Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 39.2x · EV/EBITDA 16.7x · ROE 18.1%. (2004–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9.5B | $20.4B | $19.3B | $16.0B | $20.6B | $18.2B | $16.9B | $10.7B | $4.8B | $4.0B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $9.8B | $20.8B | $19.8B | $16.8B | $21.4B | $18.7B | $17.0B | $11.4B | $5.3B | $4.3B | $2.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 39.22 | 81.68 | 45.17 | 73.80 | 4474.01 | 1064.28 | 2556.30 | 901.05 | 1468.89 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.49 | 7.55 | 9.31 | 9.41 | 15.77 | 16.61 | 18.64 | 14.45 | 8.58 | 8.63 | 5.88 |
| P/B Ratio | 6.48 | 13.49 | 15.92 | 21.81 | 43.20 | 32.80 | 27.93 | 140.53 | 22.82 | 25.25 | 34.16 |
| P/FCF | 25.03 | 54.10 | 63.16 | 227.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 16.61 | 35.89 | 44.83 | 109.66 | 172.95 | — | 200.69 | 108.40 | 134.80 | 96.91 | 135.58 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 7.67 | 9.54 | 9.88 | 16.39 | 17.06 | 18.83 | 15.40 | 9.43 | 9.26 | 6.41 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.68 | 35.39 | 50.70 | 57.29 | 212.20 | 102.19 | 159.28 | 145.94 | 123.66 | 660.90 | 752.03 |
| EV / EBIT | 20.66 | 49.54 | 57.62 | 66.89 | 467.02 | 228.00 | 310.14 | 245.54 | 168.80 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 54.98 | 64.70 | 239.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 71.6% | 71.6% | 69.8% | 68.3% | 61.7% | 68.4% | 64.4% | 65.1% | 65.7% | 59.8% | 57.5% |
| Operating Margin | 17.5% | 17.5% | 14.9% | 13.0% | 2.9% | 11.5% | 5.7% | 6.8% | 4.9% | -1.6% | -2.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 9.1% | 9.1% | 20.2% | 12.2% | 0.4% | 1.5% | 0.8% | 1.6% | 0.6% | -5.8% | -7.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 18.1% | 18.1% | 43.0% | 34.1% | 0.9% | 2.9% | 2.0% | 8.1% | 1.8% | -24.2% | -59.4% |
| ROA | 7.9% | 7.9% | 14.7% | 8.5% | 0.2% | 0.9% | 0.5% | 1.1% | 0.4% | -4.2% | -7.9% |
| ROIC | 20.1% | 20.1% | 14.4% | 11.7% | 2.4% | 10.4% | 5.0% | 5.1% | 3.6% | -1.6% | -4.6% |
| ROCE | 18.7% | 18.7% | 13.2% | 10.9% | 2.0% | 7.2% | 3.9% | 5.6% | 3.5% | -1.3% | -3.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.69 | 0.69 | 1.17 | 1.98 | 3.01 | 2.31 | 1.78 | 11.94 | 2.79 | 3.57 | 5.27 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.79 | 1.79 | 3.65 | 4.95 | 14.21 | 7.01 | 10.07 | 11.63 | 13.77 | 87.10 | 106.44 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.22 | 0.39 | 1.09 | 1.70 | 0.89 | 0.28 | 9.25 | 2.25 | 1.85 | 3.10 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.57 | 0.57 | 1.20 | 2.73 | 8.02 | 2.70 | 1.58 | 9.01 | 11.12 | 45.17 | 62.60 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.89 | 1.53 | 11.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 5.26 | 5.26 | 8.03 | 6.93 | 1.27 | 1.33 | 1.14 | 1.34 | 1.42 | -0.39 | -0.86 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.78 | 2.78 | 3.54 | 3.47 | 3.56 | 5.75 | 5.96 | 3.69 | 3.93 | 6.24 | 6.64 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.11 | 2.11 | 2.73 | 2.58 | 2.61 | 4.43 | 5.21 | 3.05 | 3.31 | 5.85 | 6.00 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.05 | 1.05 | 1.80 | 1.56 | 1.85 | 3.46 | 4.56 | 2.38 | 2.50 | 5.12 | 5.36 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.85 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.80 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.70 | 1.70 | 1.45 | 1.33 | 1.44 | 1.14 | 2.09 | 2.55 | 2.71 | 5.52 | 4.39 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 69.67 | 64.40 | 77.36 | 57.49 | 53.48 | 33.82 | 40.94 | 49.63 | 42.01 | 28.65 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.5% | 1.2% | 2.2% | 1.4% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 4.0% | 1.8% | 1.6% | 0.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.6% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.6% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $72M | $74M | $74M | $70M | $69M | $66M | $62M | $61M | $58M | $57M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 22 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PODD stock.
Insulet Corp.'s current P/E ratio is 39.2x. The historical average is 66.9x.
Insulet Corp.'s current EV/EBITDA is 16.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 47.8x.
Insulet Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is 18.1%. The historical average is -52.9%.
Based on historical data, Insulet Corp. is trading at a P/E of 39.2x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Insulet Corp. has 71.6% gross margin and 17.5% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Insulet Corp.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.8x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
SBC dilution and tax volatility
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Pricing for Accelerating Growth
PODD trades at 41x trailing earnings but only 21.9x forward, with a PEG of 0.40, suggesting the market prices in substantial near-term earnings growth, per recent SEC filings.
The steep discount between trailing and forward P/E (41.05 vs 21.93) implies the market expects a dramatic earnings inflection, consistent with the 23.5% revenue growth in 2026Q2. The PEG of 0.40, well below 1, indicates that the stock may be undervalued relative to its growth rate, but this hinges on the sustainability of margin expansion. Compared to DexCom's P/E of 41.94, PODD's forward multiple is lower, suggesting the market is pricing in faster earnings growth for PODD, which warrants scrutiny given the historical volatility in net margins.
Margin Expansion Masks Earnings Volatility
Gross margin improved to 70.2% in 2026Q2 from 67.7% in 2024Q2, while operating margin expanded to 16.2% from 11.2%, as reported in financial statements, indicating scale benefits.
The consistent gross margin expansion from 67.7% to 70.2% over eight quarters reflects manufacturing efficiencies and pricing power, a key differentiator versus DexCom's 60% gross margin. However, net margin has been erratic, swinging from 38.6% in 2024Q2 to 3.5% in 2025Q2, driven by tax items and one-time gains, which obscures the underlying earning power. Investors should focus on operating margin as the cleaner measure of profitability, as it has steadily climbed from 11.2% to 16.2%, indicating that core operations are becoming more efficient.
ROIC Recovery Signals Compounding Potential
ROIC improved to 5.4% in 2026Q2 from 2.6% in 2024Q2, as per balance sheet data, while ROE remained low at 7.0%, reflecting a capital-intensive model.
ROIC has more than doubled from 2.6% to 5.4% over the past two years, indicating that the company is beginning to generate returns above its cost of capital, though the absolute level remains modest. The improvement is driven by margin expansion rather than asset efficiency, as asset turnover has only inched up from 0.17 to 0.26. ROE of 7.0% is suppressed by a conservative capital structure and significant cash balances, but as leverage normalizes and retained earnings grow, ROE should rise, though it will likely remain below peers like DexCom's 36.2%.
Working Capital Drag Eases but Inventory Remains High
Cash conversion cycle improved to 193 days in 2026Q2 from 319 days in 2024Q1, as reported in financial statements, driven by faster inventory turnover and extended payables.
The CCC has compressed by 126 days over the period, a significant improvement, but at 193 days it remains elevated due to high DIO of 180 days, reflecting the manufacturing-intensive nature of the business. DSO has been stable around 60 days, while DPO has increased from 32 to 52 days, indicating improved supplier leverage. The reduction in DIO from 281 to 180 days suggests better inventory management, but the absolute level still ties up substantial capital, and any further improvement could unlock additional cash flow.
Deleveraging Path Improves Coverage
D/E fell to 0.67 in 2026Q2 from 1.77 in 2024Q1, while interest coverage rose to 9.79x from 6.13x, as per SEC filings, indicating a strengthening balance sheet.
The rapid deleveraging, with D/E down over 60% in two years, reflects both debt repayment and equity growth from retained earnings. Interest coverage has improved from 6.13x to 9.79x, providing a comfortable cushion, though D/EBITDA of 7.17x remains high, suggesting that EBITDA is still modest relative to debt. The company's ability to service debt is not in question, but the elevated D/EBITDA warrants monitoring, especially if EBITDA growth slows or interest rates rise.
Liquidity Buffer Remains Solid
Current ratio stands at 2.48 in 2026Q2, down from 3.70 in 2024Q1, but quick ratio of 1.83 indicates ample coverage of short-term obligations, per balance sheet data.
The current ratio has declined as the company has become more efficient with working capital, but at 2.48 it remains well above the 1.0 threshold, and the quick ratio of 1.83 shows that even without inventory, liquid assets cover current liabilities. Cash of $534.9M provides a strong buffer, and with FCF margins expanding to 18.1%, the liquidity position is robust. Under a severe stress scenario, the company could likely weather a downturn without needing external financing, given its cash generation and manageable debt maturities.
PEG Ratio Misleads on Growth Quality
The PEG ratio of 0.40, based on forward earnings growth, may overstate value because it relies on consensus estimates that assume sustained margin expansion, as per reported figures.
The PEG ratio is commonly used to assess value, but for PODD it is misleading because it uses forward earnings growth that may not be achievable given the historical volatility in net margins. For instance, net margin swung from 38.6% to 3.5% in a single year, driven by tax items and one-time gains, which are not captured in the growth rate. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBITDA, which at 17.43x is more stable and reflects the company's operating performance, or a price-to-sales multiple, which at 3.65x is more predictable given the consistent revenue growth.