Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 13.2x · EV/EBITDA 10.8x · ROE 39.4%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.6B | $2.4B | $2.7B | $2.2B | $1.8B | $1.1B | $789M | $1.5B | $1.2B | $2.1B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $4.4B | $2.2B | $3.0B | $2.6B | $2.1B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $2.1B | $1.6B | $2.4B | $3.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 13.25 | 6.89 | 18.11 | 22.40 | 67.27 | — | — | — | — | 12.58 | 112.84 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.65 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.60 | 0.43 | 0.72 | 0.62 | 1.09 | 1.22 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.35 | 2.26 | 3.71 | 3.43 | 3.37 | 2.21 | 1.41 | 1.37 | 0.84 | 1.25 | 1.83 |
| P/FCF | 22.14 | 11.71 | 27.79 | 19.90 | 44.54 | 6.44 | 10.39 | 149.14 | — | 48.78 | 12.17 |
| P/OCF | 14.43 | 7.63 | 13.14 | 10.35 | 14.68 | 5.00 | 5.77 | 9.36 | 32.61 | 15.30 | 8.15 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.80 | 1.14 | 1.06 | 1.01 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 1.01 | 0.85 | 1.27 | 1.37 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.82 | 5.49 | 8.65 | 8.95 | 8.96 | 8.18 | 15.90 | 15.73 | 10.97 | 10.93 | 9.72 |
| EV / EBIT | 14.45 | 6.91 | 11.51 | 12.96 | 17.72 | 44.38 | — | — | — | 229.90 | 39.16 |
| EV / FCF | — | 10.74 | 31.47 | 23.45 | 52.16 | 8.39 | 17.34 | 210.21 | — | 57.24 | 13.67 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 20.4% | 20.4% | 18.2% | 16.5% | 14.9% | 14.1% | 9.0% | 4.8% | 6.8% | 10.1% | 12.3% |
| Operating Margin | 10.9% | 10.9% | 9.3% | 7.5% | 5.4% | 2.1% | -24.4% | -5.7% | -7.6% | 0.6% | 3.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 12.7% | 12.7% | 5.5% | 4.0% | 1.3% | -2.6% | -27.2% | -17.0% | -11.1% | 8.7% | 1.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 39.4% | 39.4% | 21.8% | 16.8% | 5.0% | -9.2% | -60.8% | -27.9% | -13.7% | 10.4% | 1.6% |
| ROA | 14.1% | 14.1% | 6.4% | 4.6% | 1.3% | -2.5% | -20.8% | -12.5% | -7.3% | 5.4% | 0.7% |
| ROIC | 23.4% | 23.4% | 17.6% | 14.7% | 9.9% | 3.1% | -24.2% | -5.0% | -5.6% | 0.4% | 2.8% |
| ROCE | 17.7% | 17.7% | 16.2% | 12.2% | 7.6% | 2.6% | -23.8% | -5.2% | -5.9% | 0.4% | 2.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.45 | 0.45 | 1.18 | 1.34 | 1.66 | 1.72 | 1.76 | 0.91 | 0.55 | 0.47 | 0.52 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.20 | 1.20 | 2.44 | 2.96 | 3.76 | 4.90 | 11.83 | 7.40 | 5.31 | 3.53 | 2.47 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.19 | 0.49 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.67 | 0.95 | 0.56 | 0.30 | 0.22 | 0.23 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.50 | -0.50 | 1.01 | 1.35 | 1.31 | 1.90 | 6.38 | 4.57 | 2.92 | 1.61 | 1.07 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.97 | 3.69 | 3.54 | 7.62 | 1.95 | 6.95 | 61.07 | — | 8.46 | 1.50 |
| Interest Coverage | 8.73 | 8.73 | 6.93 | 5.41 | 3.07 | 0.85 | -10.36 | -6.75 | -3.92 | 0.38 | 3.15 |
Net cash position: cash ($689M) exceeds total debt ($487M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.99 | 1.99 | 1.74 | 1.78 | 2.28 | 2.37 | 2.68 | 2.07 | 2.52 | 2.72 | 2.48 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.99 | 1.99 | 1.46 | 1.50 | 1.96 | 2.06 | 2.35 | 1.78 | 2.12 | 2.23 | 1.93 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 1.01 | 1.09 | 1.06 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.99 | 0.89 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.04 | 1.14 | 1.08 | 1.02 | 0.95 | 0.89 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.73 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 9.76 | 9.66 | 9.54 | 10.45 | 11.78 | 11.16 | 9.15 | 8.02 | 7.11 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | 79.40 | 85.18 | 85.05 | 83.53 | 103.48 | 114.53 | 119.49 | 90.59 | 78.69 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.1% | 3.4% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 26.6% | 382.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.5% | 14.5% | 5.5% | 4.5% | 1.5% | — | — | — | — | 7.9% | 0.9% |
| FCF Yield | 4.5% | 8.5% | 3.6% | 5.0% | 2.2% | 15.5% | 9.6% | 0.7% | — | 2.0% | 8.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.9% | 1.7% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.9% | 1.7% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.1% | 3.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $101M | $102M | $102M | $101M | $100M | $99M | $99M | $99M | $99M | $98M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying OII stock.
Oceaneering International, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 13.2x. The historical average is 24.8x. This places it at the 15th percentile of its historical range.
Oceaneering International, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 10.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.0x.
Oceaneering International, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 39.4%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 9.6%.
Based on historical data, Oceaneering International, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 13.2x. This is at the 15th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Oceaneering International, Inc. has 20.4% gross margin and 10.9% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Oceaneering International, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.2x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
ROV overcapacity and project lumpiness
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Recovery Anchored by Subsea Robotics
Gross margin reached 20.4% in 2026Q2, the highest in ten quarters, according to recent financial statements, signaling improved pricing and fleet utilization as offshore demand strengthens.
The sequential expansion from 18.4% in 2026Q1 to 20.4% in 2026Q2, as reported in the income statement, suggests that Oceaneering is capturing better day rates and absorbing fixed costs more efficiently. Operating margin at 11.5% also marks a ten-quarter high, indicating that the cost structure is leveraging favorably with revenue growth. However, the 2025Q4 net margin of 26.6% was inflated by non-operating gains, so investors should focus on gross and operating margins as cleaner indicators of underlying earning power.
ROIC Grinds Higher but Remains Subpar
ROIC improved to 4.9% in 2026Q2 from 2.5% in 2024Q1, per reported figures, yet remains below the cost of capital, suggesting the company is still recovering from the offshore downturn.
The gradual climb in ROIC, driven by margin expansion rather than asset efficiency, indicates that Oceaneering is generating better returns on its invested capital as utilization rises. However, with ROIC at 4.9% and ROE at 5.7% in 2026Q2, the company is not yet compounding returns at a level that would justify a premium valuation. The low asset turnover of 0.29x reflects the capital-intensive nature of the ROV fleet, and meaningful improvement would require either higher utilization or a shift toward less asset-heavy service lines.
Working Capital Swings Distort Efficiency
Cash conversion cycle shortened to 66 days in 2026Q2 from 97 days in 2024Q1, based on reported data, but quarterly swings remain pronounced due to project timing and seasonal working capital needs.
The improvement in CCC is driven by a reduction in DSO to 60 days from 87 days, suggesting better collection discipline, while DPO and DIO remained relatively stable. However, the volatility in operating cash flow, which swung from -$131.6M in 2026Q1 to +$131.6M in 2026Q2, indicates that efficiency metrics can be misleading on a quarterly basis. Investors should monitor the trend over multiple quarters to distinguish genuine working capital improvements from project-driven lumpiness.
Deleveraging Path Strengthens Balance Sheet
Debt-to-equity fell to 0.70 in 2026Q2 from 1.45 in 2024Q1, per financial statements, with interest coverage at 10.27x, indicating a more comfortable debt service position.
The consistent reduction in leverage, alongside a rise in interest coverage from 4.50x in 2024Q1 to 10.27x in 2026Q2, suggests that Oceaneering has ample capacity to service its debt even if earnings were to dip. The low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.45% in 2025Q4, as reported, underscores a conservative capital structure that provides flexibility for fleet investments or strategic acquisitions. However, the D/EBITDA ratio of 7.11x in 2026Q2 remains elevated, reflecting the cyclicality of EBITDA, so investors should assess leverage on a through-cycle basis.
Liquidity Buffer Supports Cyclical Flexibility
Current ratio improved to 2.18 in 2026Q2 from 1.76 in 2024Q1, per reported data, with cash at $629.5M, providing a robust cushion against short-term obligations and market volatility.
The strengthening liquidity position, with a quick ratio of 1.90, indicates that Oceaneering can cover its near-term liabilities without relying on inventory sales, which is crucial in a cyclical industry. The build-up of cash, from $354.7M in 2024Q1 to $629.5M in 2026Q2, suggests a conservative approach that could support capital investments or weather a downturn. However, the decline in net PPE to $738.4M may indicate underinvestment in the ROV fleet, which could limit future revenue capacity if demand continues to rise.
Misapplied P/E Overstates Earnings Power
The trailing P/E of 15.04 appears reasonable, but forward P/E of 26.96, based on current estimates, suggests the market is pricing in significant earnings growth that may not materialize if ROV overcapacity pressures pricing.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Oceaneering is the P/E, because earnings are highly cyclical and can be distorted by one-time gains, as seen in 2025Q4. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 12.35x trailing and 7.87x forward, better captures the company's operating performance and capital structure. Investors should also consider the price-to-book ratio of 4.94x, which may overstate value given the capital-intensive nature of the business and the potential for asset impairments in a downturn.