Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 24.6x · EV/EBITDA 13.5x · ROE 9.9%. (1998–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $26.7B | $22.2B | $21.2B | $19.0B | $18.8B | $16.7B | $13.0B | $19.0B | $15.1B | $15.6B | $12.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $35.9B | $35.4B | $34.4B | $30.0B | $30.0B | $28.6B | $24.6B | $29.9B | $22.5B | $22.9B | $16.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 24.58 | 14.31 | 12.32 | 11.51 | 6.62 | 15.24 | — | 13.83 | 11.82 | 19.45 | 31.01 |
| P/S Ratio | 4.89 | 2.85 | 2.87 | 3.00 | 1.62 | 1.94 | 2.19 | 2.63 | 2.05 | 2.89 | 2.86 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.27 | 1.32 | 1.21 | 1.20 | 1.19 | 1.16 | 0.87 | 1.14 | 1.05 | 1.13 | 1.47 |
| P/FCF | 15.10 | 8.80 | 9.39 | 9.35 | 8.09 | 8.39 | 10.64 | 21.48 | 14.66 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 11.52 | 6.71 | 6.60 | 7.20 | 6.42 | 6.31 | 5.78 | 7.52 | 6.69 | 10.33 | 11.31 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.55 | 4.66 | 4.73 | 2.58 | 3.32 | 4.13 | 4.13 | 3.06 | 4.23 | 3.82 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.49 | 9.31 | 10.94 | 9.03 | 6.83 | 10.09 | 34.92 | 12.79 | 9.18 | 14.18 | 14.68 |
| EV / EBIT | 18.23 | 12.66 | 14.85 | 11.27 | 8.15 | 13.60 | — | 20.26 | 11.09 | 20.43 | 21.25 |
| EV / FCF | — | 14.05 | 15.22 | 14.77 | 12.90 | 14.37 | 20.10 | 33.70 | 21.83 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 38.4% | 38.4% | 44.9% | 44.9% | 26.9% | 30.7% | 33.7% | 33.7% | 31.7% | 27.4% | 23.5% |
| Operating Margin | 36.1% | 36.1% | 30.9% | 41.9% | 31.9% | 24.5% | 0.1% | 25.2% | 27.5% | 22.5% | 18.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 21.8% | 21.8% | 25.2% | 28.1% | 25.6% | 14.4% | -5.3% | 20.6% | 17.4% | 16.5% | 10.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.9% | 9.9% | 11.2% | 11.2% | 19.7% | 8.5% | -2.0% | 9.6% | 9.0% | 8.0% | 5.9% |
| ROA | 4.7% | 4.7% | 5.4% | 5.5% | 9.4% | 4.0% | -1.0% | 5.0% | 4.9% | 4.4% | 3.3% |
| ROIC | 6.9% | 6.9% | 5.9% | 7.4% | 10.4% | 6.0% | 0.0% | 5.5% | 7.1% | 5.5% | 5.2% |
| ROCE | 8.4% | 8.4% | 7.3% | 9.0% | 12.7% | 7.2% | 0.0% | 6.4% | 8.1% | 6.3% | 6.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.65 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.50 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.51 | 3.51 | 4.24 | 3.36 | 2.57 | 4.21 | 16.55 | 4.69 | 3.08 | 4.69 | 3.74 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 0.77 | 0.65 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.50 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.48 | 3.48 | 4.19 | 3.32 | 2.55 | 4.20 | 16.43 | 4.64 | 3.01 | 4.49 | 3.71 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.25 | 5.83 | 5.42 | 4.81 | 5.98 | 9.46 | 12.22 | 7.17 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 4.76 | 4.76 | 3.89 | 5.66 | 7.97 | 4.78 | 0.01 | 6.21 | 7.09 | 6.11 | 6.85 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 0.82 | 0.67 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.89 | 0.86 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.71 | 0.53 | 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.75 | 0.63 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.28 | 0.04 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.19 | 0.37 | 0.27 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.28 | 0.21 | 0.28 |
| Inventory Turnover | 16.88 | 16.88 | 13.51 | 10.48 | 31.55 | 15.90 | 17.85 | 38.07 | 25.37 | 23.37 | 18.03 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 39.23 | 53.53 | 47.51 | 21.88 | 33.00 | 39.12 | 33.67 | 24.83 | 34.56 | 37.23 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.3% | 7.4% | 7.4% | 7.7% | 8.1% | 8.3% | 10.6% | 6.9% | 8.3% | 5.0% | 2.9% |
| Payout Ratio | 96.7% | 96.7% | 84.2% | 82.2% | 51.3% | 111.6% | — | 88.7% | 97.6% | 87.7% | 75.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.1% | 7.0% | 8.1% | 8.7% | 15.1% | 6.6% | — | 7.2% | 8.5% | 5.1% | 3.2% |
| FCF Yield | 6.6% | 11.4% | 10.7% | 10.7% | 12.4% | 11.9% | 9.4% | 4.7% | 6.8% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 1.2% | 2.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 1.8% | 0.1% | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.5% | 9.4% | 7.4% | 8.0% | 9.9% | 8.4% | 11.3% | 7.7% | 8.3% | 5.0% | 2.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $582M | $574M | $551M | $554M | $551M | $550M | $514M | $509M | $432M | $389M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 28 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PBA stock.
Pembina Pipeline Corporation's current P/E ratio is 24.6x. The historical average is 20.4x. This places it at the 67th percentile of its historical range.
Pembina Pipeline Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 13.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.1x.
Pembina Pipeline Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 9.9%. The historical average is 9.6%.
Based on historical data, Pembina Pipeline Corporation is trading at a P/E of 24.6x. This is at the 67th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Pembina Pipeline Corporation's current dividend yield is 4.30% with a payout ratio of 96.7%.
Pembina Pipeline Corporation has 38.4% gross margin and 36.1% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Pembina Pipeline Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.5x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Elevated leverage limits financial flexibility
Premium Valuation vs. Peers on Growth Hope
Pembina trades at a forward EV/EBITDA of 10.19x, a notable discount to the peer median of ~14.5x, yet its P/E of 25.09x suggests the market is pricing in a significant earnings recovery from its current moderate profitability levels.
The valuation disconnect between the low EV/EBITDA and high P/E indicates the market is looking through current earnings volatility, likely driven by the Marketing segment, and valuing the company on its stable, fee-based infrastructure cash flows. This premium P/E relative to peers like Enbridge (21.47x) and TC Energy (26.21x) appears justified only if Pembina can sustainably expand its return on capital, which has averaged just 1.7% over the last ten quarters. The 4.2% dividend yield provides a floor, but the valuation is highly sensitive to the market's confidence in the company's ability to de-lever and grow its fee-based earnings.
Margin Volatility Masks Core Infrastructure Strength
Gross margin has swung from 36.7% to 47.7% over the past ten quarters, a pattern that appears driven by the shifting mix between high-margin Pipelines & Facilities and the lower-margin, commodity-exposed Marketing segment.
The reported operating margin of 37.5% in Q2 2026 is strong, but its volatility (e.g., the plunge to 6.1% in Q2 2024) underscores the earnings noise from the Marketing segment's buy-sell accounting. For fundamental analysis, the more stable fee-based segments are the true driver of earning power. The net margin of 23.8% is healthy, but its sustainability depends on managing the fixed-cost infrastructure base against variable throughput volumes, a dynamic that warrants close monitoring as new egress capacity alters regional flow dynamics.
Persistent Low Returns on Invested Capital
Pembina's ROIC has averaged just 1.7% over the last ten quarters, significantly lagging peers like ONEOK (9.6%) and Williams (7.7%), suggesting the company's massive asset base is not generating commensurate returns for investors.
The low ROIC, despite healthy margins, points to a capital-intensive structure where a large asset base (over $36B in total assets) generates relatively modest operating income. The ROE of 3.0% is similarly depressed, indicating that the company's equity is not being efficiently compounded. This return profile is a critical concern; it suggests that recent growth, funded by debt, has not yet translated into proportionate earnings power, and investors should monitor whether the PGI joint venture and Cedar LNG project can improve this trajectory.
Elevated Debt Burden Constrains Strategic Optionality
With a net debt position of $9.63 billion and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.81, Pembina's leverage is manageable but represents a significant claim on cash flows, especially as interest coverage has trended down from 5.83x to 4.94x over the past year.
While the D/E ratio is lower than major peers like Enbridge (1.61), the absolute debt level is substantial for a company of Pembina's size. The interest coverage ratio, while adequate, has shown a declining trend, which could become a concern if EBITDA growth stalls. The chronic current ratio below 1.0 (0.62 in Q2 2026) indicates a persistent reliance on short-term financing, a structural feature that increases refinancing risk in a rising rate environment and limits the financial flexibility for further large-scale acquisitions.
Negative Cash Cycle Reflects Supplier Leverage
Pembina's cash conversion cycle has been negative for six of the last ten quarters, reaching -12 days in Q2 2026, which suggests the company effectively uses supplier credit to finance its operations, a key advantage of its scale.
The negative CCC is driven by a very high Days Payable Outstanding (83 days in Q2 2026), indicating Pembina has significant leverage over its suppliers and can delay payments. This is partially offset by a moderate Days Sales Outstanding (49 days). This efficient working capital management is a positive for cash flow generation, but it is a structural feature of the midstream model rather than a sign of operational improvement. The volatility in CCC, from -24 to +7 days, is largely driven by timing of large inventory and receivable swings.
The Misleading Safety of the Dividend Yield
The 4.2% dividend yield appears attractive, but it is the ratio most commonly misapplied to this business model, as it obscures the underlying tension between high payout commitments and the need to fund growth from a low-return asset base.
Investors often fixate on the yield as a sign of safety, but for a capital-intensive midstream company with low ROIC, the dividend is a claim on scarce capital that could otherwise be used for deleveraging or high-return growth. The negative retained earnings balance confirms that cumulative payouts have exceeded cumulative earnings, a trend that is unsustainable without consistent external financing. A more appropriate metric for assessing dividend health is the payout ratio relative to Distributable Cash Flow (DCF), which is not provided here but is essential for evaluating the true sustainability of the yield.