Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 31.5x · EV/EBITDA 21.4x · ROE 25.1%. (1997–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $115.7B | $125.3B | $90.9B | $65.9B | $50.6B | $32.1B | $40.2B | $23.8B | $22.4B | $21.1B | $21.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $123.7B | $133.3B | $100.1B | $76.4B | $63.1B | $37.1B | $46.3B | $31.6B | $26.3B | $25.2B | $26.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 31.50 | 34.34 | 25.75 | 23.16 | 24.32 | 24.39 | 23.00 | 19.73 | 14.81 | 19.90 | 22.04 |
| P/S Ratio | 5.16 | 5.83 | 4.58 | 3.31 | 2.66 | 2.02 | 2.80 | 1.74 | 1.56 | 1.48 | 1.80 |
| P/B Ratio | 7.63 | 8.13 | 6.64 | 5.45 | 4.90 | 3.62 | 4.78 | 3.81 | 3.75 | 3.60 | 4.11 |
| P/FCF | 30.02 | 32.09 | 27.22 | 22.07 | 19.48 | 14.50 | 16.99 | 12.94 | 14.60 | 15.65 | 19.75 |
| P/OCF | 26.52 | 28.71 | 24.08 | 19.47 | 16.99 | 13.14 | 15.60 | 11.49 | 12.95 | 13.22 | 16.66 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.20 | 5.04 | 3.83 | 3.31 | 2.34 | 3.22 | 2.30 | 1.84 | 1.76 | 2.22 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.38 | 23.93 | 20.16 | 15.83 | 15.63 | 10.97 | 15.43 | 12.50 | 10.27 | 10.18 | 14.76 |
| EV / EBIT | 26.70 | 26.86 | 22.17 | 18.64 | 19.41 | 19.87 | 18.53 | 17.34 | 12.38 | 13.17 | 17.87 |
| EV / FCF | — | 34.14 | 29.97 | 25.61 | 24.29 | 16.79 | 19.56 | 17.17 | 17.13 | 18.71 | 24.30 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | 37.7% | 36.9% | 35.9% | 33.9% | 27.7% | 27.2% | 25.4% | 25.5% | 25.3% | 24.0% |
| Operating Margin | 21.6% | 21.6% | 20.5% | 19.6% | 16.9% | 17.7% | 16.7% | 14.5% | 14.8% | 14.1% | 12.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 17.0% | 17.0% | 17.8% | 14.3% | 10.9% | 8.3% | 12.2% | 8.8% | 10.6% | 7.4% | 8.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 25.1% | 25.1% | 27.4% | 25.4% | 21.7% | 15.2% | 23.8% | 19.7% | 25.6% | 19.1% | 20.0% |
| ROA | 12.1% | 12.1% | 12.0% | 9.6% | 7.5% | 5.7% | 8.7% | 6.4% | 9.2% | 6.9% | 7.1% |
| ROIC | 15.0% | 15.0% | 13.4% | 12.9% | 13.1% | 14.9% | 12.6% | 12.5% | 16.0% | 14.9% | 13.1% |
| ROCE | 19.1% | 19.1% | 17.8% | 17.6% | 15.2% | 15.1% | 14.1% | 12.8% | 16.0% | 16.6% | 13.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.70 | 0.91 | 1.26 | 1.32 | 0.81 | 1.36 | 1.19 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.53 | 1.53 | 1.94 | 2.27 | 3.22 | 3.46 | 2.27 | 3.35 | 2.78 | 2.00 | 3.25 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.52 | 0.67 | 0.87 | 1.21 | 0.57 | 0.72 | 1.25 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.95 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.85 | 2.19 | 3.10 | 1.50 | 2.03 | 3.08 | 1.52 | 1.67 | 2.76 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.05 | 2.75 | 3.54 | 4.81 | 2.29 | 2.57 | 4.23 | 2.53 | 3.07 | 4.55 |
| Interest Coverage | 12.38 | 12.38 | 11.04 | 8.10 | 5.67 | 7.32 | 9.99 | 5.91 | 11.17 | 8.96 | 9.18 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.26 | 1.26 | 1.19 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 2.06 | 1.81 | 1.60 | 2.43 | 1.59 | 1.41 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 1.68 | 1.14 | 0.98 | 1.90 | 1.08 | 0.95 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 1.14 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.27 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.81 | 0.93 | 0.78 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.23 | 4.23 | 4.42 | 4.58 | 4.33 | 5.18 | 5.00 | 5.20 | 6.36 | 6.59 | 5.90 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 58.96 | 62.10 | 61.06 | 62.42 | 67.05 | 64.72 | 55.95 | 62.82 | 63.13 | 66.32 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.4% | 1.8% | 1.2% | 1.9% | 1.8% | 1.7% | 1.6% |
| Payout Ratio | 25.7% | 25.7% | 24.4% | 27.5% | 33.8% | 43.3% | 27.2% | 37.8% | 27.3% | 34.4% | 35.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.2% | 2.9% | 3.9% | 4.3% | 4.1% | 4.1% | 4.3% | 5.1% | 6.8% | 5.0% | 4.5% |
| FCF Yield | 3.3% | 3.1% | 3.7% | 4.5% | 5.1% | 6.9% | 5.9% | 7.7% | 6.9% | 6.4% | 5.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.1% | 1.0% | 1.9% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 1.4% | 0.5% | 0.9% | 3.8% | 1.8% | 1.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.9% | 1.8% | 2.9% | 1.7% | 2.0% | 3.2% | 1.7% | 2.8% | 5.7% | 3.5% | 3.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $128M | $130M | $130M | $130M | $130M | $131M | $130M | $132M | $135M | $136M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PH stock.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation's current P/E ratio is 31.5x. The historical average is 18.9x. This places it at the 93th percentile of its historical range.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 21.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.6x.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 25.1%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 18.2%.
Based on historical data, Parker-Hannifin Corporation is trading at a P/E of 31.5x. This is at the 93th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation's current dividend yield is 0.80% with a payout ratio of 25.7%.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation has 37.7% gross margin and 21.6% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Unreconciled leverage and revenue data
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiples Price in Sustained Compounding
Based on reported figures, PH trades at 31.50x trailing and 25.69x forward earnings with a PEG of 1.93, a premium to HON's 9.96x that reflects expectations of durable mid-cycle earnings growth rather than cyclical recovery alone.
The 21.38x EV/EBITDA and 30.02x price-to-free-cash-flow multiples sit near the upper end of the peer group, with EMR at 33.84x and ETN at 34.15x trailing earnings, suggesting PH is valued as a quality compounder rather than a discounted cyclical. The compression from 31.50x trailing to 25.69x forward implies consensus expects earnings to rise roughly 23%, a step-up that depends on acquisition synergy capture and pricing held above input inflation. Because trailing earnings carry heavy non-cash intangible amortization, the P/FCF multiple may be the more reliable anchor, and it remains elevated.
Margin Band Stable Despite Revenue Volatility
As reported in the financial statements, PH's gross margin held between 35.9% and 39.0% across ten quarters while operating margin expanded from 19.8% to 23.9%, indicating pricing power that has outlasted choppy top-line growth.
A gross margin near 37% in a fragmented-catalog industrial suggests PH is passing through input cost inflation rather than absorbing it, which is central to its value-added positioning. Operating margin expansion of roughly 400 basis points over the period, achieved while SG&A stayed roughly flat near $874M to $884M, points to genuine operating leverage rather than cost-cutting alone. The net margin trajectory is noisier, ranging from 14.2% to 20.0%, which likely reflects acquisition amortization and non-recurring items, so operating margin is the cleaner read on earning power.
Returns Diluted by Acquisition-Built Capital Base
Based on PH's reported figures, ROIC has moved within a narrow 3.2% to 4.3% range, well below the 12.6% to 19.6% ROIC reported by HON, ROK, and ETN, suggesting acquired capital is earning returns far below what the operating margin implies.
The gap between a roughly 24% operating margin and a sub-4.5% ROIC points to asset turnover and goodwill as the binding constraint rather than profitability. With goodwill rising from $10.5B to $16.2B, a large share of invested capital is acquisition premium that has not yet produced commensurate returns. Whether ROIC recovers depends on synergy realization from recent deals; until then, investors may reasonably question the return on incremental acquisition spending.
Debt Expansion Clashes With Reported Leverage Ratios
Based on reported figures, total debt rose from $11.0B to $17.5B over the period, yet the 1.09 debt-to-equity and 8.79x interest coverage in the latest quarter warrant verification against the 0.70% D/E figure in the supplied company intelligence.
The debt increase of roughly 59% against a modest equity build implies leverage has risen materially, which reported interest coverage declining from about 8.8x to a range near 5x to 8x in recent quarters appears to corroborate. The inconsistency between the 0.70% D/E in the intelligence block and the 1.09 in the ratio table is unresolved and should be reconciled before relying on either figure. Debt service remains comfortable on reported coverage, but refinancing terms and covenant headroom are not disclosed in the supplied data and cannot be assessed here.
Thin Liquidity Buffer Relies on Operating Cash Flow
As reported in the financial statements, PH's current ratio moved between 0.93 and 1.26 and its quick ratio between 0.55 and 0.74, with cash of $711M in 2027Q1 providing a limited buffer against current obligations.
A current ratio hovering near parity indicates PH operates with minimal net working capital cushion and depends on continuous cash generation to meet short-term obligations. The quick ratio below 0.75 in every quarter confirms that inventory and receivables carry much of current asset coverage. Under a severe demand shock, the position would likely require revolver access or cash flow resilience, and the supplied data does not disclose available credit facilities.
Working Capital Cycle Steady Near Eighty Days
Based on reported figures, PH's cash conversion cycle held between 78 and 88 days, with DIO near 56 to 61 days and DPO near 54 to 63 days, indicating a consistent but not exceptional working capital profile.
The stability of the cash conversion cycle suggests PH has maintained its inventory and supplier terms through the cycle, consistent with a broad SKU catalog that requires sustained stocking. A DPO that trails DIO by roughly 20 days means suppliers finance only part of inventory, leaving PH to fund the balance. The low asset turnover of roughly 0.16 to 0.19 quarterly reflects the capital-heavy acquisition base rather than operational inefficiency alone.
Misapplied Metric Obscures Acquisition Economics
Based on reported figures, trailing P/E of 31.50x may overstate PH's cash earning power because intangible amortization from acquisitions depresses GAAP earnings, making the P/FCF of 30.02x a more relevant cross-check.
Applying P/E to a serial acquirer treats amortization of acquired intangibles as an economic cost when it is largely a non-cash accounting charge, which can make the stock look more expensive than its cash generation implies. The multiple also ignores that roughly $9.1B of acquisition outflows in 2027Q1 were capital deployed rather than expensed. An analyst should adjust for amortization, evaluate EV/EBITDA alongside free cash flow yield, and assess whether acquired ROIC converges toward the peer range over time.