Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 13.0x · EV/EBITDA 9.4x · ROE 17.2%. (2007–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $840M | $770M | $556M | $682M | $829M | $897M | $977M | $1.3B | $815M | $854M | $756M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.1B | $981M | $772M | $914M | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.5B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 13.01 | 16.57 | 10.01 | 29.39 | 22.18 | 30.28 | — | 26.07 | 18.60 | 15.75 | 19.79 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.11 | 1.17 | 0.98 | 1.20 | 1.35 | 1.66 | 2.04 | 2.19 | 1.55 | 1.80 | 1.82 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.04 | 2.74 | 2.10 | 2.94 | 3.50 | 4.18 | 4.88 | 4.01 | 2.88 | 3.33 | 3.43 |
| P/FCF | 24.63 | 12.11 | 16.67 | 349.86 | 29.61 | 18.18 | 25.13 | 19.08 | 16.80 | 14.52 | 12.59 |
| P/OCF | 11.25 | 10.31 | 13.51 | 54.66 | 20.70 | 14.82 | 18.31 | 16.23 | 14.01 | 12.71 | 10.82 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.49 | 1.36 | 1.61 | 1.68 | 2.03 | 2.51 | 2.61 | 2.04 | 2.38 | 2.53 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.44 | 11.02 | 11.78 | 13.73 | 12.98 | 15.39 | — | 14.11 | 11.53 | 12.77 | 12.25 |
| EV / EBIT | 14.28 | 13.32 | 8.66 | 20.35 | 17.65 | 23.69 | — | 18.80 | 14.68 | 15.89 | 13.33 |
| EV / FCF | — | 15.43 | 23.17 | 469.24 | 36.97 | 22.30 | 30.97 | 22.70 | 22.00 | 19.26 | 17.50 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 26.6% | 26.6% | 25.8% | 23.6% | 24.6% | 26.2% | 26.7% | 29.5% | 29.6% | 30.1% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 11.2% | 8.4% | 7.9% | 9.5% | 9.4% | -15.6% | 15.1% | 14.0% | 14.8% | 16.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 7.1% | 7.1% | 9.9% | 4.2% | 6.3% | 5.7% | -18.0% | 8.6% | 8.4% | 11.6% | 9.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 17.2% | 17.2% | 22.7% | 10.1% | 17.1% | 14.8% | -33.7% | 16.5% | 16.3% | 23.2% | 18.5% |
| ROA | 7.7% | 7.7% | 9.5% | 4.0% | 6.6% | 5.3% | -13.5% | 7.1% | 6.5% | 8.2% | 6.6% |
| ROIC | 11.4% | 11.4% | 7.6% | 7.4% | 10.2% | 9.1% | -11.5% | 12.0% | 10.3% | 10.0% | 12.0% |
| ROCE | 14.0% | 14.0% | 9.6% | 9.2% | 11.9% | 10.2% | -13.2% | 14.1% | 12.2% | 11.4% | 12.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 1.11 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.34 | 0.87 | 0.99 | 1.23 | 1.42 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.46 | 2.46 | 3.38 | 3.86 | 2.84 | 3.36 | — | 2.59 | 3.02 | 3.56 | 3.65 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.75 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.95 | 1.13 | 0.76 | 0.89 | 1.08 | 1.34 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.37 | 2.37 | 3.30 | 3.49 | 2.58 | 2.84 | — | 2.25 | 2.72 | 3.14 | 3.43 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.32 | 6.49 | 119.38 | 7.36 | 4.11 | 5.84 | 3.62 | 5.20 | 4.74 | 4.91 |
| Interest Coverage | 6.08 | 6.08 | 5.84 | 2.87 | 5.21 | 3.92 | -3.88 | 4.73 | 4.29 | 3.89 | 5.19 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.78 | 2.78 | 3.39 | 2.21 | 2.52 | 2.69 | 3.28 | 2.71 | 2.52 | 2.45 | 3.54 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.18 | 1.18 | 1.40 | 1.01 | 1.15 | 1.39 | 1.96 | 1.63 | 1.43 | 1.47 | 2.09 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.45 | 0.62 | 0.46 | 0.35 | 0.46 | 0.36 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.05 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 1.03 | 0.95 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.62 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.15 | 3.15 | 3.02 | 3.04 | 3.37 | 3.75 | 4.02 | 4.77 | 4.28 | 4.19 | 3.77 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 54.28 | 56.12 | 56.90 | 51.41 | 48.71 | 63.24 | 56.10 | 56.75 | 60.81 | 70.26 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.3% | 3.6% | 4.9% | 4.0% | 3.3% | 3.0% | 2.7% | 2.0% | 3.0% | 2.6% | 2.8% |
| Payout Ratio | 59.6% | 59.6% | 48.9% | 115.7% | 70.0% | 86.4% | — | 51.2% | 55.5% | 39.7% | 55.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.7% | 6.0% | 10.0% | 3.4% | 4.5% | 3.3% | — | 3.8% | 5.4% | 6.3% | 5.1% |
| FCF Yield | 4.1% | 8.3% | 6.0% | 0.3% | 3.4% | 5.5% | 4.0% | 5.2% | 6.0% | 6.9% | 7.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.0% | 4.4% | 4.9% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 3.0% | 2.7% | 2.0% | 3.0% | 2.7% | 2.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $24M | $24M | $23M | $23M | $23M | $23M | $23M | $23M | $23M | $22M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 19 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PLOW stock.
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 13.0x. The historical average is 32.4x. This places it at the 20th percentile of its historical range.
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 9.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.9x.
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 17.2%. The historical average is 11.3%.
Based on historical data, Douglas Dynamics, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 13.0x. This is at the 20th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 3.26% with a payout ratio of 59.6%.
Douglas Dynamics, Inc. has 26.6% gross margin and 11.2% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Seasonal working capital absorption
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Forward Multiples Imply Recovery Pricing
Based on reported figures, PLOW trades at 18.45x trailing P/E but 11.45x forward, and 8.61x forward EV/EBITDA versus 11.81x trailing, implying the market expects earnings to compound well above the recent volatile base. Investors should monitor whether that expectation holds through a normal snow season.
The gap between trailing and forward P/E signals that consensus expects a meaningful earnings step-up, consistent with the recent Q2 beat and raised guidance. Against the peer set, PLOW's 3.04x P/B and 1.28x P/S sit below the industrial specialists in the group, which may indicate the market is still pricing the business as a cyclical manufacturer rather than a high-return equipment franchise. The 3.3% dividend yield provides some support, though the 13.22x P/FCF multiple is shaped by negative seasonal cash flow in several quarters, so the free cash flow yield should be read with caution.
Margins Track Volume Rather Than Structure
As reported in quarterly statements, PLOW operating margin ranged from 2.8% to 35.4% across ten quarters, with the widest swings occurring in peak snow-season quarters, suggesting profitability is driven more by volume timing than by stable unit economics.
Gross margin stayed in a 23.5% to 31.1% band, which is relatively contained, but operating margin amplifies the volatility, implying high fixed-cost deleverage in low-volume periods. Net margin of roughly 9.7% in the most recent quarter sits below the 13.4% peak in 2025Q2, so the current profitability level should be read as a mid-cycle reading rather than a trough or peak. Trailing ROIC of 3.8% and ROE of 6.9% appear modest against MYRG's 18.3% ROIC, suggesting the margin profile alone does not yet translate into superior capital returns.
Headline Leverage Depends on Measurement Date
According to reported figures, PLOW's debt/equity ratio oscillated between 0.78 and 1.16 across ten quarters, peaking near 1.03 in 2026Q3, while interest coverage swung from 1.21x to 35.71x, indicating debt service comfort is highly sensitive to seasonal EBIT timing.
The reported 0.78 D/E snapshot appears to understate leverage at the seasonal peak, where balance-sheet debt is considerably higher, suggesting the headline ratio may depend heavily on the quarter selected. Debt/EBITDA ranging from roughly 5.7x to over 35x implies that trailing earnings coverage of debt is unreliable as a single-point measure. Investors should monitor revolver usage and refinancing terms during the pre-season build, as the balance sheet appears to carry more seasonal borrowing than the annual snapshot indicates.
Working Capital Cycle Swings Widely
Based on reported quarterly data, PLOW's cash conversion cycle ranged from 135 to 211 days, driven mainly by inventory days between 48 and 154, suggesting working capital efficiency is strongly seasonal rather than structurally improving.
Asset turnover of 0.19 to 0.33 per quarter reflects the seasonal revenue concentration and the time required to build pre-season inventory. The consistent gap between DSO of 47 to 105 days and DPO of 17 to 39 days suggests the company funds much of its channel inventory through its own balance sheet rather than supplier credit. Whether this reflects channel stuffing or normal pre-season timing warrants further investigation into receivables aging.
Thin Cash Buffer Against Seasonal Outflows
Based on reported figures, PLOW held just $5.5M in cash in 2026Q3 and $8.3M at 2025Q4 against $656M of annual revenue, while the current ratio ranged from 1.97 to 3.39, suggesting liquidity depends on receivables and inventory conversion rather than cash reserves.
The current ratio appears adequate on paper, but quick ratio ranging from 0.70 to 1.40 implies that a meaningful share of current assets is tied up in inventory and receivables. Under a poor winter with delayed collections, the company would likely rely on revolver capacity, which the supplied data does not fully disclose. Investors should monitor how quickly receivables convert during the spring release period.
Seasonal Timing Flatters Headline Ratios
Based on reported quarterly figures, PLOW's trailing ratios may look stronger than underlying economics because peak-quarter earnings and cash release coincide with seasonal working capital unwinds, which the single-period snapshot does not capture.
The most commonly misapplied metric here is the trailing P/E combined with a single-quarter D/E snapshot, since both are sensitive to the measurement date in a business with extreme seasonality. Operating cash flow of $95.9M in 2025Q4 and $74.4M in 2024Q4 likely reflects receivables collection after large prior-quarter outflows rather than steady-state cash generation. Investors should instead anchor on trailing twelve-month free cash flow and average debt across the seasonal cycle to judge whether the valuation and leverage conclusions hold.