Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 113.7x · EV/EBITDA 85.8x · ROE 7.3%. (1997–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $122.5B | $125.0B | $90.9B | $65.9B | $50.6B | $32.1B | $40.2B | $23.8B | $22.4B | $21.1B | $21.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $130.5B | $133.0B | $100.1B | $76.4B | $63.1B | $37.1B | $46.3B | $31.8B | $26.3B | $25.2B | $26.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 113.72 | 114.53 | 25.75 | 23.16 | 24.32 | 24.39 | 23.00 | 19.73 | 14.81 | 19.90 | 22.04 |
| P/S Ratio | 21.28 | 21.72 | 4.58 | 3.31 | 2.66 | 2.02 | 2.80 | 1.74 | 1.56 | 1.48 | 1.80 |
| P/B Ratio | 7.57 | 7.62 | 6.64 | 5.45 | 4.90 | 3.62 | 4.78 | 3.81 | 3.75 | 3.60 | 4.11 |
| P/FCF | 32.15 | 32.82 | 27.22 | 22.07 | 19.48 | 14.50 | 16.99 | 12.94 | 14.60 | 15.65 | 19.75 |
| P/OCF | 28.69 | 29.29 | 24.08 | 19.47 | 16.99 | 13.14 | 15.60 | 11.49 | 12.95 | 13.22 | 16.66 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 23.11 | 5.04 | 3.83 | 3.31 | 2.34 | 3.22 | 2.32 | 1.84 | 1.76 | 2.22 |
| EV / EBITDA | 85.78 | 87.46 | 20.16 | 15.83 | 15.63 | 10.97 | 15.43 | 12.60 | 10.27 | 10.18 | 14.76 |
| EV / EBIT | 95.03 | 92.70 | 22.17 | 18.64 | 19.41 | 19.87 | 18.53 | 17.47 | 12.38 | 13.17 | 17.87 |
| EV / FCF | — | 34.92 | 29.97 | 25.61 | 24.29 | 16.79 | 19.56 | 17.30 | 17.13 | 18.71 | 24.30 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 39.0% | 39.0% | 36.9% | 35.9% | 33.9% | 27.7% | 27.2% | 25.4% | 25.5% | 25.3% | 24.0% |
| Operating Margin | 23.9% | 23.9% | 20.5% | 19.6% | 16.9% | 17.7% | 16.7% | 14.5% | 14.8% | 14.1% | 12.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 19.0% | 19.0% | 17.8% | 14.3% | 10.9% | 8.3% | 12.2% | 8.8% | 10.6% | 7.4% | 8.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.3% | 7.3% | 27.4% | 25.4% | 21.7% | 15.2% | 23.8% | 19.7% | 25.6% | 19.1% | 20.0% |
| ROA | 3.6% | 3.6% | 12.0% | 9.6% | 7.5% | 5.7% | 8.7% | 6.4% | 9.2% | 6.9% | 7.1% |
| ROIC | 4.4% | 4.4% | 13.4% | 12.9% | 13.1% | 14.9% | 12.5% | 12.4% | 16.0% | 14.9% | 13.1% |
| ROCE | 5.7% | 5.7% | 17.8% | 17.6% | 15.2% | 15.1% | 14.2% | 12.8% | 16.0% | 16.6% | 13.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.70 | 0.91 | 1.26 | 1.32 | 0.81 | 1.39 | 1.19 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.60 | 5.60 | 1.94 | 2.27 | 3.22 | 3.46 | 2.27 | 3.45 | 2.78 | 2.00 | 3.25 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.49 | 0.67 | 0.87 | 1.21 | 0.57 | 0.72 | 1.28 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.95 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.27 | 5.27 | 1.85 | 2.19 | 3.10 | 1.50 | 2.03 | 3.17 | 1.52 | 1.67 | 2.76 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.11 | 2.75 | 3.54 | 4.81 | 2.29 | 2.57 | 4.36 | 2.53 | 3.07 | 4.55 |
| Interest Coverage | 15.11 | 15.11 | 11.04 | 8.10 | 5.67 | 7.32 | 9.99 | 5.91 | 11.17 | 8.96 | 9.18 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.26 | 1.26 | 1.19 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 2.06 | 1.81 | 1.55 | 2.43 | 1.59 | 1.41 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 1.68 | 1.14 | 0.98 | 1.90 | 1.08 | 0.95 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 1.14 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.27 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.19 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.81 | 0.93 | 0.78 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.11 | 1.11 | 4.42 | 4.58 | 4.33 | 5.18 | 5.00 | 5.63 | 6.36 | 6.59 | 5.90 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 201.05 | 62.10 | 61.06 | 62.42 | 67.05 | 64.72 | 56.77 | 62.82 | 63.13 | 66.32 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.4% | 1.8% | 1.2% | 1.9% | 1.8% | 1.7% | 1.6% |
| Payout Ratio | 85.8% | 85.8% | 24.4% | 27.5% | 33.8% | 43.3% | 27.2% | 37.8% | 27.3% | 34.4% | 35.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.9% | 0.9% | 3.9% | 4.3% | 4.1% | 4.1% | 4.3% | 5.1% | 6.8% | 5.0% | 4.5% |
| FCF Yield | 3.1% | 3.0% | 3.7% | 4.5% | 5.1% | 6.9% | 5.9% | 7.7% | 6.9% | 6.4% | 5.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.9% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 1.4% | 0.5% | 0.9% | 3.8% | 1.8% | 1.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.8% | 0.7% | 2.9% | 1.7% | 2.0% | 3.2% | 1.7% | 2.8% | 5.7% | 3.5% | 3.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $128M | $130M | $130M | $130M | $130M | $131M | $130M | $132M | $135M | $136M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PH stock.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation's current P/E ratio is 113.7x. The historical average is 21.5x. This places it at the 97th percentile of its historical range.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 85.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.7x.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 7.3%. The historical average is 17.6%.
Based on historical data, Parker-Hannifin Corporation is trading at a P/E of 113.7x. This is at the 97th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation's current dividend yield is 0.75% with a payout ratio of 85.8%.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation has 39.0% gross margin and 23.9% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Meggitt integration execution risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Valuation Reflects Aerospace Premium
Parker-Hannifin's forward P/E of 28.33 and EV/EBITDA of 19.82 appear elevated versus peers like Honeywell (14.77 P/E) and Emerson (38.42 P/E), suggesting the market is pricing in a structural shift toward higher-margin, longer-cycle aerospace revenue.
The current valuation multiples, particularly the forward P/E, are significantly above the company's own historical average and many industrial peers, indicating the market is assigning a premium for the perceived quality and durability of earnings from the expanded Aerospace segment. This premium appears contingent on the successful integration of Meggitt and the continued realization of higher-margin aftermarket revenue, which would justify the growth rate implied by the multiples. Investors should monitor whether the valuation gap versus pure-play industrial peers like Illinois Tool Works narrows if the aerospace growth thesis faces any execution headwinds.
Margin Expansion Drives Earnings Power
Gross margin expanded to a record 39.0% in Q4 FY2026, up from 35.4% a year prior, while operating margin reached 23.9%, indicating that pricing power and a favorable mix shift toward aerospace are the primary drivers of true earning power.
The decomposition of profitability shows that the expansion is broad-based, with both gross and operating margins trending upward over the past ten quarters. This suggests the company is successfully passing through inflationary costs and benefiting from a more favorable product mix, rather than relying solely on volume leverage. The net margin of 19.0% in the latest quarter, while strong, is more volatile and may be influenced by non-cash acquisition-related charges, making the operating margin a more reliable indicator of core operational performance.
ROIC Recovery Follows Deleveraging
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) has improved to 4.3% in Q4 FY2026 from a low of 3.2% in Q1 2025, a trend that appears driven more by balance sheet deleveraging and margin expansion than by a significant improvement in asset turnover.
The ROIC trend is encouraging but remains below the levels of more efficient peers like Eaton (13.6%) and Honeywell (12.6%), suggesting that the company's capital-intensive, acquisition-driven model may inherently dilute returns. The improvement is largely attributable to the reduction in net debt and the expansion of operating margins, rather than a fundamental shift in asset efficiency, as asset turnover has remained relatively flat around 0.17-0.19. This indicates that future ROIC expansion will depend heavily on sustaining the current margin trajectory and successfully integrating acquisitions to unlock synergies.
Working Capital Swings Obscure Efficiency
The cash conversion cycle (CCC) has fluctuated between 79 and 88 days over the past ten quarters, with a recent improvement to 79 days in Q4 FY2026, suggesting that underlying working capital efficiency is stable but subject to lumpy collection and inventory cycles.
The volatility in the CCC, particularly the swings in days inventory outstanding (DIO) and days payable outstanding (DPO), indicates that working capital management is not a primary driver of the recent cash flow surge. Instead, the improvement in the CCC appears to be a function of timing, with the Q4 2026 figure benefiting from a reduction in DIO to 82 days from 88 days in the prior quarter. This suggests that while the company maintains adequate control over its working capital, the primary catalyst for cash generation is operational profitability, not efficiency gains in the cash cycle.
Deleveraging Enhances Financial Flexibility
The debt-to-equity ratio has improved to 0.57 in Q4 FY2026 from 0.98 in Q3 2024, while interest coverage has strengthened to 15.11x, indicating that the company's debt service capacity has become significantly more comfortable following a period of strategic deleveraging.
The reduction in leverage is a direct result of the company's strong cash generation and disciplined capital allocation, which has allowed it to pay down debt while simultaneously funding acquisitions and shareholder returns. The interest coverage ratio of 15.11x is robust and provides a substantial cushion against potential interest rate increases or operational downturns. This improved financial flexibility reduces refinancing risk and positions the company to pursue further strategic acquisitions without compromising its investment-grade credit profile.
The Misleading P/E Multiple
The trailing P/E ratio of 116.51 is the most commonly misapplied metric for Parker-Hannifin, as it is heavily distorted by significant non-cash amortization of intangible assets from frequent acquisitions, making it an unreliable indicator of valuation.
This metric obscures the company's true cash-generating ability and valuation, as the high P/E is a function of accounting charges related to past deals, not operational weakness. A more appropriate metric for valuation is the forward P/E or EV/EBITDA, which better reflects the company's expected earnings power and is less affected by non-cash items. Investors relying solely on the trailing P/E may incorrectly conclude the stock is overvalued, missing the underlying strength in cash flow and the structural shift toward higher-margin revenue streams.