Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 19.3x · EV/EBITDA 9.8x · ROE 22.1%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $130.2B | $110.6B | $42.7B | $34.8B | $37.5B | $49.7B | $48.3B | $32.0B | $18.5B | $20.1B | $18.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $128.2B | $108.7B | $48.1B | $41.2B | $40.8B | $51.0B | $49.4B | $36.7B | $19.4B | $20.9B | $20.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 19.27 | 15.58 | 13.01 | — | — | 42.48 | 17.06 | 11.42 | 54.14 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 5.89 | 5.01 | 2.30 | 2.96 | 3.14 | 4.08 | 4.23 | 3.29 | 2.55 | 2.73 | 2.70 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.02 | 3.25 | 1.42 | 1.19 | 1.92 | 2.27 | 2.02 | 1.43 | 1.61 | 1.74 | 1.52 |
| P/FCF | 17.84 | 15.16 | 14.43 | 358.86 | 34.46 | 18.92 | 13.48 | 22.82 | 23.32 | 15.96 | 10.95 |
| P/OCF | 12.60 | 10.71 | 6.72 | 12.60 | 11.65 | 11.61 | 9.89 | 11.17 | 10.15 | 9.45 | 6.50 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.92 | 2.59 | 3.50 | 3.41 | 4.18 | 4.33 | 3.77 | 2.67 | 2.84 | 2.98 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.77 | 8.28 | 5.56 | 9.61 | 8.63 | 8.38 | 8.78 | 9.75 | 7.58 | 7.76 | 8.56 |
| EV / EBIT | 12.39 | 9.01 | 9.69 | — | 231.70 | 37.11 | 14.40 | 9.16 | 20.75 | 16.02 | 767.78 |
| EV / FCF | — | 14.89 | 16.24 | 425.19 | 37.45 | 19.42 | 13.81 | 26.15 | 24.40 | 16.60 | 12.08 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 49.8% | 49.8% | 34.6% | 9.9% | 17.9% | 19.5% | 31.1% | 20.8% | 21.9% | 22.2% | 19.6% |
| Operating Margin | 46.9% | 46.9% | 31.0% | 5.5% | 13.6% | 15.7% | 26.0% | 15.7% | 16.3% | 16.8% | 13.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 32.1% | 32.1% | 18.0% | -21.4% | -3.8% | 9.6% | 24.8% | 28.8% | 4.7% | -1.6% | -0.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 22.1% | 22.1% | 11.3% | -10.3% | -2.2% | 5.1% | 12.2% | 16.5% | 3.0% | -1.0% | -0.2% |
| ROA | 12.5% | 12.5% | 6.0% | -5.4% | -1.2% | 2.8% | 7.0% | 9.2% | 1.6% | -0.5% | -0.1% |
| ROIC | 23.0% | 23.0% | 12.1% | 1.7% | 5.3% | 6.0% | 8.5% | 5.8% | 7.2% | 7.1% | 4.5% |
| ROCE | 20.7% | 20.7% | 11.7% | 1.5% | 4.4% | 5.0% | 7.8% | 5.4% | 6.2% | 6.4% | 4.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.30 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.39 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.44 | 0.44 | 1.04 | 2.20 | 1.30 | 1.04 | 1.19 | 1.84 | 1.66 | 1.51 | 1.98 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.06 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.21 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.16 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.15 | -0.15 | 0.62 | 1.50 | 0.69 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 1.24 | 0.34 | 0.30 | 0.80 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.27 | 1.81 | 66.33 | 2.99 | 0.50 | 0.32 | 3.33 | 1.09 | 0.64 | 1.12 |
| Interest Coverage | 40.08 | 40.08 | 12.89 | -7.19 | 0.78 | 5.17 | 11.80 | 12.84 | 4.75 | 5.64 | 0.11 |
Net cash position: cash ($7.7B) exceeds total debt ($5.7B)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.29 | 2.29 | 1.63 | 1.25 | 2.23 | 2.90 | 2.52 | 2.63 | 2.95 | 3.62 | 2.67 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.82 | 1.82 | 1.34 | 0.81 | 1.63 | 2.23 | 1.99 | 1.86 | 2.21 | 2.65 | 1.88 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.44 | 1.44 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 1.28 | 1.91 | 1.73 | 1.04 | 1.93 | 2.38 | 1.61 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.39 | 0.33 | 0.21 | 0.31 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.24 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.32 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.13 | 4.13 | 5.56 | 4.01 | 5.59 | 5.49 | 4.40 | 4.22 | 4.28 | 4.22 | 3.90 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 28.82 | 20.77 | 38.03 | 21.08 | 10.09 | 14.35 | 14.00 | 17.39 | 11.76 | 18.71 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.8% | 1.0% | 2.7% | 4.1% | 4.7% | 3.5% | 1.7% | 2.8% | 1.6% | 0.7% | 0.4% |
| Payout Ratio | 15.6% | 15.6% | 34.2% | — | — | 150.7% | 29.5% | 31.7% | 88.3% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.2% | 6.4% | 7.7% | — | — | 2.4% | 5.9% | 8.8% | 1.8% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 5.6% | 6.6% | 6.9% | 0.3% | 2.9% | 5.3% | 7.4% | 4.4% | 4.3% | 6.3% | 9.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.8% | 2.1% | 2.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.5% | 0.5% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.6% | 3.1% | 5.6% | 4.1% | 4.7% | 4.6% | 2.8% | 4.3% | 2.2% | 0.7% | 0.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.1B | $1.1B | $841M | $795M | $801M | $806M | $737M | $535M | $535M | $531M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NEM stock.
Newmont Corporation's current P/E ratio is 19.3x. The historical average is 37.3x. This places it at the 40th percentile of its historical range.
Newmont Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 9.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.1x.
Newmont Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 22.1%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 3.2%.
Based on historical data, Newmont Corporation is trading at a P/E of 19.3x. This is at the 40th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Newmont Corporation's current dividend yield is 0.81% with a payout ratio of 15.6%.
Newmont Corporation has 49.8% gross margin and 46.9% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Newmont Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.4x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Gold price dependence
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Discounted Multiple on Record Cash Flow
Newmont trades at 14.6x trailing earnings and 7.4x EV/EBITDA, per recent filings, below Agnico Eagle's 16.4x and 8.9x, suggesting the market is pricing in integration risks and gold price cyclicality.
The forward P/E of 9.9x implies the market expects earnings to remain elevated, but the discount to peers like Agnico Eagle may reflect skepticism about the sustainability of current margins. Given the record free cash flow of $2.2 billion in Q2 2026, the P/FCF of 13.5x appears reasonable if gold prices hold, but any correction in bullion could compress the multiple further. Investors should monitor whether the copper optionality is being valued, as the current multiple seems to ignore the potential for diversified mining re-rating.
Margin Volatility Masks Underlying Strength
Gross margin swung from 27.2% in Q1 2024 to 62.4% in Q1 2026, per income statements, but Q2 2026 fell to 39.7%, highlighting extreme sensitivity to gold prices and sales timing.
The operating margin of 31.8% in Q2 2026, down from 60.6% in the prior quarter, demonstrates the high fixed-cost base and operating leverage. Net margin of 63.8% in Q2 2026 was inflated by non-operating gains, as operating income was only $1.1 billion versus net income of $2.2 billion, per financial statements. This suggests that recurring earning power is better captured by operating margin, which remains strong but volatile, and investors should adjust for one-off items when assessing true profitability.
ROIC Recovery on Deleveraging
ROIC improved from 1.9% in Q1 2024 to 10.2% in Q1 2026, per company reports, but dipped to 2.6% in Q2 2026, reflecting the lumpy nature of gold sales and price volatility.
The improvement in ROIC over the past two years is driven by both margin expansion and a reduction in invested capital, as total debt fell from $9.5 billion to $5.5 billion, per balance sheet data. However, the quarterly volatility in ROIC, ranging from 1.9% to 10.2%, indicates that the metric is highly sensitive to gold price movements and production timing. The company's return on equity of 6.2% in Q2 2026 is below peers like Kinross (35.3%) and AngloGold (35.5%), suggesting that Newmont's larger asset base and higher capital intensity may dilute returns, though this could change if copper production scales up.
Working Capital Drag from Inventory Buildup
Cash conversion cycle lengthened from 56 days in Q4 2024 to 146 days in Q2 2026, per financial statements, driven by a surge in days inventory outstanding to 147, indicating slower inventory turnover.
The increase in DIO from 63 days in Q4 2024 to 147 days in Q2 2026 suggests that Newmont is holding more inventory, possibly due to lower gold sales volumes or stockpiling of ore. DSO also rose to 38 days from 16 days, while DPO remained stable around 38 days, per the data. This working capital buildup consumed cash, as evidenced by negative working capital changes in eight of the last ten quarters, per cash flow statements. Investors should monitor whether this is a temporary timing issue or a sign of operational inefficiency, as it could pressure future cash flows if not reversed.
Leverage Retreats to Fortress Levels
Debt-to-equity fell from 0.33 in Q1 2024 to 0.15 in Q2 2026, per balance sheet data, with interest coverage soaring to 26.2x, indicating a significantly strengthened balance sheet.
Total debt was reduced by over 40% to $5.5 billion, while cash surged to $9.0 billion, per recent filings, giving Newmont a net cash position. The D/EBITDA ratio of 3.21 in Q2 2026 is elevated due to lower EBITDA in that quarter, but the trend over the past year shows a decline from 5.63 in Q1 2024, per the data. With interest coverage of 26.2x, debt service is highly comfortable, and the company appears well-positioned to fund capital returns or M&A without straining its balance sheet. However, the low leverage may also indicate a conservative capital structure that could be optimized for shareholder returns.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens to Multi-Year High
Current ratio improved from 2.15 in Q1 2024 to 2.55 in Q2 2026, per balance sheet data, with cash of $9.0 billion providing a substantial buffer against operational shocks.
The quick ratio of 1.78 in Q2 2026, down from 1.95 in Q1 2026, still indicates that liquid assets comfortably cover short-term liabilities, even with inventory excluded. The strong liquidity position is supported by robust free cash flow generation, which reached a record $2.2 billion in Q2 2026, per recent earnings release. Under a severe gold price downturn, the cash buffer would provide a cushion, but the high fixed-cost base could quickly erode liquidity if prices fall sharply. Investors should monitor the sustainability of cash flows, as the current ratio may overstate resilience if gold prices correct.
Misapplied Metric: Net Margin
Net margin is often misapplied to Newmont because it includes non-operating gains, as seen in Q2 2026 where net margin of 63.8% far exceeded operating margin of 31.8%, per income statements.
The net margin is distorted by items such as gains on asset sales, mark-to-market adjustments, and tax effects, which are not indicative of core mining profitability. For a capital-intensive miner, the more relevant metric is All-In Sustaining Cost (AISC) per ounce, which captures the true cost of maintaining production, including sustaining capital and closure costs. Analysts should focus on operating cash flow per ounce and AISC to assess earning power, rather than net margin, which can be misleadingly high or low depending on non-recurring items. This adjustment is critical for comparing Newmont to peers like Barrick and Agnico Eagle, where similar accounting nuances apply.