Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1M | $8M | $74M | $34M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $11M | $58M | $125M | $105M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.38 | 0.20 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 7.23 | 8.57 | 3.29 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 0.84 | 1.00 | 1.92 | 12.25 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.30 | 0.65 | 0.62 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 3.43 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 40.86 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 62.16 | 5.54 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 65.0% | 65.0% | 63.4% | 60.9% | 57.6% | 60.1% | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | -13.8% | -13.8% | 8.5% | -112.0% | -76.8% | -34.9% | -156.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -57.4% | -57.4% | -44.6% | -150.7% | -91.9% | -86.5% | -86.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | -30.0% | -30.0% | -20.9% | -64.7% | -27.4% | -27.8% | -11.3% |
| ROIC | — | — | — | -847.3% | -3292.4% | -158.1% | — |
| ROCE | — | — | 86.9% | -450.0% | -69.7% | -20.4% | -28.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 1.89 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 1.39 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 53.59 | 2.25 | — | 6.66 | — | -0.75 |
| Interest Coverage | -0.61 | -0.61 | 0.04 | -11.49 | -6.11 | -9.17 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.07 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.07 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.07 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.57 | 0.48 | 0.40 | 0.34 | 0.19 | 0.13 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.73 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 31.38 | 28.28 | 30.81 | 29.53 | 41.63 | 0.51 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 13.8% | 11.7% | 30.4% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $3M | $3M | $2M | $2M | $3M | $0 |
Liquidity and solvency crisis
As reported in financial statements, NVNI's P/S ratio of 0.03 and negative P/E multiple suggest that the market currently prices the firm as a distressed asset rather than a growth-oriented software aggregator, reflecting deep skepticism regarding the company's ability to achieve long-term profitability or scale its portfolio.
The absence of meaningful EV/EBITDA or forward-looking multiples indicates that investors are currently ignoring traditional SaaS valuation frameworks in favor of liquidation-based assessments. This valuation compression appears to be a direct consequence of the company's inability to demonstrate organic growth or a clear path to positive earnings.
Based on reported figures, NVNI's 64.97% gross margin indicates a functional software delivery model, yet the -13.80% operating margin highlights a failure to achieve the necessary economies of scale to cover the substantial administrative overhead inherent in its decentralized, acquisition-heavy corporate structure.
While the gross margin is respectable for a diversified software portfolio, the persistent operating losses suggest that the platform costs are disproportionately high relative to the current revenue base. Investors should monitor whether management can rationalize these corporate expenses or if the current cost structure is structurally incompatible with the company's current size.
According to recent SEC filings, NVNI's current ratio has deteriorated to a precarious 0.02, signaling a critical lack of liquid assets relative to short-term obligations that leaves the company with virtually no buffer against operational shocks or the need for immediate capital deployment.
This liquidity profile is highly concerning, as it suggests the company is operating with almost no margin for error in its working capital management. The reliance on external financing to cover ongoing losses appears increasingly risky given the current interest rate environment in Brazil.
As evidenced by the 2023Q2 ROIC of -1.3%, NVNI is currently destroying rather than compounding invested capital, a trend that underscores the fundamental difficulty the firm faces in generating returns that exceed the cost of its capital base.
The negative ROIC trend suggests that the capital deployed for acquisitions is not yet yielding the expected synergies or operational improvements. Without a significant pivot toward higher-margin organic growth, the company's ability to create long-term shareholder value remains highly questionable.
Investors frequently misapply standard SaaS valuation multiples like EV/Sales to NVNI, which obscures the reality that the company functions more as a distressed holding company than a high-growth software firm, necessitating a shift toward liquidation or cash-flow-based valuation methods instead.
Applying high-growth SaaS multiples to NVNI ignores the significant conglomerate discount and the heavy debt-servicing requirements that characterize its current financial position. Analysts should instead focus on the cash-generative capacity of the underlying subsidiaries, stripping away the corporate-level losses to determine if the core assets possess intrinsic value.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NVNI stock.
Nvni Group Limited Ordinary Shares's current P/E ratio is -0.1x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Based on historical data, Nvni Group Limited Ordinary Shares is trading at a P/E of -0.1x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Nvni Group Limited Ordinary Shares has 65.0% gross margin and -13.8% operating margin.