension of days payable outstanding to 103 days, which provides a source of working capital financing. However, the DSO of 11 days and DIO of 76 days are relatively stable, and the improvement in CCC is more a function of payables management than operational efficiency. Asset turnover remains extremely low at 0.06, consistent with a capital-intensive mining business, but the negative CCC suggests that the company is not tying up cash in working capital, which is a positive sign for liquidity.
Debt Rises but Coverage Improves
Debt-to-equity climbed to 0.18 in 2026Q2 from 0.09 in 2024Q4, while interest coverage reached 22.6x in 2026Q1, per financial statements, indicating leverage is increasing but serviceable.
The doubling of the D/E ratio to 0.18 reflects a deliberate shift toward debt financing for development projects, with total debt rising from $42.1M to $128.4M over the same period. Despite the increase, the interest coverage of 22.6x in 2026Q1 suggests that current earnings are more than sufficient to cover interest expense, though this metric has been volatile, with negative coverage in several prior quarters. The D/EBITDA of 3.86 in 2026Q2 is elevated relative to peers, but this is partly due to the low EBITDA base; as operations stabilize, this ratio should improve. Investors should monitor the trajectory of debt, especially if the Los Azules project requires additional funding.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens
Current ratio improved to 2.04 in 2026Q2 from 0.86 in 2024Q4, with cash at $78.9M, per balance sheet data, providing a stronger cushion against operational shocks.
The current ratio of 2.04 and quick ratio of 1.50 in 2026Q2 indicate that the company has ample short-term assets to cover its liabilities, a marked improvement from the 0.86 current ratio in 2024Q4 when liquidity was strained. The cash build to $78.9M, up from $13.7M in 2024Q4, is partly due to the strategic investments in McEwen Copper, which may not be fully available to the parent for gold operations. While the liquidity position appears healthy, the negative operating cash flow in several prior quarters suggests that the buffer could be quickly consumed if operational issues persist. The quick ratio of 1.50, excluding inventory, indicates that the company is not overly reliant on inventory to meet short-term obligations.
P/E Misleads on Earnings Quality
The trailing P/E of 30.95 is misleading because net income includes non-operating gains from McEwen Copper valuations, per financial disclosures, obscuring the company's true operating earnings power.
The P/E ratio is commonly applied to MUX, but it is distorted by the significant non-operating gains that have inflated net income in recent quarters, such as the 59.0% net margin in 2025Q4. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 65.10 reflects the market's valuation of the operating business, though this too is affected by the low EBITDA base. Alternatively, investors should use a sum-of-the-parts valuation that separates the gold operations from the McEwen Copper stake, as the latter is valued based on private market transactions rather than public market multiples. The forward P/E of 14.64 suggests the market expects earnings to normalize, but this depends on sustained operational improvement and the realization of copper project value.