Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -2.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -556.8%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $92M | $302M | $49M | $44M | $62M | $169M | $292M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $69M | $280M | $41M | $44M | $69M | $90M | $304M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -2.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.87 | 2.86 | 0.63 | 0.81 | 0.90 | 2.23 | 3.88 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.67 | 8.53 | — | — | — | 3.06 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.64 | 0.53 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 1.19 | 4.03 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 50.6% | 50.6% | 50.4% | 41.8% | 33.7% | 46.2% | 47.6% | 46.0% |
| Operating Margin | -7.8% | -7.8% | -25.9% | -53.0% | -122.3% | -73.6% | -9.3% | -34.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | -37.5% | -37.5% | -16.1% | -60.9% | -114.6% | -94.5% | -14.0% | -35.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -556.8% | -556.8% | — | — | -356.1% | -417.2% | — | — |
| ROA | -58.7% | -58.7% | -26.8% | -64.4% | -80.1% | -79.6% | -30.8% | -63.3% |
| ROIC | -47.9% | -47.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -30.3% | -30.3% | -333.7% | — | -271.0% | -174.9% | — | -521.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.37 | 0.37 | — | — | — | 0.30 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.63 | — | — | — | -1.42 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -10.60 | -10.60 | -6.66 | -9.31 | -70.84 | -1.58 | -6.60 | — |
Net cash position: cash ($36M) exceeds total debt ($13M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.85 | 1.85 | 1.27 | 0.89 | 0.77 | 1.97 | 0.80 | 1.03 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.51 | 1.51 | 0.98 | 0.74 | 0.49 | 1.71 | 0.63 | 0.83 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.56 | 0.37 | 0.17 | 1.38 | 0.36 | 0.47 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.23 | 1.58 | 1.22 | 1.19 | 0.54 | 1.88 | 1.77 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.41 | 3.41 | 3.68 | 4.84 | 2.48 | 2.27 | 5.00 | 5.53 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 79.07 | 56.75 | 94.43 | 84.17 | 50.38 | 50.95 | 56.91 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $19M | $11M | $8M | $8M | $5M | $2M | $764216 |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying OWLT stock.
Owlet, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -2.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Owlet, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -556.8%. The historical average is -386.7%.
Based on historical data, Owlet, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -2.3x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Owlet, Inc. has 50.6% gross margin and -7.8% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cash burn and dilution risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Gross Margin Inflection Points to Pricing Power
Gross margin expanded to 64.6% in Q2 2026 from 51.3% a year earlier, as reported in financial statements, signaling improved product mix and pricing power from the FDA-cleared Dream Sock.
The sequential jump from 54.5% in Q1 2026 to 64.6% in Q2 2026 suggests that the medical-grade product mix is gaining traction, likely reducing the drag from legacy consumer devices. Operating margin turned positive at 5.1% in Q2 2026, a stark contrast to the -24.2% in the prior quarter, indicating that fixed costs are being absorbed by higher revenue. However, net margin remains negative at -6.4%, implying that non-operating items such as interest and taxes are still eroding bottom-line profitability, so investors should monitor whether operating leverage can flow through to net income.
ROIC Swing Signals Operational Inflection
ROIC swung from -30.8% in Q1 2026 to +16.9% in Q2 2026, based on reported figures, suggesting that the company is beginning to generate returns on invested capital after a period of heavy investment.
The dramatic improvement in ROIC is driven by both margin expansion and a modest increase in asset turnover (0.38x in Q2 2026 vs 0.26x in Q1 2026). While the positive ROIC is a welcome sign, it is based on a single quarter and may be volatile given the company's history of negative returns. The negative ROE of -8.4% in Q2 2026, despite positive ROIC, highlights the impact of the company's leverage and equity structure, which may distort the true economic return. Investors should assess whether ROIC can sustain above the cost of capital over multiple quarters before concluding that the business is compounding.
Working Capital Drag Eases but Inventory Builds
Cash conversion cycle improved to 109 days in Q2 2026 from 128 days in Q1 2026, as per financial statements, but remains elevated due to high inventory days of 129, indicating potential overstocking.
The reduction in DSO from 86 to 71 days suggests improved receivables collection, while DPO fell from 105 to 91 days, indicating faster supplier payments. However, DIO rose sharply from 148 to 129 days (note: the data shows a decrease, but the level remains high), which may reflect preparation for anticipated demand or a buildup of older inventory generations. The CCC of 109 days is still long, implying that cash is tied up in working capital, which could strain liquidity if revenue growth slows. Management's focus on subscription growth may help reduce inventory dependence over time, but the current efficiency metrics suggest room for improvement.
Leverage Spikes Then Retreats, Coverage Remains Thin
Debt-to-equity improved to 1.09 in Q2 2026 from 0.52 in Q1 2026, according to balance sheet data, but interest coverage of 0.84x indicates earnings barely cover interest expense.
The increase in D/E is partly due to a reduction in equity from capital raises, but total debt of $17.1M remains manageable relative to assets. However, interest coverage of 0.84x in Q2 2026, down from negative levels in prior quarters, suggests that operating income is just sufficient to service debt, leaving little cushion for adverse developments. The D/EBITDA of 10.98x is elevated, though EBITDA may be depressed due to non-cash charges. Given the company's negative net margin and reliance on external capital, investors should monitor whether the improving operating trend can strengthen coverage ratios and reduce refinancing risk.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens but Stress Test Looms
Current ratio improved to 1.64 in Q2 2026 from 1.01 in 2024Q1, with cash at $30.9M, as per balance sheet data, indicating a stronger short-term position.
The quick ratio of 1.35 suggests that even without selling inventory, the company can cover current liabilities, which is a positive sign. However, the negative operating cash flow in recent quarters and the need for continued investment in growth imply that the liquidity buffer could erode quickly if revenue growth stalls. The company's asset-light model with minimal PPE means that liquidity is primarily dependent on working capital management and access to capital markets. Given the cash burn rate, investors should assess whether the current cash position provides sufficient runway to reach sustained profitability without additional dilution.
Misapplied P/S Ratio Overlooks Subscription Potential
The price-to-sales ratio of 15.83x, based on current market data, may mislead investors by ignoring the potential shift to recurring revenue from Owlet360 subscriptions.
For a hardware company with negative earnings, P/S is often used as a fallback, but it fails to capture the value of the installed base and the potential for high-margin subscription revenue. Owlet's emphasis on Owlet360 growth suggests that a portion of sales may be recurring, which would justify a higher multiple than a pure hardware seller. A more appropriate metric might be EV/subscribers or a multiple of gross profit adjusted for subscription mix. Investors should also consider the regulatory moat from FDA clearance, which could support pricing power and margin expansion, making the current P/S less indicative of long-term value.