Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 13.4x · EV/EBITDA 10.5x · ROE 17.6%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8.6B | $17.2B | $16.8B | $12.1B | $7.4B | $12.2B | $8.9B | $7.8B | $6.7B | $8.7B | $6.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $10.2B | $18.9B | $18.5B | $14.0B | $9.7B | $13.1B | $9.7B | $8.8B | $7.4B | $10.1B | $10.9B |
| P/E Ratio → | 13.39 | 26.30 | 26.91 | 19.44 | 15.51 | 22.13 | 24.81 | 21.95 | 19.28 | 13.06 | 13.21 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.05 | 4.13 | 4.12 | 2.95 | 1.81 | 3.25 | 2.94 | 2.64 | 2.26 | 1.76 | 1.41 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.27 | 4.45 | 4.72 | 3.76 | 2.75 | 5.05 | 4.22 | 4.00 | 3.65 | 1.73 | 1.62 |
| P/FCF | 11.49 | 23.10 | 24.29 | 22.26 | 26.78 | 22.12 | 17.38 | 26.54 | 17.14 | 14.99 | 8.43 |
| P/OCF | 10.52 | 21.15 | 21.93 | 19.53 | 20.50 | 19.95 | 15.49 | 22.14 | 15.25 | 14.05 | 8.00 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.53 | 4.52 | 3.41 | 2.36 | 3.48 | 3.22 | 2.99 | 2.50 | 2.04 | 2.24 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.49 | 19.38 | 20.11 | 16.41 | 13.87 | 18.37 | 18.14 | 17.25 | 14.22 | 13.11 | 12.40 |
| EV / EBIT | 11.94 | 22.88 | 22.87 | 19.01 | 15.90 | 20.52 | 21.34 | 20.41 | 15.83 | 25.08 | 15.41 |
| EV / FCF | — | 25.33 | 26.67 | 25.80 | 35.02 | 23.73 | 19.03 | 30.03 | 18.96 | 17.32 | 13.37 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 40.5% | 40.5% | 39.2% | 37.0% | 33.1% | 35.0% | 35.0% | 35.6% | 35.3% | 37.1% | 36.7% |
| Operating Margin | 20.5% | 20.5% | 19.7% | 18.0% | 14.4% | 16.9% | 15.3% | 14.6% | 14.7% | 13.8% | 14.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 15.7% | 15.7% | 15.3% | 15.2% | 11.7% | 14.7% | 11.9% | 12.0% | 11.7% | 13.5% | 10.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 17.6% | 17.6% | 18.4% | 21.0% | 18.7% | 24.4% | 17.7% | 18.8% | 10.1% | 14.3% | 11.9% |
| ROA | 9.8% | 9.8% | 9.6% | 9.6% | 8.6% | 12.4% | 8.6% | 9.0% | 5.6% | 6.6% | 4.4% |
| ROIC | 12.0% | 12.0% | 11.6% | 10.9% | 10.7% | 15.3% | 11.7% | 11.7% | 7.3% | 7.0% | 6.0% |
| ROCE | 15.0% | 15.0% | 14.4% | 13.4% | 13.1% | 17.9% | 13.5% | 13.6% | 8.4% | 7.8% | 6.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.65 | 0.89 | 0.41 | 0.44 | 0.57 | 0.43 | 0.29 | 1.01 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.81 | 1.81 | 1.92 | 2.45 | 3.42 | 1.38 | 1.73 | 2.16 | 1.51 | 1.88 | 4.85 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.43 | 0.46 | 0.60 | 0.85 | 0.37 | 0.40 | 0.53 | 0.39 | 0.27 | 0.95 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.71 | 1.71 | 1.79 | 2.25 | 3.26 | 1.24 | 1.57 | 2.00 | 1.37 | 1.76 | 4.58 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.23 | 2.38 | 3.54 | 8.23 | 1.61 | 1.65 | 3.49 | 1.82 | 2.33 | 4.94 |
| Interest Coverage | 11.90 | 11.90 | 9.11 | 6.23 | 9.91 | 51.14 | 19.08 | 14.39 | 14.36 | 4.60 | 4.78 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.61 | 1.61 | 1.60 | 1.65 | 1.47 | 1.24 | 1.26 | 1.42 | 1.27 | 1.46 | 1.82 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.91 | 0.80 | 0.97 | 1.46 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.16 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.57 | 0.42 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.93 | 3.93 | 4.07 | 3.81 | 3.49 | 4.34 | 4.67 | 5.05 | 4.95 | 5.35 | 5.91 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 63.55 | 54.70 | 56.25 | 51.35 | 56.53 | 50.51 | 67.13 | 64.59 | 39.53 | 65.07 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.9% | 1.0% | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.9% | 1.1% | 1.4% | 1.6% | 2.8% | 2.9% | 3.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 25.1% | 25.1% | 24.4% | 23.3% | 28.8% | 24.1% | 35.4% | 34.5% | 53.9% | 37.8% | 46.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.5% | 3.8% | 3.7% | 5.1% | 6.4% | 4.5% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 5.2% | 7.7% | 7.6% |
| FCF Yield | 8.7% | 4.3% | 4.1% | 4.5% | 3.7% | 4.5% | 5.8% | 3.8% | 5.8% | 6.7% | 11.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.6% | 1.3% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 1.2% | 1.7% | 1.9% | 7.5% | 2.3% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.5% | 2.3% | 1.8% | 1.2% | 2.6% | 2.3% | 3.1% | 3.5% | 10.3% | 5.2% | 3.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $166M | $167M | $166M | $166M | $168M | $167M | $170M | $177M | $184M | $183M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PNR stock.
Pentair plc's current P/E ratio is 13.4x. The historical average is 18.4x. This places it at the 48th percentile of its historical range.
Pentair plc's current EV/EBITDA is 10.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.2x.
Pentair plc's return on equity (ROE) is 17.6%. The historical average is 12.0%.
Based on historical data, Pentair plc is trading at a P/E of 13.4x. This is at the 48th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Pentair plc's current dividend yield is 1.87% with a payout ratio of 25.1%.
Pentair plc has 40.5% gross margin and 20.5% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Pentair plc's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.8x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Pool channel destocking persists
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Resilience Amid Volume Decline
Gross margin expanded to 42.4% in Q2 2026, up 170 bps year-over-year, despite a 17% revenue drop, according to the latest earnings release. Operating margin, however, compressed to 17.9% from 22.1% a year earlier, reflecting negative operating leverage.
The gross margin expansion suggests pricing discipline and cost controls are offsetting volume weakness, but the operating margin decline indicates that SG&A costs are sticky relative to revenue. The 20.53% operating margin reported in the snapshot appears to be a trailing figure that masks the recent sequential deterioration. Investors should monitor whether the gross margin resilience is sustainable as the channel correction persists, or if it is a temporary benefit from mix shift toward higher-margin aftermarket sales.
Working Capital Swings Signal Channel Stress
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 129 days in Q2 2026 from 101 days a year earlier, driven by DIO rising to 111 days, as reported in the quarterly data. This suggests inventory is building relative to sales, consistent with the pool channel destocking.
The DIO increase of 28 days year-over-year is a red flag, indicating that Pentair is holding more inventory relative to its cost of goods sold, likely because distributors are reducing orders. DSO remained elevated at 74 days, suggesting slower collections, while DPO rose to 55 days, indicating some supplier payment stretching. The net effect is a cash conversion cycle that has expanded by 28 days, tying up more working capital and potentially pressuring free cash flow if the trend continues.
Leverage Creeps Higher as EBITDA Contracts
Debt-to-EBITDA rose to 8.96x in Q2 2026 from 5.44x a year earlier, while interest coverage fell to 8.57x from 10.64x, based on reported figures. This indicates that debt service is becoming less comfortable as earnings decline.
The sharp increase in leverage is primarily due to a contraction in EBITDA, not a rise in absolute debt, as total debt actually declined to $1.8B. However, the D/EBITDA ratio is now at a level that could raise concerns about covenant headroom if the downturn persists. Interest coverage, while still adequate, has deteriorated, and investors should monitor whether the company can maintain its investment-grade profile if the channel correction extends into 2027.
Liquidity Cushion Thins on Inventory Build
Current ratio fell to 1.45 in Q2 2026 from 1.88 in Q1, while quick ratio dropped to 0.76, as per the balance sheet data. This suggests a tighter liquidity buffer, partly due to inventory accumulation.
The quick ratio below 1.0 indicates that Pentair relies on inventory to cover short-term obligations, which is risky if inventory becomes obsolete or difficult to sell during a prolonged downturn. Cash balances are modest at $91.8M, and the company is generating strong operating cash flow in Q2, but the seasonal pattern shows Q1 is typically a cash outflow quarter. The liquidity position appears adequate for now, but the thinning cushion warrants monitoring if the channel correction deepens.
Valuation Discount to Water Peers
Pentair trades at 16.53x trailing P/E and 12.55x EV/EBITDA, versus Xylem's 29.84x and 15.51x, respectively, based on current market data. This suggests the market is pricing Pentair as a cyclical industrial rather than a growth water technology firm.
The valuation gap to Xylem is notable, but Pentair's ROE of 13.6% (annualized from Q2) is higher than Xylem's 9.0%, and its net margin of 13.8% exceeds Xylem's 10.6%. This suggests that the discount may be unwarranted if Pentair's earnings power is more durable than the market fears. However, the ongoing channel destocking and revenue decline justify some discount, and investors should watch whether the 2027 recovery materializes to close the gap.
P/E Misleads on Cyclical Earnings
The trailing P/E of 16.53x appears cheap, but it is based on depressed earnings due to the channel correction, as reported in the latest quarterly data. Using forward earnings, the P/E drops to 14.07x, but this assumes a recovery that may not occur.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Pentair is the P/E, because it fails to account for the cyclicality of pool equipment demand and the impact of channel inventory swings. A better metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 12.55x is more comparable to peers and less distorted by non-cash items. However, even EV/EBITDA is elevated relative to the current EBITDA trough, so investors should use a normalized EBITDA based on mid-cycle margins to assess true valuation. Alternatively, P/FCF of 14.18x provides a cleaner picture of cash generation, but FCF is volatile due to working capital swings.