Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 15.7x · EV/EBITDA 2.6x · ROE 12.6%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $276M | $414M | $554M | $277M | $236M | $192M | $86M | $421M | $199M | $153M | $164M |
| Enterprise Value | $272M | $411M | $560M | $270M | $220M | $218M | $124M | $473M | $259M | $195M | $224M |
| P/E Ratio → | 15.70 | 15.75 | 10.00 | 9.87 | 4.84 | 92.24 | — | 121.01 | 13.71 | 3.63 | 47.79 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.48 | 2.23 | 2.37 | 2.25 | 2.53 | 2.33 | 1.64 | 3.86 | 1.70 | 1.72 | 2.72 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.92 | 1.92 | 2.73 | 1.72 | 1.68 | 1.94 | 0.88 | 4.07 | 1.88 | 1.49 | 2.50 |
| P/FCF | 13.28 | 19.93 | — | — | 13.73 | 24.38 | 14.70 | 45.89 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 2.85 | 4.28 | 4.78 | 2.55 | 7.11 | 6.72 | 5.26 | 15.46 | 5.10 | 3.80 | 14.94 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.21 | 2.39 | 2.20 | 2.36 | 2.65 | 2.36 | 4.34 | 2.22 | 2.19 | 3.70 |
| EV / EBITDA | 2.59 | 3.90 | 3.83 | 4.76 | 9.12 | 5.48 | 23.03 | 10.65 | 4.81 | 5.36 | 18.00 |
| EV / EBIT | 9.21 | 12.55 | 7.70 | 7.78 | 3.67 | 32.79 | — | 54.29 | 12.31 | 4.64 | 20.29 |
| EV / FCF | — | 19.76 | — | — | 12.82 | 27.63 | 21.15 | 51.62 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 26.4% | 26.4% | 37.5% | 33.1% | 17.5% | 27.3% | -14.8% | 21.9% | 25.4% | 11.2% | -16.4% |
| Operating Margin | 15.9% | 15.9% | 29.4% | 20.4% | -4.2% | 16.3% | -43.5% | 7.6% | 13.8% | 0.4% | -29.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 14.2% | 14.2% | 23.7% | 22.8% | 52.2% | 2.5% | -4.4% | 3.2% | 12.4% | 47.2% | 5.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.6% | 12.6% | 30.5% | 18.7% | 40.6% | 2.1% | -2.3% | 3.3% | 13.9% | 49.9% | 5.3% |
| ROA | 8.1% | 8.1% | 18.1% | 10.5% | 21.2% | 1.0% | -1.1% | 1.4% | 5.8% | 18.2% | 1.6% |
| ROIC | 10.5% | 10.5% | 28.5% | 13.5% | -2.4% | 7.7% | -11.7% | 3.9% | 7.8% | 0.2% | -9.6% |
| ROCE | 10.5% | 10.5% | 27.6% | 11.7% | -2.0% | 7.2% | -11.4% | 3.8% | 7.6% | 0.2% | -9.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.50 | 1.05 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.46 | 0.91 | 7.21 | 1.20 | 1.23 | 1.40 | 5.58 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.02 | 0.03 | -0.04 | -0.11 | 0.26 | 0.39 | 0.51 | 0.57 | 0.41 | 0.90 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.03 | -0.03 | 0.04 | -0.13 | -0.64 | 0.65 | 7.02 | 1.18 | 1.11 | 1.16 | 4.76 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.17 | — | — | -0.91 | 3.25 | 6.45 | 5.73 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 14.67 | 14.67 | 47.04 | 64.97 | 65.90 | 3.31 | -0.51 | 2.40 | 6.17 | 18.18 | 3.14 |
Net cash position: cash ($7M) exceeds total debt ($4M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.57 | 0.49 | 1.76 | 1.17 | 0.63 | 1.05 | 0.78 | 0.56 | 0.66 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.57 | 0.49 | 0.96 | 1.13 | 0.59 | 0.99 | 0.70 | 0.55 | 0.52 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.05 | 0.17 | 0.65 | 0.48 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.24 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.57 | 0.72 | 0.43 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.26 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.36 | 0.28 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | 2.33 | 81.71 | 102.05 | 94.83 | 37.68 | 104.42 | 17.77 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 38.11 | 37.98 | 60.18 | 49.06 | 62.92 | 50.26 | 48.10 | 46.73 | 69.62 | 44.75 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.4% | 6.4% | 10.0% | 10.1% | 20.7% | 1.1% | — | 0.8% | 7.3% | 27.5% | 2.1% |
| FCF Yield | 7.5% | 5.0% | — | — | 7.3% | 4.1% | 6.8% | 2.2% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 4.9% | 3.3% | 2.4% | 2.7% | 3.1% | 0.1% | 0.8% | 1.3% | 4.0% | 3.7% | 0.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.9% | 3.3% | 2.4% | 2.7% | 3.1% | 0.1% | 0.8% | 1.3% | 4.0% | 3.7% | 0.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $2M | $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M | $2M | $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M |
Commodity price volatility exposure
According to current market data, PNRG trades at an EV/EBITDA of 2.65x, which appears to reflect a persistent conglomerate discount compared to pure-play E&P peers, likely due to the market's inability to reconcile the company's dual-role as both an oil producer and a field service provider.
The forward P/E of 12.50x suggests that investors are pricing in a cautious outlook for commodity prices, yet the valuation remains compressed relative to the company's debt-free status. This multiple may undervalue the optionality provided by the internal service arm, which acts as a hedge against the inflationary pressures currently impacting the broader Permian basin.
Based on reported financial statements, PNRG's ROIC has exhibited significant volatility, peaking at 10.2% in 2024Q2 before moderating to 2.7% in 2026Q1, illustrating the difficulty of compounding returns in a capital-intensive industry heavily influenced by fluctuating realized prices per barrel of oil equivalent.
The decline in ROIC suggests that the company's recent capital allocation has struggled to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital during the current commodity downturn. Investors should monitor whether the company's focus on preserving its balance sheet prevents it from deploying capital into higher-yielding well-reworking projects that could restore historical return levels.
As indicated by quarterly filings, PNRG's asset turnover has remained consistently low, hovering near 0.13x to 0.15x, which highlights the structural challenge of maintaining high operational efficiency when a significant portion of the asset base is tied to non-operated wells and cyclical service contracts.
The variability in DSO, which reached 58 days in 2025Q2, suggests that the company faces periodic friction in collecting payments from third-party service clients. This inefficiency, combined with the lack of granular data on inventory turnover, implies that the company's working capital cycle is highly sensitive to the payment terms of its larger industry partners.
According to recent balance sheet disclosures, PNRG maintains a negligible debt-to-equity ratio of 0.03, providing a significant competitive advantage over micro-cap peers that rely on high leverage to fund drilling programs, thereby insulating the company from the current high-interest-rate environment.
The interest coverage ratio, which remains robust despite revenue contraction, confirms that the company faces minimal refinancing risk. This conservative capital structure appears to be a deliberate management strategy to survive commodity price troughs, though it may limit the company's ability to aggressively expand production during favorable market cycles.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to PNRG, as it fails to account for the significant non-cash DD&A charges inherent in the full-cost accounting method, which can artificially depress earnings and obscure the company's underlying cash-generating capacity during periods of asset development.
Analysts should prioritize EV/EBITDA or P/FCF over P/E to better capture the company's operational performance, as these metrics are less distorted by the accounting treatment of exploration costs. Relying solely on P/E risks misinterpreting the company's true earning power, particularly given the potential for 'ceiling test' write-downs to create non-recurring volatility in net income.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PNRG stock.
PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation's current P/E ratio is 15.7x. The historical average is 23.8x. This places it at the 58th percentile of its historical range.
PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 2.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 7.2x.
PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 12.6%. The historical average is 22.2%.
Based on historical data, PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation is trading at a P/E of 15.7x. This is at the 58th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation has 26.4% gross margin and 15.9% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.0x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.