Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -39.4%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.0B | $2.2B | $1.4B | $2.4B | $2.8B | $9.4B | $1.9B | $1.7B | $714M | $333M | $130M |
| Enterprise Value | $3.0B | $2.2B | $1.4B | $2.4B | $2.8B | $9.4B | $1.9B | $1.7B | $714M | $333M | $130M |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | 6873.49 | 9114.65 | 7099.54 | 21445.50 | 8043.82 | 9718.46 | 1674.29 | 967.03 | 402.92 |
| P/B Ratio | 407.04 | 137.59 | 315.65 | 371.79 | 487.55 | 1465.26 | — | — | 3376.76 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | 6863.11 | 9097.84 | 7085.34 | 21430.28 | 8044.02 | 9718.63 | 1673.40 | 968.29 | 404.45 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | 21.4% | 79.1% | 59.8% | 69.0% | 81.3% | 17.8% | 67.9% | 58.8% | 23.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | -2057.1% | -2876.4% | -1477.1% | -1073.5% | -580.9% | -1098.4% | -113.0% | -201.8% | -291.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | -2472.9% | -2475.8% | -1456.7% | -1100.2% | -685.9% | -1121.3% | -83.7% | -195.4% | -186.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -39.4% | -39.4% | -94.1% | -107.0% | -94.5% | -162.1% | — | — | -168.7% | — | — |
| ROA | -31.0% | -31.0% | -81.7% | -95.0% | -81.5% | -116.4% | -235.6% | -258.7% | -51.2% | -138.0% | -136.6% |
| ROIC | -50.2% | -50.2% | -146.5% | -523.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -42.7% | -42.7% | -78.3% | -123.8% | -93.5% | -143.2% | — | -927.7% | -128.3% | — | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | — | — | 0.29 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.20 | -0.48 | -0.69 | -0.98 | -1.04 | — | — | -1.79 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -30.69 | -30.69 | -55.31 | -1406.73 | -656.02 | -582.45 | -6.92 | -45.75 | -17.69 | -44.06 | -51.53 |
Net cash position: cash ($4M) exceeds total debt ($748000)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.19 | 4.19 | 3.82 | 7.02 | 8.77 | 7.76 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 1.40 | 0.23 | 0.24 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.19 | 4.19 | 3.79 | 6.86 | 8.66 | 7.74 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 1.32 | 0.22 | 0.24 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.84 | 2.84 | 2.79 | 5.75 | 7.97 | 7.31 | 0.31 | 0.53 | 0.91 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.34 | 0.26 | 0.50 | 0.64 | 0.73 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 7.86 | 0.45 | 1.94 | 6.01 | 2.65 | 8.87 | 3.59 | 9.47 | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | 657.00 | 150.07 | 178.42 | 143.81 | 236.73 | 132.87 | 131.69 | 154.84 | 171.78 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.3B | $166M | $34M | $15M | $10M | $6M | $6M | $4M | $905000 | $353000 |
Total commercial revenue collapse
According to recent financial data, NITO's P/B ratio of 407.04 suggests a valuation that is entirely detached from the company's book value, reflecting speculative market pricing rather than any underlying fundamental support for the firm's current, non-existent revenue stream or its ongoing, significant operational losses.
The extreme P/B multiple indicates that investors are pricing the company based on potential future regulatory breakthroughs rather than current asset utility. Given the -1.39 TTM P/E ratio, the market appears to be struggling to assign a rational value to a business that has effectively ceased commercial operations.
Based on reported figures, NITO's ROIC has remained deeply negative, reaching -15.6% in 2026Q1, which highlights a consistent failure to generate any meaningful return on invested capital as the company continues to burn through its limited cash reserves without achieving a sustainable, profitable commercial scale.
The trend of negative returns on capital suggests that the company's investments in R&D and regulatory compliance are not currently yielding economic value. Investors should monitor whether the company can ever achieve a positive ROIC, as the current trajectory indicates a structural inability to compound capital effectively.
As reported in financial statements, NITO's efficiency metrics are highly erratic, with the cash conversion cycle and DSO figures showing extreme volatility that reflects the lack of a stable, recurring revenue cycle or predictable inventory management processes within the company's current, pre-revenue operational phase.
The wild swings in DSO and DIO suggest that the company's internal processes for managing receivables and inventory are not functioning in a standard commercial manner. This lack of operational consistency makes it difficult to forecast future efficiency improvements without a fundamental reset of the business model.
According to recent SEC filings, NITO maintains a current ratio of 4.73, which appears superficially healthy, yet this liquidity is largely a function of the company's remaining cash reserves rather than any operational ability to generate short-term assets through its core chemical blending business activities.
While the current ratio suggests the company is not in immediate danger of insolvency, the lack of revenue means this liquidity is being steadily eroded by ongoing operating expenses. The reliance on cash reserves to maintain this ratio warrants further investigation into the company's long-term survival prospects.
The most commonly misapplied metric for NITO is the Price-to-Sales ratio, which is currently rendered meaningless by the company's -100% revenue growth, obscuring the fact that the business is currently a speculative R&D entity rather than a functional chemicals distributor with a predictable sales pipeline.
Analysts should avoid using standard valuation multiples like P/S or PEG, as they assume a level of commercial activity that does not exist. Instead, investors should focus on cash burn rates and the timeline for regulatory milestones, which are the only true drivers of value for this specific business model.
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NITO stock.
Nexentis Technologies Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -1.4x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Nexentis Technologies Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -39.4%. The historical average is -111.0%.
Based on historical data, Nexentis Technologies Inc. is trading at a P/E of -1.4x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.