Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -7.0x · EV/EBITDA 15.5x · ROE -30.8%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $145M | $63M | $159M | $187M | $67M | $180M | $277M | $389M | $213M | $766M | $515M |
| Enterprise Value | $345M | $263M | $338M | $378M | $264M | $363M | $384M | $1.2B | $1.0B | $1.3B | $510M |
| P/E Ratio → | -7.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.72 | 76.20 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.30 | 0.15 | 0.34 | 0.38 | 0.13 | 0.38 | 0.65 | 0.79 | 0.28 | 1.24 | 0.62 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.93 | 0.43 | 2.13 | 0.92 | 0.36 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.87 | 0.51 | 1.58 | 1.63 |
| P/FCF | 8.51 | 8.75 | — | 21.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.20 |
| P/OCF | 25.51 | 11.16 | 14.37 | 6.37 | 8.68 | 11.58 | 17.83 | 7.90 | 5.19 | — | 7.43 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.62 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.53 | 0.76 | 0.90 | 2.47 | 1.35 | 2.18 | 0.61 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.51 | 15.48 | 19.03 | 15.54 | 10.09 | 6.57 | — | 44.34 | — | 15.70 | 4.65 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12.61 |
| EV / FCF | — | 36.42 | — | 42.71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.01 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 14.1% | 14.1% | 15.0% | 14.3% | 15.6% | 18.3% | 19.6% | 19.8% | 23.7% | 26.0% | 25.5% |
| Operating Margin | -4.5% | -4.5% | -5.9% | -4.5% | -4.2% | 1.9% | -27.5% | -3.6% | -23.2% | 5.4% | 7.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -8.1% | -8.1% | -8.2% | -10.3% | -5.2% | -2.8% | -23.5% | -9.5% | -34.3% | 4.2% | 1.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -30.8% | -30.8% | -27.6% | -25.8% | -12.7% | -4.5% | -25.0% | -10.8% | -58.5% | 6.5% | 2.6% |
| ROA | -7.6% | -7.6% | -7.9% | -9.5% | -4.6% | -2.1% | -8.9% | -3.0% | -17.8% | 1.8% | 0.6% |
| ROIC | -4.7% | -4.7% | -6.4% | -4.2% | -4.0% | 1.5% | -10.2% | -1.1% | -11.6% | 3.6% | 6.1% |
| ROCE | -5.2% | -5.2% | -6.9% | -4.9% | -4.3% | 1.7% | -11.6% | -1.3% | -13.1% | 2.6% | 4.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.44 | 1.44 | 2.64 | 1.05 | 1.12 | 0.94 | 0.43 | 1.88 | 2.01 | 1.66 | 0.03 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 12.43 | 12.43 | 11.09 | 8.75 | 8.01 | 3.82 | — | 30.76 | — | 9.40 | 0.09 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.37 | 2.40 | 0.94 | 1.06 | 0.81 | 0.30 | 1.84 | 1.97 | 1.20 | -0.02 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 11.76 | 11.76 | 10.07 | 7.85 | 7.52 | 3.31 | — | 30.10 | — | 6.79 | -0.04 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 27.66 | — | 21.58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.19 |
| Interest Coverage | -0.90 | -0.90 | -1.06 | -1.42 | -1.07 | -0.77 | -7.05 | -1.47 | -17.42 | -0.16 | 0.64 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.83 | 1.83 | 2.00 | 2.24 | 2.43 | 2.65 | 2.08 | 2.17 | 2.05 | 4.40 | 2.02 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.09 | 1.09 | 1.26 | 1.36 | 1.41 | 1.64 | 1.48 | 1.69 | 1.20 | 3.64 | 1.20 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.16 | 0.39 | 0.47 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 2.07 | 0.10 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.96 | 1.02 | 0.96 | 0.91 | 0.82 | 0.63 | 0.31 | 0.51 | 0.42 | 0.61 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.50 | 5.50 | 6.38 | 5.86 | 5.22 | 5.20 | 5.50 | 5.85 | 4.80 | 5.55 | 5.41 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 63.26 | 58.32 | 57.76 | 63.15 | 63.61 | 79.75 | 66.52 | 63.19 | 89.34 | 41.68 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.3% | 2.3% | 4.2% | 1.0% | 1.5% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 29.6% | 91.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.2% | 1.3% |
| FCF Yield | 11.7% | 11.4% | — | 4.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.3% | 2.3% | 4.2% | 1.0% | 5.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $49M | $49M | $47M | $45M | $44M | $42M | $42M | $32M | $28M | $27M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NNBR stock.
NN, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -7.0x. The historical average is 22.4x.
NN, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 15.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.0x.
NN, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -30.8%. The historical average is -0.9%.
Based on historical data, NN, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -7.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
NN, Inc. has 14.1% gross margin and -4.5% operating margin.
NN, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 12.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent operating losses despite leverage
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Low Multiples Mask Negative Earnings
Based on reported figures, NN, Inc. trades at 0.34x sales and 0.93x book, yet its trailing P/E is negative at -2.57 and EV/EBITDA sits at 20.26, signaling the market is pricing recovery rather than current earnings power versus peers such as Park-Ohio at 25.52x P/E.
The gap between a 14.47x forward P/E and a negative trailing P/E suggests investors are pricing an expected swing back to profitability rather than valuing demonstrated earnings. The forward EV/EBITDA of 5.22x versus the trailing 20.26x implies EBITDA is expected to rise sharply, a projection that warrants close scrutiny given ten quarters of operating losses. Investors should monitor whether reported margin recovery materializes before treating the low P/S and P/B as evidence of value.
Margins Fail to Reach Operating Breakeven
As reported in NN, Inc.'s income statements, operating margin was -2.5% in the latest quarter against gross margin of 6.9%, and net margin of -3.5% trails well behind Park-Ohio's 1.6% and Insteel's 6.3% peer net margins.
Gross margin has compressed from roughly 17% in mid-2024 to 6.9% now, indicating weakened pricing power or cost absorption rather than a temporary dip. Operating losses persist even as revenue has recently grown, which suggests top-line expansion is not yet producing operating leverage. The most recent quarter's net loss exceeding the operating loss points to non-operating drags that warrant further investigation.
Negative Returns Indicate Capital Destruction
Based on NN, Inc.'s reported figures, ROIC of -0.7% and ROE of -3.2% in the latest quarter remain negative, and ROIC has been negative in most of the ten quarters, compared with Insteel's 14.1% ROIC as a peer reference.
Persistently negative ROIC suggests invested capital is not generating returns above its cost, consistent with the cumulative operating losses visible across the period. The return profile appears driven by weak margins rather than asset turnover, since asset turnover remains near 0.23x to 0.29x. Improvement would likely require sustained margin repair before capital efficiency can be meaningfully assessed.
Debt Burden Versus Erratic Coverage
According to reported balance sheets, debt-to-equity ranged from 0.99 to 2.94 across the period and stood at 1.56 in the latest quarter, while interest coverage was negative at -0.61, meaning operating earnings did not cover interest expense.
Total debt has held in a narrow band near $200M while equity has swung widely, so leverage ratios are driven more by equity volatility than by borrowing changes. Negative interest coverage in the latest quarter suggests debt service is not currently supported by operating earnings, though coverage has oscillated between positive and negative values. Investors should monitor refinancing timing and whether operating income can turn sustainably positive relative to interest costs.
Equity Rebound May Overstate Recovery
The strongest challenge to a recovery reading is that NN, Inc.'s headline equity rebounded to $139.3M while retained earnings deficit deepened to -$381.3M, which may indicate the equity figure is distorted by non-earnings items.
Because ratios such as debt-to-equity and return on equity depend on the equity denominator, a rebound in book value can make leverage look healthier than the underlying earnings record supports. Investors should consider whether the most recent equity increase reflects operating results or other balance sheet adjustments before drawing conclusions about improving solvency. Metrics based on enterprise value or tangible capital may offer a cleaner view than headline book equity in this case.